Attachment 1_ Static Aircraft Washing Amended PWS_02.27.26.pdf
PDF 228 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aircraft Washing and Anti-Intrusion Proofing
- Solicitation number
- W9124G-26-R-AXXX
About this file
This is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for static military aircraft washing and anti-intrusion proofing services at the U.S. Army Aviation Museum and gate guard locations at Fort Rucker (soon to be redesignated Fort Novosel), Alabama. The contract is a non-personal services, firm fixed-price agreement with a period of performance from April 1, 2026, through March 31, 2031. The Contractor must provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, materials, and supervision necessary to perform comprehensive washing and pest management services on six designated aircraft: two elevated UH-1 Iroquois helicopters (at Ozark Gate and Enterprise Gate), one elevated TH-67 Creek (at Cairns Army Airfield), and three aircraft at the Army Aviation Museum Airpark (L-23 Seminole, L-17 Navion, and Model 347 Winged Chinook). Services include pre-service preparation, exterior washing with approved compounds, required lubrication, drying, post-service cleanup, initial pest assessment, development and implementation of an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan, installation and maintenance of physical and non-chemical deterrents, ongoing monitoring, and environmentally compliant waste disposal.
The Contractor must develop and submit a Quality Control Program (QCP) within 30 calendar days of award, with no on-site work commencing until Government approval is received. The Contractor is responsible for all environmental compliance, including proper waste characterization, segregation, storage, and disposal in accordance with RCRA, OSHA, DOT, and Fort Rucker regulations. Work shall be performed Monday through Friday, 0800-1600 local time, excluding federal holidays, and the Contractor must coordinate access with multiple Government entities given the active military installation location and varying facility hours. Contractor personnel must possess demonstrated experience with military aircraft cleaning protocols and technical orders, and anti-intrusion proofing personnel must hold required state and federal pest management certifications. The Contractor shall designate a Contract Manager with full authority over daily operational matters, designate an alternate, and maintain adequate workforce to ensure uninterrupted performance. Contractor personnel must clearly identify themselves as contractors and may be required to wear Government-issued badges. A Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) will be designated to monitor technical aspects, perform inspections, and communicate on technical matters, though the COR has no authority to modify contract terms or costs. Annual reporting of all contractor and subcontractor manpower to the Army's Contractor Manpower Reporting system is required.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)
FOR STATIC MILITARY AIRCRAFT WASHING AND ANTI-INTRUSION PROOFING
SERVICES
Part 1: General Information
1.1 Description of Services/Introduction
This document outlines a non-personal services contract under which the Contractor shall provide all necessary personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other non-personal services required to perform static military aircraft washing and anti-intrusion proofing. The Government's sole responsibility is to provide the aircraft designated for service. The Contractor is expected to execute all tasks and deliver services in strict adherence to the performance standards detailed within this Performance Work Statement
(PWS).
The classification of this agreement as a non-personal services contract is a fundamental aspect of its structure. This designation signifies that the Government is procuring a specific outcome—clean and proofed aircraft—rather than directly controlling the means or methods by which the Contractor achieves these results. Consequently, the Contractor retains full autonomy over the management of its workforce, operational processes, and internal procedures, provided that the specified performance standards are consistently met. This arrangement effectively transfers the primary responsibility and associated risks for execution to the Contractor, necessitating their proposal of efficient and effective solutions. The Government's role, therefore, transitions from direct supervision of personnel to a focus on quality assurance, evaluating the delivered outcomes against established metrics.
1.2 Background
The U.S. Army Aviation Museum, situated within Fort Rucker (soon to be redesignated Fort Novosel) in Alabama, maintains an extensive and historically significant collection of Army aircraft. This collection serves a dual purpose: preserving the rich heritage of Army aviation and providing educational resources for military personnel and the general public. A substantial portion of these aircraft, including the L-23 Seminole, L-17 Navion, and Model 347, are displayed in the outdoor Airpark, exposing them to various environmental elements. Similarly, other historical aircraft, such as the UH-1 Iroquois at the Ozark Gate and Enterprise Gate, and the TH-67 Creek at Cairns Army Airfield, function as prominent gate guards, enduring constant exposure to weather and potential biological intrusion.
For these static displays, the nature of maintenance diverges significantly from that of operational aircraft. While active aircraft maintenance prioritizes airworthiness and mission readiness, often adhering to flight hour or calendar-based inspection intervals, the preservation of static displays focuses on entirely different objectives. The primary aim is the long-term preservation of these unique artifacts, ensuring their aesthetic quality and structural integrity are maintained for historical and educational purposes. This involves meticulous attention to detail, preventing degradation, corrosion, and pest infestation that could compromise their historical value and visual appeal. The work required is therefore centered on careful preservation techniques, rather than the rapid turnaround associated with operational readiness.
1.3 Objectives
The primary objectives of this contract are to:
• Maintain the aesthetic and structural integrity of designated static military aircraft by removing environmental contaminants and preventing degradation.
• Prevent corrosion, biological damage, and unsanitary conditions to aircraft surfaces and internal structures caused by environmental exposure and pest activity.
• Ensure a consistently clean and presentable appearance for public display, historical preservation, and military heritage.
• Implement effective, humane, and environmentally responsible anti-intrusion measures to deter and manage pests (e.g., birds, insects, rodents) that could damage aircraft or create unsightly conditions.
• Comply with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations for cleaning and pest control operations, including waste disposal.
The objectives of aircraft washing and anti-intrusion proofing are deeply interconnected and mutually supportive for the long-term preservation of these historical assets. For instance, the research indicates that improper cleaning agents or inadequate rinsing can accelerate corrosion, compromising an aircraft's structural integrity over time. This weakening can then create new entry points or exacerbate existing vulnerabilities, making the aircraft more susceptible to pest intrusion. Pests, such as birds, insects, and rodents, can cause direct physical damage by chewing on materials, nesting within structures, or depositing corrosive droppings. Their activities can also introduce moisture, further contributing to corrosion, and create unsanitary conditions that attract other pests or degrade the aircraft's appearance.
Conversely, robust anti-intrusion measures, such as sealing openings or installing physical barriers, not only deter pests but also reduce the ingress of moisture and environmental contaminants, thereby directly supporting the overall preservation effort. Therefore, these services must be approached as an integrated solution, where the quality of one directly influences the effectiveness and longevity of the other, ensuring the comprehensive protection and display quality of these irreplaceable historical artifacts.
1.4 Scope of Work
The scope of this contract encompasses all necessary services for the washing and anti-intrusion proofing of the following static military aircraft at their designated locations:
• Ozark Gate Guard, Fort Rucker, AL:
o Elevated UH-1 Iroquois (Huey)
• Enterprise Gate Guard, Fort Rucker, AL:
o Elevated UH-1 Iroquois (Huey)
• Cairns Army Airfield, Fort Rucker, AL:
o Elevated TH-67 Creek
• Army Aviation Museum, Fort Rucker, AL (Airpark Display):
o L-23 Seminole (U-8G) o L-17 Navion (L-17B) o Model 347 (Winged Chinook)
Services include, but are not limited to, pre-service preparation, exterior washing, required lubrication, drying, post-service cleanup, initial pest/bird assessment, development and implementation of an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan, installation and maintenance of physical and non-chemical deterrents, ongoing monitoring, and environmentally compliant waste disposal.
The diverse array of aircraft types and their varied locations necessitates a highly tailored approach to both washing and anti-intrusion measures. The aircraft range significantly in size and structural complexity, from the large, compound helicopter Model 347 (derived from a CH- 47A Chinook airframe) to smaller fixed-wing aircraft like the L-23 Seminole (U-8G) and L-17 Navion, as well as helicopters like the UH-1 and TH-67. The "elevated" status of the gate guard aircraft implies a need for specialized lifts or scaffolding for safe access to all surfaces. These differences imply a need for varied equipment, such as specialized lifts or scaffolding for larger airframes, and different types of brushes or applicators suitable for various surface materials.
Furthermore, the environmental conditions and public exposure differ significantly between the museum airpark displays, which are accessible to the public, and the gate guard aircraft, which are highly visible and exposed to the elements at active installation entry points. This variation dictates that the Contractor's anti-intrusion strategies must be adaptable, employing a range of methods from physical barriers for open structures to vapor deterrents for more enclosed or sensitive areas. The Contractor's proposal must demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of these distinctions, detailing how their proposed methods, personnel training, and equipment selection will be specifically adapted to each aircraft type and location, while also addressing site-specific environmental considerations.
1.5 Period of Performance
01 April 2026- 31 March 2031
1.6 General Information
1.6.1 Quality Control
The Contractor shall develop and implement a comprehensive Quality Control Program (QCP).
A finalized QCP shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) for review and approval no later than 30 calendar days following the contract award date. No on-site work may commence until the Government has provided written approval of the Contractor's QCP.
The requirement for a QCP that proactively identifies, prevents, and ensures non-recurrence of defective services is particularly vital for the preservation of historical assets. Unlike maintenance for operational aircraft where defects might be immediately apparent and addressed, damage to historical artifacts can be subtle, cumulative, and potentially irreversible if not managed with foresight. For example, improper cleaning agents or inadequate rinsing could lead to slow, undetected corrosion, or minor pest activity might gradually degrade materials over time. A reactive approach, which only addresses issues after they become visible, would be insufficient and could result in permanent harm to unique, irreplaceable items. Therefore, the Contractor's QCP must extend beyond mere inspection points. It should encompass thorough training for personnel on the nuances of handling historical aircraft, rigorous protocols for selecting and verifying material compatibility (e.g., approved cleaning compounds that will not damage historical finishes), strict adherence to applicable technical orders and preservation best practices, and a robust corrective action process that emphasizes root cause analysis to prevent future issues. This proactive stance ensures a genuine commitment to quality outcomes for the long-term integrity of these valuable historical assets.
1.6.2 Quality Assurance
The Government will conduct its evaluation of the Contractor's performance under this contract in accordance with a Government-developed Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). This QASP will precisely define the methodology for applying performance standards, the frequency of surveillance activities, and the minimum acceptable defect rates for all services provided.
1.6.3 Recognized Holidays
The Contractor is not obligated to perform services on the following Federal Holidays: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Jr.’s Birthday, President’s Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veteran’s Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. Should the Government require services on any of these holidays due to unforeseen circumstances or specific events, such performance will be coordinated in advance and compensated in accordance with the terms of the contract.
1.6.4 Hours of Operation
The Contractor shall perform services Monday through Friday, between 0800 and 1600 local time, excluding Federal Holidays. The Contractor is responsible for ensuring an adequate workforce is maintained to guarantee uninterrupted performance throughout these designated hours. Access to specific aircraft locations, such as the Army Aviation Museum Airpark or the gate guard sites, may be subject to additional restrictions based on installation and museum operating hours. The Contractor must proactively coordinate all access requirements with the relevant Government authorities well in advance of scheduled work.
The varying hours of operation for the Army Aviation Museum (which also has Saturday hours but is closed on Sundays and most Federal Holidays), contrasted with the Visitor Control Center (VCC) hours for gate access (e.g., Ozark VCC is open Monday through Friday, 0800-1600, closed weekends and federal holidays; Enterprise Gate has no VCC), introduce a significant layer of logistical complexity for the Contractor. This means that simply adhering to the general contract hours is insufficient; the Contractor must meticulously plan and coordinate personnel, vehicle, and equipment access, potentially requiring advance registration or passes that can take several days to process. Furthermore, working on public-facing displays, such as those at the museum airpark or the gate guards, necessitates careful scheduling to minimize disruption to public visitors and ongoing base operations. This complex operational environment underscores the need for a highly flexible and robust project management plan from the Contractor. Such a plan must explicitly address detailed scheduling, proactive communication channels, and seamless coordination with multiple Government entities, including the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), Museum staff, Fort Rucker Provost Marshal's Office, and gate guard personnel, to ensure efficient operations while minimizing any inconvenience or security risks to the installation and its visitors.
1.6.5 Place of Performance
All work required under this contract shall be performed at various Government facilities located on Fort Rucker, Alabama. These specific locations include the Army Aviation Museum Airpark, the Ozark Gate, the Enterprise Gate, and Cairns Army Airfield.
The fact that all aircraft are located on an active military installation, Fort Rucker (now Fort Novosel) 32, means that security and access are not merely administrative considerations but represent a primary operational constraint for the Contractor. Access to military installations is rigorously controlled, requiring all personnel aged 16 and older to present valid photo identification, such as a state-issued ID, driver's license, military dependent/retiree card, or passport. Vehicles must also have valid registration and proof of insurance. Contractors often require visitor access cards, which involve background checks (e.g., NCIC-III) and may necessitate online pre-registration 5-14 days prior to the anticipated visit. This stringent entry process means the Contractor must allocate significant time and resources for personnel vetting, obtaining necessary passes, and adhering to daily access protocols. Any delays at the gate or denied access for personnel or equipment can directly impede work progress, affecting labor scheduling, project timelines, and overall cost. The PWS explicitly places the burden of compliance with these security requirements, including any associated operational delays, entirely on the Contractor.
1.6.6 Type of Contract
Firm Fixed Price.
1.6.7 Security Requirements
Contractor personnel assigned to this contract shall meet and maintain all necessary security clearance levels as determined by the Government. These requirements will be formally documented in the attached DD254.
1.6.7.1 Physical Security
The Contractor bears full responsibility for safeguarding all Government equipment, information, and property that is provided for or accessed during the performance of this contract. All contractor-procured equipment, supplies, and materials brought onto Government property shall be secured at the close of each work period and whenever not in active use, to prevent theft, damage, or unauthorized access.
1.6.7.2 Key Control (If applicable)
No keys or locks are included in this PWS.
1.6.8 Special Qualifications
Contractor personnel performing aircraft washing and preservation tasks shall possess demonstrated experience with military aircraft cleaning protocols, including strict adherence to Technical Orders (T.O.s), and a nuanced understanding of handling historical artifacts.16 Personnel engaged in anti-intrusion proofing shall hold all required state and federal certifications in pest management, with a proven track record in implementing non-chemical and exclusion methods specifically suitable for sensitive environments such as museums.
The requirement for specialized expertise is paramount given the nature of the assets and their environment. These aircraft are historical artifacts, not active flight-line assets, and are located either in a museum or highly visible public areas. This means that standard military aircraft cleaning procedures and general pest control methods may require significant adaptation. For example, the use of approved cleaners is critical to avoid damage or discoloration and corrosion on aircraft paint a concern amplified for historical finishes that may be fragile or irreplaceable.
Furthermore, pest control within museum environments is described as a no-touch service with a limited toolbox due to the extreme sensitivity of artifacts, and there is a specific concern about chewing, residue deposition, defecation, and urination by pests. This implies that aggressive or broadly applied chemical treatments are likely inappropriate. Therefore, the Government seeks contractors who can demonstrate not just general aircraft maintenance skills, but a deep understanding of conservation principles, material compatibility, and integrated pest management tailored specifically for the unique challenges of museum and static display environments. The Contractor's proposed personnel qualifications, training plans, and methodology must explicitly reflect this specialized knowledge, showcasing their ability to execute tasks meticulously and safely around irreplaceable historical assets.
1.6.9 Post Award Conference/Periodic Progress Meetings
The Contractor agrees to attend a post-award conference following contract award, as well as periodic progress meetings with Government personnel throughout the period of performance.
These meetings will serve as forums to review performance, discuss any emerging issues, and ensure ongoing contract compliance. All attendance at these conferences and meetings shall be at no additional cost to the Government.
1.6.10 Contracting Officer Representative (COR)
A Contracting Officer Representative (COR) will be formally designated by separate letter. The COR is authorized to monitor the technical aspects of the contract, assist in contract administration, perform necessary inspections related to contract performance, communicate with the Contractor on technical matters, issue interpretations of technical requirements, monitor overall performance, and coordinate Government-furnished property and site entry. It is explicitly understood that the COR is not authorized to make any changes to the contract terms, conditions, or costs.
1.6.11 Key Personnel
The Contractor shall designate a Contract Manager who will bear overall responsibility for the performance of all work under this contract. The name of this individual, along with an alternate who will assume responsibilities in the Contract Manager's absence, shall be provided in writing to the Contracting Officer. The designated Contract Manager or their alternate shall possess full authority to act on behalf of the Contractor on all daily operational matters pertaining to this contract during specified hours.
1.6.12 Identification of Contractor Employees
Contractor personnel shall clearly identify themselves as contractors in all situations where their status might not be immediately obvious, thereby preventing any impression that they are Government officials. All documents and reports produced by the Contractor must be clearly marked to indicate their origin, or the Contractor's participation must be explicitly disclosed.
Contractor personnel may be required to wear Government-issued badges while operating on Fort Rucker.
1.6.13 Contractor Travel
No routine travel beyond the daily commute to the Fort Rucker installation and movement between the various work sites on post is anticipated for this contract. Any extraordinary travel deemed necessary for contract performance (e.g., for specialized training, or procurement of unique, off-site materials) must receive prior approval from both the Contracting Officer and the COR. Associated expenses must be consistent with the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR) and remain within contract fund limitations.
1.6.14 Environmental Compliance
The Contractor shall strictly comply with all applicable Federal, State of Alabama, and Fort Rucker environmental regulations, policies, and procedures. This includes, but is not limited to, adherence to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for hazardous waste management, regulations concerning wastewater discharge from cleaning operations, and all guidelines related to the usage and disposal of pest control chemicals.
Military installations, such as Fort Rucker (Fort Novosel), operate under a highly stringent regulatory framework for environmental compliance, often surpassing those found in civilian contexts. This is due to the unique nature of military operations and the potential for significant environmental impact. Aircraft cleaning generates wastewater and may involve various chemical compounds, while pest control utilizes specific agents. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) serves as the primary federal driver for hazardous waste management, with additional mandates from OSHA and DOT governing worker protection and transportation.
Fort Rucker has explicit guidelines for hazardous material disposal, including specific facilities like the Hazardous Materials Control Center (HMCC) and recycling centers, and outlines what items are accepted or require special handling. The research highlights that improper disposal of hazardous items on post can result in substantial fines, potentially reaching up to $70,117 per violation per day, with the responsible organization liable for payment. This underscores the critical importance of meticulous environmental planning and execution. The Contractor must not only be fully aware of these regulations but also develop a detailed, proactive plan for compliance. This plan should encompass comprehensive waste characterization, proper segregation, secure storage, compliant transportation, and appropriate disposal methods for all waste streams generated. This commitment to environmental stewardship should be a core component of their proposed Quality Control Program and may necessitate a dedicated Environmental Management Plan as a formal deliverable. The significant financial penalties for non-compliance mean that environmental adherence is not just a regulatory obligation but a substantial financial risk that the Contractor must mitigate effectively.
Part 2: Definitions & Acronyms
2.1. Definitions
2.1.1. Aircraft Washing: The systematic process of cleaning the exterior and accessible interior surfaces of static aircraft. This includes pre-rinse, application of approved cleaning solutions, manual or low-pressure scrubbing, thorough rinsing, and meticulous drying. All steps must be performed in accordance with applicable technical orders and preservation best practices to maintain the aircraft's aesthetic and structural integrity.
2.1.2. Anti-Intrusion Proofing: A comprehensive set of measures implemented to detect, deter, exclude, or humanely remove pests (e.g., birds, insects, rodents) from static aircraft and their immediate vicinity. The primary goal is to prevent physical damage, nesting, accumulation of droppings, and other unsanitary conditions that compromise the preservation and display quality of the aircraft. This includes the strategic deployment of physical barriers, visual/auditory deterrents, and environmental modifications.
2.1.3. Approved Cleaning Compounds/Solutions: Cleaning agents specifically authorized by relevant military technical orders, manufacturer guidelines, or the COR for use on military aircraft, ensuring compatibility with aircraft materials, paints, and finishes to prevent damage or corrosion.
2.1.4. Contracting Officer (KO): The individual with the authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings.
2.1.5. Contracting Officer's Representative (COR): An individual designated in writing by the Contracting Officer to perform specific technical or administrative functions related to the contract. The COR acts as a liaison between the Government and the Contractor on technical matters but has no authority to alter contract terms or costs.
2.1.6. Defective Service: Any service output that fails to meet the performance standards or requirements specified in this PWS.
2.1.7. Deliverable: Any tangible item or document, including non-manufactured items such as reports, plans, or data, that is required to be submitted by the Contractor under the terms of this contract.
2.1.8. Fort Rucker: An active U.S. Army installation located in Dale County, Alabama, serving as the primary flight training base for Army aviators. It houses the U.S. Army Aviation Museum and various gate guard displays.
2.1.9. Government-Furnished Property (GFP): Property in the possession of, or directly acquired by, the Government and subsequently delivered or otherwise made available to the Contractor for use in contract performance.1 For this contract, GFP is limited solely to the aircraft being serviced.
2.1.10. Integrated Pest Management (IPM): A sustainable approach to managing pests by combining biological, cultural, physical, and chemical tools in a way that minimizes economic, health, and environmental risks. In the context of this PWS, it emphasizes non-chemical and exclusion methods appropriate for sensitive museum environments.
2.1.11. Key Personnel: Contractor personnel identified by the Government as essential to the successful performance of the contract, whose qualifications were evaluated during source selection.
2.1.12. Performance Work Statement (PWS): A statement of work for performance-based acquisitions that describes the required results in clear, specific, and measurable terms.
2.1.13. Physical Security: Measures taken to protect Government property, equipment, and information from theft, damage, or unauthorized access.
2.1.14. Quality Assurance (QA): The Government's systematic procedures for evaluating whether the Contractor's performance meets acceptable quality standards.
2.1.15. Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP): A Government-developed document that specifies how Contractor performance will be monitored and evaluated against the performance standards outlined in the PWS.
2.1.16. Quality Control (QC): The Contractor's internal measures and procedures implemented to ensure that the quality of the end product or service consistently meets contract requirements.
2.1.17. Static Aircraft: Non-operational aircraft displayed for public viewing, historical preservation, or as gate guards, rather than for flight operations. These aircraft require specialized maintenance focused on preservation and aesthetic presentation.
2.1.18. Technical Manual/Order (TM/T.O.): A U.S. Air Force/Army publication that provides technical information and instructions for the operation, maintenance, and modification of military equipment and systems.
2.1.19. Work Day: The number of hours per day the Contractor provides services, typically 0800-1600, Monday through Friday.
2.1.20. Work Week: The standard period of performance, typically Monday through Friday, unless otherwise specified or coordinated.
2.2. Acronyms
• ACOR: Alternate Contracting Officer Representative
• AFARS: Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
• AR: Army Regulation
• CCE: Contracting Center of Excellence
• CFR: Code of Federal Regulations
• CONUS: Continental United States
• COR: Contracting Officer's Representative
• COTR: Contracting Officer's Technical Representative
• COTS: Commercial Off-The-Shelf
• DA: Department of the Army
• DD254: Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification
• DFARS: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
• DMDC: Defense Manpower Data Center
• DoD: Department of Defense
• DOT: Department of Transportation
• EPA: Environmental Protection Agency
• FAR: Federal Acquisition Regulation
• HAZMAT: Hazardous Materials
• HAZWOPER: Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
• HIPAA: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
• HMCC: Hazardous Materials Control Center
• IAW: In Accordance With
• IGCE: Independent Government Cost Estimate
• IPM: Integrated Pest Management
• JTR: Joint Travel Regulation
• KO: Contracting Officer
• MA: Methyl Anthranilate
• MASS: Modular Aerial Spray System
• NCIC-III: National Crime Information Center Interstate Identification Index
• NCR: National Capital Region
• OCI: Organizational Conflict of Interest
• OCONUS: Outside Continental United States
• ODC: Other Direct Costs
• OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration
• PIPO: Phase In / Phase Out
• POC: Point of Contact
• PRS: Performance Requirements Summary
• PWS: Performance Work Statement
• QA: Quality Assurance
• QAP: Quality Assurance Program
• QASP: Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
• QC: Quality Control
• QCP: Quality Control Program
• RCRA: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
• SN: Serial Number
• SOP: Standard Operating Procedure
• SOW: Statement of Work
• T.O.: Technical Order
• TE: Technical Exhibit
• TM: Technical Manuak
• VCC: Visitor Control Center
• VOC: Volatile Organic Compound
• WS: Wildlife Services
Part 3: Government Furnished Property, Equipment, and Services The Government will provide limited items to the Contractor for the performance of the required services. These items are provided at no cost to the Contractor.
3.1. Services
No specific Government-furnished services are provided under this contract.
3.2 Facilities
No dedicated Government-furnished facilities (e.g., office space, contractor-exclusive work areas) will be provided. The Contractor shall perform work at the aircraft locations as specified in Section 1.4.
3.3 Utilities
No Government-furnished utilities will be provided for the Contractor's exclusive use. The Contractor may utilize existing water sources at the aircraft locations for washing purposes, provided such use is coordinated with the COR and does not interfere with Government operations. The Contractor shall instruct its employees in conservation practices and operate in a manner that precludes waste of Government resources.
3.4 Equipment
No Government-furnished equipment, tools, or machinery will be provided for the performance of this contract. The Contractor shall furnish all necessary equipment as outlined in Section 4.4.
3.5 Materials
The Government will provide only the static aircraft identified in Section 1.4 for servicing. No other Government-furnished materials, such as cleaning compounds, pest control agents, or masking materials, will be provided. The Contractor shall furnish all necessary materials as outlined in Section 4.3.
Part 4: Contractor Furnished Items and Services
The Contractor shall furnish all items and services necessary for the complete and satisfactory performance of this contract, except for the Government-furnished aircraft as specified in Section 3.0.
4.1 General
The Contractor shall provide all personnel, labor, management, supervision, transportation, equipment, tools, supplies, materials, and any other non-personal services required to accomplish the washing and anti-intrusion proofing of the designated static military aircraft in accordance with this PWS.
4.2 Secret Facility Clearance
A Secret Facility Clearance is not required for this contract. However, contractor personnel must meet Fort Rucker's installation access requirements as detailed in Section 1.6.5 and 1.6.7.
4.3. Materials
The Contractor shall furnish all materials required for the complete performance of aircraft washing and anti-intrusion proofing services. This includes, but is not limited to:
• Aircraft Washing Materials: Approved cleaning compounds and solutions, dilution and mixing equipment, soft cloths, sponges, foam applicators, microfiber towels, chamois, specialized cleaners for windows, spot cleaning solvents (e.g., for fuel, carbon, hydraulic fluid, tar), rubber preservatives for landing gear, and lubrication products (as required by TMs/T.O.. All products must be compatible with historical aircraft finishes and materials.
• Anti-Intrusion Proofing Materials: Physical barriers (e.g., bird netting, bird spikes, inflatable door seals, wire mesh, anti-perching devices), non-toxic chemical deterrents (e.g., Methyl Anthranilate vapor, taste aversion repellents, bird repellent blocks), visual deterrents (e.g., bird boppers, deflectors, lasers, decoys), auditory deterrents (e.g., sonic devices, distress calls), and any other materials necessary for effective, humane, and environmentally compliant pest exclusion.
• Protective Materials: Masking materials, covers, and required locks for aircraft preparation.
• Waste Management Materials: Tarps for containing debris, drums, containers, and appropriate labeling for the collection, segregation, and temporary storage of all waste materials, including hazardous waste, in accordance with Section 1.6.14.
4.4. Equipment
The Contractor shall furnish all equipment necessary for the complete performance of aircraft washing and anti-intrusion proofing services. This includes, but is not limited to:
• Aircraft Washing Equipment: Low-pressure washing systems, vacuums, mops, ladders, lifts, specialized scaffolding or platforms for safe access to all aircraft surfaces (including large aircraft like the Model 347 and elevated gate guard aircraft), and any other tools required for thorough cleaning and lubrication.
• Anti-Intrusion Proofing Equipment: Equipment for installing physical barriers (e.g., netting installation tools), vaporizing or spraying equipment for chemical deterrents and any other specialized tools or devices required for the deployment and maintenance of anti-intrusion measures.
• Safety Equipment: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for all contractor personnel, safety cones, barricades, and signage to secure work areas and ensure the safety of personnel and public visitors.
• Transportation: Vehicles for transporting personnel, equipment, and materials to and from all work sites on Fort Rucker, including the Army Aviation Museum, Ozark Gate, Enterprise Gate, and Cairns Army Airfield.
Part 5: Specific Tasks
5.1. Basic Services
The Contractor shall provide comprehensive washing and anti-intrusion proofing services for the static military aircraft specified in Section 1.4. All services shall be performed in a manner that prioritizes the long-term preservation of these historical assets, maintains their aesthetic quality, and ensures environmental compliance.
5.1.1 Aircraft Washing Services
The Contractor shall perform thorough exterior washing and necessary lubrication of all designated aircraft. This service is crucial for removing environmental contaminants, preventing corrosion, and maintaining the aircraft's display quality.
5.1.1.1 Preparation for Wash
Prior to commencing any washing activities, the Contractor shall fully prepare the aircraft. This includes:
• Conducting a thorough pre-inspection walk-around to identify areas with heavy dirt, grease, or existing damage that may require special attention. Any pre-existing damage shall be documented and reported to the COR prior to commencing work.
• Consulting and adhering to applicable TMs/T.O.s and manufacturer guidelines for aircraft preparation.
• Properly masking off identified sensitive areas, including but not limited to, sensors, antennas, openings, pitot probes, engine/APU plugs, and any unpainted metal surfaces that require polishing rather than painting
• Installing covers and required locks as specified by TMs/T.O.s or best practices for static aircraft preservation.
• Ensuring all essential cleaning supplies and equipment are on hand and in good working condition.
• For aircraft located in public areas (e.g., museum airpark), establishing temporary barriers and signage to clearly delineate the work area and ensure public safety.
5.1.1.2 Washing Procedure
The Contractor shall wash the aircraft using only approved cleaning compounds/solutions, diluted and mixed as required, in accordance with applicable TMs/T.O.s and manufacturer recommendations. The washing process shall include:
• A pre-cleaning rinse to remove loose dirt, dust, and debris from the aircraft's surface using water only.
• Application of the specialized aircraft wash solution using soft cloths, sponges, or foam applicators. Low-pressure washing systems shall be utilized, with high-pressure washing strictly avoided near rivets, seams, or other vulnerable areas.
• Concentrating additional attention on corrosion-prone areas to facilitate corrosion-related inspections.
• Spot cleaning for stubborn stains such as fuel spills, carbon deposits, hydraulic fluid leaks, or tar, using appropriate solvent-based or specialty cleaners, followed by gentle scrubbing and rinsing. Special attention shall be given to the belly of the aircraft, which is prone to accumulating oil and exhaust stains.
• Cleaning of landing gear, including the application of a rubber preservative to extend tire life and reapplication of grease as needed if washed out by degreasers.
• Cleaning of windows using specialized cleaners designed for aviation windows, exercising extreme care to prevent damage.
• Reporting to the COR when excessive dirt, grease, or grime cannot be removed, or when water build-up is discovered in interior aircraft structures.
5.1.1.3 Lubrication
The Contractor shall perform lubrication as required by applicable T.O.s, except where explicitly listed otherwise by the Government. This includes reapplication of grease to landing gear components if removed during washing.
5.1.1.4 Drying and Post-Wash Activities
Upon completion of washing and rinsing (including clear water rinse requirements), the Contractor shall:
• Mop up, vacuum, or towel dry excess water from the aircraft and surrounding area.
• Dry the aircraft thoroughly with soft microfiber towels or chamois to prevent water spots and streaks, particularly on windows and polished surfaces.
• Remove all masking materials from the aircraft.
• Polish any original unpainted metal surfaces to a mirror finish, if applicable and specified by the COR.7
• Ensure all work areas are left clean and free of debris.
5.1.2 Anti-Intrusion Proofing Services
The Contractor shall implement comprehensive anti-intrusion proofing measures to protect the static aircraft from pest and wildlife damage. This service is crucial for preventing physical degradation, unsanitary conditions, and maintaining the aircraft's long-term preservation and display quality.
5.1.2.1 Initial Assessment and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Plan Development Upon contract award, and prior to initial anti-intrusion proofing, the Contractor shall conduct a thorough assessment of each designated aircraft and its immediate environment to identify existing pest activity (e.g., nests, droppings, signs of chewing) and potential entry points.24 Based on this assessment, the Contractor shall develop and submit an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Plan for COR approval within 30 calendar days of contract award. The IPM Plan shall:
• Identify the types of pests (e.g., birds, rodents, insects) that pose a threat to each specific aircraft.
• Detail proposed humane and environmentally responsible methods for pest detection, deterrence, exclusion, and removal, prioritizing non-chemical and physical solutions suitable for sensitive museum and display environments.
• Outline procedures for the safe and compliant removal and disposal of any existing nests, wildlife remnants, or pest carcasses.
• Specify the types and locations of physical barriers (e.g., netting, spikes, seals), visual deterrents (e.g., lasers, decoys), auditory deterrents (e.g., sonic devices, distress calls), or non-toxic chemical deterrents (e.g., Methyl Anthranilate vapor) to be deployed.
• Address methods for mitigating water intrusion, which can be exacerbated by pest activity, including the inspection and sealing of gaps or openings.
• Detail a schedule for ongoing monitoring and maintenance of anti-intrusion measures, including periodic inspections for new pest activity or damage to deterrents.
5.1.2.2 Implementation of Anti-Intrusion Measures
Upon approval of the IPM Plan, the Contractor shall implement the proposed anti-intrusion measures. This includes:
• Removal of Existing Infestations: Safely and humanely remove any existing bird nests, insect colonies, rodent nests, or other wildlife remnants from the aircraft and its immediate vicinity, ensuring proper disposal of all biological waste.
• Physical Exclusion: Install and maintain physical barriers to prevent pest access. This may include, but is not limited to, bird netting in hangars or around aircraft components 10, bird spikes on perching surfaces 10, sealing of openings and pipe penetrations 9, and ensuring proper function of existing seals (e.g., inflatable door seals if applicable) to prevent both pest and water intrusion.
• Deterrent Deployment: Strategically deploy and maintain visual, auditory, or non-toxic chemical deterrents as specified in the IPM Plan. This may include sonic devices, lasers, visual scare devices, or vapor-based repellents (e.g., Methyl Anthranilate) that condition birds to avoid the area.10 The Contractor shall vary the application of static deterrents to prevent habituation by wildlife.
• Habitat Modification: Advise the COR on any necessary habitat modifications in the immediate vicinity of the aircraft (e.g., vegetation control, removal of food/water sources, appropriate lighting) to make the area less attractive to pests.
5.1.2.3 Ongoing Monitoring and Maintenance
The Contractor shall conduct regular monitoring of all aircraft and anti-intrusion measures to assess effectiveness and identify any new pest activity or damage. This includes:
• Periodic inspections of aircraft surfaces and interiors for signs of pest activity (e.g., droppings, nesting material, chewing, carcasses).
• Inspection and maintenance of all installed physical barriers and deterrents to ensure their continued effectiveness and integrity.
• Adjusting or augmenting anti-intrusion methods as needed based on monitoring results and pest behavior, in coordination with the COR.
• Promptly reporting any significant pest infestations, damage to aircraft, or issues with deterrent systems to the COR.
5.2. Environmental Compliance and Waste Management
The Contractor shall be solely responsible for ensuring full compliance with all applicable Federal, State of Alabama, and Fort Rucker environmental regulations throughout the performance of this contract. This includes, but is not limited to, the proper management, collection, segregation, storage, transportation, and disposal of all waste materials generated during washing and anti-intrusion proofing activities.
• Waste Characterization: The Contractor shall properly characterize all waste streams generated (e.g., wastewater, cleaning chemical residues, pest remnants, contaminated absorbent materials) to determine if they are hazardous or non-hazardous waste.
• Collection and Segregation: All paint chips, cleaning residues, pest remnants, and other debris shall be collected and segregated at the point of generation. For example, the area under aircraft shall be tarped during cleaning and any debris swept up and placed into drums at the end of each day or prior to a rain event.
• Storage: Waste materials shall be stored in appropriate, labeled containers in a secure manner prior to disposal or transport, preventing spills or unauthorized access.
• Disposal: The Contractor shall be responsible for the proper disposal of all waste. This includes utilizing Fort Rucker's Hazardous Materials Control Center (HMCC) for hazardous wastes and regulated universal wastes (e.g., certain batteries, fluorescent bulbs, used oil, if applicable).18 Non-hazardous wastes shall be disposed of through appropriate recycling or refuse channels on post.18 The Contractor shall not leave tires or hazardous items for bulk trash pickup.
• Reporting: The Contractor shall provide all Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for chemicals used to the relevant environmental office (e.g., CE Environmental Office for paints, if applicable).7 Any spills or environmental incidents shall be immediately reported to the COR and relevant Fort Rucker environmental authorities.
5.3. Contractor Management Reporting (CMR) (Only applies to Army Customers) For Army customers, the Contractor shall report ALL contractor manpower (including subcontractor manpower) to a secure Army data collection site: https://Contractormanpower.army.pentagon.mil. The required information includes:
Contracting Office, Contract number, reporting period dates, Contractor's name and contact information, estimated direct labor hours and dollars, total payments, predominant Federal Service Code (FSC), estimated data collection cost, Organizational title associated with the Unit Identification Code (UIC), locations of work (zip code/city, country), presence of deployment/contingency contract language, and number of deployed employees. The reporting period is the period of performance not to exceed 12 months ending September 30, with reports due by October 31 annually. Contractors can use direct XML data transfer or fill fields on the website.1
Part 6: Applicable Publications The Contractor shall abide by all applicable regulations, publications, manuals, and local policies and procedures relevant to the performance of this contract. This includes, but is not limited to:
• Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS).
• Army Regulations (AR), including AR 11-35 (Occupational and Environmental Health Risk Management), AR 25-2 (Information Management), and AR 530-1 (Operations Security).
• Army Technical Manuals (TMs) Air Force Technical Orders (T.O.s) relevant to aircraft washing, maintenance, and material usage (e.g., TM 1-1500-344-23, T.O. 1-1- 691).
• Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and associated 40 CFR Parts 260-282.
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) mandates, including Hazard Communication Standards and Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Worker Protection Standard.
• Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations for the transportation of hazardous waste.
• Fort Rucker Environmental Regulations and Policies, including those pertaining to hazardous waste management, recycling, and wastewater discharge.
https://contractormanpower.army.pentagon.mil/
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .