Attachment_03_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
Environmental Support Services at Dugway Proving Ground Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911S6-15-R-0004
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Dugway Proving Ground

About this file

Attachment 3- Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Environmental Support Services at Dugway Proving Ground, newest first.
File Type Posted
W911S6-15-R-0004-0003.pdf PDF
TE-2_DoL_Area_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
W911S6-15-R-0004-0002.pdf PDF
SiteVisitSlideShow.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Participants.pdf PDF
TE-1_PWS__PRS-ENV_SVCS.docx DOCX document
TE-7_Formal_Informal_Training.docx DOCX document
TE-06_Historical_Manpower.docx DOCX document
W911S6-15-R-0004-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_01_Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-05_WASTE_REPORT_(SHIPPING).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911S6-15-R-0004.pdf PDF
TE-2_DoL_Area_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
TE-3_Facilities.pdf PDF
Attachment_02_Specific_Relevant_Contracts_Sheet.docx DOCX document
TE-1_PWS__PRS-ENV_SVCS.docx DOCX document
Attachment_04_Sub-Contractor_Consent_Form.docx DOCX document
TE-06_Historical_Manpower.docx DOCX document
TE-4_90-day_Storage_Sites.doc DOC document
TE-05_WASTE_REPORT_(SHIPPING).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-3_Facilities.pdf PDF
TE-2_DoL_Area_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Draft_Solicitation_W911S6-15-R-0004.pdf PDF
TE-1_PWS__PRS-ENV_SVCS.docx DOCX document
TE-4_90-day_Storage_Sites.doc DOC document
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor: _______________________________________________________________________________

1. Cage Code: _________________________________

1. Contract number: _______________________________________

1. Contract type: ______________________________

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

1. Description of service provided: ______________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name: _______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

US UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.

Technical Performance
S
M
US
NA

T1. Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T6. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T7. Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

Program Management
S
M
US
NA

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Transition/phase-in
S
M
US
NA

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction
S
M
US
NA

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation
S
M
US
NA

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Cost Performance
S
M
US
NA

C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes____Default____Convenience____Pending Terminations____
No ____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:Paul E. Frailey
U.S. Army Mission & Installation Contracting Command - Dugway
CCMI-CHD-DP
5330 Valdez Circle MS#1
Dugway, UT 84022

Or E-mail to: paul.e.frailey.civ@mail.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .