Questions and Answers.pdf

Hill AFB CMCC Demo Questions and Answers

W9123822Q0030

1. Will there be a site visit for this requirement?

No, there will not be a site visit for this project. We will be providing photos of the buildings. See attachments.

2. Are interested contractors able to visit the site on their own?

No, civilians are not allowed access on base.

3. Will the contractor have access to electricity for an onsite office trailer?

Electricity is available. Reference section 3.2.3 (n) of the PWS for a more detailed answer.

4. What is the cost for kilowatt hour the contractor would be responsible to pay for using the electricity?

Reference section 3.2.3 (n) of the PWS for a more detailed answer.

5. Will the contractor have access to water to fill up the water truck for dust control?

Water is available. Please see section 3.2.3 (e) of the PWS.

6. Will the Government assess a fee for water usage?

For details on pricing, please see section 3.2.3 (e) of the PWS.

7. Will the base supply and install the water backflow preventer for dust control?

No.

8. Is the contractor responsible for purchasing a backflow preventer, for dust control? (not associated with building 522 to refeed irrigation lines) Yes, per 3.1 General Requirements of the PWS.

9. Is there a fee if the base installs the backflow preventer for dust control? (not associated with building 522 to refeed irrigation lines) Contractor will be responsible for installing the backflow preventer. Paragraph 3.1 refers to general contract conditions, not the building 522 backflow preventer.

10. How will the RFQ be submitted?

Please submit quotes to Jessica.padilla@usace.army.mil. Please fill out the SF 1449 solicitation form with your quotes.

11. What is the Projnet code for this requirement?

There is no Projnet code for this requirement. This requirement will be done under a service contract, not a construction contract.

12. Is there an incumbent to this requirement?

No mailto:Jessica.padilla@usace.army.mil

13. Do any of the buildings that are set to demolished have cadmium, chromium or any other heavy metals present that need to be removed prior to demolition?

There is no known contamination.

14. Will the Government have all 6 buildings emptied of all furniture, cubicles, and loose items that may hinder asbestos removal activities prior to the abatement contractor arriving onsite? And if not, how is the contractor supposed to know how much stuff needs to be removed prior to asbestos abatement without a site visit?

Modular furniture and minimal loose items will remain as part of the demolition.

15. Will there be water and power left on to all 6 buildings for asbestos abatement activities?

Many of the facilities have had the power and water disconnected or turned off. The contractor is to coordinate power and water with the utility owner.

16. Will the Government evacuate all refrigerants/freon before the buildings are turned over to the primary contractor?

Please see specification section 01 57 19 Temporary Environmental controls, sections

1.8.11.6 and 3.6.8.

17. In reference to there not being a site visit, does the Government want the abatement contractor to bid solely off of the quantities and materials listed in the provided asbestos and lead survey inspection reports?

Yes, please reference specification section 02 82 00

18. Will all of the buildings be unoccupied during asbestos abatement activities, or will the removal activities need to be phased?

Yes, the buildings will be unoccupied.

19. Will the Government extend the bid due date?

This requirement must be awarded no later than September 30, 2022, so a lengthy extension is not possible.

20. Are City Light and Power as well as American Water aware of this project and prepared to provide a bid for their services?

City Light and Power as well as American Water were notified of this demo project in advance.

21. Will City Light and Power as well as American Water need to provide their services for this project?

Reference Section 3.2.3 (e) (n) of the PWS

22. Does this project bid have a Q&A period where bidding contractors can ask questions regarding the project and its scope and receive responses from the government?

The period to submit questions ended on September 5, 2022.

23. When are questions due for this project bid and when will the government have the responses sent out?

Questions for this project were due September 5, 2022.

24. It is noted on drawing sheet CD105 that there are shrubs at the north end of B1229 that are to be protected in place. Are there sprinklers and/or drip lines that are running under adjacent sidewalks or landscape that are feeding water to these areas? Where are they located?

There is a bubbler system running to the shrubs fed from a backflow preventer between Building 1228 and 1229. The system is no longer turned on due to the shrubs being well established.

25. Will the government be able to provide an existing utilities location sheet for each building that is being demolished as well as nearby facilities so demolition practices will be able to completely avoid and protect existing utilities?

Reference Drawing CD111, CD112, CD113, CD114.

26. Building 1229 is right next door to the previous building 1219 was demoed recently and the ground was left after demo as crushed rock. Can the same thing be done with building 1229?

Yes. Per PWA 3.3.3, “g) Finish surface the Building 1229 post-demolition soil exposure with 4 inch compacted Untreated Base Course (UTBC) per Utah Department of Transportation Specification Section 02721. “

27. On site near buildings 521, 522, and 526 there is another building (531) that appears to be connected to the same systems and transformers that lead to the other buildings. Will building 531 also need to be removed?

No

28. There are many transformers on site around buildings 522 and 526. Are these transformers going to be removed as well?

Contractor to coordinate with the utility owner.

29. There are steam lines running between buildings 522 and 526 which means there are probably boiler systems in one or both of those buildings. The government will need to provide more detailed as-builts of the systems contained inside those buildings in order to decrease the likelihood for change orders after award due to unknowns items.

No question asked. Base operates steam line from a central boiler plant.

30. For building 1229 it will be very helpful to understand the following:

a. Has any abatement already been performed (i.e. flooring, ACT, paint, etc. been removed)?

unknown

b. Are there still materials, desks, chairs, refrigerators, cubicles, microwaves, freezers, computers, etc. or any other items that are not immediately attached to the structure?

Yes.

c. Is anything currently being stored in the building?

Yes.

d. Is anything currently being stored on site?

Yes.

e. Will the government want to salvage any of the electrical or HVAC equipment that is still there prior to demolition?

Please see PWS section 3.3.3

31. For building 521 it will be very helpful to understand the following:

a. Has any abatement already been performed (i.e. flooring, ACT, paint, etc. been removed)?

unknown

b. Are there still materials, desks, chairs, refrigerators, laundry machines, cubicles, microwaves, freezers, computers, etc. or any other items that are not immediately attached to the structure?

It is possible there are loose items that remain. Reference photographs.

c. Is anything currently being stored in the building?

32. For building 483 it will be very helpful to understand the following:

a. Has any abatement already been performed (i.e. flooring, ACT, paint, etc. been removed)?

b. Are there still materials, desks, chairs, refrigerators, cubicles, microwaves, freezers, computers, etc. or any other items that are not immediately attached to the structure?

It is possible there are loose items that remain. Reference photographs.

d. Is anything currently being stored on site or at the pool area?

e. Is the building currently being used or is it abandoned?

Abandoned

f. Will any kind of animal removal be necessary? If so, please provide that information.

Building 483 has been abandoned for multiple years. It is unknown if any animals have used the facility as a habitat.

g. Is there a storage building on site where pool equipment, service hardware, pool chemicals, piping, etc. are stored?

h. If there is not a storage building on site, are any of these items or any items not listed currently being stored in the pool house?

Yes.

i. Are there lockers in the pool house building?

Many areas of the facility have been sealed off. It is unknown if lockers are present.

33. For magazine building 1836 it will be very helpful to understand the following:

a. Has any abatement already been performed?

b. Is there anything in the way of hazardous chemicals, materials, etc. leftover from the munitions (or anything else) that was stored in the building?

34. There is what appears to be a power line running (suspended in the air) connecting building 1229 with the adjacent building 1239. This will need to be disconnected from 1229 as part of the demolition process, but what is to be done with it at the building 1239 end?

Disconnect and abandon.

35. Building 521 has lighted bollards along the sidewalk on the west side of the building. The drawing CD112 says to protect the electric line in place. Are the lighted bollards to remain and be protected in place as well?

No. PWS document 3.3.3 (j) states that bollard walkway lighting systems shall be demolished back to the nearest source or pullbox.

36. Once building 521 is demolished and the new irrigation service line and backflow are installed is it the government's intent to have the entire area graded and leveled out, seeded with grass and have a sprinkler system installed to facilitate the growth of grass to match surrounding turf?

Reference Base Facility Design Standard Section 4.14 Landscaping

37. Is there an existing sprinkler system to water grass surrounding building 521 that we are meant to branch off and add new sprinkler heads to water the new grass seed? If so, where are the existing sprinkler boxes to make connections?

Locations are unknown, will need to coordinate with COR post award.

38. Drawing CD112 shows the main gas line under the parking lot on the west side of building 521.

The note says to demolish the gas line but it does not show to what extent. If the line is demoed all the way from the building to the main line connection that will be out of the project limits as shown on CD106. Please clarify?

Contractor shall demolish the gas line back to the demolition limits identified on Drawing CD106. The contractor shall cap the line for future use. Coordinate with Hill AFB CE Project Manager to have the gas line surveyed by Hill AFB prior to backfilling. Existing utility locations are per GIS data provided by HAFB

a. Does demolish mean cut, cap, dig up and remove completely. Please clarify.

Demolish means to completely remove. Demolish to the demolition limit line.

39. It appears from the drawings that the project limits for building 483 are following the existing fence line. If so, will the existing block wall and chain-link fencing also be part of the demolition?

Yes.

40. Please confirm once everything is demolished and the ground is graded and leveled we are to drill seed per the IFS using the standard native seed mix for HAFB?

Reference the Base Facility Design Standard Section 4.14 Landscape. Per PWS 3.1, “The site shall be leveled out and graded to match the existing adjacent grades in a manner that will not cause excess stormwater runoff pooling. Areas left after demolition shall be fully restored to match existing adjacent grades and vegetation specified by the reseeding requirements for Hill AFB found in the attached “Required Airfield and MSA seed mix.pdf”, except for Building 1229 (See 3.3.3 Demolition and Utilities)”.

41. Once native grass seed is applied are we required to provide watering for establishment?

Please see appendix E, no establishment is required.

42. For all underground utility lines that are to be demolished throughout this project is it the government's intent that these lines be removed back to their connection to the main lines or just back to the project limits of construction line and then capped and abandoned there?

Reference PWS Section 3.2.3 (e). Remove to the demolition limit, then cap and abandon remainder of utility outside of demolition limit.

43. Drawing sheet CD111 says to demolish electric service line

a. Does demolish mean cut, cap, dig up and remove completely? Please clarify.

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e).

b. How many linear feet of electric service line are we removing?

Everything within the building. Approximately 86 feet, exterior to building, per CD111 data provided by HAFB.

c. Are contractors completely removing the service line back to the nearest connection point?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

d. Are contractors simply capping and abandoning in place?

Yes, at demolition limit.

e. Are there any transformers associated with the demo of B1229?

Yes. PWS document 3.3.3 (h) states that the remaining ductbank/conduit shall be cut, capped and abandoned in place. The primary underground electrical distribution feeding B1229 shall be pulled back to the pad-mounted switch (approximately 80 linear feet north of the transformer). The transformer feeding B1229 shall be salvaged as expressed in section H.

44. Drawing sheet CD111 says to demolish communication service line

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of communication service line are we removing?

Everything within the building. Approximately 97 feet, exterior to building, per CD111 data provided by HAFB.

c. Are contractors completely removing the service line back to the nearest connection point?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

d. Are contractors simply capping and abandoning in place?

Yes, at the demolition limit.

45. Drawing sheet CD111 says demolish potable water, sanitary sewer, steam and fire building service lines

a. Does demolish mean cut, cap, dig up and remove completely? Please clarify.

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of potable water, sanitary sewer, steam and fire building service lines are we removing?

The exact number of linear feet is unknown.

c. Are contractors completely removing the service lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

d. Are contractors simply capping and abandoning in place?

Yes, at demolition limit.

e. Will potholing and geotechnical services including an engineer be required?

Per 3.1, “…All demolition and design work designed/planned by the Contractor shall be reviewed/accepted by a certified Professional Engineer (PE). The PE will stamp and sign the Demolition and Utility Work Plan … to satisfy this requirement.” Potholing and geotechnical services are recommended but are ultimately at the discretion of the Contractor.

46. Drawing sheet CD111 says demolish sewer service lines for buildings 521, 522 and 526

Drawing CD111 references Building 1229 Utility Demolition

a. Does demolish mean cut, cap, dig up and remove completely? Please clarify.

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of sewer service lines are we removing?

CD112 Referencing Building 521, 522, and 526 Utility and Utility Demolition Plan (Everything within the building plus approximately 100-linear feet).

c. Are contractors completely removing the service lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

d. Are contractors simply capping and abandoning in place?

Yes, at demolition limit.

e. Will potholing and geotechnical services including an engineer be required?

Per 3.1, “…All demolition and design work designed/planned by the Contractor shall be reviewed/accepted by a certified Professional Engineer (PE). The PE will stamp and sign the Demolition and Utility Work Plan … to satisfy this requirement.”

Potholing and geotechnical services are recommended but are ultimately at the discretion of the Contractor.

47. Drawing sheet CD112 says demolish potable water service lines for buildings 521, 522 and 526

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of potable water service lines are we removing?

Everything within the buildings plus approximately 80-linear feet

c. Are contractors completely removing the service lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

d. Are contractors simply capping and abandoning in place?

Yes, at demolition limit.

e. Will potholing and geotechnical services including an engineer be required?

Per 3.1, “…All demolition and design work designed/planned by the Contractor shall be reviewed/accepted by a certified Professional Engineer (PE). The PE will stamp and sign the Demolition and Utility Work Plan … to satisfy this requirement.”

Potholing and geotechnical services are recommended but are ultimately at the

48. Drawing sheet CD112 says demolish hot water line

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of hot water lines are we removing?

Everything within the building plus approximately 180-linear feet. Per CD112 data provided by HAFB.

c. Are contractors completely removing the water lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

Yes, at demolition limit.

49. Drawing sheet CD112 says demolish sewer line

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of sewer lines are we removing?

Everything within the building plus approximately 100-linear feet.

c. Are contractors completely removing the sewer lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

50. Drawing sheet CD112 says demolish communication line

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of communication lines are we removing?

Everything within the building. Approximately 129 feet, exterior to building, per CD112 data provided by HAFB.

c. Are contractors completely removing the comm lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

51. Drawing sheet CD112 says demolish electric line

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of electric lines are we removing?

Everything within the buildings plus approximately 200-linear feet.

c. Are contractors completely removing the electric lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

52. Drawing CD113 shows the main gas line connection at the north end of building 483. The note says to demolish the gas line but it does not show to what extent.

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e). About 50 feet from building to demolition limit indicated on

CD113.

a. Does demolish mean cut, cap, dig up and remove completely. Please clarify.

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of gas lines are we removing?

Everything within the building plus approximately 60-linear feet.

c. Are contractors completely removing the electric lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

d. Are contractors simply capping and abandoning in place at the project limits of construction?

53. Drawing sheet CD113 says demolish communication line

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of communication lines are we removing?

Everything within the facility plus approximately 300-linear feet.

c. Are contractors completely removing the comm lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

54. Drawing sheet CD113 says demolish sewer line

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of sewer lines are we removing?

Everything within the building plus approximately 250-linear feet.

c. Are contractors completely removing the sewer lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

55. Drawing sheet CD113 says demolish potable water service lines for building 483

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of potable water service lines are we removing?

Everything within the building plus approximately 200-linear feet.

b. Are contractors completely removing the service lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

c. Are contractors simply capping and abandoning in place?

Yes, at demolition limit.

d. Will potholing and geotechnical services including an engineer be required?

Per 3.1, “…All demolition and design work designed/planned by the Contractor shall be reviewed/accepted by a certified Professional Engineer (PE). The PE will stamp and sign the Demolition and Utility Work Plan … to satisfy this requirement.” Potholing and geotechnical services are recommended, but are ultimately at the discretion of the Contractor.

56. There are many places on the provided drawings that say contractor to determine locations.

a. Is this in reference to the physical locations of the lines and connections?

Yes.

b. Is this requiring bidding contractors to decide on how much line to remove?

Contractor to determine scope of work base off contract documents provided with the Solicitation and all Amendments.

c. If yes to question 44c above, this would result in bidding contractors guessing on amounts of linear footage which would create unequal comparisons between contractor bids to the government and will easily result in change orders after award. Please clarify.

Contractor to determine scope of work base off contract documents provided with the Solicitation and all Amendments.

57. Drawing sheet CD114 says demolish water service lines for building 1836

Yes. Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

b. How many linear feet of water service lines are we removing?

Everything within the building. Approximately 230 feet, exterior to building, per CD114 data provided by HAFB.

c. Are contractors completely removing the service lines back to their nearest connection points?

Reference PWS 3.2.3 (e)

d. Are contractors simply capping and abandoning in place?

Yes, at demolition limit.

e. Will potholing and geotechnical services including an engineer be required?

Per 3.1, “…All demolition and design work designed/planned by the Contractor shall be reviewed/accepted by a certified Professional Engineer (PE). The PE will stamp and sign the Demolition and Utility Work Plan … to satisfy this requirement.”

Potholing and geotechnical services are recommended, but are ultimately at the

58. Drawing sheet CD501 picture details #5 shows building 1836 with an apparent attached metal storage building. Are there any items that the government intends to salvage from that building or attached storage building?

59. The drawings do not show any other utilities to be demolished at building 1836. Usually these buildings also have some HVAC as well as electrical. Please provide more information on demo scope?

Underground electrical service to a power pole approximately 85-linear feet from the building.

60. Does the government intend to salvage any of the doors from any of the buildings being demolished in this project?

61. PWS page 48, section 3.1.6 requires bidding contractors to provide as-built drawings at the end of the project back to the government. This would be typical for most projects, but where this is demolition would this still be required? If so, what would contractors be expected to show/identify in those as-builts since the buildings would all be gone in their entirety?

As-Built drawings are not required for a demolition project.

62. Is the government aware that during demolition the contractor will be moving and will need a new staging area for each demolition site? Will this be acceptable?

Contractor shall submit a site laydown request for each proposed area.

63. PWS page 50, section 3.2.3 says that all items and objects, materials, and equipment, that are on, in, or within the indicated demolition limits at the time of mobilization, are the property of the contractor and shall be removed.

a. Does this mean that anything in the buildings right now that the government wants to salvage will be removed prior to the contractor starting the demolition?

Yes.

b. There is a cost associated with demolition when it includes items that have been left inside a structure/building. Without a site walk bidding contractors will have no way of putting an accurate cost to cover that removal. Please clarify with a date for a site walk prior to bid or a list of items and quantities to be removed from inside the buildings.

There will be no site visit. However, photos will be uploaded to SAM.gov

64. PWS page 51, section 3.2.3 J says all bollard walkway lighting systems shall be demolished.

Drawing sheet CD112 says those same electric lines are to be protected in place. Please clarify what is to be done here.

Electrical branch circuits are to be protected in place as they supply lighting in areas outside the project boundary. The walkway bollard lighting system shall be demolished as per section 3.2.3 (j).

65. Is CLP responsible for the transformer work and panel installs at building 526?

Contractor is to coordinate all exterior electrical work with CLP and the Hill AFB Electrical Shop. In addition, the contractor is responsible for installation of the electrical panel and all costs associated with the scope of work.

66. PWS page 51, section 3.2.3 M says all electrical utility lines that are part of the scope shall be cut, abandoned in place, and capped off at the nearest transformer pole or pull box. Per the questions previously there is no way of looking at the drawings being able to identify where those connection points are or how many linear feet are considered in scope. Please provide more information.

Additional information provided in Questions 44 – 58.

67. PWS section 3.2.3 makes several references to contracting with CLP for electrical work/services on this project but there are no references to be found for American Water and the potable water and standard water service lines. Is it the government's intent that contractors also reach out to American Water for services/contract?

Reference PWS Section 3.2.3 (e)

68. PWS page 52, section 3.2.5 states that all affected drain inlets shall be protected from sediment runoff. Building 1229 has two storm water inlets to the west side of the building that sit much lower than the building (even after demolition). SWPPP would only be a temporary fix while on site. What will need to be done to protect those inlets long term after the project is complete and the contractor is no longer present on site?

Contractor shall submit an Environmental Protection Plan to address long term inlet protection.

69. PWS page 59-88 contains the Davis County Register of Wage Determinations. This document appears to be standard Department of Labor wages that does not contain construction trades such as electrician, excavator, demolition, etc. that are needed for this project.

This is a service contract, and as such, the appropriate Service Contract Age Wage Determination is incorporated. Davis Bacon wages are not appliable to this requirement.

70. Will the government please provide pictures of the insides of the buildings on this project if a site walk will not be held?

Photographs of the buildings are located in the attachments section.

71. Solicitation 3.2.3e) states how to cap water services but can the Government provide locations?

Our team is worried some of the utilities may be out of the demo boundary. If this is the case, it will be a bigger expense because we will have to locate the tie in, cut asphalt, and dig down and cap it by cutting out the ‘T’ and replacing it with 2 couplers and a pipe and then backfill with structural fill and then patch the asphalt/ concrete. This will again require work over and above what industry can accurately and competitively bid.

Water and Sewer work will conform to American Water Details and Specifications as indicated in Section 3.2.3 (e).

72. Solicitation 3.1 General Requirements states post-demolition to grade and seed the sites “except building 1229 (see 3.3.3)”. That section says nothing about building 1229 requirements. Section

3.2.3 g) states to put down 4 inches of what we would call “state spec road base” for Building 1229. Please confirm if Section 3.2.3 g) is the correct section to refer to for post-demolition building 1229 instructions rather than 3.3.3.

Correct.

73. Does the Government have plans for future buildings at these sites that would require us to fill each one of the holes where the buildings were with compacted structural fill (including the pool) and then top it with topsoil for the seed (and on building 1229 with state spec base)? If so, what material does the Government require? We do know a landfill/ recycle yard is on base with recycled asphalt and concrete that should work but if structural fill is not required can we use dirt? Would the landfill be able to provide that?

Reference Attachment 2 – Technical Specifications Section 02 41 00.

74. Section 3.2.3 D – States the contractor will remove the foundation to a minimum depth of 4 feet – What if the foundation is deeper than 4 feet?

Buildings shall be completely demolished from top to bottom of existing footings.

75. Is bonding required for this contract and if so, what is the amount?

No. This is a service contract.

76. 6.1.1 Site Safety Health Officer - Does SSHO require 5 years minimum experience?

Yes. Reference EM 385-1-1 paragraph 01.A.17 c.

77. Our envisioned plan for demo starts with the pool area first, could we then use this area as a staging area for the remainder of the project period of performance?

A Construction Laydown Plan is required to be submitted for approval.

78. 3.2.3 G – Who is responsible for mobilization & storage of saved items?

Government salvaged items shall be removed by the Government prior to demolition.

79. Regarding Section 3.2.3 Demo and Utilities Subsection I) -- Is switchgear and equipment provided by CLP? If not are specifications available?

Contractor shall coordinate equipment requirements with CLP.

Subsection K) -- After determination is made and conductors are found to be too short for new location is pricing to be given at point of demolition or prior to?

Please see section 3.2.3 (K), contractor is to make the best business assumption for their quote.

Subsection L) -- Is new electrical equipment supplied by CLP or 75th CES exterior electrical shop? If not, are there specifications for new location and equipment?

No. Provide equipment compatible with existing branch circuits and equipment.

Coordinate all exterior electrical work with CLP and 75th CES Exterior Electrical Shop.

Subsection N) -- Is the "quote" from CLP an actual price or simply a scope of work to be done for "service connections"?

Contractor to coordinate with CLP.

80. Section 3.4.8 -- It is our understanding the CMRA manpower reporting site is outdated and no longer used. Is there a new manpower reporting site for this project?

No, the CMRA will not be required for this effort.

81. In addition to the Over and Above line item will the government consider placing a line item for

Program Management in this contract?

This is a firm fixed priced service contract. The prices for each CLIN should include all elements needed to perform the work, in accordance with the PWS, and its attachments.

No other CLINS will be added.

82. Due to this long list of additional information we require to submit a comprehensive, cost-accurate, and properly-planned-for solicitation response, will the government extend the due date to 30 days after pre-solicitation site visit is completed?

It in the intention to award this contract no later than September 30, 2022. Therefore, an extension of that length is not possible