W911SA24Q3074 SN NE036 Multi Site Performance Checklist.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911SA-24-Q-3074
About this file
This document contains a contractor performance inspection checklist and summary report for snow removal services at multiple Army Reserve facilities in Nebraska, as well as the related federal contract opportunity solicitation. The inspection checklist evaluates contractor compliance with requirements to remove snow and ice from roads, sidewalks, parking lots and other areas within required timeframes according to different event types, provide employee identification and training, submit required documentation, and treat surfaces to prevent slipping hazards. The summary report rolls up inspection results across 30 performance standards into total compliant and noncompliant factors, and calculates an overall compliance rate. The related solicitation seeks quotes for snow removal services at three Army Reserve locations in Fremont, Lincoln and Elkhorn, Nebraska from March 2024 to October 2024, with option periods to October 2028. Quotes are due by the date and time listed on the solicitation to be issued on February 20, 2024 via SAM.gov. The contractor must provide all required documents with its quote by the deadline.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 3 - NE023 Drawing.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - AT OPSEC.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Sample Service Ticket.docx | DOCX document | |
| W911SA24Q3074 SN NE036 Solicitation (1).pdf | ||
| W911SA24Q3074 SN NE036 Types (8).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 - NE003 Drawing.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - NE024 Drawing.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Price Schedule - CUI.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FACID CHECKLIST
| CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST & SUMMARY REPORT V 1.5 | Method of Surveillance: Periodic Surveillance |
| Service Provided: Snow Removal Services | |
| Contractor Name: | |
| Contract Number: Contractor email: | |
| FAC ID: | |
| Building Number(s): | |
| Contracting Officer Representative: | Meeting Contract Requirements |
| Designated Representative: | |
| Contracting Officer: | |
| Contract Specialist: |
| Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | ||||||||||
| PWS PART 1 General, Yes, No, or n/a | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| 1 | PWS # 1.6.6.1 ID OF EMPLOYEE'S: Are contractor personnel wearing ID badges in a conspicuous place on the front exterior clothing above the waist and are the contractor personnel wearing the ID badges on the employee list provided by the contractor? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Snow Removal, 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 2 | PWS 5.1 GENERAL: Did snow plowing operations begin within two (2) hours after notification from the COR or Designated Representative or as otherwise coordinated? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 1 Snow Removal, 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 3 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Was the snow and ice plowed and cleared from roads, sidewalks, parking lots and Military Equipment Park (MEP) lot(s) down to the bare surface as indicated on the drawings? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 4 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Were the dumpsters cleared of snow so they may be serviced? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 5 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 6 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Did the Contractor treat plowed and cleaned surfaces skid free by applying a contractor furnished sand, salt or approved chemical? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 7 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Did the Contractor keep sidewalks in a slip free condition? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 2 Snow Removal, 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 8 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Was the snow and ice plowed and cleared from roads, sidewalks, and parking lots down to the bare surface as indicated on the drawings? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 9 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Were the dumpsters cleared of snow so they may be serviced? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 10 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 11 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Did the Contractor treat plowed and cleaned surfaces skid free by applying a contractor furnished sand, salt or approved chemical? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 12 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Did the Contractor keep sidewalks in a slip free condition? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 3 Snow Removal (MEP Lots), 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 13 | PWS 5.4 TYPE 3: Was the snow and ice plowed and cleared from roads, sidewalks, and parking lots down to the bare surface as indicated on the drawings? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 14 | PWS 5.4 TYPE 3: Were the parked military vehicles cleared of snow so as to be accessable? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 15 | PWS 5.4 TYPE 3: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 4 Snow Removal (Sidewalks), 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 16 | PWS 5.5 TYPE 4: Was the snow and ice plowed and cleared from sidewalks down to the bare surface as indicated on the drawings? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 17 | PWS 5.5 TYPE 4: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 18 | PWS 5.5 TYPE 4: Did the Contractor treat surfaces skid free by applying a contractor furnished sand, salt or approved chemical? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 19 | PWS 5.5 TYPE 4: Did the Contractor keep sidewalks in a slip free condition? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 5 Salting and Sanding, 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 20 | PWS 5.6 TYPE 5: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 21 | PWS 5.6 TYPE 5: Did the Contractor treat plowed and cleaned surfaces skid free by applying a contractor furnished sand, salt or approved chemical? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 22 | PWS 5.6 TYPE 5: Did the Contractor keep sidewalks in a slip free condition? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 6 Snow Removal (Hauling), 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 23 | PWS 5.7 TYPE 6: Was the snow moved from the designated areas to dumping sites as directed by the COR or as shown on the attached drawings? | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 8 Snow Removal (Cleanup), 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 24 | PWS 5.9 TYPE 8: Did the Contractor provide adequate End of Season Cleanup that was ordered within 15 business days of being notified? | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 7 Deliverables, Yes, No, or n/a | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| 25 | PWS 1.6.14. Key Personnel: Did the contractor provide contact information of the designated and alternate POC 5 days after contract award and update this contact information as changes occur? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 26 | PWS 1.7.1. AT Level 1 Training: Did Contractor provide the COR certificates verifying all employees completed AT Level 1 Training within 30 days of the contract start date or new hire start date? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 27 | PWS 1.7.5. iWATCH Training: Was this training to be completed within 30 calendar days of Notice to Proceed and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the Contracting Officer no later than 60 calendar days after Notice to Proceed? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 28 | PWS 5.10. Did the Contractor submit a service ticket NLT at end of the month after the service occurred? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 29 | PWS 5.11. Did the contractor invoice in the appropriate invoicing system? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 30 | PWS 5.12. Did the Contractor provide required annual CMRA data NLT 31 October? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| Total: | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | |
| 100.00% Found Acceptable | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||||||||
| 0.0% - 99.99% Found Unacceptable | |||||||||||||||||
| All tasks have been inspected in accordance with this checklist per method of surveillance | Cumulative percentage: | 100.00% | |||||||||||||||
| Summary Report (Required): | |||||||||||||||||
| Designated Representative name and date of inspection: | |||||||||||||||||
| NAME: DATE: | |||||||||||||||||
| COR Name and date of reviewed and accepted inspection results: | |||||||||||||||||
| NAME: DATE: |
W911SAXXXXXXX LOG
| W911SAXXXXXXX Performance FYXX | ||||||||||||||
| # | Month | Contract Number | Contractor Name | Contracting Office | Customer | Contract Value | Type Contract | KO Name | COR Supervisor Name | COR Name | Total PRS Factors | Compliant PRS Factors | Noncompliant PRS Factors | Compliant Rate |
| 1 | October | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 2 | November | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 3 | December | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 4 | January | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 5 | February | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 6 | March | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 7 | April | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 8 | May | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 9 | June | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 10 | July | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 11 | August | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 12 | September | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| Totals | 0 | 0 | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
W911SAXXXXXXX Performance FYXX W911SAXXXXXXX Performance FYXX October November December January February March April May June July August September 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W911SAXXXXXXX Performance
| Contractor Performance Inspection Checklist | FYXX | TOTALS | |||||||||||
| Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep |
| PERFORMANCE STANDARD | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | SAT | USAT |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTALS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
USAT Factors
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W911SAXXXXXXX Compliance Rates
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .