B03_am_4_Solicitation_W9126G-13-R-0014_6_June_14.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04 EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Small Business Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Construction Services for the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in Southwestern Division (SWD) and other SWF and SWD customers on a limited nationwide basis, is amended as follows:

See SF30 Continuation Sheet(s)

NOTE: The Phase 2 proposal receipt date is changed to 24 June 2014, 2:00 p.m., Central Time.

• The As-builts and RFP CADD files were sent via AMRDEC on 5/29/14 for reference and information only.

• The As-builts for laundry room files were sent via AMRDEC on 6/5/14 for reference and information only.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15C. DATE SIGNED 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer) (Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

W9126G-13-R-0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-May-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-June-2014

CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, FORT WORTH

ATTN: CESWF-CT

819 TAYLOR ST, ROOM 2A19

P.O. BOX 17300

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

W9126G 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODE CODE

EMAIL: TEL:

X

W9126G-13-R-0014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. Proposal Receipt Date: The Phase 2 proposal receipt date is changed to 24 June 2014, 2:00 p.m., Central Time.

2. Replacement Sections: The following sections have been replaced in their entirety, bearing the notation “W9126G-13-R-0014, Amendment No. 0004”:

MATOC SECTIONS

DIVISION 00 – PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

• 00 21 00 – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

• 00 22 20 – PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF

AWARD

DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

• 01 35 13.03 44 – TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE DESIGN GUIDE FOR JOINT BASE

SAN ANTONIO/FORT SAM HOUSTON

SEED TASK ORDER SECTIONS

DIVISION 00 – PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

• 00 11 00 – CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE

DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

• 01 10 00 – TASK ORDER STATEMENT OF WORK

Seed Task Order Appendices

APPENDIX D – RESULTS OF FIRE FLOW TESTS

3. Replacement Drawings: The following drawings from Appendix J have been replaced in their entirety, bearing the notation “W9126G-13-R-0014, Amendment No. 0004”:

• G-101

• G-102

• CS-101

• LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN

W9126G-13-R-0014

4. New Sections: The following new sections bearing the notation “W9126G-13-R-0014, Amendment No. 0004” have been added to this solicitation.

SEED TASK ORDER SECTIONS

• 23 09 23.13 20 – BACnet DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR HVAC

Seed Task Order Appendices

APPENDIX X – FY12 JBSA DORMITORY FURNISHINGS

APPENDIX Y – CCTV DRAWING & EQUIPMENT LIST

4. New Drawings: The following new drawings bearing the notation “W9126G-13-R-0014, Amendment No. 0004” have been added to Appendix J.

• C-501

End of Summary of Changes

W9126G-13-R-0014, Amendment No. 0004

Section 00 21 00 – General Description of Work, Site Visit, & Bid Guarantee.

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

1.2 CONTRACT COST LIMITATION FOR DESIGN AND CONTRUCTION COSTS

1.3 COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

1.4 OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

1.5 SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

1.6 PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

1.7 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

1.8 ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

1.9 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

1.10 PROPOSAL FORMAT & GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.11 JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1.12 BID GUARANTEE

1.13 CONTRACT PRICES - BIDDING SCHEDULE (PHASE 2 ONLY)

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

The Fort Worth District intends to award up to six (6) contracts as Small Business Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) in Southwestern Division (SWD) and other Southwest Fort Worth (SWF) and SWD customers on a limited nationwide basis. The estimated maximum task order limitation of $25,000,000 and a minimum task order limitation of $2,500.

The Government may exceed the stated maximum task order limitation upon mutual agreement of all parties.

The solicitation will be a negotiated acquisition; there will be no public bid opening. All contracts will be awarded based upon an evaluation of the overall Best Value to the Government.

General Description of Work: Scope of work includes, but is not limited to, construction activities such as new construction, maintenance, repair, alteration and minor construction type tasks, including asbestos and lead based paint abatement and other environmental remediation incidental to the construction, for both military and civil projects. Only construction task orders will be awarded under the MATOC. The contracts are not only intended to execute new construction, design-build and design-bid-build, but to provide a timely response to remediation of real and personal property facilities, e.g., maintenance, repair and minor construction situations relating to, but not limited to, civil, mechanical, plumbing, structural, electrical, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), instrumentation, anti-terrorism and force protection.

General Description of Seed Task Order: (AM#3) Design and construct the renovation of two (2) Training Barracks, Buildings 915 and 916 and supporting facilities, to meet Advanced Individual Training (AIT) dormitory standards. These facilities are three-story structures and house single trainee soldiers in addition to company administrative, training and command operations. AIT complexes are required by the Army to encompass living, dining, training, and administrative/command operations. Barracks 915 & 916 are comprised of sleeping units, toilets, multipurpose space, storage, laundry area, day rooms, and company operations components. Primary facilities include training barracks, parking, building information systems, fire protection and alarm systems, and energy monitoring and control systems (EMCS) connection. . Facility shall meet LEED Silver sustainability and energy reduction measures per ASHRAE 189.1. Supporting facilities include underground utilities (water, sewer, gas), electric service, ramps, parking and access roads, paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, storm drainage, information systems, landscaping, and site improvements.

Facilities shall comply with Department of Defense (DoD) Anti-Terrorism / Force Protection criteria.

Facilities shall include self-contained systems for heating and air conditioning. Comprehensive Interior Design and furnishings related design services are required. Access for individuals with disabilities is required. The complete Request for Proposal for the seed project, Design and Construction of the renovation of Two Training Barracks, Buildings 915 and 916, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, will be provided during Phase 2 to the selected Phase 2 offerors. Building 916 will be the base offer, with building 915 as an option (/AM#3).

1.2. CONTRACT COST CEILING LIMITATION FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS

The Contract Cost Limitation (CCL) will be provided with the Request for Proposals (RFPs) for each Task Order. It is the Government's intent to award at full scope within the CCL. The Magnitude of Construction for 100% designed projects will be stated on each Task Order in accordance with DFARS 236.204.

1.3. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and all amendments are available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All solicitation documents and amendments will be posted on Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website at http://www.fbo.gov/ and Offeror can access solicitation documents by solicitation number without dashes (i.e., for sample W9126G13R0014).

It is solely the Contractor’s responsibility to check the fbo.gov website for the solicitation and any amendments prior to the RFP closing date. The Offeror shall submit in its proposal all requested information as specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

Additional information regarding this solicitation and potential Offerors (i.e., interested vendors list) and/or subcontractors will be available fbo.gov website under the solicitation number.

1.4. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

1.4.1 Bidder Inquiry

1.4.1.1 Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet.

1.4.1.1.1 To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click to continue.

1.4.1.1.2 From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry. (AM#1) Only one question will be allowed per inquiry. If multiple questions are included in a single inquiry, only the first question will be answered. All others will remain unanswered until entered in a single inquiries (/AM#1).

1.4.1.1.3 Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

1.4.1.1.4 The Solicitation Number is: W9126G-13-R-0014

1.4.1.1.5 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: I629BU-5UVDC9

http://www.fbo.gov/ http://www.projnet.org/projnet

1.4.1.2 The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquires (AM#4) 5 days seven (7) calendar days, 17 June 14, 2PM CST (/AM#4) prior to proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary. (AM#4) If the System is not closed in a timely manner, an inquiry posted within seven calendar days of the receipt of proposals will still be regarding as untimely and will not afforded a substantive response. (/AM#4)

1.4.1.3 Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

1.4.1.4 The bidder call center operates weekdays from 8am to 5pm U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

1.4.1.5 Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

1.5. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

See Section 00 45 00, FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (FEB 2009) for the small business size standard/NAICS Code.

1.6. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This Request for Proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay as a direct charge any costs incurred by the Offeror in the preparation and submission of its proposal or revisions. A stipend is not authorized for unsuccessful Phase 2 Offerors in accordance with Section 00 22 20.

1.7. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

If the Government intends to hold a pre-proposal conference, it will be announced after the Offerors are selected to participate in Phase 2 of the solicitation process.

1.8. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth with full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C.

1001.

1.9. PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS (PHASE 1 & 2)

1.9.1 In an effort to reduce paperwork and cost, ALL Phase 1 and Phase 2 proposals shall be submitted electronically via the AMRDEC SAFE website at: https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE2/Welcome.aspx .

At the AMRDEC SAFE website, select the link: I do not have a CAC or this machine is not configured to read my CAC and I would like to access SAFE as the Guest User, to register, access the site and submit your proposal(s). When completing the information for transmittal at the AMRDEC SAFE website, notification should be submitted to Contract Specialist, Jennifer Fox, email Jennifer.R.Fox@usace.army.mil and Contracting Officer, Linda Griffith, email Linda.M.Griffith@usace.army.mil.

1.9.2 Offers received by telegraph, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will not be accepted.

mailto:Jennifer.R.Fox@usace.army.mil mailto:Linda.M.Griffith@usace.army.mil

1.9.3 Facsimile offers, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will not be accepted.

1.9.4 Offers received by e mail, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will (AM#3) not (/AM#03) be accepted.

1.9.5 SITE VISIT: (AM#3) See Specification Section – Site Visit (PHASE 2) Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234 June 3, 2014 from 0900 to 1300.

POC: Marco Barberena, 210-410-8284, Marco.T.Barberena@usace.army.mil.

Contractors need to fill out the Application for Installation Access Credential (Spreadsheet) in order to get access on the installation. Contractors will need to submit the Application for Installation Access Credential by 20 May 2014, 2 PM CST via email to Jennifer.R.Fox@usace.amrmy.mil and Linda.M.Griffith@usace.army.mil, please use the attached PDF.

Contractors are to meet at the entrance to the USACE Area Office Building 4196. See attached map. Please contact Mr. Barberena for all site visit information (/AM#03).

IMPORTANT NOTES: (1) Remarks and explanations addressed during the conference shall not qualify or alter the terms and conditions of the solicitation. (2) The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing.

1.10. PROPOSAL FORMAT & GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ((AM#3) PHASE 1 & 2 (/AM#03))

1.10.1 Submit only the electronic-documents. Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. All pages should be numbered.

1.10.2 PDF pages should be formatted to print on 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Spreadsheets must fit to 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” paper size unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide, but may include headers and footers of the solicitation, project title and company.

1.10.3 Hard copies will not be submitted.

1.10.4 “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215- 1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

1.10.5 In the case of an Offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.

1.10.6 Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., mailto:Jennifer.R.Fox@usace.amrmy.mil mailto:Linda.M.Griffith@usace.army.mil bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision or amendment, e.g., Error, Omission or Clarification shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered and clearly marked “REVISED”, with the date of revision. Revised page will be submitted in a different color than the original pages being replaced.

1.10.8 Within three (3) days of contract award, the awarded contractors shall submit their conformed proposal via the AMRDEC SAFE website at: https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE2/Welcome.aspx .

1.11. JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If this is an 8(a) or HubZone joint venture, the Offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively.

1.12. BID GUARANTEE (PHASE 2 ONLY)

A Bid Guarantee is not required for the Phase 1 proposal submission. A Bid Guarantee will be required for the initial Task Order during Phase 2 of this solicitation. The penal sum of the bond for the task order will be required as in provision 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. Facsimile Bonds are not acceptable. (AM#4) Hard copy submission of the bid bond is required by due date for proposal submission and shall be sent to:

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, FORT WORTH

ATTN: CESWF-CT- Jennifer Fox

819 TAYLOR ST, ROOM 2A19

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300 (/AM#4).

1.13. CONTRACT PRICES - BIDDING SCHEDULE (PHASE 2 ONLY)

Payment for the various items listed in the Bidding Schedule shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, appliances, materials and bonds (performance and payment), and for performing all operations required to complete the work in conformity with the drawings and specifications. All costs for work not specifically mentioned in the Bidding Schedule shall be included in the contract prices for the items listed.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

FORT WORTH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

SOUTH TEXAS AREA OFFICE

2202 15TH STREET, SUITE 12

FORT SAM HOUSTON, TEXAS 78234-5012

Fort Sam Houston Resident Office DATE: 16 May 2014

MEMORANDUM FOR 502D SECURITY FORCES SQUADRON

2163 WILSON WAY

FORT SAM HOUSTON TX 78234-0039

ATTN: PASS & REGISTRATION OFFICE (S5B)

SUBJECT: Application for Contractor/Vendor Installation Access Credential (AIAC)

1. The following company/organization is providing either vendor’s service or holds a contract with our organization. The individual is required to enter Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston in an official capacity on a regular basis. Request the issuance of an access credential.

Company/Organization Contract/Service Number Required Times/Days of Week Required Dates

Full Address of Company/Organization

2. The below listed individual understands that this is an identification credential, not a sponsoring credential and that it will not allow entry into any facilities other than the installation gates. Use of this credential is strictly for business purposes only. Individual also agrees to adhere to all vehicle regulations and guidelines set forth by AFI 31-204, Air Force Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision, and those set by the installation commander.

3. Upon termination contract expatriation, employee termination, or expiration of the access credential, the holder agrees to return it to the host contractor, sponsor, or building 260 (Registration Office) or any Visitor Control Center.

Name of Credential Holder Date of Birth

Home Address

Vehicle Make Vehicle Model Year Color

Plate # State DL Number State

Registration Office Use Only Requesting Authority/Authorizing Official

NCIC Printed Name COPS/SFMIS Digital Signature FBI TWL Title OFF INIT Duty Phone SUP INIT Email

All requests must be submitted in person or via encrypted .mil email to usaf.jbsa.502-abw.mbx.502-sfs-fsh-visitor-control-cente@mail.mil NLT 5 working days prior to the start date.

"FOUO, This document contains information exempt from mandatory disclosure under the FOIA. Title 5 U.S.C. 552 (b) (6) applies. This document also contains personal information that is protected by the Privacy Act of 1974 and must be safeguarded from unauthorized disclosure."

Use Spreadsheet for group access

W9126G-13-R-0014, Amendment No. 000п

Full Name (L, F, MI) DOB Home Address Make Model Year Plate# State Color Number State Personal Information Vehicle Information

FOUO, This document contains information exempt from mandatory disclosure under the FOIA. Title 5 U.S.C. 552 (b) (6) applies. This document also contains personal information that is protected by the Privacy Act of 1974 and must be safeguarded from unauthorized disclosure."

Application for Installation Access Credential (Spreadsheet) Contract/Service Number Company/Oraganization Employment Start Date Employment End Date

Driver's License

Application for Installation Access Credential Process

Contracting submits AIAC documents to the sponsoring

Authorizing Official (AO)

AO signs and forwards AIAC documents to 502 SFS/S5B via an encrypted .mil email address or in person

502 SFS/S5B initiates pre-vetting procedures

Approved

502 SFS/S5B signs and returns AIAC to the AO for further action

AO provides completed AIAC to contractor/vendor

Contractor/vendor brings employees to S5B for credential issuance (must have valid photo ID)

S5B validates photo against AIACApproved

*NOTE* AO’s must have approved memorandum on file with 502 SFS/S5B

502 SFS/S5B issues access credential

502 SFS/S5B denies issuance as a result of findings. Notifies AO.

Approved

502 SFS/CL is advised and determines assumes waiver responsibilities

Yes No

No No

Yes Yes

W9126G-13-R-0014, Amendment No. 000п

Section 00 22 20 is replaced in its entirety

SECTION 00 22 20

PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD

1. OVERVIEW

2. BASIS OF AWARD

3. PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES

4.1. GENERAL

4.2. DISCUSSIONS (IF NECESSARY)

5. VOLUME 1, TAB A - FACTOR 3 – DESIGN TECHNICAL

5.1. GENERAL

5.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

6. VOLUME 1, TAB B - FACTOR 4 – SUMMARY SCHEDULE

6.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

6.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

7. VOLUME 1, TAB C – FACTOR 5 – SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

7.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

7.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

7.3. DEFINITIONS

8. VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION

8.1. GENERAL

8.2. TAB A – FACTOR 6– PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE)

8.3. TAB B – BID GUARANTEE

8.4. TAB C – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

8.5. TAB D - REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

1. OVERVIEW

Those Offerors short-listed in Phase 1 will be invited to submit a Phase 2 Best Value proposal, as indicated below. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria described herein, using the evaluation rating system outlined in the Phase 1 Design-Build selection procedures for Factors 3, 4, and 5, and the evaluation rating system outlined herein for Factor 6. Price information will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and for material unbalancing, as described herein. The Phase 2 evaluation will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 15.

2. BASIS OF AWARD (MATOC)

2.1. The Contracting Officer will award at least two (2), but up to six (6) firm fixed-price Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contracts to the responsible Offerors whose proposals the Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable with regard to pricing for the initial task order, and whose proposals offer the best overall value to the Government, considering the price and non-price factors described herein. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than the price; however the initial Task Order award may not exceed the cost limitation described in Section 01 00 50.00 44 for the seed project. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best value proposal within the contract cost limitation for the initial task order. There is no obligation to approach or match the contract cost limitation in the offer. Innovations in proposals will be evaluated to determine if creative ideas of the Offeror are a better value to the Government compared to the minimum criteria. After the Government evaluates and rates each proposal, the Government prepares the comparative analysis to determine best value and make a recommendation to the Source Selection Authority (SSA) which proposals represent the best value for award.

2.2. First Award and Seed Project. Award of the first IDIQ will be made to the Offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the best overall value to the Government based on the evaluated ratings from Phase 1 and Phase 2 proposals and the proposed price for the initial task order. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the SSA must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal for the initial task order would justify award to that Offeror. The Offeror receiving the first award will receive either the task order for the seed project if funds are available or a minimum guarantee task order with the award of the basic IDIQ.

2.3. Subsequent Awards and Minimum Guarantee Task Orders. Award of the subsequent IDIQ contracts will be made to the Offeror(s) whose proposal(s) is (are) considered to represent the second (2nd) and up to the top six (6) best value(s) to the Government based on the evaluated ratings from Phase 1 and Phase 2 and the proposed price for the seed project. The price proposed under Phase 2 will be used to assist in the evaluation of the best value proposals for award of an IDIQ. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers.

The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined under FAR Subpart 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the SSA must determine that the value added of a more expensive proposal than accepted for the initial task order justifies award of a basic IDIQ to that Offeror. Offerors receiving subsequent awards will receive a minimum guarantee task order with award of the basic IDIQ.

3. PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 (Volume 1 -from Phase 1)

Past Performance 2nd Most Important Factor, less important than Factor 3 and more important than Factors 4 and 5

FACTOR 2 (Volume 1 – from Phase 1)

Organization and Technical Approach 2nd Most Important Factor, less important than Factor 3 and more important than Factors 4 and 5

VOLUME 1 – PHASE 2, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 3 Vol. 1, TAB A DESIGN TECHNICAL Most Important Factor, more important than all other factors

FACTOR 4 Vol. 1, TAB B SUMMARY SCHEDULE 3rd Most Important Factor, less important than Factors 1, 2, and 3 and more important than Factor 5

FACTOR 5 Vol. 1, TAB C SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION Least Important Factor

VOLUME 2 – PHASE 2, PRICE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 6 Vol. 2 TAB A Price (Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Bid Schedules)

Not rated. Significantly less important than all technical factors combined.

N/A Vol. 2 TAB B Bid Guarantee

Acceptable/Unacceptable N/A Vol. 2 TAB C Required Pre-Award Information

N/A Vol. 3 TAB D Representations and Certifications

4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES

4.1. GENERAL:

The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will not re-evaluate your Phase 1 proposal; the results of the evaluation will be included in the determination for best value. The SSEB will evaluate the Phase 2 proposals and assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor, utilizing the evaluation and rating system described in section 00 22 10 for Factors 3, 4 and 5, and in Section 00 22 20 for Factor 6: Small Business Utilization.

4.2 DISCUSSIONS (If Necessary) –

4.2.1 During Phase 2, the Government intends to award without discussions. A “Competitive Range” is a subjective determination of the most highly rated Phase 2 proposals in the event that discussions with Offerors are required in Phase

2. In such an event, the SSA will approve a competitive range of all the most highly rated Phase 2 proposals.

4.2.2 If discussions are held, the Government may engage in a broad give and take with each Offeror in the competitive range, in accordance with FAR 15.306 (d). The Government will provide the Offeror an advance agenda for the discussions. During discussions, the Government may ask the Offeror to further explain its proposal and to answer questions about it.

4.2.3. Upon conclusion of discussions, those Offerors still considered the most highly rated, will be afforded an opportunity to submit their Phase 2 proposal revisions for final evaluation and selection.

5. VOLUME 1, TAB A – FACTOR 3 – DESIGN TECHNICAL

5.1. GENERAL: The design-technical factor consists of technical approach narratives, conceptual level presentation drawings, and information regarding material and system quality, and sustainability. The proposal must clearly define the proposed scope and quality levels that the design-build team is offering to the Government in enough detail for the Government and the Offeror to mutually understand whether or not the proposal meets or exceeds the minimum Solicitation requirements. Fully developed drawings, details, or specifications are not desired or required. (AM#4) A 15-page limit will be allowed for Factor 3, Design Technical Narrative (/AM#4).

5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

5.1.1.1. Technical Approach Narratives:

(a) Discuss, by discipline, the design, demolition, and construction renovations for the subject project described in the Statement of Work, to include building exterior, roof, stairwell enclosures, windows, utilization of the room spaces, interior finishes in the barracks rooms, mechanical, electrical and communications rooms. Discussions shall also address maintenance considerations, operability, durability, and energy consumption, as applicable, by discipline.

(b) Discuss the design, demolition, and construction for all exterior site work, to include sidewalks, grading, drainage improvements, and landscaping. Discuss the overall design theme for the landscaping, the durability and appropriateness of selected plant materials, and maintenance considerations.

5.1.1.2. Presentation Drawings

As a minimum, provide the following conceptual level drawings:

(a) Typical building sections for a barracks with appropriate details depicting full building height. Show walls section of typical exterior walls showing finish materials interfacing with other materials/systems such as metal roof, windows and doors.

(b) Schematic floor plans for barracks for all differing first floor conditions showing proposed use for each space (i.e., utilization of existing room and laundry spaces). A common floor plan for the second and third floors is acceptable.

5.1.1.3. Product Data

Provide product data for the products listed below. The products provided shall indicate the minimum level of quality that will be provided for construction.

(a) Provide product data for a TPO single membrane roof.

(b) Provide product data for all proposed major mechanical systems.

(c) Provide selection of piping material for fire sprinkler, interior plumbing and HVAC piping.

5.1.1.4. Sustainability Requirement

The Offeror shall acknowledge that it understands the contract requirements for sustainable design and construction and that the final project will be designed and constructed to be LEED Silver certifiable, but not certified. The Offeror shall submit LEED-NC v 3.0 Registered Project Checklist demonstrating how it will achieve the Silver LEED rating. If the Offeror proposes a higher LEED rating than silver, the proposal shall discuss whether achieving the higher rating involves additional costs over achieving LEED Silver and meeting other RFP requirements.

5.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1. General: It is the Army’s objective with this renovation project that these buildings will have a 25-year useful design life before an additional reuse/repurpose or renovation requirement. Within that overriding theme the Government will evaluate the Offeror’s selected systems and components proposed in terms of maintenance considerations (frequency, estimated cost, equipment locations), operability (ease of use, placement of control features, simplicity), durability (withstand troop usage, ease of cleaning), sustainability, and energy consumption (HVAC, lighting, power). The minimum acceptable level of quality for exterior finish materials for these buildings are those materials suitable for the expected population and usage. Residential or similar exterior grade finishes and materials are not acceptable for inclusion in these buildings.

5.2.2. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed mechanical equipment to determine the most efficient system used for the conditions at the subject installation. More emphasis will be placed on those Offerors who propose equipment that is easy to maintain and has a history of being durable and reliable.

5.2.3. The site design proposal shall be evaluated based on the overall compliance with the requirements set forth in the RFP. The Government will ensure that the proposal is complete, realistic and takes into consideration all requirements set forth in the RFP.

5.2.4. All requirements identified as mandatory in Section 01 10 00 or elsewhere in the Solicitation must be included and the proposal must meet the requirements of the LEED-NC v 3.0 for Silver certification. The Government will provide additional evaluation consideration for proposals which include LEED points identified as preferred. The Government does not desire to pay more to obtain a higher LEED rating, such as Gold.

6. VOLUME 1, TAB B - FACTOR 4 – SUMMARY SCHEDULE

6.1. Submission Requirements:

6.1.1. Proposed Contract Duration: The Offeror shall propose the overall contract duration in the CLIN Schedule, not to exceed the maximum contract duration specified in the RFP.

6.1.2. Summary Schedule: Submit a summary level schedule for integrated design and construction. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read and clearly labeled as Tab B. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 10: Project Schedule.

The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of choice; however, schedules shall be graphically represented. Give attention to the following features:

(a) Provide a narrative, describing the design packaging plan for separate design packages, based on the Offeror’s plan for fast tracking. Describe all design and construction to be “fast-tracked” (See section 01 33 16: Design After Award).

If long lead item equipment must be ordered prior to completion of a design phase, describe the requirement in the narrative and show the required ordering date in the schedule.

(b) Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the interim and final design submittals for each package and the proper handling of the review comments for each design package (See section 01 33 16).

(c) Show the overall construction phase for the base bid and all options. Show fast track starts for design packages but it isn’t necessary to show the detailed breakdown construction (e.g., by trades) of the building, site work and utilities.

(d) Show turnover of the facility. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspection.

(e) Show as-built submissions (See section 01 78 02.00 10).

(f) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

6.2. Evaluation Criteria:

6.2.1. Proposed Contract Duration: This duration will become the contractually binding schedule. The Government will evaluate the contract duration for both the base and option, as proposed by the Offeror herein and also on the Price Proposal Schedule, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration required by the RFP. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. The Government will rate a proposed contract duration matching the maximum allowed contract duration as “acceptable”, provided that the schedule provided is logical and realistic. A proposed contract duration shorter than the maximum allowed duration, will receive additional rating consideration, provided the schedule is realistic and deemed to be achievable. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places additional cost or schedule risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment.

6.2.2. Summary Schedule: The Government will evaluate the summary schedule for integrated design and construction. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., permitting (see section 01 10 00), long lead items, etc. The Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of events associated with coordinating design submittals, reviews and incorporating review comments, the Offeror's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed contract duration and the realism of the schedule. The Government will evaluate the design packaging plan for logic, reasonableness, how it facilitates meeting the proposed contract duration and how it facilitates the Government’s ability to timely perform its design reviews. The packaging plan should minimize risk to the Contractor and to the Government for tear-out and coordination for reviews. A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will receive additional consideration.

7. VOLUME 1, TAB C - FACTOR 5 –SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

In accordance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, it is the policy of the United States that small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service- disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in performing contracts let by any Federal agency, including contracts and subcontracts for subsystems, assemblies, components, and related services for major systems.

It is further the policy of the United States that its prime contractors establish procedures to ensure the timely payment of amounts due pursuant to the terms of their subcontracts with small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns.

The Contractor hereby agrees to carry out this policy in the awarding of subcontracts to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance. The Contractor further agrees to cooperate in any studies or surveys as may be conducted by the United States Small Business Administration or the awarding agency of the United States as may be necessary to determine the extent of the Contractor's compliance with this clause.

Size determination, as defined by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 236220 for this solicitation is $33.5M.

7.1. Submission Requirements:

(a) In accordance with FAR 52.219-8, All offerors are to provide:

(i) a narrative statement describing the offeror's compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns as stated above.

(ii) a narrative statement describing established procedures to ensure the timely payment of amounts due pursuant to the terms of their subcontracts with all small business concerns.

(iii) a narrative statement affirming the policy compliance of providing maximum practicable opportunity to all small business concerns in the performance of this solicitation.

(iv) Evidence of past performance of small business utilization. The small business offeror shall provide 3 (three) completed projects over the past three years. The offeror is to utilize Attachment 1 when complying with this requirement. (AM#4) If Offeror is proposing as a Joint Venture (JV) and Small Business Utilization cannot be provided as a JV, each partner can submit no more than three (3) projects each (/AM#4).

7.2. Evaluation Criteria

(a) The Government will review the documentation provided in response to Factor 5. Offerors must demonstrate all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “Acceptable” rating on this factor: This factor will be rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable.

(b) Provide all documentation as identified in (a) (i) through (iv) above for compliance with FAR 52.219-8.

7.3. Rating Definitions for Factor 5:

7.3.1. ACCEPTABLE: Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

7.3.2 UNACCEPTABLE. Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

8. VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION

8.1. GENERAL

Submit the other required information in a separate electronic file labeled: “Phase 2, Volume 2 – Price and Other Required Information.”

8.2. VOLUME 2, TAB A – FACTOR 6 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM

SCHEDULE).

8.2.1. Submission Requirements:

8.2.1.1. Submit the properly filled out and executed SF 1442, along with the CLIN Schedule, containing proposed line item and total pricing, as well as the proposed contract duration. See instructions in Section 00 21 00, “Instructions to Offerors”.

All elements of the Offeror’s technical proposal shall be included in the total price for the project.

8.2.1.2. Supplemental Price Breakdown. If deemed necessary to evaluate the price proposals, the Government will request a Phase 2 price breakdown of the Contract Line items as a separate electronic file labeled “Phase 2 Price Breakdown Information”, in Excel format. The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown.

This information will not be needed sooner than three working days after the proposal submission due date. This information may be required for the initial Phase 2 proposal and, if requested, for any revised proposals. This information is not an opportunity for an Offeror to revise its non-price or price proposal.

8.2.2. Evaluation Criteria:

8.2.2.1. Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. The price evaluators will also check for appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc. and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract.

8.2.2.2. If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above.

8.2.2.3. Award may not be made for an Offeror’s proposal for design and construction that exceeds the cost limitation described herein.

8.3. VOLUME 2, TAB B – BID GUARANTEE

8.3.1. Submission Requirements

Submit the Bid Bond in accordance with the Instructions in Section 00 21 00, Provision 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee. Bid bond shall be submitted electronically as part of Volume 2. (AM#4) Hard copy submission of the bid bond is required by due date for proposal submission and shall be sent to:

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, FORT WORTH

ATTN: CESWF-CT- Jennifer Fox

819 TAYLOR ST, ROOM 2A19

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300 (/AM#4)

8.3.2. Evaluation requirements:

This item is not rated. The Government will review the Bid Bond for legal sufficiency. The Bond must be legally sufficient.

Failure to submit a bid bond will make the Offeror’s proposal ineligible for award.

8.4. VOLUME 2, TAB C – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

8.4.1. Submission Requirements:

8.4.1.1. Submit this information for the Contracting Officer’s determination of Offeror responsibility, which includes, but is not limited to the following:

(a) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value thereof, and name of the organization under which the work is being performed.

(b) A certified statement listing; (1) each contract awarded within the preceding three month period exceeding $750,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract; and (2) each contract awarded within the preceding three year period not already physically completed and exceeding $5,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract.

(c) If the prospective contractor is a joint venture, each joint venture member will be required to submit the above defined certification.

(d) The Offeror is to utilize Attachment 2 when complying with this requirement.

8.4.2. Evaluation Requirements:

In addition to the other Phase 1 and Phase 2 proposal information, the Contracting Officer shall use this information in making an affirmative responsibility determination for award to the Successful Offeror, in accordance with FAR Part 9.

Failure to achieve an affirmative responsibility determination will make the Offeror ineligible for award.

8.5. VOLUME 2, TAB D – REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

8.5.1. Submission requirements

Confirm that the Offeror’s representations and certifications have been completed in the Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) in accordance with FAR 52.204-8. Submit the representations and certifications not covered by (ORCA) that are included in Section 00 45 00 of this solicitation, under this tab.

Evaluation Criteria

The representations and certifications submitted under this requirement as well as online will be reviewed to ensure the Offeror’s representations are consistent, accurate and in accordance with regulation. It will not be rated.

February 14, 2013

Section 01 35 13.03 44

Technical Supplement to the Design Guide for Fort Sam Houston

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Division 2

1. Section 31 23 00.00 20 (02111) Excavation and Fill

2. Section 02 41 00 (02050) Demolition

3. Sections 02 81 00 (02051, 02080, 02091)- General Hazardous Material Disposal procedures

4. Section 02222 Excavation,…