Frequently ask Questions.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911RZ-23-Q-0004
About this file
This document contains a solicitation for role players to support a Validation Exercise at Fort Carson, Colorado. The Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Hood is seeking 69 personnel to serve in roles such as a US Embassy Team, Battalion Advisor Team, Company Advisor Team, and Maneuver Advisor Team. The performance period is December 12-14, 2022 and January 9-19, 2023. This is a firm fixed price, 100% small business set-aside contract under NAICS code 611699 with a size standard of $14.5 million. Questions are due by November 23 and quotes by November 28, 2022. Offerors must be registered in SAM and acknowledge any amendments to the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Answers to Industry Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Answers to Industry Questions 2.docx | DOCX document | |
| W911RZ23Q0004 4SFAB Role Player Solicitation Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| Frequently Asked Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4SFAB FP23-2 VALEX PWS Role Players Support Training v3 11212022.docx | DOCX document | |
| DOL Wage Determination 2015-5417 Oct 2022.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 4SFAB FP23-2 VALEX PWS.pdf | ||
| W911RZ23Q0004 4SFAB Role Player Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Frequently asked Questions References: PWS Paragraph 4.4, Page 12, specifies equipment that includes “…at a minimum 22 vendor owned and operated computers (no less than two per team based on Annex A).”
Additionally, PWS Paragraph 1.6.17, Page 8, states “No later than 7 days prior to contract execution, the Contractor shall submit a list of names and personal information of all role players that require DoD facility or military installation access. The list of required information can be found in Annex B 'FP 23-1-E FCCO Access Roster' of the PWS. However, there is no Annex A nor Annex B provided in the PWS.
Correction: There is no Annex A nor is it required. This was from a previous contract. Wording was removed. Annex B not required either as base access is granted at the front gate upon arrival. Wording removed.
Question: Can the Government please provide the referenced Annexes in an updated version of the PWS?
References: The PWS contains several references to “section 1.9 of the PWS” in the context of role player qualifications (PWS Paragraph 1.4, Page 2 and PWS Technical Exhibit 1, Page 17, including several references for PRS #1 and #3). However, there is no Paragraph or section 1.9 in the PWS.
Questions: Can the Government please clarify if references to “section 1.9” should instead be referring to PWS Paragraph 1.6.8, Special Qualifications, Pages 4-6? If not, then can the Government please provide the referenced “section 1.9” in an updated version of the PWS?
Correction: Section 1.9 should be section 1.6.8. Replaced all section 1.9 with section 1.6.8.
Reference: PWS Paragraph 1.2, Table 1, Pages 1-2 specifies 2x, 5x, and 6x Operations Officers/Support Operations Officer (SPO) (G/S-3) Role Players for Groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively. However, PWS Paragraph 1.6.8.c, Page 5, and Paragraph 1.6.8.i, Page 6, specifies personnel qualifications for two distinct positions, the Unit G/S-3 (Operations) Officer and the Unit Support Operations Officer (SPO), respectively.
Questions: Can the Government please clarify which personnel qualifications and experience requirements apply to the “Operations Officers/Support Operations Officer (SPO) (G/S-3)” Role Player position: PWS Paragraph 1.6.8.c or 1.6.8.i or both? Alternatively, can the Government please specify which Role Player position(s), Operations Officer or SPO, are required for each group and the quantity of each?
Correction: NO CHANGE: Role player numbers provided in table 1. Duties and responsibilities provided in 1.6.8.c and 1.6.8.i. Operations Officer and SPO are same position.
Reference: Solicitation 52.212-1 Addendum, Paragraph 1.6.3, Past Performance, Page 3 of 34, states “Provide a list of up to five similar previous contracts within the last 5 years where you have performed work that is similar in nature and scope.”
Question: Can the government clarify the minimum number of past performance references that need to be submitted? Of those, how many must be provided by the prime offeror?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .