Past_Performance_Questionnaire2.pdf

PDF 47 KB Posted

Attached to
Lockout Tag Out (LOTO) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KF-15-Q-0089
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command TACOM Life Cycle Management Command

About this file

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE 2

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Lockout Tag Out (LOTO), newest first.
File Type Posted
EPA.pdf PDF
3WageDeter.pdf PDF
1-SOW_-_LOTO_Service_6-2.pdf PDF
W911KF-15-Q-0089.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION From Anniston Army Depot, Anniston, Alabama

Respond To: Ryan Abernathy, Contract Specialist Phone: (256) 235-6179 FAX (256) 235-6353 Email: ryan.e.abernathy.civ@mail.mil Please respond by: November 25, 2015 by 10:00 AM CST

SOLICITATION: W911KF-15-Q-0089 FOR: Lockout/Tag out /Procedures/Services

Offeror’s Name:

Address:

Responding Reference Organization:

Company:

Address:

Person Responding:

Telephone:

Description of work performed for referenced Organization:

Cost of Project for referenced Organization: $

* Respondent – Please rate offeror’s performance as it relates to subject questions. Other ratings are assigned accordingly.

1. QUALITY – Conformance to specifications.

(a) Explain how well the contractor conformed to the specifications.

Comments:

Rating: * Neutral Unknown Risk

Poor Very High Risk

Good /Satisfactory Low Risk

Excellent Very Low Risk

(b) Explain how well the contractor was able to plan and cope with requirements and adjust to changes.

Rating:

Unknown Risk

Poor Very High Risk

Good /Satisfactory Low Risk

(c) Describe access to the Contractor, and Contractor responsiveness in performance, delivery, and in responding to quality and warranty issues.

Unknown Risk

Poor Very High Risk

Good /Satisfactory Low Risk

2. DELIVERY – Adherence to delivery schedules

(a) How well did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules?

Unknown Risk

Poor Very High Risk

Good /Satisfactory Low Risk

(b) If contractor was ever delinquent in performance service, was delay contractor’s fault? If so, please explain the delay (describe problem and any corrective action by contractor).

Unknown Risk

Poor Very High Risk

Good /Satisfactory Low Risk

3. CUSTOMER SERVICE – Availability and responsiveness to customer needs.

(a) Was the availablilty of customer support sufficient enough to meet your missions needs and/or requirements.

Unknown Risk

Poor Very High Risk

Good /Satisfactory Low Risk

(b) Did the contractor provide adequate customer service? Was the contractor responsive to your needs?

Unknown Risk

Poor Very High Risk

Good /Satisfactory Low Risk

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .