FY21 Med Log and Contracting QA - 2 Feb 2021.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 23 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9124P-21-R-0004
About this file
This document contains a draft request for proposal and related federal contract opportunity notice. The draft RFP seeks proposals for medical logistics and contracting quality assurance support services to analyze, review, and provide impact assessments on Department of Defense and Army medical operations and policies affecting missions at the U.S. Army Medical Command. The work includes logistics planning, inventory and asset management, program management, and policy analysis. The current incumbent is MB Solutions, LLC. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number W9124P-21-R-0004 for medical logistics support services to analyze, review, and assess medical operations and policies at the U.S. Army Medical Command and its subordinate elements. The support includes logistics, maintenance, program and policy analysis, and medical supply chain and inventory management. The agency is the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command at Redstone Arsenal.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W9124P-21-R-0004 Medical Logistics Solicitation - FINAL.pdf | ||
| Attach 0001 - PWS - Medical Logistics.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach 0002 - Medical Logistics Proposal Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W9124P-21-R-0004 Medical Logistics Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT RFP Q's
| POC | Question Number | Draft RFP Document | Draft RFP Document Paragraph Number | Draft RFP Document Page Number | Question or Comment | Question | Government Response |
| Tim Fitzpatrick | 1 | Request | All | Can you share who are the current incumbents | MB Solutions, LLC | ||
| Tim Fitzpatrick | 2 | Request | 11 | After review of the solicitation and considering this being an 8(a) set-aside, would the government consider either extending the recency period in the Past Performance evaluation section from 3 years to 5 years? | The Government will not extend from 3 to 5 years for the Period of Past Performance | ||
| Tim Fitzpatrick | 3 | Request | All | I am hoping to find out if there is an incumbent contractor currently performing these services, if similar services have been performed in the past, or if this is a new requirement. | This is not a new requirement and MB Solutions, LLC is the Incumbent. |
DRAFT PWS Q's Question Number Draft PWS Section PWS Paragraph Number PWS Page Number Question or Comment Question Government Response
Contracting Q's POC Question Number Draft RFP Document Draft RFP Document Paragraph Number Draft RFP Document Page Number Question or Comment Question Garrison Response Doc ediit required Contracting Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .