IMI_Pilot_Draft_SOW.pdf
PDF 828 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Intent to Sole Source IMI/PTE Effort Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-RFI-IMI_PTE
About this file
Draft SOW
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| JA_Redacted.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PEO-STRI-15-W???
15 August 2016, Rev 1.0
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Statement of Work (SOW)
Live Training Systems (LTS) Interactive Multimedia Instructions
(IMI) Development and Pilot Training Evaluation (PTE) Events
U.S. Army Program Executive Office for
Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation (PEO STRI)
12350 Research Parkway
Orlando, FL 32826-3276
X Prepared By:
Training Officer
Concurrence:
Chief Engineer
Vic Elsey, PM LTS Jesse Campos, PM LTS Training Officer Chief Engineering
X
Lead Acquisition Logistician
Chief Logistics Manager, PM TRADE
Destiny Laski, PM LTS Roberto Capote, PM TRADE Lead Acquisition Logistician Chief Logistics Manager
X Submitted By:
Project Director
Approved by:
Product Manager
David Brunat, APM I-MILES LTC Corey Hemingway, PM LTS
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Table of Contents
1. SCOPE
1.1. INTRODUCTION
1.2. BACKGROUND
1.3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
2.1. MILITARY STANDARDS
2.2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANUALS
2.3. OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS
2.4. AVAILABILITY OF OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS AND PUBLICATIONS
2.5. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
3. REQUIREMENTS
3.1. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
3.1.1. Data Rights
3.1.2. Post-Award Conference (PAC)
3.1.3. Planning and Coordination
3.1.4. Off-site Support
3.1.5. Program Management Reviews (PMRs)
3.1.6. Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
3.1.7. Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD)
3.1.8. Associate Contractor Agreements (ACAs)
3.1.9. Quality Assurance
3.1.10. Site Security
3.2. TRAINING SUPPORT
3.2.1. Training Situation Document
3.2.2. Instructional Performance Requirements Document
3.2.3. Instructional Media Requirements Document
3.2.4. Course Conduct Information Package
3.2.5. Training Conduct Support Document
3.2.6. Training Evaluation Document
3.2.7. Instructional Media Design Package
3.2.8. Instructional Media Package
3.2.10. Vehicle and Equipment Access
3.3. INSTRUCTIONAL MULTIMEDIA INSTRUCTION (IMI) DEVELOPMENT
3.4. PILOT TRAINING EVALUATION EVENTS (PTEE)
3.4.1. BRADLEY COMBAT VEHICLE TACTICAL ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION SYSTEM (CVTESS) PTEE
3.4.2. INDIVIDUAL WEAPON SYSTEM (IWS) PTEE
3.5. LANGUAGE
3.6. DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
APPENDIX A: TRAVEL
REVISION LOG
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Date Author Version Section Revision Description
15 August
VJE 1.0 N/A Initial SOW
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
STATEMENT OF WORK
PM Live Training Systems Interactive Multimedia Instructions Development and
Pilot Training Evaluation Events
1. Scope
This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the detailed terms describing specific tasks that PM
TRADE desires to be executed in support of Live Training Systems (LTS) Interactive
Multimedia Instructions (IMI) development and pilot training evaluation events. This SOW details expected products and data item work to be performed by the contractor.
1.1. Introduction
This SOW defines the work efforts to analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate an
Interactive Multimedia Instructions level four product that can be hosted and accessed both on the Army Learning Management System (ALMS) and as a mobile APP (Android & IOS systems) on the TRADOC APP Gateway (TAG) for the Bradley Combat Vehicle Tactical
Engagement Simulation Systems (CVTESS).
Additionally, the contractor shall perform a 12 month Pilot Training Evaluation (PTE) event of the initial and sustainment training programs comparing the Bradley CVTESS IMI and the IWS
JPA to their respective existing Instructor Led Training (ILT) programs to determine their educational value, training effectiveness, capabilities and limitation, knowledge and skill retention rate, suitability, and cost effectiveness to ultimately reduce sustainment costs through enhancing Operator and Maintainer training with an emphasis on the Learning-Centric model.
The U.S. Army Learning Concept (ALC) 2015 states the Learner-Centric model is a necessity in developing Soldiers and leaders who are capable of meeting the challenges of operational adaptability in an era of persistent conflict. The execution of ALC 2015 is detailed in the Army
Learning Model (ALM), which calls for learner-Centric outcome-based education and training.
1.2. Background
The Product Manager for Training Devices (PM TRADE) is the Army’s solution provider for collective instrumented live training systems. PM TRADE’s mission is to improve Soldier readiness, in peace and war, by leading lifecycle management of collective Live Training capabilities that enhance the Integrated Training Environment at Home stations, Combat
Training Centers, and deployed locations and to provide our Soldiers realistic training solutions to ensure they are the best trained force in the World.
1.3. Goals and Objectives
The goals are to analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate systems for the purpose of creating cost effective and efficient training solutions in line with LTS recommended Training
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Program that will be utilized by Soldiers to train the required knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
The following Training Data Products support obtaining the training objectives:
a. Training Situation Document
b. Instructional Performance Requirements Document
c. Instructional Media Requirements Document
d. Instructional Media Design Package
e. Course Conduct Information Package
f. Training Conduct Support Document
g. Training Evaluation Document
h. Instructional Media Package
i. Training System Support Document
2. Applicable Documents
The following documents form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents are those listed in the latest issue of the
Department of Defense Index of Specifications and Standards (DoDISS) and supplement thereto.
2.1. Military Standards
MIL-PRF-29612B Training Data Product Specification
MIL-HDBK-29612-2 Department of Defense Handbook, Instructional systems
Development/Systems Approach to Training and Education
(Part 2 of 5 Parts)
The above standards are available at http://www.assistdocs.com/
2.2. Department of Defense Manuals
DoDM 5200.1 (Vol. 1-4) DoD Information Security Program
DOD 8570.01 M Information Assurance (IA) Workforce Improvement
Program
DODD 8570.1 IA Training, Certification and Workforce Management
DODI 8500.1 Cybersecurity
DODI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information
Technology (IT)
DODI 8582.01 Security of Unclassified DoD Information on Non-DoD IT
Systems http://www.assistdocs.com/
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
The above manuals are available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives
2.3. Other Government Documents
AR 350-1 Army Training and Leader Development
The above regulations are available at http://www.apd.army.mil/
TRADOC Regulation 350-70 Army Learning Policy and Systems
TRADOC Pamphlet 525-8-2 U.S. Army Learning Concept (ALC) 2015
The above DoD documents are available at http://www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/regndx.htm
MIL-PRF-29612B Performance Specification Training Data Products
Copies of these documents are available from PEO STRI, SFAE-STRI-KOL, 12350 Research
Parkway, Orlando, FL 32826.
CNSSI 1253 Security Categorization And Control Selection For
National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI)
NIST SP 800-53 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Special Publication (SP) 800-53: Security and Privacy
Controls for Federal Information Systems and
Organizations
AR 25-2 Army Regulation (AR) for Information Assurance (IA)
2.4. Availability of Other Government Documents, Drawings and Publications
Copies of the documents are available from PEO STRI, SFAE-STRI-LTS, 12211 Science Drive, Orlando, FL 32826, and may be available at http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ or http://www.lt2portal.mil.
2.5. Order of Precedence
In the event of a conflict between the text of this SOW and the references cited herein, the text of the SOW shall take precedence.
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pub1.html http://www.apd.army.mil/ http://www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/regndx.htm http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ http://www.lt2portal.mil/
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
3. Requirements
The requirements defined herein form the basis for the work to be performed by the contractor in support of analyzing, designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating systems for the
Government.
3.1. Program Management
The contractor shall provide the overall management and administrative effort necessary to ensure that the requirements of this SOW are accomplished.
3.1.1. Data Rights
The contractor shall obtain and deliver a minimum of Government Purpose Rights in technical data, metrics, software, and hardware, such that Government can:
a. Use, maintain, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display, or disclose technical data within the Government without restriction;
b. Release or disclose technical data outside the Government and authorize persons to whom release or disclosure has been made to use, maintain, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display, or disclose that data for United States Government purposes;
c. Maintain, repair, modify, and upgrade assets using Government personnel and other
Government contractors; and
Compete future requirements, maintenance, repair, modification, and upgrades
3.1.2. Post-Award Conference (PAC)
The contractor shall participate with the Government in a PAC within 15 days of Contract
Award (CA) to address, the following program elements:
a. Government and contractor understanding of the scope of work.
b. Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) key milestones and supporting schedules are understood.
c. Identify resources (equipment, weapons, facilities, personnel, etc.) for the assigned tasks.
d. Ensure management processes are in place to support successful execution of the project.
3.1.3. Planning and Coordination
The contractor shall plan, coordinate and manage activities under this SOW. All site surveys with the respective installations, data requests, and other coordination/communications shall be only as authorized by the Government.
3.1.4. Off-site Support
The contractor shall provide off-site support, accompany designated personnel, and perform
SOW functions at various off-site locations as required per the respective SOW activities. The
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
contractor shall be responsible for coordination of these events with the Government, and other agencies as directed by the PM LTS, prior to execution of the off-site activities.
3.1.5. Program Management Reviews (PMRs)
The contractor shall conduct monthly PMRs to provide the Government a status and update. The contractor’s PMR shall include the entirety of the program’s activities being completed, and status reviews for cost, schedule and performance of all affiliated activities. The contractor shall provide briefing slides which updates Government to the risk management planning, execution, and the IMS with dependencies. The contractor shall provide visibility on the progress, performance, and status of major subcontractors.
3.1.6. Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
The contractor shall develop, implement, manage to, update, and maintain an IMS. All contract schedule information presented at program reviews shall originate from the IMS, and shall contain all accomplishments, predecessors and successors events, and their dependencies. The
IMS shall address total program activities including activities performed by major subcontractors.
3.1.7. Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD)
The contractor shall establish and maintain a process for IPPD and participate in joint
Government/contractor Integrated Product Teams (IPT) to manage and integrate all tasks, activities, and data. The contractor shall facilitate Government insight into contract activities and establish working relationships with Government personnel that will enable continuing insight into all appropriate contract activities.
3.1.8. Associate Contractor Agreements (ACAs)
The contractor shall maintain the capability to enter into ACAs for exchanging data, accessing and using third party software and equipment, receiving technical support, working interface issues, and/or agreeing on equipment use and time. ACAs shall be maintained to achieve interoperability and common component goals, as applicable.
3.1.9. Quality Assurance
The contractor shall maintain a Quality Assurance (QA) program that satisfies program objectives. The quality system procedures, planning, and all other documentation and data that comprise the quality system, shall be made available to the Government for review upon request.
Existing quality documents, which meet the requirements of the contract as determined by the
Government, may continue to be used. The Government may perform any necessary inspections, verifications, and evaluations to ascertain conformance to requirements and the adequacy of the implementing procedures. Third-party certification of the contractor’s quality program is not required. The contractor shall require subcontractors to maintain a quality system, which achieves control of the quality of the services provided.
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
The Government reserves the right to disapprove the quality system or portions thereof when the quality system fails to meet the contractual requirements. If this occurs, the contractor shall have seven (7) business days to re-submit an acceptable quality system.
3.1.10. Site Security
3.1.10.1. Anti-Terrorism (AT) Level 1 Training
All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities, and controlled access areas shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 60 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer, if a COR is not assigned, within 60 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel. AT level I awareness training is available at the following website: https://atlevel1.dtic.mil/at.
3.1.10.2. Access and General Protection Policy and Procedures
The contractor and all associated subcontractors employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by Government representative). The contractor shall also provide all information required for background checks to meet installation access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services or
Security Office. Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements as directed by DOD, HQDA and/or local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection
Condition (FPCON) at any individual facility or installation change, the Government may require changes in the contractor security matters or processes.
3.1.10.3. Access to Government Information Systems
All contractor employees with access to a Government information system shall be registered in the Army Training Certification Tracking System (ATCTS) at commencement of services, and must successfully complete the DoD IA Awareness training prior to assess to the Information
System and then annually thereafter.
3.2. Training Support
The contractor shall be compliant with TRADOC Regulation 350-70 and supporting TRADOC
Pamphlets to analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate training data products. The contractor shall ensure that a Learner-Centric outcome-based education and training solution is required as identified by Army Learning Concept 2015. The contractor shall use, to the maximum extent possible, all previously developed data that can be applied towards satisfying https://atlevel1.dtic.mil/at
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
the data requirements of MIL-PRF-29612B (section 3 and 4) and the supporting Data Items (DIs) as identified in this SOW, this includes Government Furnished Information (GFI) and data developed by the contractor incident to other contractual requirements. The contractor shall ensure the training data products are maintained to reflect the current design.
The training data products shall support both operator and maintainer personnel requirements.
The training data products shall provide the information necessary to support attainment of the physical and mental skills and attitudes required for operators and maintainers to perform the necessary learning objectives (LOs) for the training systems.
3.2.1. Training Situation Document
The contractor shall conduct a training needs analysis of the identified, equipment/weapons systems, personnel, and facilities to identify the existing training situation and to assist the
Government in determining such things as; how train and maintain devices at the institution, Homestation, and Combat Training Center (CTC), what are the capability gaps, operational limiting factors, and design and constraints for the training systems.
The contractor shall identify the different types of existing training systems and technologies that are used and how they might support the program training products and training program.
The system training data products shall provide the specific data necessary to verify the efficiency of a training system to meet existing training needs, training programs survey results data, and analysis results information on technologies applicable to new training needs.
DI-SESS-81517B Training Situation Document
3.2.1.1. Verification
The Government will utilize inspection verification method of examination and evaluation Type
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.2. Instructional Performance Requirements Document
The contractor shall utilize the training needs analysis information, findings, and conclusions to support the instructional performance requirements document development. The contractor shall analyze the proposed design solution of the training system and conduct a training analysis of mission and job tasks (introduction, theory of operation, inspect, prepare, install, power-up, calibrate/align, setup, operate, power-down, remove, pack, troubleshoot, maintain, remove, replace, repair, etc.) required to maintain and train the operators and maintainers personnel that will support the initial, sustainment, and refresher training life cycle.
DI-SESS-81518B Instructional Performance Requirements Document
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
3.2.2.1. Verification
The Government will utilize inspection verification method of examination and evaluation Type
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.3. Instructional Media Requirements Document
The contractor shall utilize the task analysis information, findings, and conclusions to support the instructional media requirements document. The contractor shall conduct an instructional media analysis to identify both an instructional strategy approach and identify the types of media that may be used to support the system for both operators and maintainers (learner-centric). The contractor shall propose multiple learner-centric delivery strategies inclusive of suggested delivery method options to include cost, schedule, and performance of each to the Government so that a course of action (COA) can be identified (decided by the government). The COAs shall include an initial, sustainment, and refresher training strategy that will support the new equipment training (NET), institutional training, Homestation training, and CTCs training for the life cycle. The system training data product shall provide specific data necessary for the development of instructional media for both operators and maintainers.
DI-SESS-81519B Instructional Media Requirements Document
3.2.3.1. Verification
The Government will utilize inspection verification method of examination and evaluation Type
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.4. Course Conduct Information Package
The contractor shall utilize the instructional media analysis information, findings, and conclusions to design and develop the Course Conduct Information Package. The System training data product shall provide data required by the Government for outsourcing the conduct of training. The System product shall provide sufficient information for an accurate evaluation of a student’s capabilities to meet all learning objectives of a course and shall identify prerequisite knowledge, skills, and attitudes of students entering the course. The product shall inform students of the training syllabus, organization, operation, scheduling, and other pertinent information. The product shall also provide information on an evaluation of a trainee’s performance, the trainee evaluation of training, and shall provide the trainee with a certificate of training
DI-SESS-81522B Course Conduct Information Package
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
3.2.5. Training Conduct Support Document
The contractor shall utilize the course conduct information package and the task analysis information, findings, and conclusions to develop the Training Conduct Support Documents.
The contractor shall develop a warfighter training support package to include, at a minimum, a facilitator guide, trainee guide, and facilitator visual aids in support of both the operators and maintainer instructor facilitator training (IFT). The system training data product shall provide definition and direction for facilitator and trainees for the conduct of training. The system product shall support the trainee’s mastery of knowledge, skills, and attitudes for a given learning objective. The contractor shall conduct the IFT courses developed for maintenance personnel and users/operators function and operational capabilities.
DI-SESS-81523B Training Conduct Support Document
3.2.5.1. Verification
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.6. Training Evaluation Document
The contractor shall utilize other data products produced on this effort information, findings, and conclusions to support the development and evaluation of the Training Evaluation Documents.
The contractor shall specify the personnel, resources, organization, functions, procedures, and requirements for evaluating training and training equipment. The contractor shall develop, implement, and document a training evaluation plan, the training evaluation results, and an instructional delivery system test and evaluation inclusive of such things as: demographics, knowledge and skill retention levels, rates, complexity, comprehension, difficulty, location, pre-test and post-test, surveys, and questions and answer (Q&A). The Training Evaluation Document shall determine the effectiveness and Return-on-Investment (ROI) of training.
DI-SESS-81524C Training Evaluation Document
3.2.6.1. Verification
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.7. Instructional Media Design Package
The contractor shall utilize the task analysis and the instructional media analysis information, findings, and conclusions to support the instructional media design development, when identified, for
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
the development and production of learner-centric media. The System training data product shall provide baseline requirements data necessary for the development and production of learner-centric media. The contractor shall deliver a “wireframe” that is a technical demonstration, exclusive of the actual course content, of the sequencing and navigation of the specific instructional design documented in the IMDP on the ALMS CTE. The government will conduct functionality verification of the wireframe(s) submitted with this document. The wireframe shall demonstrate proper execution of the instructional strategy as shown on the media course map in the IMDP. When identified as a solution, the contractor shall design SCORM 2004 3rd edition compliant, web-based IMI courseware to maximize reusability of content by designing content as individual Sharable Content Objects
(SCOs) in accordance with ADL SCORM Initiative and the SCORM Business Rules. The contractor shall develop SCOs for each Enabling Learning Objective (ELO) using the definition of an ELO by
TRADOC Regulation 350-70. The contractor shall batch SCOs as needed to improve the students learning experience. This batching shall be documented in the IMDP.
DI-SESS-81520B Instructional Media Design Package
3.2.7.1. Verification
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.8. Instructional Media Package
The contractor shall utilize the instructional media design package findings, and conclusions to support the Learner-Centric media development.
When interactive multi-media instructions (IMI) is identified as a training solution, the system training data products shall be SCORM 2004, 3rd edition compliant for both content and the targeted Army Learning Management System (ALMS) to ensure that they are interoperable, accessible, reusable, playable, and durable. This training data product shall provide specific data necessary to support the transfer of knowledge, skills, and attitudes by use of learner-centric instructional media. The Government will conduct an acceptance review of the final courseware to include all lessons/modules, tests, assessments, and exercises to verify SCORM 2004 3rd edition compliance and proper courseware functioning to include proper implementation of the instructional strategy on the targeted ALMS. The contractor shall validate all courseware online prior to final acceptance by the Government. This includes: test validation, content validation
(individual trials) and educational (that is, group Trials) validation in accordance TRADOC Pam
350-70-10 and the identified criticality standard for each TLO in the courseware. The
Government will provide the subject matter experts (SME) needed for content validation and test validation and the target audience for the individual and group trials.
When instructional videos (job performance aids) are identified as a training solution, the training data product shall be interoperable, accessible, reusable, playable, and durable. The training data product shall provide specific data necessary to support the recall of knowledge, DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
skills, and attitudes by use of instructional media. The Government will conduct an acceptance review of the final JPAs through individual and groups trials. The contractor shall validate all
JPAs online prior to final acceptance by the Government. This includes: JPA content validation and educational (that is, Individual and group Trials) validation in accordance TRADOC Pam
350-70-10 and the identified criticality standard for each ELO in the JPAs. The Government will provide the subject matter experts (SME) needed for content validation and the target audience for the individual and group trials.
When a delivery method of Mobile Application has been chosen it shall be accessed via an App store. The learner searches and accesses content to enhance previous learning by practicing or game playing or by self-knowledge checks.
DI-SESS-81526B Instructional Media Package
3.2.8.1. Verification
The Government will utilize inspection verification method of examination and evaluation Type
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.8.2. Scripts and Storyboard Review
The contractor shall utilize the IMDP training data product information to assist in the design and development of scripts and storyboards in support of the learner-centric media product. The script and storyboard design and development will be performed during IPT working with the government. The government shall review and approve media scripts and storyboards prior to the contractor beginning content data collection and or media development.
3.2.8.3. Online Review
The contractor shall provide the Government with access to an on-line system for the review of all courseware media. The purpose of an on-line review system is to provide content reviewers with the ability to review and de-conflict courseware developed by the contractor. The system shall provide the ability for managers and reviewers to also view all related documents provided for the course, such as the course IMDP, scripts, storyboards, media flow diagrams, and lessons.
3.2.8.4. Web-Based Courseware
The contractor shall ensure web-based courseware is SCORM 2004 3rd edition complaint IAW
TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-10, Systems Approach to Training Course and Courseware Validation and TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-12, Distributed Learning- Managing Courseware Production and
Implementation.
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
3.2.8.5. SCORM Compliance Testing
The contractor shall test to verify sharable content objects (SCOs) ability to communicate with the target Army Learning Management (ALMS) v3.0 Suite, Saba Enterprise 5.3 Learning Suite Service
Pack 1 using the ADL Test Suite content Package Conformance Test.
3.2.8.6. Checks on Learning
The contractor shall develop checks-on-learning questions and practical exercises in such a manner that a learner is provided feedback, remediation, reinforcement and the correct answer or in an after action review at the end of the Check on Learning alerting the learner of what was done correctly and incorrectly.
3.2.8.7. Test Questions
The contractor shall develop test questions in such a manner that learners shall receive remediation on objectives missed but not be given the answers to specific test questions. For practical exercises/simulations, the contractor shall vary the situations/scenarios.
3.2.8.8. Test Integrity
The tests shall be developed in such a manner that a learner shall not gain access to solutions to problems and scenarios prior to completing the test. The contractor shall take reasonable measures to ensure tests are developed with safeguards to help prevent compromises in accordance with
TRADOC Pam 350-70-5.
3.2.8.9. Answer Keys
The contractor shall develop and provide to the Government answer keys for all Checks on Learning, Practical Exercises, Simulations, and Learner Performance Tests (for example, pretests, posttests).
For assessments derived from item banks which present questions in a randomized order all answer keys will include a ‘unique question ID’ for each question. This ‘unique question ID’ will also be displayed in the lower right corner (preferred) of the ‘instructional white space’ or other prominent location consistent with presentation of instructional material. For questions presented in random order, the answer keys must include the text of the ‘item stem’ and the full text of the correct answer.
3.2.8.10. Computer Configurations
When interactive multi-media instructions (IMI) is identified as a training solution, the courseware shall play on the current versions of the Digital Training Facility (DTF) Student
Workstation configuration and the Baseline Home Computer Configuration. CD-ROM courseware or other media, when identified, shall play on the Baseline Home Computer Configuration.
When instructional videos (JPA) are identified as a training solution, the JPAs shall primarily be playable on smart phones (Android, iphone and tablets), and the current versions of the Digital
Training Facility (DTF) Student Workstation configuration and the Baseline Home Computer
Configuration. The contractor shall design and develop JPA Mobile App that are accessible and
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
downloadable on to a smart phones and tablet for all products. The contractor shall create specific mobile app icons for each JPA.
The contractor shall develop a Mobile App for each JPA that shall be validated, verified and complies with the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) protocols Common
Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) latest release to reduce security vulnerabilities and be operational on the US Army Training & Doctrine Command (TRADOC)
APP Gateway (TAG).
3.2.8.11. Delivery
When interactive multi-media instructions (IMI) is identified as a training solution, the primary delivery method desired for this courseware shall be over the Internet and where feasible and identified in the approved training program, embedded on the fielded devices. The contractor shall develop the courseware as a SCORM 2004 3rd edition compliant content package and deliver the courseware to the Government as a Package Interchange File (PIF). A content package includes all the learning resources (Assets, Sharable Content Objects (SCOs) and Content Aggregations) for the courseware and is used to move those digital learning resources or collections of learning resources between LMSs, development tools and content repositories. For tracking purposes, the PIF file name for each final courseware deliverable shall contain a unique version identifier. When the PIF file is delivered on CD-ROM, the CD-ROM label shall include the same unique version identifier.
When instructional videos (JPA) are identified as a training solution, the primary delivery method for distribution statement “A” JPAs/Mobile Applications shall be over the Internet using
TRADOC APP Gateway (TAG) to host and be accessible through Google Play and IOS store via smart phones and tablets. JPAs that are distribution “B, C, or D” shall be accessed through the internet using AKO TRADOC APP Gateway (TAG) via which includes Distribution A
JPAs/Mobile Applications.
The contractor shall obtain the URL name www.tess-apps.com, server hosting space, and a CDN that will support the performance, storage, hosting, and accessing for a period of 5 years of
JPAs/Mobile Application. The contractor shall ensure that the US Army PEO STRI, PM
TRADE-LTS is the owner of these accounts and shall have all access, control, and rights to said accounts.
3.2.8.12. Imsmanifest
The contractor shall provide a top level imsmanifest file and SCORM 2004 3rd edition compliant schema files as part of the content package. The contractor may leave the individual imsmanifest files and SCORM compliant schema files in their SCOs; however, when a SCO(s) is part of a higher level aggregation, these files are not required and shall not be included as resources in the top level imsmanifest file. An imsmanifest file is a XML document describing the content, organization and resources of a SCORM compliant content package. XML Schemas define and describe the structure, content, and to some extent semantics (rules of language) of XML documents.
http://www.tess-apps.com/
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
3.2.8.13. Runtime Environment
The contractor shall develop a SCORM 2004 3rd edition compliant Runtime Environment for all
Sharable Content Objects (SCOs) that implements the mandatory minimum API calls and Data
Models IAW paragraph 4 of the SCORM Business Rules. The contractor may use additional API calls and Data Model elements as long as they are LMS SCORM 2004 3rd edition compliant elements that are supported by an Army Learning Management (ALMS) v3.o suite, Saba Enterprise
5.5 Learning Suite Service Pack 1 SCORM compliant LMS.
3.2.8.14. Playability
The contractor shall perform courseware playability and Army SCORM 2004 3rd edition compliance testing (for IMI) to assure that the courseware meets the contract requirements. The contractor shall complete all courseware testing (playability and SCORM) prior to delivery to the Government. The contractor shall use the Army Acceptance Criteria (link:
http://www.atsc.army.mil/itsd/imi/Accept_Criteria.asp) to satisfy SCORM 2004 3rd edition requirements. The contractor shall submit all test logs produced as a result of running the latest Army
Acceptance Criteria on the final courseware package that is to be delivered to the Government for approval when the final CW is submitted. The contractor shall include all log files generated from the following conformance tests, as identified in the Army Acceptance Criteria:
1. Resource Validator log file of “Undetected Manifest Files”
2. Resource Validator log file of “Incomplete Manifest (Packaged Files Missing)”
3. The ADL Test Suite Sharable Content Object (SCO) Run-Time Environment Conformance Test log file(s) named “RTE.htm”
4. The ADL Test Suite Content Package Conformance Test log file(s) named “manifest_op4.htm”
(Summary) and “manifestDetails_op4.htm” (details)
5. Results from the Validate Army Run Time program saved to a file named “ValidateRTE.html”
6. Results from the Validate Army Meta-data program saved to files named“SCOMDLog.html”.
When instructional videos (JPA) are identified as a training solution, the contractor shall perform courseware playability testing to assure that the JPAs meet the contract requirements for smart phones and tablets (Android and iphones). The contractor shall complete all JPA testing (playability) on the TRADOC APP Gateway prior to delivery to the Government.
3.2.8.15. Content Test Environment (CTE) Testing
The contractor shall perform courseware testing utilizing the CTE to assure that it communicates accurately with Army Learning Management (ALMS) v3.0 suite, Saba Enterprise 5.5 Learning Suite
Service Pack 1 via the courseware-to-LMS and LMS-to-courseware data calls IAW paragraph 4 of the SCORM® Business Rules.
When instructional videos/mobile applications (JPA) are identified as a training solution, the contractor shall perform JPA testing using the TAG test server to assure that the mobile application
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
meet the interoperable, accessible, reusable, playable, and durable requirements as identified in this document.
3.2.8.16. Automated Utilization Reporting (JPAs/Mobile Applications)
The JPA mobile app training products shall provide automated reporting that tracks student location, duration, utilization, quantity of personnel trained for a given JPAs down to the enabling learning objective (ELO). The automated utilization reports shall be generated monthly and automatically emailed to usarmy.orlando.peo-stri.list.trng-feedback@mail.mil.
3.2.8.17. Mobile Application
Mobile application enhancement levels create the interaction between a user and the media which leads directly to engagement and motivation. It is desirable to use some sensory stimuli/media such as audio, video, animation, or interactive graphic to create engagement to deepen the users experience and to motivate the user. This requires a mobile application enhancement level 1, 2, or 3.
Enhancement Level 1– Passive; Basic Informational Application with Multiple Links
Read text on screen
Minimum inserted internal graphics, photographs, illustrations, simple charts and diagrams
Video Tab linked to You Tube or other RSS feed style location
Use navigation buttons to progress in a linear sequence forward and back through the publication
Provided Support Information for App and Content (About Page)
Social Media Links to all appropriate websites (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.)
Touch enabled
Enhancement Level 2– Limited; Specific Photo Enhancements, Audio soundbites, Videos, Telephone Interactions
Enhancement Level 1 capabilities
Embedded and geospatially positioned pictures and/or videos within a product. (Items must be in a specific location in the app and react to the user interaction in a specific way)
Insertion of telephonic interactions (user will use buttons in app to call a specific location for support or inquiry)
Enhancement Level 3+ – Complex; Games and or visualizations involving 3D models
Enhancement Level 2 capabilities
Initiate complex animated demonstrations, operations and/or procedures.
mailto:usarmy.orlando.peo-stri.list.trng-feedback@mail.mil
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
3.2.8.18. Certificate of Training
The contractor shall provide and make available to the user through the mobile application upon the completion of viewing all segments/items of the instructional video (JPA)/mobile application a Certificate of Training that can be downloaded in .pdf format or saved to their device which includes but is not limited to; Name, Unit, JPA/Mobile App title, date, and location.
3.2.8.19. Verification
The Government will utilize inspection verification method of examination and evaluation Type
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.9. Training System Support Document
The contractor shall provide trainer software application data and training system operating data.
The training data product shall provide specific data necessary for the operation and life-cycle software configuration management of a training system.
DI-SESS-81527B Training System Support Document
3.2.9.1. Verification
“A” of MIL-PRF-29612B section 4.3.1 with a minimum of 95% of the intended data as identified by this SOW and a 100% accuracy of data elements based on its qualified sources.
3.2.10. Vehicle and Equipment Access
The government shall support the contractor obtaining access to vehicle and equipment. The government shall identify the location where vehicle and equipment can be accessed. The contractor shall develop a site visit plan that shall consist of the following:
a. Order of the sites to be visited.
b. Types of GFE/GFP required
c. Date of data collection event.
d. Duration of data collection event.
e. Agency/Group to be visited/asked to participate.
f. Special instruction or needed directions.
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
3.3. Instructional Multimedia Instruction (IMI) Development
The purpose of the Interactive Multimedia Instructions (IMI) is to provide specific data necessary to support the transfer of knowledge, skills, and attitudes by use of learner-centric instructional media. The contractor shall design and develop the following IMI:
a. Bradley Combat Vehicle Tactical Engagement Simulation System (CVTESS)
The contractor shall design and develop an interactive level four (4) IMI in accordance with paragraphs 3.2, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.7, and 3.2.8 of this SOW and other terms of this document in preparation for the Pilot Training Evaluation
(PTE) events.
3.4. Pilot Training Evaluation Events (PTEE)
The contractor shall conduct Pilot Training Evaluation Events that assess and compare the educational value, training effectiveness, retention rates, and return-on-investment (ROI) for a period of 12 months. The contractor shall identify the type of planned evaluation, method of evaluation, types of information to be collected, procedures to be used for collecting information and data analysis, to include criteria, and procedures to be used for reporting the findings, conclusions and recommendations. Through these PTEEs, the government will use the findings and results compare with our Initial Training Needs Analysis (ITNA) results recently conducted to identify PM LTS’s “Training Gold Standard” for all I-MILES products.
3.4.1. Bradley Combat Vehicle Tactical Engagement Simulation System (CVTESS)
PTEE
The contractor shall ensure that the PTEE plan, execution, and results compares the two training data products and that the identified unit and Soldiers are tracked and monitored throughout a 12 month period. The contractor shall document a summary of the findings, conclusion and recommendations.
a. Bradley Combat Vehicle Tactical Engagement Simulation System (CVTESS)
Interactive Multimedia Instruction (IMI)
b. Bradley Combat Vehicle Tactical Engagement Simulation System (CVTESS)
Instructor Led Training (ILT)
3.4.2. Individual Weapon System (IWS) PTEE
The contractor shall ensure that the PTEE plan, execution, and results compares the two training data products and that the identified unit and Soldiers are tracked and monitored throughout a 12 month period. The contractor shall document a summary of the findings, conclusion and recommendations.
a. Individual Weapons Systems (IWS) Job Performance Aid (JPA)
b. Individual Weapon System (IWS) Instructor Led Training (ILT)
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
3.5. Language
The contractor shall provide all instruction, training materials and system documentation in the
English language.
3.6. Disclosure of Information
The contractor shall comply with the protection standards and guidance described in DoDM
5200.1 (Volume 1-4) to prevent foreign intelligence collection and/or the unauthorized disclosure of information.
DISTRIBUTION LIST STATEMENT A:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Appendix A: Travel
A.1. Interactive Multimedia Instructions (IMI) Development/Pilot
Item # Organization Location # Trips # Days Personnel
1 Maneuver Center of
Excellence (MCOE)
Fort Benning, GA 1 5 7
2 Field Unit Fort Stewart, GA 4 3 2
A.2. Job Performance Aids (JPAs) Development/Pilot
Item # Organization Location # Trips # Days Personnel
2 Field Unit Fort Stewart, GA 4 3 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .