CLR043_AM_1_Package.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: CLR043, Fire Station, Clear Air Force Station, Alaska

a. This amendment provides changes to the solicitation as indicated on the continuation pages of this document

b. PROPOSAL DUE DATE HAS NOT BEEN EXTENDED. Proposals shall be submitted electronically or in accordance w ith Section 00 21 00, Para 1.10, Proposal Submittals.

c. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AMENDMENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS STANDARD FOR 1442.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-Dec-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB18R0018

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Nov-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Dec-2017

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

a. The following drawings are substituted for the superseded documents/sections:

NONE

b. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections: The identifier “AM#01” appears before and after new and/or revised materials, except as noted below.

SECTION 00 22 10 – PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

- Revised paragraphs 5.1, 5.1.2, 5.2.2, 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 (Reissuing pages 4, 5, 6 and 8).

NOTE: Revisions within the following documents do not contain the above referenced identifiers:

SECTION 00 11 00 – STANDARD FORM 1442, BLOCK 13A

- Revised number of copies from 1 to 3.

c. The following sections are deleted:

d. The following documents are added:

e. The following revisions are incorporated:

f. Other:

(End of Summary of Changes)

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME.

Section 00 22 10 W911KB18R0018

CLR043

Section 00 22 10 Page 4

Attachment 3 may also be used for consultants with fire station experience if included as part of the design build team. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements. If the offeror is a newly formed joint venture without any previous experience as the joint venture, each firm of the joint venture shall provide information demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Submit projects that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than seven (7) years preceding the date of this Solicitation.

An offeror may receive credit for relevant experience under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the submitted project is relevant to their role on this project. Offerors who submit experience information of a parent, sister or other affiliated company must describe what involvement such company will have on the instant acquisition. The offeror shall provide a one page narrative that clearly and specifically indicates what resources of the parent, sister or other affiliated company – its workforce, management, facilities, or other resources – will be provided or relied upon for contract performance. The Government may discount the experience of a parent, sister or other affiliated company unless the prime contractor clearly provides evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the parent, sister or other affiliated company or provides a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter including the following:

1. A statement of commitment as to the performance and utilization of the identified entity’s resources on the project.

2. Signatures of both the Offeror and Meaningful Relationship Entity.

The offeror shall select the design firm(s). Design firms may list projects of prime contractors they have worked for, or projects directly contracted with Government, private or commercial customers. If projects were design-build, so identify them. Submit no more than five (5) projects for the prime contractor for the below facility type or equivalent or similar commercial or institutional type facility. Submit no more than six (6) projects total for the design firms and consultant, if applicable, and no more than five (5) projects for any individual design firm/consultant. Submit relevant projects for the below facility type or similar commercial or institutional type:

• Fire Station

5.1.1. Provide a one page consolidated list of submitted projects for prime contractor and design firms to include a matrix that identifies the Specialized Experience projects and the firms that worked on each (teaming). If needed, the Specialized Experience matrix may be submitted on one 11” x 17” sheet.

AM#01

Section 00 22 10 Page 5

5.1.2. Provide a supplemental narrative, not to exceed two (2) pages, to address any of the following that are applicable. The information shall be limited to projects that are well underway (at least 50% completed) or that have been completed and turned over no longer than seven (7) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

(a) If submitting relevant experience under a previous business relationship, clearly describe the offeror’s role on the submitted project. Offerors who submit experience information of a parent, sister or other affiliated company shall describe what involvement such company will have on the instant acquisition and demonstrate a firm commitment that the affiliated firm will participate meaningfully in the performance of the contract. The narrative shall clearly and specifically indicate how the resources of the parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company – its workforce, management, facilities, or other resources – will be provided or relied upon for contract performance.

The Government may discount experience of a parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company unless the prime contractor clearly provides, in its proposal, evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company. If there is no contractual arrangement between the prime contractor and the parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company, provide a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter including the following:

1. A statement of commitment as to the performance and utilization of the identified entity’s resources on this project.

2. Signatures of both the Offeror and Meaningful Relationship Entity.

(b) Describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described on the project experience forms and address how the team members worked together to achieve safety, quality and schedule compliance goals. Identify specific projects and teaming.

(c) Describe team members’ experience with Sustainable Design and Development, if not included on the project experience forms.

(d) Describe design-build experience on other types of projects. Identify specific projects.

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, relevant experience of the prime contractor and design firms in design, construction or design-build as relevant to their role proposed on this project. Experience on the similar projects identified on the project

Section 00 22 10 Page 6 experience sheets (Attachment 2) will receive more consideration than experience provided in the supplemental narrative. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience. In assessing relevancy of Specialized Experience, the relevancy ratings included at the end of this section will be utilized.

5.2.2. The Offeror must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in both design and construction for the facility type, which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts. Recent experience includes projects well underway (at least 50% completed) or those completed and turned over within seven (7) years of the proposal issue date for this RFP for construction experience. Joint Venture partners shall each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their proposed role on this project.

5.2.3. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System, CPARS and any other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.2.4. To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror and its proposed design firm(s) shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. Experience of a parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company will not be considered if the offeror fails to demonstrate what resources of the parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company will be provided or relied upon or fails to demonstrate the existence of a contractual or meaningful relationship with the parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company. Experience under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the firm’s role on the submitted project is not considered relevant to their anticipated role on this project.

Section 00 22 10 Page 8

Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal and may be duplicated for submission on future solicitations. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first 2 pages of the PPQ (Attachment 4), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Theresa Afrank, via email at: Theresa.m.afrank@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

6.1.1 Projects cited shall be currently well underway (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or construction completed and turned over within seven (7) years preceding the date of this solicitation. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last seven (7) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

6.1.2 In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. If the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) is used, past performance will be reviewed going back six (6) years preceding the date of this solicitation. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

6.1.3 Experience of a parent, sister or other affiliated company will not be considered if the offeror fails to demonstrate what resources of the parent, sister or other affiliated company will be provided or relied upon or fails to demonstrate the existence of a contractual or meaningful relationship with the parent, sister or other affiliated company. An offeror may receive credit for relevant past performance under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the submitted project is relevant to their role on this project.

AM#01

mailto:Theresa.m.afrank@usace.army.mil