W911KB24R0010 0001 Port of Nome Ph 1.pdf
PDF 17 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Port of Nome Modification Phase 1, Nome, Alaska
- Solicitation number
- W911KB24R0010
About this file
This document is a solicitation for the Port of Nome Modification Phase 1 project in Nome, Alaska. The project will expand the port and extend the West Causeway by approximately 3,500 linear feet into the Deep-Water Basin. The work includes 2000 feet of Open Cell Sheet Pile (OCSP) dock face, fender piles combined with floating fendering along the dock face, construction of fuel, water, sewer, electrical, and telecommunications system upgrades, and incidental related work. The estimated contract cost magnitude for award is approximately $250 Million to $500 Million. The solicitation is issued by the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Alaska.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Project/Location: Port of Nome Modif ication Phase 1, Nome, Alaska
1. This Amendment provides changes to the solicitation as indicated on the continuation pages of this documet.
2. The proposal due date has not been extended.
3. You are required to acknow ledge receipt of this Amendment on the Standard Form 1442 Back.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 51
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 01-Apr-2024
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB24R0010
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
27-Feb-2024
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
01-Apr-2024
CODE
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK
CEPOA-CT (W911KB)
2204 TALLEY AVENUE
JBER AK 99506-0898
W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
a. The following drawings are substituted for the superseded documents/sections:
None
b. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections. The identifier “AM#0001” appears before and after new and/or revised materials, except as noted below.
SECTION 00 22 11
− Paragraph 2.1 and Paragraph 4 have been revised
(Reissuing Page 3 and 4 of section)
NOTE: Revisions within the following documents do not contain the above referenced identifiers:
c. The following sections are deleted:
NONE
d. The following documents are added:
e. The following revisions are incorporated:
f. Other:
Pre-proposal conference slides and Sign In Sheet.
(End of Summary of Changes)
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME.
Section 00 22 11 W911KB24R0010
Section 00 22 11 Page 3
1.0 OVERVIEW
1.1 Interested firms (here after referred to as Offerors) shall submit proposal demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the construction contract resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein.
1.2 This is a “Best Value” solicitation for the construction of Port of Nome Modification Phase 1, located at
Nome, Alaska. Offerors shall submit proposals demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the construction contract resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and award a firm fixed price (FFP) contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government utilizing the trade-off process described in FAR 15.101-1.
2.0 BASIS OF AWARD
AM#0001….
2.1 The Contracting Officer will award a FFP contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority has determined conforms to the solicitation and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors, described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined are considered approximately equal to price, however the Contract Award may not exceed the funds available for this project. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offerors. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer, the Source Selection Authority (SSA) must determine the added value of the more expensive proposal that would justify award to that offeror. ….AM#0001
3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
3.1 Proposals should be submitted initially in the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint.
Do not assume offerors will be contacted or awarded an opportunity to clarify, discuss, or revise their proposal.
3.2 Firms formally recognized as small business firms formally organized as construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms, or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key subcontractors.
3.3 Submit proposal in as specified in Section 00 21 00. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, indicated in the sections below.
Section 00 22 11 W911KB24R0010
Section 00 22 11 Page 4
4.0 PROPOSAL AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS
AM#0001…..
Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance
Vol 1, Tab A
Factor 1 Past Performance (Confidence Assessment)
Most Important Factor
Vol 1, Tab B
Factor 2 Technical Approach 2nd Most Important Factor
(Slightly Less Important Than Factor 1)
Vol 1, Tab C
Factor 3 Project Execution Concept/Schedule 3rd Most Important Factor
(Slightly Less Important Than Factor 2)
Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance
Vol 2, Tab A
Factor 4 Extent of Participation of Small Businesses
4th Most Important Factor (Less Important Than Factors 1-3)
Vol 2, Tab B
Factor 5 Price
(Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet Contract Line Items Schedule)
Approximately Equal to Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4 Combined
Vol 2, Tab C
N/A Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated
Vol 2, Tab D
N/A Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Upon request by the Contracting Officer and applicable to Large Businesses only)
Not Rated
…..AM#0001
5.0 VOLUME 1, TAB A – FACTOR 1 –PAST PERFORMANCE (CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT)
5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
5.1.1 The offeror shall submit information for no more than five (5) projects* for the prime contractor
(and major subcontractors) that best demonstrates the offeror’s experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to this project, as described in this solicitation. To be evaluated, each project must have been completed or must be substantially complete** by the offeror within 10 years of the date that proposals are due.
*A maximum of five (5) projects will be evaluated. If an offeror disregards these instructions and submits more than five projects, only the first five projects will be evaluated. Offerors should describe each project with enough detail to ensure that the Government can meaningfully assess the projects against the evaluation criteria described in the RFP.
PORT OF NOME MODIFICATION,
NOME, AK
USACE Alaska District
Phase 1 – West Causeway Extension
Date: Tuesday, 12 March 2024
Time: 2:00 P.M.
CONTRACTING
CONTRACTING
• W911KB24R0010 PORT OF NOME MODIFICATION PHASE 1 – Unrestricted, Fully Designed, FFP Construction Project
• Estimated Magnitude is $250 - $500 Million
• Award will be based on Tradeoff process described in FAR 15.101-1 to determine the proposal which represents the best value to the Government. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are equal to price.
• Evaluation Factors are Past Performance, Technical Approach, Extent Of Participation Of Small Businesses, and Price. (Section 00 22 11 Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria And Basis Of Award One Step - - Best Value)
• Proposal Due Date is 29 April 2024
PROPOSAL PACKAGE
• It shall be the contractor’s responsibility to check the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) website for any Amendments and to submit proposals.
• Read Section 00 21 00 Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors
• Acknowledge all Amendments (SF1442)
• Volume 2 Tab C - Required Pre-award Information - Project Labor Agreement (PLA) – complete and signed with the proposal IAW FAR Provision 52.222-33
• VOLUME 2 -TAB D – Small Business Subcontracting Plan – LG Businesses Upon request by the Contracting Officer for the apparently successful offeror
QUESTIONS
• Submit questions in writing to - Projnet The Bidder Inquiry System and they will be answered in the system and incorporated by amendments as needed - http://www.projnet.org/projnet
• The last day to submit questions will be no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the proposal due date
• Important: Any remarks, comments, or explanations provided during the conference/site visit shall not change or qualify the terms and conditions of the solicitation or resultant contract. Changes can only be made by formal written amendment(s)
CITY OF NOME
TYPES OF VESSELS PORT OF NOME SERVES
COMMODITY MOVEMENT
On-water Transfers
Deliveries to Shore
TYPES OF VESSELS PORT OF NOME SERVES
SHIP RESUPPLY/CREW CHANGE
USACE – CIVIL WORKS
PORT OF NOME MODIFICATION - PROJECT TEAM
Local Service Facilities (LSF) General Navigation Features (GNF)
LSF Design Package
GNF Design Package
Contractor Bid Package
OVERVIEW OF PORT OF NOME MODIFICATION PROJECT
• First Corps’ construction on Harbor began in 1917.
• Port last upgraded in 2006 to -22 ft MLLW.
• Port Modification authorized for construction in WRDA
2020.
• Provides support to Nome users and regional communities utilizing Section 2006 of WRDA 2007.
• Allows navigation projects in Alaska to be justified based upon:
• Community Viability
• Public Health and Safety
• Access to Subsistence Resources
• Cultural Significance
• Feasibility Report March 2020.
• Design Agreement executed June 2021.
• Project Partnership Agreement executed January
2024.
• Advertise 27 February 2024.
• Proposals due 29 April 2024.
Deep Water Basin
PROJECT PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
• United States only deep-water port in the Arctic.
• Provides a critical link with 60 communities and the rest of Alaska.
• The existing port facilities in the region are overcrowded and have insufficient draft to accommodate larger and deeper drafting vessel traffic.
• The proposed project objective is to improve support for multiple maritime missions: cargo transportation, search and rescue, emergency and oil spill response, natural resource exploration by:
• Reducing draft limitations to allow use by more efficient vessels.
• Increasing dock space to serve more vessels safely and to avoid delays.
• Increasing navigation area to allow for safe and efficient maneuvering of all vessels.
14PROGRAMMATIC APPROACH
THREE PHASES
PHASE 1 - W. Causeway Extension (Award 2024)
• Stub BW removal
• Causeway extension
• Dock construction
PHASE 2 - Basin Dredging (Award 2025)
• Deep water basin dredging
• Outer basin expansion
PHASE 3 - E. Breakwater Construction (Award 2027)
• East BW demo
• Outer basin expansion
• East causeway construction
USACE DESIGN CAUSEWAY ARMOR STONE AND
DREDGING (VOLUME 1)
Major Components of Solicitation:
• Removal of existing stub breakwater
• Extension of the causeway
• New L-shaped dock
• Utility extensions and upgrades
WEST CAUSEWAY – VOLUME 1
Causeway Extension
• 3480-foot L- shaped extension.
• Extension cross section similar to the existing causeway
• 18-ton A1 rock, 3600-pound B1 rock, 180-pound C1 rock, 12.25-ton A2 rock, 2450-pound B2 rock, 130-pound C2 rock, filter material, E and F fills, and seaward toe dredging.
WEST CAUSEWAY – VOLUME 1
SEASIDEHARBORSIDE
EXISTING
GROUND
ANTICIPATED HAUL ROUTE AND STAGING AREAS
STAGING AREAS
PND DESIGN – DOCKS AND MOORINGS (VOLUME 2)
Extend Causeway and Roadway ~3,500’
(Phase I)
New ~2,000’ OCSP Dock Structure
(Phase I)
Existing East Breakwater to Remain (Phase I)
Phase I – Full Buildout
ADD IN OCSP CROSS SECTION FOR DISCUSSION
ANDREA IS WORKING THIS
Typical Causeway Cross Section at Dock
195’ – 235’ Wide Causeway
X-WYE PILE
X-Wye Pile
• Similar to X-Pile
• Used on every cell except TEP.
OCSP TEMPORARY SUPPORT
Reference Specification 35 31 16.19
OCSP STABILIZATION
Reference Specification 35 31 16.19
TEMPORARY END PROTECTION CAUSEWAY & DOCK
Protection of completed causeway sections during construction delays of 30 days or more.
Contractor is required to submit a Temporary End Protection (TEP) Plan for approval prior to the construction delay.
The plans show sections for the three TEP plans.
TEP plan A (causeway only section) TEP plan B (NS causeway and dock section) TEP plan C (EW causeway and dock section)
References:
Spec Section 01 19 40.00 29 Paragraph 1.5 Plans V1-C-106 through V1-C-108 and V1-C-313 through V1-C-322
CAUSEWAY TEMPORARY END PROTECTION
TEMPORARY END PROTECTION SHEET PILE
REF. DRAWINGS
• V2-S-108
REF. SPECIFICATIONS
• 35 31 16.19
BASE BID – (REF. DRAWING V2-C-101)
TEP Area
REF. DRAWINGS
• V2-C-102
BASE BID
REF. DRAWINGS
• V2-C-102
OPTION 1
TEP Area
REF. DRAWINGS
• V2-C-102
OPTION 2 AND OPTION 3
TEP Area
TE
P Ar ea
REF. DRAWINGS
• V2-C-102
CRW DESIGN – UTILITIES AND LIGHTING (VOLUME 3)
DOCK UTILITIES
DOCK UTILITIES Water Vault Details
DOCK UTILITIES Fuel Hard Stand
Shore Power Pedestal
GEOTECH
• Geophysical Survey – Sub-Bottom Profiler and Magnetrometer
• 47 sub-surface objects (likely boulders). Possible areas of dense boulders identified (Fig. 27 of Geophysical Survey Report)
• 16 ferrous objects of interest,
• 1 within breakwater extension (OBJ-13)
• Geotechnical Investigation
• 16 borings
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS
• General Soil Profile Along Breakwater I. Marine Sands II. Reworked Marine Sands and Till III. Glacial Till IV. Marine Sediments V. Glacial Rubble VI. Bedrock
• Medium-Dense Marine Sands ~5-10 ft thick
• Anticipate conventional dredging methods
Blue indicates soils within excavation/dredge prism
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL
Primary environmental issues affecting Phase I:
• Harassment of marine mammals (primarily beluga whales and seals) by underwater noise (pile driving, etc.), dredging & fill, project vessel movement.
• Dredged/excavated material placement.
• Water quality (turbidity, spills and discharges).
• Subsistence access.
Environmental agency coordination documents:
See attachments to Sec 01 57 20.01 29 “Enviro Protection”
• MMPA Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) – NOAA Marine Mammal Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (4MP)
• ESA Biological Opinion – NMFS
• ESA Informal Consultation LOC – USFWS
• National Historic Preservation Act LOC – SHPO
• CWA Section 401 Certificate – ADEC
Over 100 project environmental and cultural resource stipulations; see USACE “Compilation of Environmental Mitigatory Measures”
Marine Mammal Monitoring & Mitigation Plan (4MP) - Establishes:
o Authorized take numbers o Mitigation zones
• Shutdown zones
• Harassment zones
• Assumed take zones o Observer roles and responsibilities
• Number and placement of PSOs depends on activity o Monitoring & mitigatory procedures
• Baseline monitoring o Data collection and reporting requirements
The IHA contains special monitoring requirements that are NOT included in the 4MP
Includes:
o Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM)
• For recording MM vocalizations and pile driving sound energy verification
• Acoustic Monitoring Plan to be approved by
NMFS 30 days prior to pile driving o Aerial overflights to assist in estimating species presence in far field during fender pile installation
Dredged Material Placement for Phase 1 Initial 6.5-acre on-shore site for up to 60K cubic yards of dredged/excavated material
Water Quality (CWA Sec 401 WQ Certification)
ENVIRONMENTAL
Standard ADEC dredging stipulations:
o “Reasonable precautions and controls must be used to prevent incidental and accidental discharge of petroleum products or other hazardous substances…” o “During construction, spill response equipment and supplies… shall be available and used immediately to contain and cleanup… pollutant spills. Any spill amount must be reported…” o “All dredging shall be conducted so as to minimize the amount of dredge material and suspended sediments that enter the Norton Sound. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be employed...”
o Etc.
CLOSE OUT
CLOSE OUT
CAMP Facilities:
1.12 CAMP FACILITIES
There are no Government owned camp facilities at the job site for the Contractor's use.
1.12.1 Required Workforce Camp
Provide temporary housing for non-resident contractor and subcontractor employees. Utilization of housing existing prior to the contract award date is prohibited. Upon completion of the project, remove temporary housing established for the contract. Any temporary fill used for these facilities shall be removed and placed in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations.
IHA Permit:
• Good for one year and ends in April 2025. USACE is working on IHA extension
• USACE working on stand alone contract for LOA.
Buy American Act Clause will apply:
REF. SPECIFICATIONS
• CAMP FACILITIES
• 01 19 40.00 29
THANK YOU
| 4-DIV 00-updated 28 Mar 2023.pdf |
| -- See Section 00 22 11 for recommended Small Business Participation goals – |
| 12.4.1 Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001. |
| 12.4.2 Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001. |
| 12.4.3 Significant Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001. |
| 12.4.4 Strength: An aspect of an offerors’ proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance. |
| 12.4.5 Significant Strength: An aspect of an offerors’ proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract perform... |
| 12.4.6 Deviation Proposal implies or specifically offers a deviation below the specified criteria. The offeror may or may not have called the deviation to the Government’s attention. A deviation is a deficiency. The proposal must conform to the solici... |
| 12.4.7 Uncertainty: Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission... |
| Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluati... |
| Contracting Officer |
| USACE Alaska District Small Business Professional |
| Alaska SBA Procurement Center Representative |
| End of Section 00 22 11 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .