Attachment_1 Performance Work Statement.pdf

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

FOR STATIC MILITARY AIRCRAFT WASHING AND ANTI-INTRUSION PROOFING

SERVICES

Part 1: General Information

1.1 Description of Services/Introduction

This document outlines a non-personal services contract under which the Contractor shall provide all necessary personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other non-personal services required to perform static military aircraft washing and anti-intrusion proofing. The Government's sole responsibility is to provide the aircraft designated for service. The Contractor is expected to execute all tasks and deliver services in strict adherence to the performance standards detailed within this Performance Work Statement

(PWS).

The classification of this agreement as a non-personal services contract is a fundamental aspect of its structure. This designation signifies that the Government is procuring a specific outcome-clean and proofed aircraft-rather than directly controlling the means or methods by which the Contractor achieves these results. Consequently, the Contractor retains full autonomy over the management of its workforce, operational processes, and internal procedures, provided that the specified performance standards are consistently met. This arrangement effectively transfers the primary responsibility and associated risks for execution to the Contractor, necessitating their proposal of efficient and effective solutions. The Government's role, therefore, transitions from direct supervision of personnel to a focus on quality assurance, evaluating the delivered outcomes against established metrics.

1.2 Background

The U.S. Army Aviation Museum, situated within Fort Rucker in Alabama, maintains an extensive and historically significant collection of Army aircraft. This collection serves a dual purpose: preserving the rich heritage of Army aviation and providing educational resources for military personnel and the general public. A substantial portion of these aircraft, including the L-23 Seminole, L-17 Navion, and Model 347, are displayed in the outdoor Airpark, exposing them to various environmental elements. Similarly, other historical aircraft, such as the UH-1 Iroquois at the Ozark Gate and Enterprise Gate, and the TH-67 Creek at Cairns Army Airfield, function as prominent gate guards, enduring constant exposure to weather and potential biological intrusion.

For these static displays, the nature of maintenance diverges significantly from that of operational aircraft. While active aircraft maintenance prioritizes airworthiness and mission readiness, often adhering to flight hour or calendar-based inspection intervals, the preservation of static displays focuses on entirely different objectives. The primary aim is the long-term preservation of these unique artifacts, ensuring their aesthetic quality and structural integrity are maintained for historical and educational purposes. This involves meticulous attention to detail, preventing degradation, corrosion, and pest infestation that could compromise their historical value and visual appeal. The work required is therefore centered on careful preservation techniques, rather than the rapid turnaround associated with operational readiness.

1.3 Objectives

The primary objectives of this contract are to:

• Maintain the aesthetic and structural integrity of designated static military aircraft by removing environmental contaminants and preventing degradation.

• Prevent corrosion, biological damage, and unsanitary conditions to aircraft surfaces and internal structures caused by environmental exposure and pest activity.

Furthermore, the environmental conditions and public exposure differ significantly between the museum airpark displays, which are accessible to the public, and the gate guard aircraft, which are highly visible and exposed to the elements at active installation entry points. This variation dictates that the Contractor's anti-intrusion strategies must be adaptable, employing a range of methods from physical barriers for open structures to vapor deterrents for more enclosed or sensitive areas. The Contractor's proposal must demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of these distinctions, detailing how their proposed methods, personnel training, and equipment selection will be specifically adapted to each aircraft type and location, while also addressing site-specific environmental considerations.

1.5 Period of Performance

Five Years, Base Plus four

1.6 General Information

1.6.1 Quality Control

The Contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive Quality Control Program (QCP) to ensure that all services rendered under this PWS consistently meet or exceed specified requirements. This QCP must include detailed procedures for identifying service deficiencies, preventing their occurrence, and implementing corrective actions to ensure non-recurrence. A draft QCP shall be submitted as part of the Contractor's proposal, with a finalized version due within 30 calendar days following contract award. Any subsequent modifications or changes to the approved QCP must receive written acceptance from the Contracting Officer prior to implementation.

The requirement for a QCP that proactively identifies, prevents, and ensures non-recurrence of defective services is particularly vital for the preservation of historical assets. Unlike maintenance for operational aircraft where defects might be immediately apparent and addressed, damage to historical artifacts can be subtle, cumulative, and potentially irreversible if not managed with foresight. For example, improper cleaning agents or inadequate rinsing could lead to slow, undetected corrosion, or minor pest activity might gradually degrade materials over time. A reactive approach, which only addresses issues after they become visible, would be insufficient and could result in permanent harm to unique, irreplaceable items. Therefore, the Contractor's QCP must extend beyond mere inspection points. It should encompass thorough training for personnel on the nuances of handling historical aircraft, rigorous protocols for selecting and verifying material compatibility (e.g., approved cleaning compounds that will not damage historical finishes) 6, strict adherence to applicable technical orders and preservation best practices, and a robust corrective action process that emphasizes root cause analysis to prevent future issues. This proactive stance ensures a genuine commitment to quality outcomes for the long-term integrity of these valuable historical assets.

1.6.2 Quality Assurance

The Government will conduct its evaluation of the Contractor's performance under this contract in accordance with a Government-developed Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). This QASP will precisely define the methodology for applying performance standards, the frequency of surveillance activities, and the minimum acceptable defect rates for all services provided.

1.6.3 Recognized Holidays

The Contractor is not obligated to perform services on the following Federal Holidays: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, President's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. Should the Government require services on any of these holidays due to unforeseen circumstances or