W911KB21R0043 AM01.pdf

W911KB21R0043

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 32

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Jul-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB21R0043

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Jun-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

LRDR Campus HEMP Hardness Maintenance and Surveillance Amendment #1

The follow ing revisions are made. The identif ier “AM#01” appears before and after new and/or revised material and replacement pages are provided:

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Jul-2021

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

SECTION C

STATEMENT OF WORK

Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) Campus HEMP Hardness Maintenance/Surveillance (HM/HS) Clear Air Force Station, Alaska

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 The purpose of this Statement of Work is to provide High-altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) Enclosure Maintenance, Surveillance and Sustainment services to the Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) Campus at Clear Air Force Station (CAFS), Alaska. The LRDR Campus includes the Mission Control Facility (MCF)(Bldg. 900), LRDR Power Plant (LPP)(Bldg. 901, and the LRDR Equipment Shelter (LES)(Bldg.902). All of these actions shall be conducted in accordance with (IAW) MIL-STD-188-125, HEMP Protection for Ground-Based C4I Facilities Performing Critical, Time-Urgent Missions, MIL-HDBK-423, HEMP Protection for Fixed and transportable Ground-Based C4I Facilities and Strategic Instruction (SI 501-02). Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Surveillance (HM/HS) services executed under this contract will require a full range of activities including, but not limited to, development of HM/HS program plans, engineering and technician support, recurring and systematic refurbishment, perform HM/HS actions: shield effectiveness testing, preparation of work plans, engineering support, execute facility enhancements, preparation of technical approach supporting HEMP enhancements, emergency and routine service calls, HM/HS training, and verification testing.

The single-award indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract tool is anticipated to support Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Surveillance activities for both the Missile Defense Agency and the United States Space force. The primary performance location is Clear Air Force Station, Alaska. Task Orders (TOs) will be performance-based and will be issued as firm-fixed price (FFP).

1.2 The planning and technical requirements specified in this statement of work (SOW) are intended to provide requirements for execution of the contract and a general understanding of the functions that the contractor may be required to perform. Individual TOs will contain additional detailed requirements for each specific project. The contractor will receive from USACE a complete scope of work, performance work statement, or plans and specifications for each individual TO.

1.3 The Contractor is required to furnish all necessary labor, equipment, materials, and transportation to perform the work described in this SOW unless otherwise specified in an individual TO. The Contractor shall provide adequate professional supervision to assure the accuracy, quality, completeness, and progress of the required work.

1.4 Points of contact for each project will be provided in each individual TO. All correspondence and communication shall be through the Contracting Officers Representative (COR) or Contracting Officer (CO).

1.5 Work issued under this contract will utilize service (Service Contract Act) wage rates.

1.6 The Contractor shall comply with all provisions of the current edition of the U.S. Army Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Manual, EM 385-1-1. Contractor will find the manual at http://www.usace.army.mil/CESO/Pages/Home.aspx

1.7 The contractor shall competitively procure subcontracts to the maximum extent practicable to ensure the best price for the Government. See also FAR 52.244-2 regarding Contracting Officer consent to procure subcontracts.

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK

Work shall be performed in accordance with all applicable federal and state regulations; manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance and policy letters; and industry standards and codes. Examples of Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Surveillance include:

Development of Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Program Plans: The Contractor shall ensure HM/HS procedures are captured in the HM/HS Program Plans consistent with MIL-HDBK 423, High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) Protection for Fixed and Transportable Ground-Based C4I Facilities, and vendor manuals. The Contractor shall correct and/or revise procedures, as necessary, to ensure proper maintenance actions are captured. Updates shall ensure HCIs/HCAs are correctly identified, reflect the correct locations, and revise incorrect or outdate procedures. The Contractor shall update the HM/HS Program plans annually (establish new baseline) to ensure the entire HEMP topology has been captured and is being maintained consistent with MIL-HDBK 423 and associated vendor documentation. The Contractor shall create the initial HM/HS Program Plan for the LRDR Campus.

Sparing Analysis: The contractor shall provide Parts Lists of the installed HEMP hardness critical assemblies or items and lists of recommended organizational LRDR Campus HEMP-related systems’ spare parts, repair parts, supplies, special tools and special test equipment IAW MIL-STD-188-125-1.

Engineering and Technician Support: The Contractor shall provide engineering and technician support for HM/HS work. HM/HS actions shall incorporate any infrastructure or structural requirements to support the overall HEMP topology. Scope includes requirements for 1) testing, 2) engineering support, 3) technical solutions/options for unknown/unpredicted issues as funding allows, and 4) technical support to the USACE/MDA/13th SWS via telephone or e-mail. These services require familiarity with the maintenance and sustainment of HEMP systems.

The activities supported under this PWS must be IAW MIL-STD 188-125 and MIL-HDBK-423 and the provided/revised HM/HS Program plans.

Recurring and Systematic Refurbishment: The Contractor shall perform recurring and systematic refurbishment level HM/HS services IAW the site HM/HS Program plans, applicable MIL Standards, TOs, and OEM/Vendor manuals. In addition to maintenance actions, the Contractor shall conduct surveillance measures, as described in MIL-HDBK-423, which shall be required on a systematic basis to validate the performance of the HEMP systems.

Perform HM/HS Actions: The Contractor shall propose a plan to perform HM/HS actions for all HCI/HCA at the respective site. The plan shall include references to OEM and standard maintenance practices and procedures where necessary to perform HM/HS service. The Contractor shall perform hardness surveillance measures on a systematic basis to validate the performance of the HEMP systems. Hardness Surveillance shall include PMI actions to sustain the performance of HCI/HCA.

Shield Effectiveness Testing: The Contractor shall perform shield effectiveness testing IAW MIL-STD-188-125 during each of the HM/HS service cycles of refurbished HCI/HCA and associated shielding performance anomalies.

Preparation of Work Plans: The Contractor shall submit both draft and approved work plans to site appointed representatives. The work plans shall include the following for HCIs/HCAs:

• Times and durations of maintenance

• Recovery times to normal operation

• HCI identifiers

• Location of item

• Description of item

• Description of work to be performed

• Date range

• Work start and finish times

• Recovery times

• Description of work to be performed

Engineering Support: The Contractor shall provide Senior Engineer level support to the USACE/MDA/13th SWS.

Engineering support services include, but are not limited to: HEMP studies, surveys, report reviews, engineering modeling, engineering test activity, technical or programmatic counsel, program support, design support, drafting and technical order development and proof of concept development or technical concept work.

Execution of Facility Enhancements: Facility enhancements are intended to extend the service life of the Electromagnetic Barrier or improve operability. The Contractor shall complete enhancements and corresponding acceptance testing in a timely manner, and report any issues discovered during acceptance testing not related to the enhancement activities. The Contractor shall install and re-test all enhancements related to Contractor installation(s) to ensure each enhancement has not degraded the current performance of the shield topology and / or meets the criteria IAW MIL-STD-188-125. The Contractor is responsible for any subsequent or incidental damage which affects the HEMP performance of the facility during completion of the work.

Preparation of Technical Approach Supporting HEMP Enhancements: HEMP-hardened facilities are designed, constructed, and modified according to referenced standards and established practices. Recommendations for protective measures must reflect proven capabilities. MIL-STD 188-125 requirements will also be used to evaluate a facility's hardness at the organizational and depot level. Description of the purpose of the technical approach. The Contractor shall provide a description of the current status of the site (including HEMP enhancements). A description of the characterization of the site into test-able zones. Finally, a description of the goals and objectives as they relate to recommendations contained within the Technical Approach.

Emergency and Routine Service Calls: The Contractor shall respond to service calls as requested in a task order.

Emergency Service Calls includes any situation that is an immediate threat to life, property, environment, security or mission. Routine Service Calls include all other service calls placed to the contractor to provide corrective maintenance for an issue.

HM/HS Training: The Contractor shall conduct Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Surveillance “On the Job Training” for site personnel assigned to Clear AFS, AK. This training is intended to be conducted over the shoulder during routine HM/HS scheduled activities. This “Train the Trainer” concept is to be repeated four times per contract year in conjunction with the Scheduled routine HM/HS visit. No additional travel funding will be provided by the Government to accomplish this training.

Verification Testing: The Contractor shall conduct verification testing at the site IAW MIL-STD-188-125-1 and shall publish a Test Plan and schedule to define the approach to verification testing at the site.

3.0 LICENSES, PERMITS, CERTIFICATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS

3.1 The contractor shall be responsible for having or obtaining all necessary licenses, certifications and permits for the work described herein. As a minimum, the contractor shall be responsible for the following:

a . Licensing and certification as required by State and Federal agencies and as required by the location of the project for performing all work specified within this statement of work and each individual TO.

b. Compliance with all federal, state and local regulations.

c. Request for Frequency Authorization: The Contractor shall prepare a draft request for test frequency clearance and provide the necessary documentation to support the request, to include AF Form 1494.

Frequency Authorization (FA) is the responsibility of the Government, with the support of the technical documentation provided to the Government by the contractor. The draft request and AF Form 1494 shall be delivered to the Government at least 9 calendar months prior to verification testing or SACP certification.

Note: The intent is, in a subsequent task, the Contracting Officer, or agent, shall submit the Frequency Clearance request to the appropriate spectrum/frequency authorizing agency.

4.0 GENERAL CONTRACT INFORMATION

4.1 This is an indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract tool is anticipated to support Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Surveillance activities at Clear AFS, Alaska as specified in individual TOs and is effective for a base period of two (2) years after receipt of Notice of Award with an extension of performance possible if any of the three (3) option periods of one (1) year are exercised. Total contract period if all options are exercised is five

(5) years.

4.2 Delivery or performance shall be made only as authorized by TOs issued in accordance with contract clause 52.216-18, ORDERING. The contractor shall furnish to the Government, when and if ordered, work for the items specified in individual TOs. The Government may issue concurrent orders requiring delivery to multiple destinations or performance at multiple locations.

4.3 Any TO issued during the ordering period of this contract and not completed within that period shall be completed by the Contractor within the time specified in the TO. The Contract shall govern the Contractor's and Government's rights and obligations with respect to that TO's period of performance.

4.4 Commencement and Execution of Work: The Contractor shall be required to commence the work required by a TO at the time specified on the TO, execute the work, and complete the entire project not later than the completion time specified on the TO. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the project site.

Individual TOs may include other requirements that must be met before on-site work can commence.

4.5 Notice of Completion of TO: The Contractor shall notify the Government in writing upon completion of each individual TO. The contractor shall give verbal and email advance notice, to the Contracting Officer’s authorized representative on the project, of the date the work will be fully completed and ready for final inspection.

Notice shall be provided at least 30 days prior to the expected completion date.

5.0 CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL

Contractor Quality Control (CQC) is the means by which the contractor ensures that all work, including that of subcontractors, complies with the contract requirements. The contractor is responsible for quality control and shall establish an effective quality control system. The quality control system shall consist of plans, procedures, and organization necessary to produce an end product acceptable to the USACE. Individual TOs may require project-specific QC plans. Detailed requirements will be specified in the TO scope of work.

6.0 CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL AND QUALIFICATIONS

The contractor shall have sufficient experienced personnel to perform the services required under this contract.

6.1 KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL: Key Management Personnel requirements are identified below.

The level of effort required for the Key Management Personnel shall be determined for each TO depending on the type of project and project specific needs. One person may perform the duties of more than one role if the person has the expertise and experience for both positions, based on the specific requirements of the TO.

6.1.1 PROGRAM MANAGER: The Program Manager shall be responsible for the overall management of the contract including cost, schedule, and technical quality. The contractor shall designate a Program Manager as a single point of contact for coordination of program issues with the USACE. The Program Manager shall oversee the development and implementation of the contract including administration, quality control, and sub-contracting\teaming agreements. The Program Manager shall be Senior level staff with a minimum of ten (10) years of professional experience of which five (5) years are specifically related to hardness maintenance/surveillance activities similar in size and complexity to the effort described in the

TO.

6.1.2 PROJECT MANAGER(S): The contractor shall designate a Project Manager (PM) for each TO.

The PM shall serve as the single point of contact for the TO and shall be responsible for the management and execution of all activities in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, statement of work, approved work plans, and all federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The PM shall be responsible for coordination between staff members on his team to ensure that all site activities are performed safely, efficiently, correctly, and with the appropriate level of quality. This person(s) may be responsible for management of one or more task orders under this contract. This individual shall have a minimum of six

(6) years of professional experience of which three (3) years are specifically related to hardness maintenance/hardness surveillance activities similar in size and complexity to the effort described in the

TO.

6.1.3 PROJECT ENGINEER(S): Project Engineer(s) shall be responsible for the overall planning, design, and implementation of projects. The Project Engineer shall ensure that work is performed in accordance with established project objectives, program policies, laws/regulations, guidelines, and professional standards. These individuals should have as a minimum a Bachelor of Science in Civil, Electrical, or Mechanical Engineering and at least five (5) years of experience in their area of professional expertise. Professional registration may be required for individual TOs.

6.1.4 SUSTAINMENT MANAGER(s): Sustainment Manager(s) shall be responsible for the overall planning, design, and implementation of onsite maintenance and surveillance. The Sustainment Manager shall ensure that work is performed in accordance with established project objectives, program policies, laws/regulations, guidelines, and professional standards. This individual should have as a minimum a Bachelor of Science in Civil, Electrical, or Mechanical Engineering or closely-related field and at least five

(5) years of experience in their area of professional expertise.

6.2 TECHNICAL PERSONNEL: The requirements for on-site and off-site personnel will differ for each project and shall be determined for each individual TO. This list generally reflects the personnel requirements associated with activities under this contract; however, projects will usually require only some of these personnel categories. Additional, other disciplines not listed may be needed for certain individual Task Orders. One (1) person may perform the duties of more than one (1) role if the person has the expertise and experience for the position.

6.3 HEALTH AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR FIELD PERSONNEL: The Contractor shall ensure that all personnel involved in the performance of TO work meet the safety and health requirements and that adequate documentation is available for the Contracting Officer's (or COR) review. If adequate documentation is not made available, personnel shall not be allowed on-site. All field staff, both Contractor and Subcontractor personnel, are responsible for understanding and complying with all requirements of the Contractor's approved Site Safety and Health Plan and other OSHA compliance plans as may be appropriate for the particular work in the TO.

7.0 CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING – Not Required for this contract.

8.0 ANTITERRORISM/OPERATIONS SECURITY

AT Level I Training. IAW DODI 2000.16, paragraph 3.27, a Contractor with employees performing work on a DOD installation will meet DOD Anti-Terrorism (AT) Level I training requirements. The Contractor shall submit certificates of completion for all employees and subcontractor personnel to the COR and to the CO, NLT 30 calendar days after contract start date. All new employees and subcontractor personnel who begin performance under this contract during the contract period of performance must submit certificates of completion within 30 calendar days of performance start date. AT Level 1 awareness training is available at the following website http://jko.jten.mil.

Suspicious Activity Reporting Training. The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall receive a brief/training provided by the Requiring Activity (RA) on the local suspicious activity reporting program. This locally developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the project manager, security representative or law enforcement entity.

This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR within 5 calendar days after the completion of the training.

OPSEC Training. Contractor personnel shall complete initial and annual refresher OPSEC training IAW AFI 10- 701, Chapter 4. OPSEC training is provided via Advanced Distributed Learning Service (ADLS).

The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training.

OPSEC awareness training is available at the following websites: https://www.iad.gov/ioss/ or http://www.cdse.edu/catalog/operations-security.html; or it can be provided by the RA OPSEC Officer in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum.

Handling or Access to Classified Information. Access to classified information, i.e. Confidential or Secret, may be required under this contract for select on-site individuals and specified support as requested; Access to classified information will be limited, not be required routinely, and limited to the individuals approved by the COR or contracting officer.

The Contractor shall comply with FAR 52.204-2, Security Requirements, the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD 5220.22-M); any revisions to DOD 5220.22-M, notice of which has been furnished to the contractor. For classified contracts, the DD Form 254 will be attached with the contract.

AM#1…

The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the below Security Classification Guides:

1) BMDS Security Classification Guide, Change 1, May 26, 2017

2) Ballistic Missile Defense Radars Security Classification Guide, Change 1, April 25, 2017 Facility and Individual Clearances The Prime Contractor Company must have a Facility Clearance (FCL) a t the appropriate level (IAW the NISPOM DOD 5220.22-M and AR 380-49) prior to performing any classified work under this contract. Select on-site Contractor personnel performing classified work under this contract must have the required security clearance, per AR 380-67, at the appropriate level prior to performing classified work. Security Clearances and FCL requirements are required to be maintained for the life of the contract IAW the DD Form 254 attached to the contract.

…AM#1

(End of Section C)

SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

The following have been modified:

ORDERING PROCEDURES

1.0 INDEFINITE-QUANTITY, INDEFINITE-DELIVERY (IDIQ) SINGLE-AWARD CONTRACT (SATOC)

1.1 The objective of this contract is to provide HEMP Enclosure Maintenance, Surveillance and Sustainment services to the Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) Mission Control Facility (MCF)(Bldg. 900), LRDR Power Plant (LPP)(Bldg. 901), and the LRDR Equipment Shelter (LES)(Bldg. 902) at Clear Space Force Station (CSFS), Alaska.

Task Orders (TOs) will be performance-based and will be issued as firm-fixed price (FFP).

1.2 The minimum guarantee for the contract shall be AM#1… $10K $5K …AM#1 for the base ordering period. There is no separate minimum guarantee for the optional ordering periods (if the options are exercised).

1.3 For task order proposals, the proposals shall include the established and contractually binding Key Personnel labor rates incorporated into the base IDIQ contract.

1.4 Performance shall be authorized only by issuance of task orders by the Contracting Officer; specific ordering procedures are discussed in the Ordering Procedures paragraph below. No work will be performed prior to receiving a written and signed notice by the Contracting Officer in the form of a task order (unless verbal notice if given solely as the discretion and by the Contracting Officer). Task orders may be issued by the Contracting Officer electronically via e-mail or by hard copy. The effective date of the task order will be the date signed by the Contracting Officer.

1.5 There is no limit on the number of task orders that may be issued except that a task order may not be issued over the IDIQ contract capacity. The Government may issue simultaneous task orders. See contract clause 52.216- 19 for minimum and maximum order amounts.

1.6 Modifications that increase the scope of task orders must be issued within the task order performance period; however, the performance period of the task order may extend beyond the IDIQ contract ordering period (only as permitted by Federal, DoD, and Army acquisition regulations). The Contractor shall complete all work described in the Scope of Work for each task order within the performance period of each task order.

1.7 Task orders will be issued only as firm fixed-price (FFP).

1.8 In the event of any inconsistency between the contract and any task order, the terms and conditions of the contract shall govern.

2.0 ORDERING PROCEDURES: As the needs of the Government are determined, the Contracting Officer or his/her authorized representative will notify the Contractor(s) of an existing requirement.

2.1 A Request for Proposal (RFP) (to include the scope of work and any site specific task order Special Contract Requirements for submission with the Contractor's proposal documents) will be issued per task order. The Contractor(s) shall then prepare and submit a price proposal for accomplishing the work requested for the task order or modification.

2.2 The time set for the receipt of proposal(s) for each task order or modification will be identified in each Request for Proposal.

2.3 Travel: All per diem costs shall be in accordance with the current rates established by the Joint Travel Regulations. Profit/fee shall not apply to travel costs.

2.4 Task orders will be issued by the Contracting Officer using a DD Form 1155. Each task order will include the following information as a minimum:

a. Date of order

b. Contract number and order number

c. Contract line item number (CLIN), description, quantity, and unit price or estimated cost and profit

d. Scope of Work

e. Delivery or performance schedule

f. Accounting and appropriation data

g. Method of payment and payment office, if not specified in the contract

h. Any other pertinent information

2.5 The task order will be signed by the Contracting Officer.

2.6 The Contracting Officer may at any time, prior to award of the task order, determine that the task order is not in the best interest of the Government and not issue the task order. No liability will accrue to the Government for task orders cancelled prior to award.

3.0 OPTIONS WITHIN TASK ORDERS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS: The Government may require performance of additional work, identified as an option item in individual task orders or modifications to task orders, at the price stated in the task order award. The Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within the option acceptance period stated in the specific task order or modification. Exercised options shall be completed within the task order completion period.

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP): Each task order will require a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate contractor performance on the contract and subsequent task orders.

5.0 INDEFINITE DELIVERY CONTRACT AND TASK ORDER OMBUDSMAN: IAW FAR 16.505 (b)(8), the USACE Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) has appointed a USACE Task Order Ombudsman. If the contractor believes it was not fairly considered for a particular task order, the contractor may present the matter to the contracting officer. The contractor may appeal the explanation or decision of the contracting officer to the USACE Ombudsman. The ombudsman will review the contractor’s complaint, and in coordination with the contracting officer, ensure that the contractor was afforded a fair opportunity to be considered for the task order.

USACE Task and Delivery Order Ombudsman Deputy Director of Contracting U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 441 G Street NW Washington D.C. 20314

6.0 PAYMENTS: All requests for payment shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) assigned to the specific task order. Payments to the Contractor will only be made against the CLIN associated with the specific Task (to include Fiscal Year in which the work was performed) for which the Contractor is requesting payment. The Contractor is required to clearly identify the CLIN and the amount billed for each Task within the Task Order on the payment request (invoice). The contractor shall ensure invoices are submitted to the correct address and location (may be electronically) as specified in each task order for prompt payment by the Government.

6.1 ADMINISTRATION OF PAYMENTS: The Government will make maximum use of discrete CLINs for tasks or project milestones. Work under FFP CLINS will be payable upon tender and acceptance under FAR 52.232- 1 "Payments" and FAR 52.232-25 "Prompt Payment."

7.0 DESIGNATION OF CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE(S) (COR): Designation of a COR will be made upon base IDIQ contract award and per each individual task order. Copies of the designation letters shall be furnished to the contractor. Limits of authority are described in each designation letter. If the assignments are changed, a new letter will be furnished to the contractor accordingly.

8.0 EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE: Contractor Performance Evaluations shall be completed annually for any task order over $1M and input into the Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) promptly upon completion of the task order period of performance (not later than 120 days after contract completion. The point of contact for Contractor Performance Assessment is the appointed is the Contracting Officer or the Contracting Officer’s authorized representative.

9.0 COMMUNICATION SECURITY: All communications with DOD organizations are subject to COMSEC review. Contactor personnel shall be aware that telecommunications networks are continually subject to intercept by unfriendly intelligence organizations. The DOD has authorized the military departments to conduct COMSEC monitoring and recording of telephone calls originating from or terminating at DOD organizations. Therefore, civilian contractor personnel are advised that any time they place a call to or receive a call from Alaska District offices, they are subject to COMSEC procedures. The contractor will assume the responsibility for ensuring wide and frequent dissemination of the above information to all employees dealing with official DOD information.

Additionally, the contractor shall comply with the contract clauses in Section I (to include but not limited to, FAR 52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems, and DFARS 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting) that address security of systems where Federal and DOD covered information may flow through the system.

10.0 PUBLIC AFFAIRS: The contractor shall not disclose or distribute any data, reports, software or electronic files generated or reviewed under this contract. All reports and data, including all electronic data and software, generated under this contract are the property of the Government. The contractor shall refer all requests for information to the COR and the Alaska District Project Manager.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SECTION M

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

ONE STEP - - BEST VALUE

(SINGLE AWARD)

LRDR Campus Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Surveillance

W911KB21R0043

A. OVERVIEW

B. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

C. PROPOSAL AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

1) VOLUME 1, TAB A – FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

2) VOLUME 1, TAB B – FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

3) VOLUME 1, TAB C – FACTOR 3 – SEED TASK ORDER

4) VOLUME 1, TAB D – FACTOR 4 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

D. EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND DEFINITIONS

SECTION M ATTACHMENTS

1 – PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

3 – SEED PROJECT PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT & PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

A. OVERVIEW

The objective of this contract is to provide HEMP Topology Maintenance, Surveillance and Sustainment services to the Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) Mission Control Facility (MCF)(Bldg. 900), LRDR Power Plant (LPP)(Bldg. 901), and the LRDR Equipment Shelter (LES)(Bldg. 902) at Clear Space Force Station (CSFS), Alaska.

B. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. Basis for Contract Award

This is a best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Army Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS). These regulations are available electronically at https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far. The Government will select the offer representing the best overall value based on a comparative analysis and an integrated assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation. One contract will be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, as supplemented, and who proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is determined, based on the evaluation factors to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offeror who gives the Government the greatest confidence that it will best meet, or exceed, the requirements. This may result in an award to the higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) reasonably determines that the technical and/or overall business approach and/or past performance of the higher priced offeror outweighs the cost difference.

The SSA will base the source selection decision on an integrated assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation (described below).

Award Without Discussions: The Government intends to make award without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms in response to all evaluation factors for the purposes of making the award decision without discussions, all initial proposals that are rated technically Unacceptable on any factor will be unawardable.

Number of Contracts to be Awarded: The Government intends to award one (1) Firm Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery Contract for the LRDR Campus Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Surveillance, but reserves the right to not make a contract award from this solicitation.

Rejection of Unrealistic Offers: The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low cost when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

C. EVALUATION FACTORS

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal: Award will be made to the offeror proposing the combination representing the best value to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors shown in the table and described below.

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance FACTOR 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Specialized Experience 1st (Most Important

Factor)

FACTOR 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Past Performance 1st (Equal to Factor 1) https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

FACTOR 3 Vol. 1 TAB C Seed Task Order Narrative and Technical Approach

2nd (Slightly less important than Factors 1 and 2)

FACTOR 4 Vol 2. TAB A Price (Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Schedule)

3rd (Equal in importance to Factors 1, 2 and 3 combined) N/A Vol. 2 TAB B Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

1. VOL 1 TAB A – FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

1.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

1.1.1. The prime contractor shall demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar maintenance, surveillance, and sustainment services of High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) protected facilities using Company Specialized Experience - Prime Contractor – (AM#1… Attachment 1 2 …AM#1) at the end of the section (no more than 2 pages per project). Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements. If the offeror is a joint venture, each firm of the joint venture shall provide information demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Submit projects that are currently well underway (at least 50% progress/service period completed) or completed no longer than six (6) years preceding the date of this solicitation. An offeror may receive credit for relevant experience under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the submitted project is relevant to their role on this project. Submit no more than five (5) projects for the prime contractor for the maintenance, surveillance, and sustainment services of High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) protected facilities.

1.1.2 Provide one page consolidated list of submitted projects for prime contractor to include a matrix that identifies the Specialized Experience projects and the firms that worked on each (teaming).

1.1.3 Provide a supplemental narrative, not to exceed two (2) pages, to address any of the following that are applicable. The information shall be limited to projects that are well underway (at least 50% progress completed) or that have been completed no longer than six (6) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

a . Offerors who submit experience information of a parent, sister or other affiliated company shall describe what involvement such company will have on the instant acquisition and demonstrate a firm commitment that the affiliated firm will participate meaningfully in the performance of the contract. The narrative shall clearly and specifically indicate what resources of the parent, sister or other affiliated company – its workforce, management, facilities, or other resources – will be provided or relied upon for contract performance. The Government may discount the experience of a parent, sister or other affiliated company unless the prime contractor clearly provides evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the parent, sister or other affiliated company or provides a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter including the following:

(i) A statement of commitment as to the performance and utilization of the identified entity’s resources on the project.

(ii) Signatures of both the Offeror and Meaningful Relationship Entity

b. Describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described on the project experience forms. Identify specific projects and address how the team members worked together to achieve safety, quality, and schedule compliance goals.

1.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

1.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the prime contractor and subcontractors as relevant to their role on this project. The Government may place greater importance on demonstrated maintenance, surveillance, and sustainment services of High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) protected facilities experience by the prime or key subcontractor depending on relevancy. For the prime contractor, the Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience. In assessing relevancy of Specialized Experience, the relevancy ratings included under the Past Performance evaluation factor will be utilized.

1.2.2 Relevant experience includes:

(a) Experience with the maintenance, surveillance, and sustainment services of High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) protected facilities;

(b) Experience with the development of Hardness Maintenance/Hardness Surveillance Program Plans for HEMP protected facilities;

(c) Experience with the onsite maintenance and surveillance of HEMP protected facilities;

(d) Experience with verification testing IAW MIL-STD-188-125-1 to support USSTRATCOM SACP

Certification;

(e) Previous experience with the execution of service contracts;

(f) Previous teaming experience between the prime contractor and subcontractors.

Experience with HEMP maintenance, surveillance, and sustainment services is considered most relevant. Experience as the Prime Contractor who self-performed the work will be rated inherently more important, than projects where the Prime Contractor subcontracted out the maintenance and surveillance activities. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important that non-Federal Government project experience. The construction and installation of HEMP shielded facilities are considered not relevant to the inspection and maintenance services required by this contract.

1.2.3 To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the offeror shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. Experience of a parent, sister or other affiliated company will not be considered if the offeror fails to demonstrate what resources of the parent, sister or other affiliated company will be provided or relied upon or fails to demonstrate the existence of a contractual or meaningful relationship with the parent, sister or other affiliated company. Experience under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the firm’s role on the submitted project is not considered relevant to their anticipated role on this project.

2. VOL 1 TAB B – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

2.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

2.1.1 Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner’s perspective. The offeror shall provide customer reference name(s), company affiliation and current contact information (phone number and email address) utilizing the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 2) the offeror may rely on or provide finalized CPARS reports. Previously completed PPQ’s may be submitted however ensure current phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. The completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal and may be duplicated for submission on future solicitations.

If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 2), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Kimberly Tripp via email at Kimberly.D.Tripp@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

2.1.2 Projects cited shall be currently well underway (at least 50% progress completed) or completed within six

(6) years preceding the date of this solicitation. The Government may contact and interview the points of contact and reserves the right to review data from CPARS or other agency performance databases on projects determined to be recent and relevant as defined above. Team members are encouraged to briefly provide information on problems encountered on identified or other contracts and the corrective action taken.

2.1.3 In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), System for Award Management (SAM), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

2.1.4 An offeror will not receive credit for past performance of a parent, sister or other affiliated company if the offeror fails to demonstrate what resources of the parent, sister or other affiliated company will be provided or relied upon or fails to demonstrate the existence of a contractual or meaningful relationship with the parent, sister or other affiliated company. An offeror may receive credit for relevant past performance under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the submitted project is relevant to their role on this project

2.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

2.2.1. The Government will first assess and rate the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the offeror to the scope of this contract for overall application to the performance confidence assessment ratings described hereinafter. The projects will include those submitted under the Specialized Experience Factor as well as from other sources described above. This rating is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing overall past performance confidence assessment rating assigned to the Past Performance Factor. The past performance relevancy ratings are described below:

• Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

• Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

• Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

• Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities…