Industry Day Med Referral Slides 07 August 2023.pptx
PPTX presentation 454 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Medical Referral Services MEPCOM Industry Day
- Solicitation number
- W81K04-24-R-0001
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army Medical Command
About this file
This document provides an overview of a solicitation for medical referral services for the Military Entrance Processing Command. The solicitation seeks proposals for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract with a five-year ordering period to provide non-personal medical referral services including ancillary services, medical consultations, dental services, and laboratory services to support medical examinations for applicants to the U.S. Armed Forces. Services must be provided within 15 business days of order and within a 30-mile radius or the required radius of locations specified in the solicitation. Offerors must demonstrate technical capability, past performance, small business participation, and propose fixed prices for order periods. Proposals are due by the date specified on the solicitation page and must be submitted via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment system. The contract will be awarded using best value tradeoff source selection procedures with technical factors significantly more important than price.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INDUSTRY DAY
Industry Day Medical Referral Services W81K04-24-R-0001
8 August 2023
Presented By:
Yvonne Y. Camarce, Contacting Officer and Maria Fidone, Contract Specialist
UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO
Army OTSG
UNCLASS/FOUO
AMERICA’S ARMY:
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Name // Section // v1 // as of
SCHEDULE
9:00 a.m. – 9:15 a.m. Registration/Welcome/Introductions
9:15 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. Overview of Medical Referral Services
9:45 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Medical Referral Requirement
10:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Break
10:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Solicitation Requirements and Evaluation Procedures
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS
This contract provides support to the U.S. Military Entrance Processing Command (MEPCOM) Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS) and will be administered by the Army’s Health Readiness Contracting Office (HRCO)
During the briefings:
Place the speaker in MS Teams on mute If you have an administrative question, please submit in writing by August 15, 2023
Clarifications and Questions related to the RFP Must be submitted via email
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS
To be posted on PIEE.Gov after conference:
Briefing Slides Official responses to clarifications and questions Company and authors’ names excluded
Unauthorized Activities Sidebars with Government Personnel Use of Recording Devices
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Introduction of Government Team
Contracting Officer – Ms. Yvonne Y. Camarce Yvonne.y.camarce.civ@health.mil
Contract Specialist – Ms. Maria Fidone Maria.g.fidone.civ@health.mil
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Introduction of Government Team
HQ US MEPCOM Representatives Lt Col Steven E. Tutaj Michael Mitsch Viktoriya Abrashkin
Physicians COL Kevin L. Cummings MAJ Jacob Robinson
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Overview
Lt Col Steven E. Tutaj Acquisition and Contracting Deputy/Director
HQ USMEPCOM
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
This contract provides non-personal medical referral services to the USMEPCOM Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS), to include supporting satellite cities, and remote processing stations (RPS) throughout the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico.
Medical referral services will support medical examinations provided to applicants processing into the Active, Reserve and National Guard components of the Armed Forces for Departments of Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force and United States Coast Guard, and other government agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Medical Referral Services
Medical Referral services include but are not medical/dental consultations and ancillary/laboratory services listed in Exhibit G Required Services and Scheduling and Referral Processing Times’
Services may be conducted in-person face-to-face or virtual.
In person face-to-face consultations shall be performed the required mile radius of the locations as identified in Exhibit A Locations and Radius or 30 miles of the applicant’s current address.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Scheduling Services Primary Scheduling The contractor will receive government/applicant preferences for scheduling dates/times. Wherever possible within the remaining contract requirements, the contractor shall schedule appointments to meet government/applicant preferences to maximize the likelihood of attendance.
The contractor shall provide an initial appointment date and time via the portal solution and communicated to the applicant, recruiter, Service liaison, and MEPS. The Government will provide all required contact information for the applicant, recruiter, service liaison and MEPS Secondary Scheduling If the applicant/government is not available to attend the initial appointment date the contractor shall provide an alternate/secondary appointment date.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Web Based Solution
The contractor shall provide a commercial web browser-based solution as a means to manage the medical referral process, heretofore referred to as the portal.
The contractor’s portal shall include the ability for government personnel to schedule referrals, view referral status, access consult and ancillary/laboratory results, review applicant appointment scheduling, confirm/cancel appointments, generate monthly reports, review current/historical data (what was ordered by MEPS, type of consult and ancillary or laboratory service).
The contractor’s portal shall include the ability for government personnel to schedule referrals, view referral status, access consult and ancillary/laboratory results, review applicant appointment scheduling, confirm/cancel appointments, generate monthly reports, review current/historical data (what was ordered by MEPS, type of consult and ancillary or laboratory service).
The contractor’s portal shall be HIPAA Compliant.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Cancellations and No Shows
Government Cancellations: If unforeseen events require the cancellation of any type of appointment by the government/applicant, the MEPS Government Point of Contact will notify the specialty consultant or ancillary/laboratory facility at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled appointment. Appointments cancelled by the government/applicant at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled appointment time shall not be billed by the specialty consultant or facility for services not rendered.
No-Shows: Appointments cancelled by the government/applicant within 24 hours of a scheduled appointment time, or unattended without prior notice, shall be billed against the "No-Show" CLIN.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Exhibit H Network Services Pricing
EXHIBIT H – Network Services Pricing PWS 5.21.1 The base fee for network referral services provided during a task order will be established based upon standard Medicare rates relevant to the zip code associated with the locations identified in Exhibit A. Once established, based fees will remain fixed for the entirety of the task order, typically 12 months. The originating MEPS location for an order will be the applicable zip code that applies for determining the base fee. in the market they were provided in.
PWS 5.21.2 For successfully completed services, the contractor shall be paid the base fee for the services provided in the market they were provided in. Additionally, the contract shall bill the government the agreed to administrative services percentage for each order IAW with the pricing structure of Exhibit H.
PWS 5.21.3 For Government/applicant no-shows as defined by Section 5.10, the contractor shall be paid the no-show fee percentage of the base fee for the services ordered IAW with the pricing structure of Exhibit H.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Scenario A Example:
The established base fee for a Psychology Consult for orders placed from location in zip code 00000 is established as $100 at task order award based on standard Medicare rates for zip code 00000.
The established administrative services fee for the contractor is 1% for all orders.
In this scenario: Upon completion of the psychology consult services, the contractor may invoice the government for $101. ($100 for the base fee + $1 for the administrative services fee (1% of $100)).
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Scenario A Example:
No-show/late cancellation free for the contractor is 50% of the base fee for all orders.
In this scenario, if the applicant was a no-show, then the contractor may invoice the government for $50 (50% of the base fee).
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Exhibit J Non-Network Service Pricing EXHIBIT J – Non-Network Services Pricing PWS 5.23.3.1 Cost Determination: Within five business days, the contractor shall identify the cost to be charged by the non-network specialty consultant and submit to the government for approval.
PWS 5.23.4 Non-Network Contract Pricing: For successfully completed services, the contractor shall be paid a fixed non-network services administrative fee in Exhibit J. Additionally, the contractor shall bill the government for the agreed to direct cost of the non-network specialty consultant order IAW with the cost-share structure of Exhibit J.
Administrative Fee and Cost/Share Pricing Structure Non-Network Services Administrative Fee for Each Order = $TBD upon contract award/negotiation Contractor Share of Non-Network Direct Cost of Order = %TBD upon contract award/negotiation
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Exhibit J Non-Network Service Pricing (Cont’d) EXHIBIT J – Non-Network Services Pricing Continued Scenario B Example:
Non-Network Services Administrative Fee = $10 Contractor Share of Non-Network Direct Costs = 90% Government Share of Non-Network Direct Costs = 10% The agreed to direct cost of a psychology consult is communicated and approved IAW with Para 5.23.3.1 to be $100.
In this scenario: Upon completion of the psychology consult services, the contractor may invoice the government for $20. ($10 for the Non-Network Services Administrative Fee + $10 for the government share of non-network direct costs (10% of $100)).
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Data Rights
DATA RIGHTS
The Government has unlimited rights to all documents, data and materials, to include the source codes of software or data interfaces developed, produced under this contract. All documents, data and materials produced under this contract shall be Government owned and are the property of the Government with all rights and privileges of ownership and copyright belonging exclusively to the Government. These documents, data and materials may not be used or sold by the Contractor without written permission from the Contracting Officer. All documents, data and materials supplied to the Government shall be the sole property of the Government and may not be used for any other purpose. Any source code and data interfaces developed prior to the contract start date or as a result of modifications to existing code, remain the property of the contractor. This right does not abrogate any other Government rights.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
W81K04-18-D-0014 Current Challenges
Days to Appointment Meeting requirement of Medical Special appointments within 15 Business Days from date of order is an industry challenge Transportation; Mileage limits Government constraints limit transportation to 60 miles from the MEPS Non-Network providers Government still needs the requirement met to process an applicant even if the contract network can’t provide Appointment Notifications Quality of reports from providers that meet MEPCOM mission needs
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Medical Referral Services
COL Kevin Cummings USMEPCOM Command Surgeon
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
DHA PM 6025.13 Volume 4
DHA PM 6025.13, Volume 4, as referenced in PWS 4.2 and Exhibit B, includes the restriction in section 5.a.(3)(c) stating:
"(c) Portability of state licensure does not apply to:
Non-personal services contractor healthcare providers, unless specifically stated in the applicable contract and specifically approved by the ASD(HA)."
At this time, portability of state licensure does not apply.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Technical Requirements Clinical Psychologist
Reference Exhibit B for Specialty Consultant Qualifications
Clinical Psychologist Optometrist Physician Assistant Podiatrist Dentist Nurse Practitioner (Advanced Practice Nurse) Physician
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Solicitation Terms and Conditions
Yvonne Y. Camarce Health Readiness Contracting Office Contracting Officer
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
FAR Part 12 Commercial Terms and Standards
| Contract Type | |
| Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Single Award Task Order | Contract (SATOC) issuing Firm Fixed Priced (FFP) Task Orders |
Period of Performance Five Year Ordering Period
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
CLIN Structure
CLIN Structure
0001 – Network Providers - Ancillary 0002 – Network Providers – Medical Consult 0003 – Network Providers – Dental 0004 – Network Providers – Laboratory Services 0005 – Non-Network Providers – Ancillary 0006 – Non-Network Providers – Medical Consult 0007 – Non-Network Providers – Dental 0008– Non-Network Providers – Laboratory Services 0009 – No Shows 0010 – Transition 0011 – Post Award Conference
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
A standard of surveillance for monitoring Medical Referral Services
Contractor performs in accordance with acceptable performance metrics
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Best Value FAR 15.101
Competitive, Trade-Off Source Selection Procedures
Tradeoff Process, FAR 15.101-1
A tradeoff source selection approach
The relative importance of cost or price may vary in relation to other evaluation factors as communicated by the Government to potential offerors in the solicitation per FAR Subpart 15.304(d) and (e).
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Evaluation Factors
Tradeoff Process, FAR 15.101-1 Evaluation Factors
Factor 1. Technical Capability
Factor 2. Performance Risk (Past and or Current Performance)
Factor 3. Small Business Participation/Sub-Contracting Plan
Factor 4. Price
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Basis of Award
Factor 1 is significantly more important than Factor 2. Factor 2 is significantly more important than Factor 3. When combined Factors 1, 2 and 3 are significantly more important than Factor 4.
In accordance with FAR 15.304(e)(1 ), all non-cost factors, when combined, are significantly more important than Price
Offerors are cautioned that the awards may not necessarily be made to the lowest-priced offers
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
FAR Provision 52.212-1
Instructions to Offerors (FAR 52.212-1) General Instructions Offerors will be required to submit all documentation/ information detailed within the solicitation, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements
Failure to submit all required documentation/information may result in a proposal being ineligible for award
In submitting a proposal, offerors will be agreeing to the terms and conditions as written in the entire solicitation
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
FAR Provision 52.212-1 Continued
General Instructions continued The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims
The proposal shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale methods, processes and procedures to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements
Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
FAR Provision 52.212-1 Volume I
FAR Addendum to 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors
Volume I – Administrative Cover Letter Master Table of Contents Contract Administrative Data Completed Signed SF 1449 and all amendments Completed FAR Clauses and Provisions Responsibility Determination Contractor Teaming Arrangement (if applicable) Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
FAR Provision 52.212-2
Evaluation of Offers (FAR 52.212-2)
Evaluation Approach. Each proposal received will be evaluated with the criteria outlined in the solicitation for the purpose of assessing the proposal and the offeror’s ability to perform the prospective contract successfully.
Technical factors will be assigned an adjectival rating using the combined technical/risk ratings from the DoD Source Selection Procedures dated 20 August 2022
The Past Performance factor, on the basis of “recent” past performance information, will be assigned a relevancy rating and a performance confidence assessment
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
FAR Provision 52.212-2 Continued
Small Business Participation/Sub-Contracting Plan will be evaluated to identify the extent to which small business will participate in the performance of the proposed acquisition
The Price factor will be evaluated to establish reasonableness of the otherwise successful offeror’s price and will not receive an evaluation rating
All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Team. The overarching evaluation approach for all factors is adequacy of response and feasibility of approach.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
FAR 52.212-2 Continued
Consideration for Award
A rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved on all technical factors and sub-factors under (Factor 1) Technical Quality.
Factor 2 Performance Risk, Past and Present Performance must first meet Recency and Relevancy definitions, to be further evaluated for Quality of Performance. A rating of no less than “Satisfactory Confidence” must be received on Factor 2 Performance Risk. A rating of “Unknown Confidence” will be neither treated favorably or unfavorably and shall be considered for award.
Factor 3 Price proposal must be considered fair and reasonable.
A rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be received on Factor 4 Small Business Participation.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Combined Technical Risk Ratings
| TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS | ||
| Color | Rating | Description |
| Blue | Outstanding | Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirement and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. |
| Purple | Good | Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. |
| Green | Acceptable | Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. |
| Yellow | Marginal | Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. |
Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings
| Rating | Definition |
| Very Relevant | Past and present performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Relevant | Past and present performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Somewhat Relevant | Past and present performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Not Relevant | Past and present performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Performance Confidence Assessments
| TABLE 3 - Performance Confidence Assessments | |
| Rating | Definition |
| Substantial Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral Confidence | No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. |
| Limited Confidence | No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of Past and present performance. |
| No Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance |
record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Price Factor
The Government will evaluate price reasonableness for the fixed priced effort
Adequate price competition pursuant to FAR 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) is anticipated to determine price reasonableness of the Price factor.
Offerors are to complete the Pricing Spreadsheet (RFP Attachment 8). Instructions are listed on the “Instruction” tab.
Do NOT change the formulas or any other numbers.
An offeror’s Total Evaluated Price will be established by calculating the sum of the CLINS for each ordering year to arrive at the overall total.
Post-Award Conference (Minimum Guarantee), CLIN 0011. Offerors shall not provide separate pricing for post-award conference (minimum guaranteed amount) as it is priced by the Government ($1,500).
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Price Factor Continued
The Government may use any of the following price analysis techniques pursuant to FAR 15.404-1(b) to determine price reasonableness:
comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation;
comparison of proposed prices to historical prices paid, whether by the Government or other than the Government, for the same or similar items or services;
comparison with competitive published price lists or market prices; comparison of proposed prices with independent Government cost estimates;
comparison of proposed prices with prices obtained through with market research; and/or, analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data provided by the offeror.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
FAR Clause 52.217-8
Given that FAR Clause 52.217-8 provides the Government may exercise the option to extend services at the rates specified in the contract (i.e., the rates in effect when the Extension of Services option is exercised), for purposes of evaluating the option to extend services, the KO will consider the prices submitted for the base year and each ordering year as binding should the option to extend services be exercised.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Information Security DFARS 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident reporting Requires implementation of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-171, “Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations,” in accordance with DoDI 8582.01 "Security of Unclassified DoD Information on Non-DoD Information Systems The contractor shall self-certify compliance to implementing the NIST SP 800-171 security requirements by submitting a signed and completed System Security Plan (or extract thereof) and any applicable Plans of Action items.
DFARS 252.227-7015 Technical Data-Commercial Products and Commercial Services
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Contractor Responsibility
The Contracting Officer will conduct a responsibility assessment, in accordance with FAR Part 9.104 of each offeror being considered for award
The offeror must be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Proposal due date: as stated on solicitation Proposals shall be submitted via the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/ All proposals received after the exact time specified for receipt shall be treated as late submissions and will not be considered except under facts and circumstances allowed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo: https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Procuring and Administrative Contracting Officer – Ms. Yvonne Y. Camarce Contract Specialist – Ms. Maria Fidone
Technical Representative Contracting Officer Representative – Michael G. Mitsch
Legal Representative
- Mr. Thomas Hineman
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO
Name // Section // v1 // as of
Questions
Offerors are to read and follow the solicitation and amendments Any questions must be submitted in writing to maria.g.Fidone.civ@health.mil and Yvonne.y.Camarce.civ@health.mil NLT Tuesday, August 15, 2023, 4:00 P.M. CST
Using the attached question format (Do not PDF document)
All Government Responses to the questions received via email only will be posted to the https://PIEE.eb.mil.
Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO
Name // Section // v1 // as of image2.png image3.png image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .