A.2.11_Solicitation_Amendment2_W9127S16R6001_ProjNet_Report_13Jan2016.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contracting Officers Report Closed Inquiries

Project: FY14 LRAFB Refueling Vehicle Repair Shop Review: RFI Review #2 (00002) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 87 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 6322205 General Project Drawings

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The drawings that have been issued are formatted as 11x17. Will the project be issuing full-size drawings? Some of the information contained on the drawings is very hard to read in the current smaller size.

By: Brian Hoeppner; Zieson Construction - Riverside, MO; (816-505-1695). On: Dec 11 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Format of 11x17 is correct. Some will be issued full size, but most will be half size. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 21 2015

1-1 Government Response. Format of 11x17 is correct. Some will be issued full size, but most will be half size. By:

Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6324688 General Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is it possible for bid date to be postponed two weeks due to holidays?

By: Trey Smith; R.C. Construction; (662-453-2424). On: Dec 14 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. There will be an extension of the due date. A formal amendment will be issued to specify the any new amendment date. Absent an amendment all terms and conditions remain unchanged. By: Darrell Montgomery; SWL Contracting Division; (5013245720) On: Dec 17 2015

1-1 Government Response. There will be an extension of the due date. A formal amendment will be issued to specify the any new amendment date. Absent an amendment all terms and conditions remain unchanged. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6324932 Specifications Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Request that the bid date be postponed due to the holiday. Many subcontractors, suppliers and manufacturers are closed during this time of the year and pricing will be limited.

Also request that ProjNet be extended past 12-30-15 for the same reasons.

By: Danny Farmer; RC Construction - Greenwood, MS; (662-453-2424). On: Dec 14 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Anticipate an Amendment to extend Proposal/Bid Date to Jan 19, 2016 and ProjNet to Jan 11, 2016. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment of Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Anticipate an Amendment to extend Proposal/Bid Date to Jan 19, 2016 and ProjNet to Jan 11, 2016. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment of Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6324939 Contracting 00 22 11

Page 1 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

1/13/2016https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&...

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that if offerors are currently registered in SAM, they should not submit anything in Price Proposal, Tab 4, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 14 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Offerors are required to submit confirmation of their SAM Registration OR the "Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors" included in the solicitation. The Government will verify your SAM registration based on the information provided. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division;

(501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Offerors are required to submit confirmation of their SAM Registration OR the "Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors" included in the solicitation. The Government will verify your SAM registration based on the information provided. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501 -340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325480 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Technical Proposal - Tab Factor 1 - Past Performance - for this section, please confirm that offeror's should submit one (1) completed PPIRS evaluation (or, if completed PPIRS is unavailable, a completed Past Performance Questionnaire PPQ) for each project submitted in Tab Factor 3 - Relevant Project Experience.

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Confirmed. Additionally, anticipate an Amendment to increase the Page Limit from 3 pages to 12 pages – 6 pages for the three (3) ratings and 6 pages for performance recognition documents. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Confirmed. Additionally, anticipate an Amendment to increase the Page Limit from 3 pages to 12 pages – 6 pages for the three (3) ratings and 6 pages for performance recognition documents. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment and page limitation details. By:

Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325649 Contracting page 26 Tab 6 The Pre-Award Survey Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

On page 26 of the RFP, Tab 6 of the price proposal submission instruction requires that a pre-award survey which is to be found on the following pages of the RFP is to be completed and included as part of the price proposal submission. However, no pre-award survey appears to be included. Please clarify what needs to be completed by the offeror in order to fulfill the requirements for Tab 6.

By: Krista Cummins; Zieson Construction - Riverside, MO; (8165051695). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Construction Contractor Project Information Sheet (Solicitation pages 26-27 of 187) & Schedule 1 Existing Commitments (Solicitation pages 27-28 of 187). By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Construction Contractor Project Information Sheet (Solicitation pages 26-27 of 187) & Schedule 1 Existing Commitments (Solicitation pages 27-28 of 187). By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division;

(501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325662 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Technical Proposal - Tab 1 - Factor 1 - Past Performance. We are seeking clarity on exactly what should be included in the proposal for this requirement. If an offeror has a completed PPIRS evaluation for each project submitted in Factor 3, relevant project experience, should the offeror included any information in factor 1 other than performance recognition documents within the past 5 years ?

Page 2 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Anticipate an Amendment to increase the Page Limit from 3 pages to 12 pages – 6 pages for the three (3) ratings and 6 pages for performance recognition documents. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Anticipate an Amendment to increase the Page Limit from 3 pages to 12 pages – 6 pages for the three (3) ratings and 6 pages for performance recognition documents. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment and page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325666 Contracting 00 22 11 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Technical Proposal - Tab 1 - Factor 1, Past Performance. The page limit is 3 pages ( a maximum of 1 page per rater). If offeor submits the max of 5 projects in Factor 3, Relevant Project Experience, shouldn't the page limit reflect the need for 5 pages (1 page per rater)? Also, shouldn't the page limit be greater than 5 to include space for performance recognition documents within the past 5 years ?

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Anticipate an Amendment to increase the Page Limit from 3 pages to 12 pages – 6 pages for the three (3) ratings and 6 pages for performance recognition documents. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Anticipate an Amendment to increase the Page Limit from 3 pages to 12 pages – 6 pages for the three (3) ratings and 6 pages for performance recognition documents. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment and page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325668 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Technical Proposal, Tab 1 - Factor 1, Past Performance - should offerors submit 1 page for each project submitted in Factor 3, Relevant Project Experience that includes point of contact information for that project ? If so, exactly what information should be included ? Please clarify

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 15 2015.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. RESPONSE: The Offeror/contractor should provide detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information, as stated on pages 30-33 of 187. Additionally, anticipate an Amendment to extend Proposal/Bid Date to Jan 19, 2016 and ProjNet to Jan 11, 2016. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment of Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015

1-1 Government Response. The Offeror/contractor should provide detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information, as stated on pages 30-33 of 187. Additionally, anticipate an Amendment to extend Proposal/Bid Date to Jan 19, 2016 and ProjNet to Jan 11, 2016. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment of Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325679 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Technical Proposal, Tab 3 - Factor 3, Relevant Project Experience - this section is limited to 8 pages. However, on page 34 of 187 of the solicitation, offerors are instructed they can submit a maximum of 5 projects, with each project having a max length of 2 pages. Should the page limit for this section be 10 pages to reflect these instructions ?

Page 3 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Anticipate an Amendment to make the following changes - Factor 3, Relevant Project Experience – Ten (10) page Limit (not to exceed two (2) page narrative each for at least three (3) project experience overviews, but no more than 5 project experience overviews). It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501- 340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Anticipate an Amendment to make the following changes - Factor 3, Relevant Project Experience – Ten (10) page Limit (not to exceed two (2) page narrative each for at least three (3) project experience overviews, but no more than 5 project experience overviews). It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment and page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325685 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Proposal Delivery - May the Technical Proposal be mailed in and the price proposal be hand delivered ?

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. It is the offeror's/contractor's discretion to ensure the Technical and Price proposal is received by USACE Little Rock Contracting on the Proposal/Bid due date and time. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. It is the offeror's/contractor's discretion to ensure the Technical and Price proposal is received by USACE Little Rock Contracting on the Proposal/Bid due date and time. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325686 Contracting Page 30-31 Vol. I, Tab I Past Performance

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The page limit listed for Factor I, Past Performance on page 29 of the RFP limits Factor I to 3 pages total for all evaluation.

However, on page 32 of the RFP the offeror is also required to include performance recognition documents from the past five years. Please confirm whether or not the performance recognition documents count towards the overall page count.

By: Krista Cummins; Zieson Construction - Riverside, MO; (8165051695). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Anticipate an Amendment to increase the Page Limit from 3 pages to 12 pages – 6 pages for the three (3) ratings and 6 pages for performance recognition documents. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Anticipate an Amendment to increase the Page Limit from 3 pages to 12 pages – 6 pages for the three (3) ratings and 6 pages for performance recognition documents. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment and page limitation details. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325697 Contracting pages 29-31 Vol I, Tab I Past Performance Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For Vol. I, Tab I Past Performance, please advise if the offeror is only submitting projects that have PPIRS/CPARS/CCASS evaluations whether or not these evaluations need to be included in the proposal submission or whether the written notification to the Contracting Officer regarding these evaluations will suffice.

By: Krista Cummins; Zieson Construction - Riverside, MO; (8165051695). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0

Page 4 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

EvaluationConcurred. For projects that have final PPIRS evaluation, do not request past performance questionnaires from your clients. For projects that do not have a final PPIRS evaluation, the offeror shall forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Solicitation pages 35-40) to its clients for completion and submission to USACE Little Rock Contracting. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22

1-1 Government Response. For projects that have final PPIRS evaluation, do not request past performance questionnaires from your clients. For projects that do not have a final PPIRS evaluation, the offeror shall forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Solicitation pages 35-40) to its clients for completion and submission to USACE Little Rock Contracting. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325727 Contracting pages 29-31 Vol I, Tab I Past Performance Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If PPQ evaluations are being submitted for past performance, please confirm that only the first page of the PPQ must be included in the proposal submission as this section is limited to a 3 page limit.

By: Krista Cummins; Zieson Construction - Riverside, MO; (8165051695). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 Past Performance for the Prime Contractor. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be returned directly to, Darrell L.

Montgomery via email by the client. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22

1-1 Government Response. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the 'CLIENT' for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 Past Performance for the Prime Contractor. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be returned directly to, Darrell L. Montgomery via email by the client. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On:

Jan 13 2016

2-0 EvaluationConcurred. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the 'CLIENT' for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 Past Performance for the Prime Contractor. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be returned directly to, Darrell L.

Montgomery via email by the client. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Jan 13

3-0 EvaluationConcurred. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the 'CLIENT' for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 Past Performance for the Prime Contractor. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be returned directly to, Darrell L.

Montgomery via email by the client. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Jan 13 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6325906 Contracting page 26, 34 Vol. I, Factor III Project Information Sheet

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 34 of Vol. I, Factor III states that the offeror must submit a minimum of 3 maximum of 5 projects to fulfill the Relevant Project Experience requirements, and that the offeror shall submit these using the "Project Information Sheet" form. However, the only sheet labeled as a Project Information Sheet is found on Page 26 of the RFP and does not appear to be the correlating project information sheet for this Factor. Please clarify the correct Project Information Sheet for this factor.

By: Krista Cummins; Zieson Construction - Riverside, MO; (8165051695). On: Dec 15 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationNon-concurred. Requirement Page 34, VOl I, Factor III is correct in its current form. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 21 2015

1-1 Government Response. Requirement Page 34, VOl I, Factor III is correct in its current form. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Page 5 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327246 Construction Management 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Factor 2 Volume 1 Tab 2 notes an requirement for a WBS Work Breakdown Structure. What exactly is he government asking for? A P6 schedule, simple Gantt Chart? Work Plan?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationNon-concurred. Requirement in Factor 2, Volume 1, Tab 2 is correct in its current form. By: William

Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 21 2015

2-0 EvaluationConcurred. It is at the offeror's/contractor's discretion to determine the proposed Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

2-1 Government Response. It is at the offeror's/contractor's discretion to determine the proposed Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327256 Construction Management 00 22 11 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Facto 2 Volume 1 Tab C notes a 5 page submission limit. We request this be increased to 10 pages as the Government is requesting a great deal of information.

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Anticipate an amendment to increase page limit from 5 to 8 pages. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015

1-1 Government Response. Anticipate an amendment to increase page limit from 5 to 8 pages. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327263 Landscape Architecture 32 92 23 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 32 92 23 specifies sodding. none shown on plans. is it required? if so where. Make note that Sheet C102 plan note 1 requires seeding only.

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Sodding is not required on the plans. Seeing is required. Job is being ammended to include a seeding spec. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On:

Dec 23 2015

1-1 Government Response. Sodding is not required on the plans. Seeding is required. Anticipate an amendment to include a seeding spec. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327271 Civil 31 31 16

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 31 31 16calls for soil treatment. Since this is an all concrete and metal building is soil treatment required?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Soil treatment is required. Section 31 31 16 is correct. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

Page 6 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

1-1 Government Response. Soil treatment is required. Section 31 31 16 is correct. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327272 Architectural 10 26 13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 10 26 13 specifies wall and corner guards. None shown on plans. Confirm if required, if so, where?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Refer to General Note-3 Sheet A-101. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Refer to General Note-3 Sheet A-101. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division;

(501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327275 Architectural 08 36 13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Drawings show coiling roll up overheads that are to comply with section 08 33 23. Specification also has section 08 36 13 specifying sectional overhead doors. none are shown on plans, confirm if required, if so where?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Coiling Roll up Overhead doors is correct and Section 08 33 23 applies. Section 08 36 13 does not apply. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Coiling Roll up Overhead doors is correct and Section 08 33 23 applies. Section 08 36 13 does not apply. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327276 Architectural 07 41 63

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Gutters and downspouts are specified in section 07 41 63 and 07 60 00. Which section takes precedence?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Section 07 41 63 discusses the Flashing of Gutters and Downspouts. Section 07 60 00 is the main Spec Section for Gutters and Downspouts. Both are required. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Section 07 41 63 discusses the Flashing of Gutters and Downspouts. Section 07 60 00 is the main Spec Section for Gutters and Downspouts. Both are required. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327278 Architectural 07 42 13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Wall panels are are specified in section 07 42 63 and 07 42 13. Which section takes precedence?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Both Spec Sections are required.

Section 07 42 13 "METAL WALL PANELS" is used in places such as soffits under eaves.

07 42 63 "FABRICATED WALL PANELS" is used as assembly on exterior walls (In drawings are referred to as R- Panels). By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Both Spec Sections are required.

Section 07 42 13 "METAL WALL PANELS" is used in places such as soffits under eaves.

Page 7 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

07 42 63 "FABRICATED WALL PANELS" is used as assembly on exterior walls (In drawings are referred to as R- Panels). By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327280 Architectural 07 21 13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 07 21 13 paragraphs 21.1. and 3.5.3 reference floor and slab insulation. none is shown on plans. confirm none is required, if required, where?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Under slab insulation is required per Paragraphs 2.1.1 and 3.5 of section 07 21

13. Paragraph 2.1.1 identifies the insulation is to have an R value of 10. Paragraph 3.5 indicates under slab perimeter insulation is required in heated spaces, which would apply to the entire facility. Paragraph 3.5.3 indicates the under slab insulation is to extend a distance of 4' from the edge of the slab and is to turn up at the slab edge.

By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Under slab insulation is required per Paragraphs 2.1.1 and 3.5 of section 07 21 13.

Paragraph 2.1.1 identifies the insulation is to have an R value of 10. Paragraph 3.5 indicates under slab perimeter insulation is required in heated spaces, which would apply to the entire facility. Paragraph 3.5.3 indicates the under slab insulation is to extend a distance of 4' from the edge of the slab and is to turn up at the slab edge. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327281 Architectural 07 13 53

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Confirm location of sheet waterproofing per 07 13 53. none shown on plans. it is understood that waterproofing per 07 17 00 is required at trench drain and oil change pit.

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Sheet Water proofing is not used in the project as Flashing. Section 07 13 53 does not apply. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Sheet Water proofing is not used in the project as Flashing. Section 07 13 53 does not apply. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327282 Mechanical sheet M601

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) plan note 4 at louver at schedule mentions pit exhaust. none is shown on plans or in specifications. what is required?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Refer to notes 4 and 14 on M-101 for service pit exhaust requirements. Refer to specification section 23 00 00 for EF-2 requirements. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Refer to notes 4 and 14 on M-101 for service pit exhaust requirements. Refer to specification section 23 00 00 for EF-2 requirements. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340- 1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327290 Contracting 01 45 00 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 01 45 00 par3.4.3 indicates the assistant CQC staff in the civil, electrical, mechanical, environmental, and architectural (further defined in matrix on page 5 of 01 45 00)are required to be employed directly by the prime. This project is a TSB set aside. As a small business we do not typical employ these staff, they are typically part of the subcontractor engaged to do the physical work. If we required to employee this staff project cost could increase $350,000.00 to

Page 8 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

$500,000.00. We request the Government allow these staff members be employed by the subcontractor engaged to do the work.

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Spec section 01 45 00 para 3.4.3 is worded properly in its current form. Quality control is first priority. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On:

Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Spec section 01 45 00 para 3.4.3 is worded properly in its current form. Quality control is first priority. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327293 Contracting 01 17 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 01 17 00 Contractor Security plan par 1.5.1 references a different project "repair runway 07-25" project. is this plan required for this solicitation?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. A security plan is required per Section 01 17 00 "Contractor Security plan" par

1.5.1. The project name is incorrect and will be corrected by amendment. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. A security plan is required per Section 01 17 00 "Contractor Security plan" par 1.5.1.

The project name is incorrect and will be corrected by amendment. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division;

(501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327294 Contracting 01 33 29

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide a complete submittal register, none provided in RFP.

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Submittal register will be issued by amendment. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Submittal register will be issued by amendment. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6327295 LEED 01 33 29

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 01 33 29 discusses sustainability however no LEED rating is noted in the RFP. is this project to be LEED certified/certifiable? if so what level?

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 16 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Project is not required to be LEED certified. Project however is to meet the requirements of UFC 1-200-02 as defined in section 01 33 29.00 20, SUSTAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS. By:

William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Project is not required to be LEED certified. Project however is to meet the requirements of UFC 1-200-02 as defined in section 01 33 29.00 20, SUSTAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6329929 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 9 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

Technical Proposal - Tab 2, Factor 2 - Overall Construction Approach - please clarify the level of detail required for the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). Should primary activities be broken down by element or further by division ? A comprehensive WBS could easily be 5 pages in length - given the page constraints, it is unclear the level of detail required. Please clarify.

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 17 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Will ammend to allow 8 pages. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Amendment 0001 increased page limit to 8 pages. The proposal shall include a comprehensive Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) including the construction activities as they relate to the primary construction work elements. The proposed WBS must be organized by the most current Construction Specification Institute (CSI) MasterFormat structure. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Jan 13

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6329963 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Technical Proposal - Tab 2 - Factor 2 - Organizational Chart - elements d. and e. can be best explained with a combination of organizational chart and narrative. Will any narrative in addition to the org chart be evaluated ?

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 17 2015.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. See pages 33-34 of 187 for submission requirement.Anticipate an amendment to increase page limit from 5 to 8 pages. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015

1-1 Government Response. See pages 33-34 of 187 for submission requirement.Anticipate an amendment to increase page limit from 5 to 8 pages. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6330028 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide the Project Information Sheet referred to on page 34 of 187 of the solicitation.

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 17 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Construction Contractor Project Information Sheet (Solicitation pages 26-27 of 187) & Schedule 1 Existing Commitments (Solicitation pages 27-28 of 187). By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Construction Contractor Project Information Sheet (Solicitation pages 26-27 of 187) is incorrectly labeled. Amendment 0002 will be issued to correct the title to read 'Construction Contractor Experience Data Pre-Award Survey Information' and should be included with the Price Proposal Tab 6. There is not a Project Experience form included with the solicitation, it is at the contractor's discretion to provide their format and to ensure the required information is included.

Schedule 1 Existing Commitments (Solicitation pages 27-28 of 187). By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division;

(501-340-1273) On: Jan 13 2016

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6330967 Architectural SF1442 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Option 2 Clin 0003 requires a oil change pit cover. This is shown on the pans, however there are no technical specification provided. Please provide technical specification.

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 18 2015. Forward request by email.

Page 10 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Drawing 03/A-302 indicates: DEVON EZ GLIDE EG38 OIL CHANGE PIT SAFETY COVER (OR EQUAL) WITH TIRE GUIDE AND TIRE GUIDE LEADER. REF. STRUCTURAL FOR TRACK CONNECTION DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section;

((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Drawing 03/A-302 indicates: DEVON EZ GLIDE EG38 OIL CHANGE PIT SAFETY COVER (OR EQUAL) WITH TIRE GUIDE AND TIRE GUIDE LEADER. REF. STRUCTURAL FOR TRACK CONNECTION DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On:

Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6330971 Architectural A501

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sheet A501 elevation 2/A501 show a refrigerator and microwave. confirm these items are government furnished and government installed. No technical specification is provide within the RFP.

By: Kevin Lisowski; The Clement Group LLC; (608-864-0509). On: Dec 18 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Yes, they are government furnished. In drawing 02/A501 a note indicates: "Refrigerator by Owner". The same applies to Microwave. Installation of Microwave is by the GC. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Yes, they are government furnished. In drawing 02/A501 a note indicates: "Refrigerator by Owner". The same applies to Microwave. Installation of Microwave is by the GC. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6334488 Contracting RFP Pages 29, 33 Factor II

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 29 of the RFP limits the overall page count for Factor II: Overall Construction Approach to 5 pages, however page 33 of the RFP which lists the submission requirements for Factor II requires that "The Offeror shall fully describe the project management approach and ability to execute the full scope of the award within the limits of the phasing as specified in the RFP requirements in the Specifications and Drawings. The Offeror shall provide, at a minimum, the following:

• WBS– The proposal shall include a comprehensive Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) including the construction activities as they relate to the primary construction work elements. The proposed WBS must be organized by the most current Construction Specification Institute (CSI) MasterFormat structure.

• Project Management approach - A supporting narrative that addresses the Offeror's project management approach. The narrative shall address the following elements at a minimum:

a. Construction Safety with an emphasis on building construction

b. Construction Quality Control (CQC)

c. Reporting

d. Meetings

e. Resolution of contract Requests for Information (RFIs)

f. Coordination and supervision of work activities

g. Challenges that the Offeror foresees and plans for overcoming these challenges

h. Minimizing impact to cost and schedule in support of project objectives

• Organizational Chart - An organizational management chart. The chart shall address the following elements at a minimum:

a. Management structure/chains of communication

b. Execution structure

c. Subcontractor tiers

d. Onsite project management controls and execution approach (placement, inspection and supply)

e. Management of staff and coordination among labor, subcontractors, and suppliers."

The Maximum page limit for this factor is too stringent to adequately comply with the section requirements. Please consider lengthening the page limit to 10 pages minimum for Factor II.

By: Krista Cummins; Zieson Construction - Riverside, MO; (8165051695). On: Dec 21 2015.

Page 11 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Anticipate an amendment to increase page limit from 5 to 8 pages. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015

1-1 Government Response. Anticipate an amendment to increase page limit from 5 to 8 pages. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify amendment. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 29 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6334757 Contracting 00 22 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Request the proposal delivery time be extended to 2:00 PM CST to allow for FedEx guaranteed delivery. If offerors mail out proposals on Friday, FedEx and other commercial carriers cannot guarantee delivery before 10:00 AM on Monday.

By: Nancy Johnson; R.C. Construction Co., Inc.; ((662) 453-2424). On: Dec 21 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationConcurred. Anticipate an Amendment to extend Proposal/Bid Date to Jan 19, 2016 and ProjNet to Jan 11. 2016. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 22 2015

1-1 Government Response. Anticipate an Amendment to extend Proposal/Bid Date to Jan 19, 2016 and ProjNet to Jan 11. 2016. It is the offeror's/contractor's responsibility to monitor FedBizOps.gov to verify Proposal/Bid due date and time. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6335584 Specifications 10 14 00.20

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 3.1 states that interior sign shall be installed at locations shown on drawings. Locations are not shown on drawings please advise.

By: Trey Smith; R.C. Construction; (662-453-2424). On: Dec 22 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Interior ADA Sign locations are indicated on sheet A-002. There are 2 details for ADA RESTROOM SIGNAGE and ROOM IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE. Signage notes indicate the location and height of the signs.

Exterior Building Signs are indicated on 1/A-201.1 and 1/A-201 By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 23 2015

1-1 Government Response. Interior ADA Sign locations are indicated on sheet A-002. There are 2 details for ADA RESTROOM SIGNAGE and ROOM IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE. Signage notes indicate the location and height of the signs.

Exterior Building Signs are indicated on 1/A-201.1 and 1/A-201 By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501- 340-1273) On: Dec 28 2015

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6337637 Specifications 08 33 23 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.8 indicates color as selected by Architect. It is our interpretation that the color will be one of the manufacturer's standard colors. Please confirm.

By: Danny Farmer; RC Construction - Greenwood, MS; (662-453-2424). On: Dec 23 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Chart of manufacturer's standard colors will be submitted to COR who will then choose one of the colors. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Dec 23 2015

1-1 Government Response. Chart of manufacturer's standard colors will be submitted to COR who will then choose one of the colors. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Jan 13 2016

Page 12 of 27ProjNet: Logged In User

6337638 Specifications 08 33 23

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are the motor operators for the overhead doors supposed to be explosion proof operators?

By: Danny Farmer; RC Construction - Greenwood, MS; (662-453-2424). On: Dec 23 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. Yes, overhead door motor operators are to be explosion proof to meet Class 1 Division 1 requirements. By: William Jackson; SWL Architecture & Facilities Design Section; ((501)324-5001) On: Jan 05 2016

1-1 Government Response. Yes, overhead door motor operators are to be explosion proof to meet Class 1 Division 1 requirements. By: Vonda Rogers; SWL Contracting Division; (501-340-1273) On: Jan 11 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6338086 Structural S-302 2/S302

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

THE SECTION INDICATES THST THE FLOOR SLAB IS TURNED DOWN OVER THE PIT WALL. THIS MEANS THAT THE INSIDE & OUTSIDE FORM WILL HAVE TO STAY IN PLACE UNTIL THE FLOOR SLAB IS PLACED. CAN THE FLOOR SLAB TURN DOWN BE OMITTED AND THE CONSTRUCTION JOINT BE PPLACED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FLOOR

SLAB?

By: Claud Rankin; Comanche Nation Construction; (501.6721595). On: Dec 23 2015. Forward request by email.

1-0 EvaluationFor Information Only. The intent with the slab turn-down is to have the wall placed and cured and then back filled (earth side form removed) and subgrade then placed.