HAZMAT_Survey.pdf

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS I TASK ORDER W9126G-18-F2533 I 7GAE

ATTACHMENT P

LEAD & ASBESTOS ABATEMENT

Champion Environmental Consulting, Inc.

8911 Capital of Texas Highway North, Building 3, Suite 3210 Austin Texas 78759 main (512) 992-5383

January 7, 2019

Eric Phillips, LEED AP, CAPM Project Coordinator | BIM Manager Seven Generations Architecture & Engineering, LLC 600 E. Michigan Avenue, Suite B Kalamazoo, MI 49007

RE: Limited Asbestos Survey of Target Areas at the Site

Renovation B36000 Convert HPS to HW at Fort Hood, TX Project #18-1187

Dear Mr. Phillips:

Champion Environmental Consulting Inc. (Champion Environmental) was retained by Seven Generations Architecture & Engineering, LLC (Hereinafter, the Client) to conduct a limited asbestos survey at the Site within the following Target Areas as identified by the Client.

Renovation B36000 Convert HPS to HW at Fort Hood

The attached report summarizes these services in accordance with our discussion. Regulated amounts of asbestos were detected in the following samples collected during the sampling program:

Sample #(s) Location/Material Result – Asbestos

APPROXIMATE

Quantity

7 PH1, Expansion Tank Insulation 15% Chrysotile 150 SF

10 AHU P2A HWS (old) Insulation 15% Chrysotile 100 LF

11 AHU P2A HWS Insulation 30% Chrysotile 100 LF

12 AHU P2A HWR Insulation 8% Chrysotile 12% Amosite

25 Fittings

15 AHU P3A SS (old) Insulation 15% Chrysotile 100 LF

50 Room 2029 2F1 HWR Sealant 4% Chrysotile 25 LF and 6 Fittings

103 FD 1201 1D1 Cond Return Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 6 Fittings

104 FD 1201 1D1 HWS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 6 Fittings

107 FD 1190 From East to West 1 Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 4 Fittings

108 FD 1190 From East to West 2 Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 4 Fittings

109 FD 1190 From East to West 3 Sealant 4% Chrysotile 20 LF and 4 Fittings

117 X107 GE2 HWS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 50 LF and 12 Fittings

118 X107 GE2 HWR Sealant 4% Chrysotile 50 LF and 12 Fittings

APPROXIMATE

Quantity

119 X107 GE3 SS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 50 LF and 12 Fittings

125 0202 GD1 HWS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 20 LF and 8 Fittings

132 0202 GD3 CR Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 4 Fittings

137 0202 SW CR Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 4 Fittings

142 XG09 MG6 SS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 100 LF and 20 Fittings

148 XG09 MG6 HW Conv Tank H3 Sealant Foil

4% Chrysotile 905 SF

The laboratory analytical results are attached in Appendix A of this report. Licenses are attached in Appendix B of this report. Reference Drawings are attached in Appendix C of this report. If you have any questions on this report or any other matter, please do not hesitate to call me at (512) 992-5383.

Sincerely, Champion Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Wade Champion Individual Asbestos Consultant DSHS License No. 10-5410 Expiration Date 8/25/19

Project #18-1187 Asbestos Survey – B36000 Ft Hood January 7, 2019

1.0 Services

Table I Services Summary

Client Seven Generations Architecture & Engineering, LLC 600 E. Michigan Avenue, Suite B Kalamazoo, MI 49007

Site Address Fort Hood Killeen, TX

Target Areas identified by client

Renovation B36000 Convert HPS to HW

Scope of Work

1. Conduct a preliminary visual reconnaissance of the renovation /demolition Target Areas identified by the client to visually determine the presence of suspect ACM

2. In the event suspect ACM is identified, visually assess suspect ACM for variations in color, texture, thickness, and other characteristics useful in determining the material’s uniformity and homogenous area

3. In the event suspect ACM is identified, evaluate current physical condition, friability and potential for damage, assign hazard ratings and estimate quantities

4. Collect samples of identified and reasonably accessible suspect ACM within Target Areas

5. Send suspect ACM samples to laboratory for analysis of asbestos content, if any

6. Prepare report summarizing results

Sample Date(s) November 27- November 30, 2018

Inspector(s) DSHS License #

Wade Champion 10-5410

Samples Collected: A total of 223 samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected, as agreed with the Client, within reasonably accessible portions of the Target Areas

Analytical Lab: CA Labs, LLC asbestos laboratory is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) through the National Institute for Standards and Technology (ID Code No 200772-0) and licensed as a DSHS licensed asbestos bulk laboratory (License No. 30-0370)

No. of Samples Analyzed 223 Samples – Main Building Analyzed Date: December 6, 2018

Report Date: January 7, 2019 Analytical Method: Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

“Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” [40 CFR Chapter 1 (1-1-87 Edition) Part 763, Subpart F, Attachment III]

General Information about Suspect ACM

Asbestos has historically been a component of a wide variety of building materials. These types of building materials, which may potentially contain asbestos, are termed suspect asbestos-containing materials” or suspect ACM). Suspect ACM may or may not contain asbestos. The actual asbestos content of a suspect material can be determined only through proper sampling and analysis performed by a qualified building inspector and laboratory.

Pursuant to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) asbestos regulations (40 CFR§61:141, et seq) ACM can be classified into two categories; friable ACM which can be reduced to powder or crumbled under light hand pressure (e.g. ceiling textures and thermal system insulation) and non-friable ACM, which are materials that cannot be easily crumbled (e.g. floor tile and floor tile mastic).

Regulated asbestos containing materials (RACM) which are those materials containing over 1% asbestos as defined under asbestos NESHAP.

2.0 Standard of Care and Limitations:

This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Client named herein to aid in the identification and management of ACM and RACM in the renovation/demolition Target Areas identified by the Client.

Champion Environmental performed its service in a manner consistent with the level of care and expertise exercised by asbestos professional performing the same or similar services at the same time and in the same geographic area.

Samples for this asbestos survey were collected from discrete sample location within the rooms and areas specifically identified herein (i.e., Target Areas). While attempts were made to obtain representative samples most likely to contain asbestos, finding and conclusions herein are necessarily limited by the number of samples taken and access provided for sampling activities. The results herein cannot guarantee that no asbestos is present in any area not sampled. This asbestos survey was not intended to be a comprehensive asbestos inspection of the site, nor was it intended to be used for evaluation of worker health and safety conditions. To determine whether regulated ACM is present at other locations not sampled herein, a comprehensive asbestos inspection of the site would be necessary.

Conclusions and recommendations herein represent the professional opinions of the Champion Environmental Consulting personnel involved with the project. The results of this report should not be considered as legal interpretation of existing federal, state or local environmental, health and safety laws or regulations. Champion Environmental Consulting, Inc., assumes no responsibility or liability for errors in information or data provided by third party sources.

3.0 Report Use and Reliance:

This report represents Champion Environmental’s services as of the sampling date. As our final document, it may not be altered after final issuance. This study and report were prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of the Client solely its use and reliance in determining the presence of FACM in identified Target Areas of the site. The Client was the only party to which Champion Environmental explained the risks and was solely involved in shaping the scope of the services. Accordingly, reliance on this report by any other party may involve assumptions leading to an unintended interpretation of findings and opinions.

With the consent of Champion Environmental and the Client, Champion Environmental may offer reliance to third parties or contract with other parties to develop findings and opinions related to such party’s unique risk management concerns. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any and all third-party reliance upon this Report shall be limited to the fair market value of services undertaken to perform this Report as of the report date.

4.0 Methodologies:

4.1 Sampling

This limited inspection was guided by the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) (see 25 TAC §295.58) and generally in accord with AHERA (the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act of 1986, Public law 99-519) sampling protocols (see 40 CFR §§ 763.86 and 763.88). The AHERA sampling protocols are statistically-based and were originally developed to implement AHERA which amends the Federal Toxic Substances Control Act (see 15 USC, §2641, et seq). These rules are often followed by the OSHA, and the Department of State Healthy Services (DSHS). Champion Environmental generally followed these sampling protocols to in an effort to collect representative samples of the various suspect building materials in the Target Areas.

Suspect ACM samples were collected by physically removing a small portion (approximately one square inch) of the suspect material using a sharp instrument. All layers of the material samples were penetrated and registered as separate samples. Disturbance of adjacent material was minimized during the sampling activities. Each sample was place into a separate container and then sealed. Each sample was labeled with the sample number and collected location, and a chain-of-custody form was completed. The sampling instrument was cleaned between each sample collected to mitigate potential cross contamination between samples collected.

4.2 Analytical Procedures

If the results of the bulk laboratory analysis reveal asbestos, the percentage of asbestos contained within the sample is compared with the criteria outlined in the EPA definition of asbestos-containing material (and which value is also followed by OSHA and DSHS). If a concentration of greater than one percent (1%) asbestos is reported, it is defined by the Asbestos NESHAP as a positive identification and the material could be considered RACM depending upon the nature of the ACM and its coverage.

The Asbestos NESHAP states the RACM (as defined in 40 CFR §61.141) containing less than 10% asbestos should be verified by point counting. If bulk sampling analysis determines that asbestos content of a friable asbestos sample is less than 10%, the building own may;(i) elect to assume the asbestos content to be greater than 1% and treat the material as RACM, or (ii) require verification of asbestos content by point counting. If a result obtained by point counting is different from a result obtained by visual estimation, the point count result is used.

5.0 Recommendations:

Based upon the forgoing results, if applicable, Champion Environmental Consulting, Inc. offers the recommendations presented below. Such recommendations should be implemented prior to the commencement of any renovation or demolition activities or any other activities that would potentially disturb the identified ACM or RACM at the site.

Identified ACM. Including non-friable ACM that will be disturbed by renovation or demolition activities should be removed as soon as feasibly possible by appropriately licensed personnel and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

Identified ACM which will not be disturbed by renovation or demolition activities but which is damaged should be repaired or encapsulated (by appropriately licensed personnel and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations) to prevent future damage.

ACM to remain in place should be enclosed in airtight impermeable barrier or encapsulated to prevent damage.

An Asbestos Operation and Maintenance Program should be implemented to manage existing ACM in place.

In the event renovation or demolition activities are slated for portions of the site outside of the Target Areas, an asbestos survey should be performed for those portions of the site –prior to the initiation of renovation or demolition activities.

APPENDIX A

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT(S)

Limited Asbestos Survey of Target Areas at the Site Related to Proposed Demolition/Renovation

Project #18-1187

Renovation B36000 Convert HPS to HW at Fort Hood

Laboratory Analytical Results Summary

APPROXIMATE

Quantity 7 PH1, Expansion Tank Insulation 15% Chrysotile 150 SF

10 AHU P2A HWS (old) Insulation 15% Chrysotile 100 LF

11 AHU P2A HWS Insulation 30% Chrysotile 100 LF

12 AHU P2A HWR Insulation 8% Chrysotile 12% Amosite

25 Fittings

15 AHU P3A SS (old) Insulation 15% Chrysotile 100 LF

50 Room 2029 2F1 HWR Sealant 4% Chrysotile 25 LF and 6 Fittings

103 FD 1201 1D1 Cond Return Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 6 Fittings

104 FD 1201 1D1 HWS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 6 Fittings

107 FD 1190 From East to West 1 Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 4 Fittings

108 FD 1190 From East to West 2 Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 4 Fittings

109 FD 1190 From East to West 3 Sealant 4% Chrysotile 20 LF and 4 Fittings

117 X107 GE2 HWS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 50 LF and 12 Fittings

118 X107 GE2 HWR Sealant 4% Chrysotile 50 LF and 12 Fittings

119 X107 GE3 SS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 50 LF and 12 Fittings

125 0202 GD1 HWS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 20 LF and 8 Fittings

132 0202 GD3 CR Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 4 Fittings

137 0202 SW CR Sealant 4% Chrysotile 30 LF and 4 Fittings

142 XG09 MG6 SS Sealant 4% Chrysotile 100 LF and 20 Fittings

148 XG09 MG6 HW Conv Tank H3 Sealant Foil

4% Chrysotile 905 SF

Note: Refer to attached laboratory report for details

Attn:

Customer Project:

Reference #: Date: 12/6/2018

Analysis and Method

Discussion

Qualifications

A "trace asbestos" will be reported if the analyst observes far less than 1% asbestos. CA Labs defines "trace asbestos" as a few fibers detected by the analyst in several preparations and will indicate as such under these circumstances.

Quantification of <1% will actually be reported as <=1% (allowable variance close to 1% is high). Such results are ideal for point counting, and the technique is mandatory for friable samples (NESHAP, Nov. 1990 and clarification letter 8 May 1991) under 1% percent asbestos and the "trace asbestos". In order to make all initial PLM reports issued from CA Labs NESHAP compliant, all <1% asbestos results (except floor tiles) will be point counted at no additional charge.

CA Labs is accredited by the National Voluntary Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for selected test methods for airborne fiber analysis (TEM), and for bulk asbestos fiber analysis (PLM). All analysts have a college degree in a natural science (geology, biology, or environmental science) or are recognized by a state professional board in one these disciplines .Extensive in-house training programs are used to augment education background of the analyst. The group leader of polarized light has received supplemental McCrone Research training for asbestos identification. This report is not covered by the scope of AIHA accreditation. Analysis performed at CA Labs, LLC 12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809.

Fibrous talc containing samples may even contain a related asbestos fiber known as anthophyllite. Under certain conditions the same fiber may actually contain both talc and anthophyllite (a phenomenon called intergrowth). Again, TEM detection methods are recommended. CA Labs PLM report comments will denote suspected amounts of asbestiform anthophyllite with talc, where further analysis is recommended.

Some samples (floor tiles, surfacings, etc.) may contain fibers too small to be detectable by PLM analysis and should be analyzed by TEM bulk protocols.

Laboratory Analysis Report - Polarized Light

Champion Environmental Wade Champion

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Materials Characterization - Bulk Asbestos Analysis

Summary of polarizing light microscopy (PLM / Stereomicroscopy bulk asbestos analysis) using the methods described in 40CFR Part 763

Appendix E to Subpart E (Interim and EPA 600 / R-93 / 116 (Improved). The sample is first viewed with the aid of stereomicroscopy. Numerous liquid slide preparations are created for analysis under the polarized microscope where identifications and quantifications are preformed. Calibrated liquid refractive oils are used as liquid mouting medium. These oils are used for identification (dispersion staining). A calibrated visual estimation is reported, should any asbestiform mineral be present. Other techniques such as acid washing are used in conjugation with refractive oils for detection of smaller quantities of asbestos. All asbestos percentages are based on calibrated visual estimation traceable to NIST standards for regulated of asbestos. Traceability to measurement and calibration is achieved by using known amounts and types of asbestos from standards where analyst and laboratory accuracy are measured. As little as 0.001% asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 0.50% (well above the laboratory definition of trace).

Vermiculite containing samples may have trace amounts of actinolite-tremolite, where not found be PLM should be analyzed using TEM methods and / or water separation techniques. Suspected actinolite/vermiculite presence will be indicated through the sample comment section of this report.

Labs

A

C

Overview of Project Sample Material Containing Asbestos

Customer Project: 36000 HPSTO HW CA Labs Project #: CBR18125891

Tan Insulation

White Insulation

White Surfaced Tan Sealant

Gray and White Surfaced Tan Sealant

White Surfaced White Sealant

Tan Sealant on Foil

Glossary of abbreviations (non-asbestos fibers and non-fibrous minerals):

104 1

Gray and White Surfaced Tan

Sealant 4% Chrysotile

50 1 White Surfaced Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

103 1 Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

12 3 White Insulation

12% Amosite

8% Chrysotile

15 3 Tan Insulation 15% Chrysotile

10 3 Tan Insulation 15% Chrysotile

11 3 White Insulation 30% Chrysotile

7 1

This report relates to the items tested. This report is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the return of any samples.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay)

Tan Insulation

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

List of Affected Building

Material Types

Sample # Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

15% Chrysotile

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Labs

A

Glossary of abbreviations (non-asbestos fibers and non-fibrous minerals):

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay)

This report relates to the items tested. This report is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the return of any samples.

132 1 White Surfaced Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

119 1 Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

125 1 White Surfaced Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

117 1 Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

118 1 Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

Gray and White Surfaced Tan

Sealant 4% Chrysotile

109 1 White Surfaced Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

List of Affected Building

Material Types

107 1 White Surfaced Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

Sample # Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Labs

A

Glossary of abbreviations (non-asbestos fibers and non-fibrous minerals):

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay)

142 1 White Surfaced Tan Sealant 4% Chrysotile

148 1 Tan Sealant on Foil 4% Chrysotile

137 1 White Surfaced White Sealant 4% Chrysotile

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

List of Affected Building

Material Types

This report relates to the items tested. This report is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the return of any samples.

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Sample #

Labs

A

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Customer Info: Attn: Customer Project:

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

100% fg

4 1 White Surfaced White Wrap N None Detected

10% fg

60% ce 30% qu, ma, bi

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

100% fg

3 1 White Sealant Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

100% fg

2 1 White Sealant Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

1 1 White Sealant Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

10% fg

60% ce 30% qu, ma, ot

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

2 White Wrap on Foil N None Detected

8 1 White Sealant Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

4 3 Tan Fibrous Insulation N

40% fg 45% qu, ma, ca

4 2 Brown Wrap on Foil N

7 1 Tan Insulation Y 15% Chrysotile

95% qu, ma

6 1 White Surfaced Tan Sealant N None Detected 6% wo 94% qu, ma, bi

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

5 1 Red Sealant Y None Detected 5% fg

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

11 4 1 White Sealant N

3 Tan Insulation Y 15% Chrysotile 40% fg 45% qu, ma, ca

4 2 White Woven Wrap N

100% fg

10 4 1 White Sealant N

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

9 1 White Sealant Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

3 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

60% ce

40% qu, ma, bi, ot

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

14 1

White Surfaced White Wrap on

Foil N None Detected

80% qu, ma, ca

13 1 Gray Sealant Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

3 White Insulation Y

12% Amosite

8% Chrysotile

4 2 White Woven Wrap N

12 4 1 White Sealant N

3 White Insulation Y 30% Chrysotile 70% qu, ma, ca

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

4 2 White Woven Wrap N

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

100% qu, ma

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

17 1 White Sealant Y None Detected

100% qu, ma, ot

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

16 1 White Sealant on Foil N None Detected

3 Tan Insulation Y 15% Chrysotile 40% fg 45% qu, ma, ca

4 2 White Woven Wrap N

15 4 1 White Sealant N

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

6% wo 94% qu, ma

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

21 1 White Sealant Y None Detected

100% ce

2 Gray Sealant Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

20 1 White Wrap Y None Detected

10% fg

60% ce 30% qu, ma, ot

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

19 1 White Wrap on Foil N None Detected

18 1 White Surfaced White Wrap N None Detected

10% fg

60% ce 30% qu, ma, bi

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

100% fg

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

100% fg

23 1 White Sealant Y None Detected

6% wo

10% fg 84% qu, ma

3 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

6% wo 94% qu, ma

2 White Woven Wrap on Foil N None Detected 60% ce 40% qu, ma, ot

22 1 White Sealant Y None Detected

30% qu, ma, ot

3 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

2 White Wrap on Foil N None Detected

10% fg

60% ce

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

60% ce

40% qu, ma, bi, ot

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

27 1

White Surfaced White Woven

Wrap on Foil N None Detected

60% ce 40% qu, ma, ot

3 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

2 White Wrap on Foil N None Detected

5% fg 95% qu, ma

26 1 White Sealant Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

25 1 Red Sealant Y None Detected

84% qu, ma, ot

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

24 1 White Sealant on Foil N None Detected

6% wo

10% fg

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

6% wo 94% qu, ma, bi

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

31 1 White Surfaced White Sealant N None Detected

100% fg

30 1 Red Sealant Y None Detected 4% ce 96% qu, ma, ot

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

100% fg

29 1 White Sealant on Foil N None Detected 100% qu, ma, ot

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

28 1 White Sealant on Foil N None Detected 10% fg 90% qu, ma, ot

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

100% fg

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

3 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

6% wo 94% qu, ma

2 White Wrap on Foil N None Detected 60% ce 40% qu, ma, ot

33 1 White Sealant Y None Detected

60% ce 40% qu, ma, ot

3 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg

2 White Wrap on Foil N None Detected

40% qu, ma, ot

32 1 White Sealant Y None Detected 6% wo 94% qu, ma

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

2 White Wrap on Foil N None Detected 60% ce

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

10% fg

90% ce

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

2 White Wrap N None Detected

100% fg

36 1 Gray Surfaced White Sealant N None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

100% fg

35 1 White Sealant on Foil N None Detected 10% fg 90% qu, ma, ot

3 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected

94% qu, ma

2 White Wrap on Foil N None Detected 60% ce 40% qu, ma, ot

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

34 1 White Sealant Y None Detected 6% wo

512-992-5383 Date Of Sampling:

512-597-8787 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Champion Environmental

36000 HPSTO HW

CBR18125891

8911 Capital of TX Hwy Bldg 3, Ste 3210

Austin, TX 78759 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Wade Champion CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

12/6/2018

2 day 12/4/2018

Phone # 11/30/2018

Fax # 18-1187

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Kyle Hoffpauir Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

10% fg

60% ce 30% qu, ma, ot

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta -…