Amendment No. 0003 to W91238-09-R-0017.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES SERVICES WITHIN THE SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION BOUNDARIES -

1. Insert attached replacement pages 99 and 127 in their entirety.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE 1OF 3 PAGES

J

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91238-09-R-0017

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-Apr-2009

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-May-2009

CODE

USACE SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

ATTN: CONTRACTING DIVISION

1325 J STREET-ROOM 878

SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922

W91238 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W91238-09-R-0017

AMENDMENT NO. 0003 99

SERVICE CONTRACTOR DATA – SUMMARY _________ DATE: __________

Offeror’s Name, Address (Street, City, State, Zip Code)

Listing of City Locations of Branch Offices: General Type of Services Performed by Offeror:

Organization:

Individual ____ Joint Venture____ Partnership ____ Corporation ____

Date Organized: Date Incorporated:

State:

Names of Officers and Other Key Personnel:

I – PRESENT PAYROLL PERSONNEL (List Number of Each Category Below) Remainder: Partners:

Officers:

Other Key:

Total:

Subtotal Permanent:

Maximum Personnel at Any Time:

Date:

II—EQUIPMENT OWNED

III --- FINANCIAL DATA AS OF

(DATE):

Present Value ($) Current Assets:

Current Liabilities: Acquisition Cost ($) Net Worth:

IV—TOTAL VALUE OF WORK IN PAST 3 YEARS EXCLUSIVE

OF JOINT VENTURE (LIST MOST RECENT FIRST)

V—LARGEST JOB EVER

CONTRACTED (If Other Than in Past Three Years)

$ LARGEST JOB IN PAST 3 YRS

Avg. Annual Income

Contract Amount:

Description:

Owner:

Contract Amount:

Description:

Owner:

NAME AND POSITION/TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING SIGNATURE

Note: Use reverse side for explanation or detailed description of items reported above.

W91238-09-R-0017

AMENDMENT NO. 0003 127

FACTOR THREE: ORGANIZATION PLAN: Responses to this factor will be evaluated as follows:

1. To determine the offeror’s ability to respond to the requirements of the contract in order to provide expeditious, responsive, and cost effective service;

2. To determine the offeror’s understanding of the organizational coordination necessary for proper operation/management of the contract; and

3. To determine the size, technical diversity and organizational structure of the team and which entity will be responsible for the different aspects of the work, and if the proper balance of these services have been proposed, including the distribution of work between in-house staff and team/key subcontractors.

4. To determine the offeror’s ability to meet the Limitations on Subcontracting as found in FAR 52.219-14, ** in Section I, which states, “(b) by submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Offeror/Contractor agrees that in performance of the contract in the case of a contract for –(1) Services...At least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern.”

7. RELATIVE WEIGHTING OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

Factor one, previous experience - planning and environmental studies, is the most heavily weighted factor in this procurement. Factor two, past performance quality - planning and environmental studies, is the second most heavily weighted factor. Factor three, organization plan is the third most heavily weighted factor.

8. DISCUSSIONS: The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with offerors in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisitions.

9. GENERAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA

1. The Offeror’s conformance with the requirements will be considered during the technical evaluation. Failure to comply with the submission requirements may be seen as indicative of the type of problems that could be expected during contract performance. Lack of conformance could therefore result in a higher risk assessment, in addition to any other impacts on the evaluation. Material omissions may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

2. Technical proposals which do not provide the specified information in the specified location in accordance with the submission instructions may be downgraded. The Government is under no obligation to search for information that is not in the specified location.

3. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be downgraded. The proposal submission instructions are written to give prospective contractors, where feasible, an indication of the level of detail desired by the Government. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included may result in the proposal being downgraded and/or being found deficient if inadequate detail is provided.

4. The degree of risk to the Government inherent in the offeror’s technical proposal will be a consideration under every evaluation factor.

5. The Government cannot make award based on a deficient offer. Therefore, a rating of “unsatisfactory” or “fail” under any factor will make the offer ineligible for award, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that offeror and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal.

10. 52.217-5 EVALUATION OF OPTIONS (JUL 1990)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(End of provision)