RFP Question and Answer_Advanced Helicopter_Final_010424.pdf
PDF 104 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9124G24R0001
About this file
This document is the Questions and Government Answers for the Request for Proposal (RFP) for Advanced Helicopter Flight Training Services at Fort Novosel, Alabama. The RFP is being issued by the Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) - Fort Eustis, VA on behalf of the United States Army Aviation Center of Excellence (USAACE). The key details are:
The RFP instructs offerors to not include pricing information in Volumes I, II, III or IV of the proposal, but allows for the inclusion of pricing data in Volume IV under the Small Business Participation factor, where offerors must identify the proposed dollar value and percentage of anticipated awards to small business subcontractors as a percentage of the total contract value. The Government has removed the restriction on including pricing data in Volume IV, making it acceptable for offerors to provide the required pricing information in that volume. No other details about the required services, response dates, award information, set-asides, or other salient contract terms are provided in this document.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Mission and Installation Contracting Command – Fort Eustis Request for Proposal Questions and Government Answers
Advanced Helicopter Flight Training Services at Fort Novosel, Alabama
1. Question: 1.4.5. Volume V: Factor IV – Price, 1.4.5.1. reads: “ The offeror shall not include pricing information in Volumes I, II, III or IV of its Proposal.” 1.4.4. Volume IV: Factor 3 – Small Business Participation, 1.4.4.3.2. reads: “Of the proposed TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE, not total subcontract value, identify the proposed dollar value and percentage of anticipated awards to small business. All percentages shall use TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE as a baseline. Include only first tier U.S. subcontractors.” Is it acceptable to add the pricing data into Volume IV as directed in section 1.4.4.3.2?
Answer: Volume IV has been removed from RFP paragraph 1.4.5.1 making it acceptable to add the pricing data required by RFP paragraph 1.4.4.3.2.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .