W911W6-16-R-0005_(NGRT).docx

DOCX document 14 KB Posted

Attached to
Next Generation Rotorcraft Transmission (NGRT) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911W6-16-R-0005
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Redstone Arsenal

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Next Generation Rotorcraft Transmission (NGRT), newest first.
File Type Posted
A-02_Submitted_Questions_-_Government_Response.docx DOCX document
TIA_Template_-_Expenditure_Based_4_Sep_2015.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

NO

QUESTION REFERENCE
COMMENT/QUESTION
RESPONSE
1
Call, W911W6-16-R-0005, paragraph 2.0(a)
Does 3,500HP – 7,000HP rating range stated in the BAA refer to an OEI power, or an AEO power?
AEO Power
2
Call, W911W6-16-R-0005, paragraph 2.0(a)
Is the statement “7 speed shifts per hour is desired” mean that 7 speed changes per hour is desired or 7 shift cycles per hour is desired (shift down to 50% and shift back up to 100%)?

7 speed changes per hour (100% to 50% counts as 1 speed change, and 50% to 100% counts as 1 speed change)

3
Call, W911W6-16-R-0005, paragraph 2.0(a)
How much detail is required in the proposal about what the optimal speed ratio for the proposed platform should be if it isn’t 50%?
As part of the proposal, offerors should state what they currently believe is the optimal speed reduction ratio and why they believe that. A more detailed analysis on this optimal reduction ratio should be performed during the proposed effort.
4
Call, W911W6-16-R-0005, paragraph 6.0
Would like to request an extension on the submission date of 21 March 2016 to BAA W911W6-16-R-0005.

This request is being made to allow collaboration with other parties who have expressed interest in working with us on this effort.

Proposal extension will not be granted

5
Call, W911W6-16-R-0005, paragraph 3.1
Please clarify the following:

a) Are we to identify our “proposed changes “ to the clauses and provisions as written in the draft TIA?

b) Are we supposed to fill in all the “highlighted” areas throughout the TIA template? For example pg 1, Name, Funding amounts/ address pg 5 Background information?

a) You are to identify your proposed changes to the language of the draft document

b) Highlighted areas throughout the document pertaining to your company should be completed.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .