Q&A_2.pdf
PDF 10 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127N-17-Q-0047
About this file
Since the first round of questions and answers, the Government has received the following questions about RFQ solicitation W9127N-17-Q-0047. As of 12 August 2017, the Government has provided the following answers.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q&A.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_Map_update.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_Map.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_NHPA_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_GIS.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_QASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_References.pdf | ||
| RFQ_W9127N17Q0047.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_NPS_10-900.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Since the first round of questions and answers, the Government has received the following questions about RFQ solicitation W9127N-17-Q-0047. As of 12 August 2017, the Government has provided the following answers.
1) Should the need to propose selection of larger test excavation units, presumably in response to a need to open a larger excavation unit to clarify the integrity and content deposits encountered during the SP/AP phase of investigations, their number and location, and the reasoning for that selection be included as part of Task 5:
Additional Work Statement?
Answer: Yes, a proposal to utilize larger excavation units, (quantity, location reasoning) would be included as part of Task 5: Additional Work Statement.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .