Government Response (Peer Intervention).xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 22 KB Posted

Attached to
Peer Intervention Lethal Means Safety III AC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W91151-23-Q-0064
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Hood

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document contains instructions and responses to questions regarding a solicitation for peer intervention services. The solicitation is issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Hood for Peer Intervention Lethal Means Safety III AC services. The instructions provide guidance for submitting comments at critical, substantive, or administrative levels and requiring supporting rationale. The responses clarify that no subcontracting plan is evaluated for award, plans are for responsiveness only; and certificates will not be required with the offer but within 30 days of award.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Peer Intervention Lethal Means Safety III AC, newest first.
File Type Posted
W91151-23-Q-0064 v1.5.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Instructions

**INSTRUCTIONS & GENERAL RULES**

1) LEVEL column--for Critical comments enter A for Administrative, S for Substantive and C for Critical.

Use the following guidelines for rating comments:
(1) Critical: Critical comments apply to issues, which are considered potential “show stoppers” until resolved. Critical issues identify problems of such severity that, if not resolved, will have a significant impact on the cost, performance, or schedule of the program or related programs. Critical issues can arise from several causes.
(2) Substantive: Substantive comments document problems within the program worthy of correction, but not of such severity as to require program redirection. These comments must be accompanied by a recommendation for correction of the document with supporting rationale.
(3) Administrative: Administrative comments provide feedback to the program office concerning structure of the document, spelling, punctuation, grammar, paragraph marking inconsistencies, and other items related to the document’s form and readability rather than its content.

2) Comments/Rationale column: provide clear concise comment or recommended change to specific document reference (page, para, line). Rationale should clearly articulate purpose for comment/change.

NOTE: Comments without rationale clearly explaining proposed recommendations or without citing any governing references are not useful. In general, format comments will not be categorized higher than Administrative unless there is a clear rationale how performance, interoperability, supportability, or other factors that may impact the potential success of the program .

Comments

Document Name: CRM for AG SAN PWS
Control NumberSection
(e.g. Section 3.1, Section 4, etc)Paragraph Header Number & NameCOMMENT LEVEL (C/S/A)COMMENTRATIONALEGovernment Response
1Addendum to FAR 52.212-1Volume I, part 4This RFQ is unrestricted, but on page 61 it lists a requirement that identified as “Other than Small Business” under NAICS 611699 must submit a subcontracting plan.If an offeror is not a small business, is it required to subcontract a certain percentage of work to small businesses? If so, what is the threshold for subcontracting?There is no requirement from the Government mandating that a business must sub-contract a certain percentage of work to small businesses. FAR part 19.702 provides the statuatory requirements as a reference.
2Addendum to FAR 52.212-1Volume I, part 4This RFQ is unrestricted, but on page 61 it lists a requirement that identified as “Other than Small Business” under NAICS 611699 must submit a subcontracting plan.How will the subcontracting plan impact the ranking of offers?The subcontracting plan is not an evaluated factor for award. Submission of a plan is required for an offeror to be considered responsive IAW Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 but is not evaluated for award.
3Addendum to FAR 52.212-2Section B, part 4On page 61, it says “Offeror shall provide a State Unemployment Tax Act (SUTA) Certificate and Workers' Compensation Insurance (WCI) Certificate. In addition, if General Liability is proposed separate from G&A, the Offeror shall submit the General Liability certificate to support the proposed rate. This information will assist in facilitating option period wage determination price adjustment(s), if necessary (see FAR 52.222-43).”Does this need to be part of the Offer, or is this something that is provided after the award is made?This will not be required to be submitted as part of the offer. The awardee will need to submit this within 30 days of contract award.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .