A07-Attachment_19_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire_Form_A1.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) - Bioresearch Support to the Lugar Center, The Republic of Georgia
Solicitation number
W81XWH-16-R-0019
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 19 Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Form

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A07-Attachment_20_Medical_Equipment_and_Maintence_ScheduleA1.pdf PDF
A07-W81XWH-16-R-0019-0001.docx DOCX document
A03-Attachment_17_Sample_Task_Order_1_Performance_Work_Statement_UPDATEDA1.docx DOCX document
A07-Attachment_18_Sample_Task_Order_2_Performance_Work_Statement_UPDATEDA1.docx DOCX document
A07-Attachment_9_Pricing_Table_UPDATEDA1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A07-Attachment_3_Common_European_Framework_of_Reference_for_Languages_Learning _Teaching _Assessment.pdf PDF
A07-Attachment_9_Pricing_Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A07-Attachment_7_JTA_5_June_2014.pdf PDF
A07-Attachment_4_General_WRAIR_Organization_Chart.pptx PPTX presentation
A07-Attachment_8_Organizational_Conflict_of_Interest_Certification.docx DOCX document
A07-Attachment_12_Security_Cooperation_Agreement_10.12.2002_(Eng_-_signed).pdf PDF
A07-Attachment___18_Sample_Task_Order_2_Performance_Work_Statement.docx DOCX document
A07-Attachment_6_Holidays_Observed.docx DOCX document
A07-Attachment_15_WRAIR_Participation_agreeement_A.pdf PDF
A07-Attachment_13_Security_Cooperation_Agreement_10.12.2002_SOFA_equivalent_(Eng).doc DOC document
A07-Attachment_2_Application_on_Tax_Registration_of_a_Physical_Person.pdf PDF
A07-Attachment_16_WRAIR_Participation_Agreement_B.pdf PDF
A07-Attachment_10_Labor_Categories_and_Descriptions2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A07-Attachment_14_Starting-a-business-in-Georgia-guide.pdf PDF
A07-W81XWH-16-R-0019.docx DOCX document
A07-Attachment___17_Sample_Task_Order_1_Performance_Work_Statement.docx DOCX document
A07-Attachment_11_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_Base_IDIQ.docx DOCX document
A07-Attachment_5_Georgia__BW_Umbrella_Agreement.pdf PDF
A07-Attachment_1_Acronyms.docx DOCX document
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 19

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS

U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQUISITION ACTIVITY

Fort Detrick, MD

The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past and present performance of offerors submitting proposals in response to the solicitation # W81XWH-16-R-0019. The information you provide will be instrumental in allowing the Government to evaluate how well the contractor performed under your contract(s).

a.Please complete all sections of the attached questionnaire. Include your name and title, organizational address, e-mail address, telephone and fax number.
b.Include the contractor’s name and address, the title and/or description of the type of work performed the award number, the value of the contract (including options), the award and completion date of the project and the type of award/solicitation.
c.Use the rating scale found on the bottom left corner of the questionnaire to rate each performance element.
d.Comments are encouraged and would be appreciated. The last page may be used if additional space is needed for comments. Clear handwritten responses are sufficient.
e.Please e-mail your response to the Contract Specialist whose number and address is shown at the bottom right corner of the questionnaire. Please use the following format for the email subject line “W81XWH-16-R-0019 Offeror Name Performance Questionnaire”.

Thank you for your time and participation.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

YOUR NAME & TITLE

YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL ADDRESS

TEL NO.

FAX :

E-MAIL:

CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS

TITLE OR DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

CONTRACT VALUE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):

CONTRACT TYPE:

|_| FIXED PRICE |_| COST + FEE |_| COMPETITIVE

|_| NON-COMPETITIVE |_| SET-ASIDE |_| SEALED BID |_| NEGOTIATED

CONTRACT AWARD & COMPLETION DATE:

PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT
RATING
1
2
3
4
5
NA
1.Contractor demonstrated a thorough understanding of technical requirements of the contract/task.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

2.Contractor anticipated/identified and resolved problems effectively.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

3.Contractor managed and directed resources (i.e. personnel, subcontractors, equipment, etc.) effectively.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

4.Contractor provided the necessary skilled personnel to perform the required work.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

5.Contractor retained the necessary skilled personnel and maintained a low turnover rate.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

6.Contractor met scheduled contract delivery dates.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

7.Contractor provided accurate, complete and high quality deliverables.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

8.Contractor complied with the terms of the contract.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

9.Contractor was diligent in forecasting and controlling contract cost.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

10. I would recommend award to this contractor again.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

1
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in comments above)
PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED RESPONSE TO:

U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Contract Specialist: Andrew Green E-MAIL: Andrew.W.Green17.civ@mail.mil Phone: 301-319-9279

2
Good
3
Acceptable
4
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in comments above)
5
Unacceptable (Explanation must be provided in comments above)
NA
No Knowledge of This Element

Adjectival ratings definitions to be used in your response:

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective

No Knowledge of This Element: No knowledge of this element or does not apply to meeting contractual requirements

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .