Past Performance Questionnary.pdf

PDF 231 KB Posted

Attached to
Postwide Construction Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC)
Solicitation number
W56ZTN26R0004
Issued by

About this file

This is a past performance questionnaire used by the U.S. Army Contracting Command to evaluate offerors' prior contract performance during the source selection process for RFP W56ZTN-25-R-0001. The questionnaire is addressed to previous customers or points of contact who have worked with offerors on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts comparable to NAICS code 236220. Responses must be returned to Mrs. Barbara Cousins (barbara.d.cousins.civ@army.mil) or submitted to Mrs. Debora Cardoso Thelen (debora.c.cardosothelen.civ@army.mil) within 15 days of receipt, with a date of January 17, 2026.

The questionnaire consists of three parts: Part I requires offerors to provide contract identification details including contractor name, address, program title, contract number, contract type, prime contractor name if applicable, award date, completion date, nature of effort, and total contract value, along with identification of the offeror's representative. Part II requires respondents to evaluate contractor performance across five key criteria—compliance with specifications and workmanship standards, project management effectiveness including subcontractor control, timeliness of performance, cost forecasting and control effectiveness (for cost reimbursement contracts only), and commitment to customer satisfaction—using a four-point confidence scale (Substantial, Satisfactory, Limited, or No Confidence) with required rationale for each rating. Part III requests information about other relevant past efforts and respondent identification. The document includes detailed definitions for each confidence rating level to ensure consistent evaluation standards.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
MATOC SITE VISIT SIGN IN SHEET 11MARCH 2026.pdf PDF
SITE VISIT UPDATE.pdf PDF
Visitor Map Updated.pdf PDF
Visitor Map.pdf PDF
SITE VISIT.pdf PDF
W56ZTN26R0004.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104)

MAR 23

APPENDIX D

Performance Assessment

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND

17 January 2026

CCAP-MDT

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W56ZTN-25-R-0001

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 236220. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to Mrs. Barbara Cousins, barbara.d.cousins.civ@army.mil no later than 15 days after receipt. Submit your completed questionnaire to Mrs. Debora Cardoso Thelen at debora.c.cardosothelen.civ@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to Mrs. Cousins and Mrs. Cardoso Thelen.

Sincerely, Barbara Cousins Contracting Officer mailto:barbara.d.cousins.civ@army.mil mailto:debora.c.cardosothelen.civ@army.mil

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .