B08_CSS_24Q0051 AMD0001 Combined.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to rescind the previous solicitation dates 07/31/2024.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Aug-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9126G24Q0051

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12-Aug-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Aug-2024

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FORT WORTH

819 TAYLOR ST, CT OFC RM 2A17

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

W9126G 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9126G24Q0051

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 01

Solicitation No. W9126G24Q0051, Amendment 0001, Janitorial, Refuse and Water Testing, Waco Lake, Texas

The purpose of this amendment is to rescind the solicitation issued 07/31/2024 and issue the attached solicitation in its place.

When submitting proposals, the solicitation dated 08/12/2024 must be acknowledged.

(End of Summary)

(End of Summary of Changes)

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (CSS) Solicitation Number: W9126G24Q0051 Date Issued: 08/12/2024

Solicitation is issued by:

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FORT WORTH

819 TAYLOR ST, CT OFC RM 2A17

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

PROJECT NAME: Waco Lake Consolidated Cleaning Services

1. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial services prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers USACE), Fort Worth District intends to issue a Purchase Order (PO), for the non-personal service listed below in the description. The contract performance will consist of One (1) Twelve Month Base Period and Four (4) Twelve Month Option Periods.

Description of Services: The Contractor shall furnish, all necessary labor, transportation, equipment, materials/supplies, and supervision to perform non-personal janitorial services in the manner, location and frequency set forth in the Performance Work Statement and schedules.

Work shall be performed in support of the USACE Three Rivers Region Waco Lake Midway Park Office 2332 West Highway 6 Waco, TX 76712

The government reserves the right to limit and/or not respond to any further questions pertaining to this project received after 08/21/2024. Offerors should base their quotes on the information provided in the solicitations and all issued amendments thereto.

All answers to technical inquiries and questions are reviewed by the Contracting Officer prior to the response date.

Answers to technical inquiries may result in amendment(s) to the solicitation. If an amendment is issued, it will be posted on the Government Point of Entry website www.sam.gov.

2. This is a Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (CSS) and incorporates FAR provisions and clauses in effect through the Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2024-03 (23 Feb 24). Solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Department of Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS).

a. The provision at 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition and a statement regarding any addenda to the provision. Offerors are also required to submit a completed copy of the Request for Quotation and a completed copy of the pricing schedule.

b. Offerors include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-

Commercial Items, with its offer.

c. Clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition and a statement regarding any addenda to the clause.

d. Clause at 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition and a statement regarding which, if any, of the additional FAR clauses cited in the clause are applicable to the acquisition

3. This acquisition is SET ASIDE 100% for Small Business.

4. PSC: S201 Housekeeping – Custodial Janitorial NAICS CODE: 561720, Janitorial Services SIZE STANDARD: $22 Million

5. System for Awards Management (SAM): In accordance with FAR 52.204-7(b)(1) An Offeror is required to be registered in SAM when submitting an offer or quotation and shall continue to be registered until time of award, during performance, and through final payment of any contract agreement resulting from this solicitation.

6. Evaluation Information: The Government intends to award a firm fixed price (FFP) Purchase Order resulting from this CSS to the responsible offeror whose offer represents the best value in terms of price, past performance and technical approach and Understanding of the Work IAW 13.106-2(b)&(3).

The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.

The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

Quote Content – All quotation documents when printed shall fit on 8 x 11inch paper to include spreadsheets (with the appropriate page breaks). Ensure the quote is submitted in PDF format. In-order to be considered responsive to the CSS, the prospective offeror’s quote shall consist of a Vendor Information Sheet, Complete and Defective Free Bid Sheet, Technical Proposal (Understanding of Work), Screen Shot of the Offeror’s NIST/SPSRS Assessment, and completed provisions.

Quotes shall be responsive to and comply with the terms of the combined synopsis solicitation in order to be eligible to receive an award. All technical requirements shall be addressed in sufficient written detail for the Government to determine if the offeror understands each aspect of the Government’s requirement. The offeror/quoter shall address each technical factor separately and shall provide sufficient narrative and supporting data for each factor. Lack of sufficient detail shall be considered sufficient cause for the quote to be determined unacceptable. Statements that the quoter understands, can or will comply with all specifications and statements paraphrasing the specifications or parts thereof, or phrases such as “standard procedures will be used” or “well-known techniques will be used” will be considered unacceptable. The Government will reject the proposal if determined to be materially non-responsive to include submissions that fail to conform to the terms of the combined synopsis/solicitation.

Quoters that fail to adhere to the submittal requirements will be determined non-responsive and will be considered ineligible for award. To be eligible to receive an award, the quote submitted in response to the combined synopsis/solicitation shall consist of the contents required in the sub-paragraphs described below:

a. Technical: Specifications have been defined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The vendor shall submit a technical quote that meets or exceeds all specifications identified in the PWS and Evaluation Factors. (See FAR Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items). The Technical Factor Ratings, excerpted below focus on the strengths, deficiencies, weaknesses, risks, and uncertainties of the offeror’s technical submittal. The color rating depicts how well the offeror’s proposal meets the Technical subfactor requirements.

Table 1

Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Adjectival Rating

Definition

Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful contract performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

b. Past Performance: The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirement. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance of supplying the herbicide service that meets the contract requirements. For an offeror’s record of past performance to be an indicator of its future performance, the past performance information must be relevant to the pending contract. Recent or relevant work is defined as similar work in size and scope within the past four (4) years.

NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ): The quoter is required to submit two (2) PPQs with an overall rating of satisfactory or higher to be considered eligible for award. Additional PPQs submitted for assessment will be discarded and not considered for evaluation. The Contracting Officer may use additional data obtained from any available sources such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and personal knowledge to assess the contractor’s likelihood of success in performing the solicitation’s requirements as indicated by those offerors’ record of past performance.

If for any reason, the contractor does NOT have recent or relevant past performance, the quoter is still required to submit a PPQ with a brief narrative explaining “No Recent or Relevant Past Performance”. In the case of a quoter without a record of recent or relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the quoter shall be determined to have unknown or (“neutral”) past performance. In the context of eligibility, a “Neutral” adjectival rating shall be considered eligible for award. Contractor’s that have proven past performance ratings with an adjectival rating below “Satisfactory” shall not be ineligible to receive consideration for award.

A contractor’s past performance rating may be used at the Contracting Officer’s discretion to make an overall determination of the level of confidence the government has in the contractor’s capability to perform the service.

The Contracting Officer may determine that a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating as stated in the evaluation.

Table 2 - Confidence Adjectival Rating Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror' s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror' s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on. the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In performing the past performance factor evaluation, evaluators will apply the following relevance levels to assess the relevance of the prior contract effort(s) of offerors.

Table 3

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

c. Price: A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) shall be submitted for this effort. The vendor will provide pricing for each line item listed in the attached Priced Schedule (Bid Sheet). The Government will evaluate all aspects of the price proposal for reasonableness. Proposals found to be unreasonable may be rejected on that basis. The Government will only award the contract if the pre-priced list of services is determined fair and reasonable.

6. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 60 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

7. In accordance with FAR Part 29.3 – State and Local Taxes, and per Title 4 of US Code 104-07, the Government is exempt from paying state and local taxes.

8. Response Date: Quotes for this solicitation are due 08/26/2024, by 10:00 AM CST.

Electronic copies of each volume shall be submitted through the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/. Quotes submitted by mail or hand carried will not be evaluated. Proposals sent through proprietary or third-party File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites or DoD SAFE will not be retrieved. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to confirm receipt of proposals. All proposals received after the exact time specified for receipt shall be treated as late submissions and will not be considered except under facts and circumstances allowed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).

There are 10 general steps a vendor must follow in order to use PIEE application modules. A complete list can be viewed at the following site:

https://piee.eb.mil/xhtml/unauth/web/homepage/vendorGettingStartedHelp.xhtml#step5

For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo:

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf.

It is the Offeror’s responsibility to obtain written confirmation of receipt of all electronic files of the full proposal by the Fort Worth District Contracting office. In the event that the Solicitation Module is down, the alternate method for proposal submission is via email. The Offeror MUST obtain prior approval from the Contracting Officer (Jamauh D. Winston) or the Contract Specialist (Ms. Angelina L. PinaHardin) Angelina.l.pinahardin@usace.army.mil to use the alternate submission method. Offerors are responsible for ensuring electronic copies are virus-free and shall run an anti-virus scan before submission.

Electronic copies of each volume shall be compatible with the following software products: Adobe Acrobat Reader 11 and Microsoft Office Suite 2016. Narrative portions of the proposal shall be in Adobe Acrobat portable document file (pdf) searchable text format. The Offeror shall not embed sound or video (e.g., MPEG) files into the proposal files. Electronic files shall be clearly identified for each volume, section, and item.

7. Submittals: Offerors must submit representation and certifications in accordance with the provisions at FAR 52.212-3 Offeror Representation and Certifications – Commercial Item (Accessible at https://www.acquisition.gov) or the vendor may verify their Online Representation and Certification Application (ORCA) is updated in SAM by checking “Yes” on the Vendor information sheet. The contract specialist will verify the quoters FAR & DFAR Reports are updated in SAM.GOV prior to determining the quoter responsive.

Submit the following PDF files in the response to the CSS:

a. Attach the Vendor Information Sheet and Priced Schedules. Compile the vendor information sheet and schedules and submit as one conformed document. Label Submittal: Company Name, Quote, Example: ABC, LLC Price Quote 24Q0051

b. Technical Submittal (Approach and Understanding of Work) (See Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items), Shall not exceed five (5) pages. Compile the technical submittal and submit as one conformed document.

Label Submittal: Company Name, Technical Quote, Example: ABC, LLC Technical Quote 24Q0051

c. Past Performance NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (See Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items). Recent or relevant work is defined as similar work in size and scope within the past four (4) years. If for any reason the contractor does NOT have recent or relevant past performance, the offeror is still required to submit a PPQ with a brief narrative explaining, "No Recent or Relevant Past Performance in block 6 of the PPQ Contractor Information Sheet. The Contracting Officer shall deem an offeror non-responsive if the offeror fails to submit a PPQ. An Offeror that submits a PPQ that is deemed neither recent nor relevant will be treated as “NEUTRAL”. PPQ Submittals shall consist of the Contractor Information Sheet and the Completed Adjectival Rating Sheets. Compile the two (2) PPQs and submit them as one conformed document (2) Label Submittal:

Company Name, PPQ, Example: ABC, LLC PPQ 24Q0051

d. Screen Shot of the Offerors NIST/SPRS Assessment. Compile the assessments and submit as one conformed document. Label Submittal: Company Name, NIST/SPRS, Example: ABC, LLC NIST/SPRS 24Q0051

e. Complete and return the provisions at 52.204-24, and 52.204-26, 52.212-3 Dev, 52.219-1, and 52.219-28.

Compile the Provisions and submit as one conformed document. Label Submittal: Company Name, Provisions, Example: ABC, LLC Provisions 24Q0051

f. If applicable, acknowledge and return any amendments with your submittals. Compile the amendments and submit as one conformed document. Label Submittal: Company Name, AMD 0001 – 0004, Example: ABC, LLC

AMD 0001 – 0004 24Q0051

g. Contractors that failure to adhere to the submittal requirements will be determined non-responsive and will be considered ineligible for award.

h. Please NOTE this solicitation requires offerors to enter a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) score in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) prior to responding to this solicitation. The NIST score is a responsiveness item. Bids/offers from contractors with a NIST score in SPRS will be considered qualified and eligible for award. * If the apparent awardee does not correct the omission by refusing to enter its NIST score within 14 days after the allotted time then it can be safely deemed “not responsive” and ineligible to receive the award.

Reference: 252.204-7019 - Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements

Reference: 252.204-7020 - NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements

See the Attached Quick Entry Guide to assists with entering NIST Assessment.

Contact Help Desk at (866)618-5988 for additional assistance

9. 52.237-1 SITE VIST

Offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award.

Prospective offerors/quoters are required to contact the Contract Specialist via email to express their interests by 3:00 PM (CST) two business days prior to attending the site visit. Site visit attendees must provide the following information the Solicitation Number, Project Title, Name(s) of Individual(s) who will attend the site visit, Name of Company Represented, Phone Number of Company being represented. All attendees are required sign the attendance sheet.

Date: 08/19/2024 @ 10:00 am CST

Address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Midway Park Office 2332 West Highway 6 Waco, TX 76712

CT POC: Angelina L. PinaHardin Contact Info: 817-886-1082 Email: Angelina.l.pinahardin@usace.army.mil

TECH POC: Michael Champagne Contact Info 254-756-5359 Email: michael.j.champagne@usace.army.mil

To attend please contact QA: Cara Niemietz – 254-245-2337 Lead Ranger: Arianna Jacinto – 254-715-6499

VENDOR INFORMATION SHEET

W9126G24Q0051 Waco Lake Consolidated Cleaning Services

COMPANY NAME

POC

(Last, First Middle)

ADDRESS

(Number & Street) (City, State and Zip)

PHONE NUMBER MOBILE

(Area code and number) (Area code and number)

EMAIL ADDRESS___________________________________________

Unique Identity NUMBER CAGE CODE NUMBER_______________

Vendor’s Online Representation and Certification Application (ORCA) are updated in SAM Yes No

Signature Date

NIST SP 800-171

NIST SP 800-171 QUICK ENTRY GUIDE

VERSION 3.3

NSLC PORTSMOUTH BLDG. 153-2 PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD, PORTSMOUTH, NH 03804-5000

Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited.

NIST SP 800-171 Quick Entry Guide SPRS Release V 3.3

1. NIST SP 800-171 Assessment Database: The purpose of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-171 is to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations.

This database contains data associated with NIST SP 800-171 Assessments.

2. PIEE Access: A “SPRS Cyber Vendor User” role is required to enter Basic Assessment information. Step-by-step PIEE Access Instructions can be found here.

https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Access_Instructions.pdf

3. SPRS Application Access: To Access SPRS, follow the below steps:

a. PIEE landing page: https://piee.eb.mil/piee-landing/

b. Click “log-in” and follow prompted log-in steps

Screenshot Dtd 2 NOV 2020

c. Select the SPRS Icon:

d. Select NIST 800-171 Assessment:

3.1 Creating a Header: A “Header” is required for each Highest Level Owner (HLO) CAGE. If a Basic Confidence Level header does not already exist for your HLO, it may be created by selecting “+ Create New HLO CAGE” from the Header View:

*Note: If you have SPRS access but do not see the create buttons, please confirm your “SPRS Cyber Vendor User” role has been activated in PIEE.

3.2 Header View: The header page only displays the HLO(s) for a company and will contain up to four rows per HLO, one for each Confidence Level (Basic, Medium, High Virtual, and High On-site). Basic is the only vendor self-assessed confidence level.

Version 3.3 AUG 2021 1

NIST SP 800-171 Quick Entry Guide SPRS 3.3

*Note: CAGE Hierarchy is imported from the System for Award Management (SAM).

Contact your company’s CAGE hierarchy authority to have your data updated in SAM.

Updates typically flow to SPRS within 48 hours.

3.3 Detail View: From the header view select “View Details” at the Basic confidence level to view, enter, and edit assessment summary results associated with any CAGE within that HLO’s hierarchy (see arrow above, section 3.2):

3.4 Assessment Entry: Select “+ Add New Assessment” button within Detail View (see arrow above, section 3.3), enter assessment summary results within the Enter Assessment Details page, and select “Save”:

*Note: The Assessment Methodology and System Security Plan should be completed prior to entering assessment summary results within SPRS.

*Note: Information related to each data field may be viewed by moving the cursor over the field title or column header.

3.5 Assessment Edit: The user may update as necessary to reflect the company’s current status. While viewing the NIST assessments in Details View (Section 3.3 above), click the pencil icon to edit assessment details.

Version 3.3 AUG 2021 2

ATTACHMENT 1

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNS Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of Project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNARIE AND

SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNARIE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATION. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER,

QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE

OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO

VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATIONOF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable Equivalent to Neutral Adjectival Rating

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive or negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and /or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirement and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agree price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor Proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports. Budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) In the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

YES NO

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

YES NO

f) Have there been any indication that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

YES NO

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To What extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements, regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues)

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

YES NO

d) In Summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (Please attach additional pages in necessary):

BID SCHEDULE

SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTATION FOR CLIN 0001 (5 Aug 2024 - 04 Aug 2025)

DESCRIPTION EST.QTY U/M UNIT

PRICE

PRICE

0001 Winter Summer

PICNIC/CAMPING UNITS 6926 21873 28799 EA

GROUNDS CLEANUP (Acres) 3287 10523 13810 ACRE

RESTROOMS/BATH HOUSES 412 1452 1864 EA

GROUP PAVILLIONS 44 122 166 EA

GROUP CAMPGROUND AND

SHELTER

44 61 105 EA

DUMP STATIONS 84 124 208 EA

PLAYGROUNDS/PLAY

AMENITY AREAS

66 116 182 EA

PIERS, DOCKS/RAMPS 132 174 306 EA

SCREEN SHELTERS 220 610 830 EA

BEACH AREAS 22 180 202 EA

BEACH WATER

SAMPLING/TESTING

0 15 15 EA

ACCESS POINT GROUNDS

CLEANING

30 42 72 EA

REFUSE COLLECTION AND

DISPOSAL

726 2760 3486 EA

PORTABLE TOILETS 43 61 104 EA

KOEHNE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

BOSQUE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

LACY POINT PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

TWIN BRIDGES PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

SPEEGLEVILLE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

TOTAL

SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTATION FOR CLIN 1001 (05 Aug 2025- 04 Aug 2026)

DESCRIPTION EST.QTY U/M UNIT

PRICE

PRICE

1001 Winter Summer

PICNIC/CAMPING UNITS 6926 21873 28799 EA

GROUNDS CLEANUP (Acres) 3287 10613 13900 ACRE

RESTROOMS/BATH HOUSES 412 1458 1870 EA

GROUP PAVILLIONS 44 122 166 EA

GROUP CAMPGROUND AND

SHELTER

44 61 105 EA

DUMP STATIONS 84 124 208 EA

PLAYGROUNDS/PLAY

AMENITY AREAS

66 124 190 EA

PIERS, DOCKS/RAMPS 132 186 318 EA

SCREEN SHELTERS 220 610 830 EA

BEACH AREAS 22 186 208 EA

BEACH WATER

SAMPLING/TESTING

0 15 15 EA

ACCESS POINT GROUNDS

CLEANING

30 42 72 EA

REFUSE COLLECTION AND

DISPOSAL

726 2852 3578 EA

PORTABLE TOILETS 43 62 105 EA

KOEHNE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

BOSQUE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

LACY POINT PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

TWIN BRIDGES PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

SPEEGLEVILLE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

TOTAL

SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTATION FOR CLIN 2001 (05 Aug 2026- 04 Aug 2027)

DESCRIPTION EST.QTY U/M UNIT

PRICE

PRICE

2001 Winter Summer

PICNIC/CAMPING UNITS 6926 21986 28912 EA

GROUNDS CLEANUP (Acres) 3287 10613 13900 ACRE

RESTROOMS/BATH HOUSES 412 1470 1882 EA

GROUP PAVILLIONS 44 122 166 EA

GROUP CAMPGROUND AND

SHELTER

44 61 105 EA

DUMP STATIONS 84 124 208 EA

PLAYGROUNDS/PLAY

AMENITY AREAS

66 120 186 EA

PIERS, DOCKS/RAMPS 132 180 312 EA

SCREEN SHELTERS 220 610 830 EA

BEACH AREAS 22 183 205 EA

BEACH WATER

SAMPLING/TESTING

0 15 15 EA

ACCESS POINT GROUNDS

CLEANING

30 42 72 EA

REFUSE COLLECTION AND

DISPOSAL

726 2806 3532 EA

PORTABLE TOILETS 43 61 104 EA

KOEHNE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

BOSQUE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

LACY POINT PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

TWIN BRIDGES PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

SPEEGLEVILLE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

TOTAL

SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTATION FOR CLIN 3001 (05 Aug 2027- 04 Aug 2028)

PRICE

PRICE

3001 Winter Summer

PICNIC/CAMPING UNITS 6877 22176 29053 EA

GROUNDS CLEANUP (Acres) 3287 10613 13900 ACRE

RESTROOMS/BATH HOUSES 405 1470 1875 EA

GROUP PAVILLIONS 42 124 166 EA

GROUP CAMPGROUND AND

SHELTER

42 62 104 EA

DUMP STATIONS 88 124 212 EA

PLAYGROUNDS/PLAY

AMENITY AREAS

63 120 183 EA

PIERS, DOCKS/RAMPS 126 180 306 EA

SCREEN SHELTERS 210 620 830 EA

BEACH AREAS 21 183 204 EA

BEACH WATER

SAMPLING/TESTING

0 15 15 EA

ACCESS POINT GROUNDS

CLEANING

30 42 72 EA

REFUSE COLLECTION AND

DISPOSAL

695 2760 3455 EA

PORTABLE TOILETS 43 61 104 EA

KOEHNE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

BOSQUE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

LACY POINT PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

TWIN BRIDGES PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

SPEEGLEVILLE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTATION FOR CLIN 4001 (05 Aug 2028 - 04 Aug 2029)

PRICE

PRICE

4001 Winter Summer

PICNIC/CAMPING UNITS 6877 21986 28863 EA

GROUNDS CLEANUP (Acres) 3287 10613 13900 ACRE

RESTROOMS/BATH HOUSES 405 1473 1878 EA

GROUP PAVILLIONS 42 122 164 EA

GROUP CAMPGROUND AND

SHELTER

42 61 103 EA

DUMP STATIONS 88 120 208 EA

PLAYGROUNDS/PLAY

AMENITY AREAS

63 124 187 EA

PIERS, DOCKS/RAMPS 126 186 312 EA

SCREEN SHELTERS 210 610 820 EA

BEACH AREAS 21 183 204 EA

BEACH WATER

SAMPLING/TESTING

0 15 15 EA

ACCESS POINT GROUNDS

CLEANING

30 42 72 EA

REFUSE COLLECTION AND

DISPOSAL

693 2852 3545 EA

PORTABLE TOILETS 43 61 104 EA

KOEHNE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

BOSQUE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

LACY POINT PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

TWIN BRIDGES PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

SPEEGLEVILLE PUMP OUT 1 0 1 EA

PRICE

Total

CLIN0001

Total

CLIN1001

Total

CLIN2001

Total

CLIN3001

Total

CLIN4001

TOTAL $ -

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job $_________________ $__________________

WA Lake Consolidated Cleaning

Base Year

The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and nonpersonal services necessary to perform facility cleaning, grounds cleaning, beach water testing and refuse collection and refuse disposal services at 10 recreation areas on Waco Lake, Texas.

1001 1 Job $_________________ $__________________ OPTION WA Lake Consolidated Cleaning

Option Year 1

The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and nonpersonal services necessary to perform facility cleaning, grounds cleaning, beach water testing and refuse collection and refuse

2001 1 Job $_________________ $__________________

OPTION WA Lake Consolidated Cleaning

Option Year 2

The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and nonpersonal services necessary to perform facility cleaning, grounds cleaning, beach water testing and refuse collection and refuse

3001 1 Job $_________________ $__________________

OPTION WA Lake Consolidated Cleaning

Option Year 3

The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and nonpersonal services necessary to perform facility cleaning, grounds cleaning, beach water testing and refuse collection and refuse

4001 1 Job $_________________ $__________________

OPTION WA Lake Consolidated Cleaning

Option Year 4

The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and nonpersonal services necessary to perform facility cleaning, grounds cleaning, beach water testing and refuse collection and refuse

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government 1001 Destination Government Destination Government 2001 Destination Government Destination Government 3001 Destination Government Destination Government 4001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

1001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

2001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

3001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

4001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

PWS

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

CONSOLIDATING CLEANING SERVICES

WACO LAKE, TEXAS

1.0 GENERAL: This is a non-personal services contract to provide all management, tools, equipment, materials, and labor necessary to ensure that services for facility cleaning, grounds cleaning and beach water testing is performed at Waco Lake, Texas. The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government. The Contractor shall perform to the standards in this contract.

1.1 Scope: The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform facility cleaning, grounds cleaning, beach water testing and refuse collection and refuse disposal services at 10 recreation areas on Waco Lake, Texas. Services include general grounds cleaning, cleaning and disinfection restrooms, cleaning picnic/camp sites, cleaning group shelters and group camping shelter, cleaning screened camping shelters, cleaning dump stations, cleaning playgrounds and play amenities, cleaning fishing piers, cleaning swim beaches, collecting and disposing of refuse, restroom vault pumping services, providing and service portable toilets and testing beach water. The Contractor shall accomplish all operations in accordance with procedures and practices described IAW EM 385-1-1.

1.2 Period of Performance: One year Base Period, plus four one-year options.

1.3 General Information

1.3.1 Award of Other Contracts - The services provided under this contract shall be independent of all services provided under other contracts, at this work site or any other work site, at which the Contractor may receive award. The Contractor shall be responsible for meeting all deadlines for services specified under this contract.

1.3.2 Time Limitations: The Contractor shall complete the work scheduled on the specified day according to the approved work schedules.

1.3.3 Cooperation with Other Contractors: - The Government may undertake or award other contracts for additional work not related to the contract, and the Contractor shall fully cooperate with other Contractors and Government employees. The Contractor shall not commit, direct, lead or permit any acts that will interfere with the performance of work by another Contractor, or by Government employees.

1.3.4 Occupied Facilities: If a facility is occupied by the public at the time of the scheduled service, the Contractor will ask permission to service the facility. If the public objects to the performance of the service, the Contractor will immediately record the unit (by park and number) on a written list of non-serviced units. If the site becomes unoccupied while the Contractor is still in the park, the Contractor shall service the unit as required and remove that number from the list. The list must be kept current and maintained so that if a unit is inspected and found not serviced and rejected by the Government's Quality Assurance Representative (QAR), it can be checked against the list of non-serviced units that shall be submitted to the QAR daily.

1.3.5 Payment: Payment for completed and accepted work on a monthly (30 day) basis. The Contractor shall invoice upon completion of work or end of each month.

1.3.6 Performance Evaluation Meetings: The Contractor, Contractor's superintendent, and quality control inspectors shall meet with the QAR and Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) once a quarter to discuss performance. However, a meeting shall not be held later than one normal working day after a Contract Deficiency Report (CDR) is issued. Mutual effort will be made to resolve all problems identified. Written minutes of these meetings shall be prepared by the COR, Contractor, and their respective employees.

1.3.7 Quality Control: The Contractor shall develop and maintain an effective quality control program to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The Contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The Contractor's quality control program is how he assures himself that his work complies with the requirement of the contract. The Quality Control Plan (QCP) is the method the Contractor uses to ensure all work complies with the requirements of the contract. The QCP is to be delivered within 30 calendar days after contract award or with the Contractor's proposal if it is an evaluation factor. A comprehensive written QCP shall be submitted for approval by the Contracting Officer (KO). Any proposed changes to an approved QCP, shall be submitted, in writing, to the KO for review and approval.

1.3.8 Quality Assurance: The Government shall evaluate the Contractor's performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). This plan is primarily focused on what the Government must do to ensure that the Contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards.

It defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance, and the minimum acceptable defect rate(s).

1.3.9 Government Holidays: On holidays or special occasions, the COR may decide to reschedule a service frequency to avoid conflict with visitors. A minimum of 24 hours notification will be given to the Contractor via telephone or in writing. If Memorial Day, 4th of July or Labor Day falls on a Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday, all facilities scheduled for that day shall not be cleaned but shall be cleaned on the day following the holiday unless otherwise directed by the COR. Cleaning of restrooms and beaches during the above special occasions will be required unless otherwise directed by the COR. For information purposes only observed federal holidays are as follows:

New Year's Day Memorial Day Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday President's Day Labor Day Thanksgiving Day Columbus Day Christmas Day Veteran's Day Juneteenth Independence Day

1.3.10 Hours of Operations: Waco Lake Office's normal office hours are 08:00 am to 4:30 pm (CST), Contractor work hours shall be 7:00 am to 3:30 pm (CST), and seasonal staff may work alternate shifts as necessary. The Lake Office shall be closed on Federal holidays. The Contractor shall be required to submit a work schedule for review and approval by the KO or COR. This schedule shall meet the requirements of this PWS, Technical Exhibit 2 "Deliverables" and Technical Exhibit 3-Appendix B, "Frequency of Service".

1.3.11 Place of Performance: The work to be performed under this contract will be performed at various park facilities and locations around Waco Lake, Texas.

1.3.12 Type of Contract: The government will award a Firm Fixed Price contract.

1.3.13 Safety: The Contractor shall develop and execute an effective safety program…