Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 287 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Joint Effects Model (JEM)-DRAFT RFP
- Solicitation number
- W911SR17R0002
About this file
Attachment 3_Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A02-W911SR_17_R_0002_Draft_Questions_with_Answers_26_Oct_2016.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_4__Excel_Cost_Proposal_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911SR-17-R-0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6__ProjectForge_Access_Request_Form_and_Non-Disclosure_Agreement.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_11__Excel_Uncosted_Proposal_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit_A_DD_Form_1423 _Contract_Data_Requirements_List_(CDRL).docx | DOCX document | |
| W911SR_17_R_0002_Draft_Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_9_Joint_Program_Executive_Office_For_Chemical_and_Biological_Defense_(JPEO-CBD)_Critical_Information_List_(CIL).pdf | ||
| Attachment_8_DD254_Contract_Security_Specification.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_Defined_Labor_Categories.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_1_Task_Order_0001_PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_Award_Fee_Plan_26JUL16.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_10_Facility_Clearance_(FCL)_Request_OCT15.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W911SR-17-R-0002, Attachment #3
Dear Sir or Madam:
Joint Program Manager Information Systems (JPM IS) is tasked to provide a Joint Effects Model (JEM) Contract. The JEM program is the development and integration of existing and new software capability to model and simulate the effects of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) weapon strikes and Toxic Industrial Chemical/Toxic Industrial Material (TIC/TIM) incidents. The primary objective of the JEM contract is to support software research and development, and integration, upgrade, modernization and sustainment to advance an intelligent Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Warfare infrastructure.
The US Army is conducting a performance confidence assessment in anticipation of a possible contract award. An offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract which the offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror under the Factor of past performance. The Questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
Please complete and submit the Questionnaire within 3 days of receipt via e-mail to the undersigned Contracting Officer at david.j.shriner3.civ@mail.mil. If you have any questions relative to the enclosed Questionnaire, please contact me.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely, David J. Shriner
CONTRACTING OFFICER
Department of the Army U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMANd-ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND
EDGEWOOD CONTRACTING DIVISION
E4215 Austin road
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21010-5401
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within 3 days.
Adjectival Rating Definitions:
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .