H.01.04_Technical_Specification_Package.pdf

For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!

http://www.adobe.com/go/reader

Attachment 8 Map Showing Option 2 Previously Recorded Sites

Attachment 9

Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within Survey Areas

Elk Creek Fuels Reduction Site Type Description NRHP Status

35JA27a-c Habitation Site Lithics, housepits Eligible 35JA28 Lithic Scatter Chert flakes nodules, tool Eligible

Elk Creek Option 1 – Riparian Restoration

35JA100 Village Site House Pits, Archaeological District Eligible 35JA106 Lithic Scatter Heavily disturbed site due to dam construction Unevaluated 35JA113 Lithic Scatter Eroded site Unevaluated 35JA234 Village Site House pits Unevaluated 35JA11 Village Site Heavily vandalized village site; Eligible 35JA28 Base Camp Lithic Scatter Unevaluated

Elk Creek Option 2 – Boundary Fence

35JA102 Multi component Lithics, groundstone, multi component Eligible 35JA221 Lithic Scatter Lithic, Scrappers, Possible House Pits Unevaluated

Attachment 2 References

Minor, Rick 2011 Historic Properties Management Plan for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Elk Creek Project, Jackson County, Oregon. Heritage Research Associates, Inc., Report No. 354

Attachment 10

GIS DATA

USACE Portland District will provide a blank geodatabase and the data dictionary for use on the project.

Any questions concerning GPS or GIS should be directed to Vanessa van der Borg, (503-808-4684), Vanessa.vanderBorg@usace.army.mil.

ATTACHMENT 1: QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

The KTR will be evaluated periodically during performance of this Contract to ensure compliance with the proposed and accepted performance goals, regulations, and guidance. This evaluation will be performed according to the QASP. The KTR shall review the proposed QASP and propose any desired revisions with the proposal. The QASP will be used by the Government to evaluate the KTR’s performance. Failure to adequately complete any service or submittal to at least a satisfactory level of quality or timeliness may result in repeat of work, a poor performance evaluation, or both.

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN FOR CONTRACT NO. W9127N-16-R-0021.

Deliverable of Service

Requirement Measurement / Metric Surveillance Method Frequency

Procedures to be taken when performance standards not met

Pre-Field Activities Compliance with requirements to include timeliness, accuracy, quality, consistency, and functionality

Submittal Review

Draft Submittal Final Submittal

a. Contractor revision of submittal at own expense;

b. Poor performance evaluation

Field Survey Compliance with requirements to

25% fieldwork inspection

Monthly Contract Update Reports

Report Compliance with requirements to

Draft Submittal Final Submittal

CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

Work Plan Timeliness, accuracy, quality, consistency, functionality

Draft and Final a. Contractor revision of submittal;

Quality Control Plan Timeliness, accuracy, quality, Minutes of all significant conversations and meetings

Timeliness, accuracy, quality, CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND ACCOUNTING

Monthly Progress Reports

Upon Submission a. KTR revision of

b. Delay in payment

Monthly Invoices Timeliness, accuracy, quality, Monthly Expenditure Reports

Upon Submission a. KTR revision of submittal

Monthly Exposure (man-hours) Report

Upon Submission a. KTR revision of submittal

Release of Claims Timeliness, accuracy, quality,

b. Delay in Final Payment

Attachment 3 Maps Showing Survey Area Base Contract

Attachment 4 Map Showing Option 1 Previously Recorded Sites*

*Site location is based on the 2012 HPMP

Attachment 5 Maps Showing Survey Area Option 1

Attachment 6 Map Showing Option 1 Previously Recorded Sites*

*Site location is based on the 2012 HPMP

Attachment 7a Maps Showing Survey Area Option 2

Attachment 7b Maps Showing Survey Area Option 2