Attachment 1 - Technical Exhibits Amendments.pdf
PDF 303 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation Army Continuing Education Services Amendment 3 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91247-21-R-0005
About this file
This document provides technical exhibits and attachments for an amendment to a solicitation for Army Continuing Education Services. The solicitation seeks to award a fixed price contract to provide education support services at fourteen Army locations across the United States, Puerto Rico and Hawaii. Services include academic and career guidance, job skills enhancement, and transition assistance for Soldiers. The six-month base period of performance begins June 14, 2021 with three one-year option periods. The contractor must be a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business. Technical exhibits describe performance requirements, deliverables, historical workload and tests administered at each location. Wage determinations by state and county are also provided.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 3_Industry Questions and Answers 19 APR 21.pdf | ||
| Amendment 3 SF30.pdf | ||
| W91247-21-R-0005 Amendment 3.pdf | ||
| Solicitation W91247-21-R-0005 Amendments.pdf | ||
| ACES Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Solicitation W91247-21-R-0005 (Final) 03152021.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - DD Form 254.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Technical Exhibits.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 1
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
The Government reserves the right to review all services called for in the contract to determine whether or not the performance objectives and goals were met. The performance of the service will be evaluated to determine whether or not it meets the performance threshold. These thresholds are critical to mission success. Government surveillance of Contractor performance is not limited to the Performance Objectives as outlined in this PRS.
The Government reserves the right to conduct compliance surveillance of any contractual requirement of this acquisition. The absence of any contract requirement from the PRS shall not detract from its enforceability nor limit the rights or remedies of the Government under any other provision of the contract, including the clauses entitled “Inspection of Services” and “Default.”.
Performance Objectives Performance Standards Performance Thresholds
Incentives or Disincentives
PRS # 1. Education Services
Contractor shall perform education services and support in accordance with the PWS Specific Tasks Para
(s) 5.1.2 to 5.1.41
The Contractor shall complete all education service and support tasks and required deliverable(s) with 95% accuracy.
Deliverables shall reflect an up-to-date and complete description of the requirements and procedures in accordance with applicable laws, Army regulations, DoD, and Directives. Contractor data, forms, reports, and other documents shall be logically organized, and grammatically correct. The Contractor shall meet the specified due dates at least 98% of the time
While the Government anticipates that the deliverables may go through one or more rounds of Government review and comments, all Contractor deliverables shall substantially meet these performance standards.
95% accuracy required Contract Discrepancy Report
1298220403.mil Highlight
PRS # 2. Test Examination Services
Contractor shall perform Test Examiner services in accordance with the PWS Specific Tasks Para(s) 5.2.1 thru 5.2.18
The Contractor shall complete Test examiner services IAW Army Personnel Testing TCO Handbook, AR
611-5, AR 611-6, AR 601-210, AR 601-222,
USMEPCOM 611-1, USMEPCOM 601-4, and the Defense Activity for Non-Traditional Education Support (DANTES) Examination Program Handbook (DEPH), Volumes I and II with 100% accuracy.
Contractor shall submit required deliverables to the Government no later than the due date(s) the Government specified in the PWS or when assigning the task. The Contractor shall meet the specified due dates at least 98% of the time.
Deliverables shall reflect an up-to-date and complete description of the requirements and procedures in accordance with applicable laws, Army regulations, DoD, and Directives. Contractor data, forms, reports, and other documents shall be logically organized, and grammatically correct.
While the Government anticipates that the deliverables may go through one or more rounds of Government review and comments, all Contractor deliverables shall substantially meet these performance standards.
100% accuracy required Contract Discrepancy Reports
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 2
DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE
DELIVERABLE FREQUENCY # OF COPIES MEDIUM/FORMAT SUBMIT
Quality Control Plan (QCP)
PWS 1.6.1.
Within thirty (30) days of task order award and five
(5) business days after any subsequent changes.
One (1) Electronic/
Memo MS Word
KO/COR
Monthly Report
PWS 5.2.15.
Within ten (lO) business days following the end of the month.
One (1) Electronic I Excel Spreadsheet
COR
Quarterly Report
PWS 5.2.16.
5th day of each quarter (December, March, June, and September).
One (1) Electronic I Excel Spreadsheet
COR
Annual Report
PWS 5.2.18.
Copy to COR within twenty
(20) calendar days following the end of each performance period.
One (1) Electronic/ Memo MS Word
KO/ COR
Test Certification
PWS 1.15.2.5.3
Two (2) weeks after commencement of base period of performance.
One (1) Electronic/ Memo MS Word
COR
Contractor Manpower Reporting
PWS 5.2.13
Annually, by 31 October. One (1) Computer/
Online
KO/COR
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 3
HISTORICAL WORKLOAD DATA BY
LOCATION, ZONES 1-3
a. Historical Annual Workload Data by Location 1-3, Zones 1-3 Army Education Support Locations Education Service
Advisor Personnel Annual Hours
Test Examiner Personnel Annual Hours
Zone 1- East
1st MSC, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico 1,920 1,920
USACAPOC, Fort Bragg, North Carolina 5,760 0
99th RSC West, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania 7,680 1,920
99lh RSC East, Fort Devens, Massachusetts 3,840 1,920
99th RSC North, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 3,840 0
81st RSC Birmingham, Alabama 7,680 0
Zone 2 -Middle States
88th RSC South. Wichita, Kansas 3,840 0
88th RSC East, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 7,680 1,920
88th RSC North, Fort Douglas, Utah 5,760 1,920
USAR, Fort McCoy, Wisconsin 7,680 1,920
63rc1 RSC East North Little Rock, Arkansas 5,760 0
Zone 3- West
63rc1 RSC West, Los Alamitos, California 3,840 0
88lh RSC West, Seattle, Washington 3,840 0
9th MSC, Honolulu, Hawaii 4,800 0
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 4
ARMY EDUCATION SUPPORT
LOCATIONS
The CONUS locations to include Puerto Rico and Hawaii are divided into three zones: Zone 1 - East, Zone 2 - Middle States, Zone 3 -West.
Zone 1-East l" MSC, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico
USACAPOC, Fort Bragg, North Carolina
99m RSC West, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania
99m RSC East, Fort Devens, Massachusetts
99m RSC North, Fort Belvoir, Virginia
81"RSC Birmingham, Alabama
Zone 2 -Middle States 88m RSC South, Wichita, Kansas
88m RSC East, Fort Snelling, Minnesota
88m RSC North, Fort Douglas, Utah
USAR, Fort McCoy, Wisconsin
63"' RSC East North Little Rock, Arkansas
Zone 3-West 63"' RSC West, Los Alamitos, California
88m RSC West, Seattle, Washington
9m MSC, Honolulu, Hawaii
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 5
WAGE DETERMINATION FOR EDUCATION SUPPORT LOCATIONS
Applicable Wage Determinations for Locations
1st MSC, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico State/County: Puerto Rico
Wage Determination No.:2015-5707
Revision No.: 14
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
USACAPOC, Fort Bragg, North Carolina State/County: North Carolina/Cumberland Co.
Wage Determination No.:2015-4377 Revision No.: 13
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
99111 RSC West, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania State/County: Pennsylvania/Allegheny Co.
Wage Determination No.: 2015-4235
Revision No.: 14 Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
99111 RSC East, Fort Devens, Massachusetts State/County: Massachusetts/Middlesex Co.
Wage Determination No.:2015-4055
Revision No.: 16
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
99t11 RSC North, Fort Belvoir, Virginia State/County: Virginia/Fairfax Co.
Wage Determination No.:2015-4281
Revision No.: 17
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
81st RSC Birmingham, Alabama State/County: Alabama/Jefferson Co.
Wage Determination No.:2015-4591
1098699666.civ Sticky Note Based on industry questions, some of the WD have been updated. We need to update any of the WDs on this list to be current especially since we are doing the amendment anyway.
This is important because we need to ensure the most current is applied prior to award. Update and highlight.
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
Revision No.: 14
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
SSW RSC South, Wichita, Kansas State/County: Kansas/Sedgwick Co.
Wage Determination No.: 2015-5341
Revision No.: 15
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
88'" RSC East, Fort Snelling, Minnesota State/County: Minnesota/Hennepin Co.
Wage Determination No.: 2015-4945
Revision No.: 14
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
88'" RSC North, Fort Douglas, Utah State/County: Utah/Salt Lake Co.
Wage Determination No.: 2015-5489
Revision No.: 12
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
USAR, Fort McCoy, Wisconsin State/County: Wisconsin/Monroe
Wage Determination No.: 2015-4929
Revision No.: 13
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
63"' RSC East North, Little Rock, Arkansas State/County: Arkansas/Pulaski
Wage Determination No.: 2015-5117
Revision No.: 14
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
63"' RSC West, Los Alamitos, California State/County: California/Orange Co.
Wage Determination No.: 2015-5645
Revision No.: 15
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
1298220403.mil Highlight
SSW RSC West, Seattle, Washington State/County: Washington/King Co.
Wage Determination No.: 2015-5535
Revision No.: 12
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
9'" MSC, Honolulu, Hawaii State/County: Hawaii/ Honolulu Co.
Wage Determination No.: 2015-5689
Revision No.: 13
Date Of Revision: 12/21/2020
Wage Determination may be downloaded from the following h t tps : / / b e t a .SA M.gov
1298220403.mil Highlight
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 6
HISTORICAL TESTS ADMINISTERED AT EDCUATION SUPPORT
LOCATIONS
Tests Administered at Education Support Locations
Location Test
Zone 1- East
1st MSC, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico APT Exams: Armed Forces Classification Test (AFCT), Defense Language Proficiency Test (DLPT), Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB), and Proctored Exams
USACAPOC, Fort Bragg, North Carolina None
99m RSC West, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania DANTES Exams: SAT, American College Testing (ACT), Praxis, APT Exams, Web Based AFCT, AFCT Practice Exams, Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE), Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI), Online DLPT exams, Web based Selection Instrument for
Flight Training (SIFT)
99m RSC East, Fort Devens, Massachusetts APT Exams: DLPT, AFCT, SIFT, OPI, TABE, English Proficiency, and Proctored Exams.
99m RSC North, Fort Belvoir, Virginia None
81st RSC Birmingham, Alabama None
Zone 2 -Middle States
88m RSC South, Wichita, Kansas None
88m RSC East, Fort Snelling, Minnesota DANTES Exams: ACT, SAT, DLPT, AFCT, DANTES Subject Standardized Test (DSST), APT
Exams: TABE, Proctored testing, and SIFT
88m RSC North, Fort Douglas, Utah DANTES: DSST. SAT, and APT
USAR, Fort McCoy, Wisconsin DANTES: SAT, ACT, and DSST. APT Exams:
DLPT, DLAB, OPI, AFCT, TABE, and Proctored
Exams
63'0 RSC East North Little Rock, Arkansas None
Zone 3 - West
63'0 RSC West, Los Alamitos, California None
88m RSC West, Seattle, Washington None
9m MSC, Honolulu, Hawaii None
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .