W56HZV19R0097-0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

W56HZV

ACC-DTA

6501 E. 11 MILE RD.

DETROIT ARSENAL, MI 48397-5000

MICHAEL BRUSATE

EMAIL: MICHAEL.D.BRUSATE.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56HZV-19-R-0097

2020JUL16

X

X

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 15

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: MICHAEL BRUSATE

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-HCS-B/(586)282-7930

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

Amendment 0004 changes the packaging requirements for CLIN 0045, M203A2 SPARE PARTS KIT, from Mil B, to Commercial, and replaces references to Attachment 0003 with the latest title (Price Evaluation Sheet Rev 1).

1. The change to CLIN 0045 was announced on Amendment 0002 as one of 15 Spares CLINs that the packaging requirements were changing for, but this particular CLIN inadvertently omitted from that amendment.

2. The name of Attachment 0003 is changed to Price Evaluation Sheet Rev 1 at L.4.2.2, L.4.2.3, and M.4.2.1.1(a).

3. At time of offer submission, it is the contractor's responsibility to sign the cover page of the offer, acknowledge this amendment, submit only the revised version of the pricing attachment rev 1 (do not submit the original in addition to the revised version), and make sure all fill ins are completed and submitted. Failure to do so may lead to your offer being rejected in accordance with M.2.1 of this solicitation.

4. The solicitation closing date and time remains unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0005 ***

2 15

W56HZV-19-R-0097

PIIN/SIIN

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

0045 FIFTH ORDERING YEAR $ $ ___________________ ______________ __________________

COMMODITY NAME: M203A2 SPARE PARTS KIT

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Packaging and Marking _____________________

PACKAGING/PACKING/SPECIFICATIONS:

SEE PACKAGING REQUIREMENTS CLAUSE

LEVEL PRESERVATION: Commercial

LEVEL PACKING: Commercial

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Origin ACCEPTANCE: Origin

3 15

PIIN/SIIN

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

4 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 General Proposal Information

L.1.1 The Offeror's proposal, subject to the Submission, Modification, Revision and Withdrawal paragraph of FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions, shall be submitted in the format and quantities as set forth below. All information necessary for the review and evaluation of a proposal is to be contained in the proposal volumes set forth below. Section M of the solicitation sets forth the evaluation criteria and delineates the Factors to be evaluated. The offeror's proposal, as required by this section, shall be evaluated as set forth in Section M of this solicitation. The Government will not assume the offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in its proposal. It is an offeror's responsibility to submit a well-written proposal with adequately detailed information which clearly demonstrates an understanding of and the ability to comply with the RFP requirements to allow for a meaningful evaluation. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals.

L.1.2 Minimum Acceptance Period

This provision supersedes any language pertaining to the acceptance period that may appear elsewhere in this solicitation (e.g. SF 33

Box 12).

ACCEPTANCE PERIOD means the number of calendar days available to the Government for awarding a contract from the date specified in this solicitation for receipt of offers.

L.1.2.1. The Government specified minimum acceptance period of is 120 calendar days.

L.1.2.2. The offeror shall clearly state in its Administrative volume the proposal acceptance period. Offerors may specify a longer acceptance period than the Government's minimum acceptance period stated above.

L.1.2.3. An offer that proposes less than the established minimum acceptance period, or fails to provide a proposal acceptance period, may be rejected.

L.2 Proposal Content, Format and Instructions

L.2.1 Proposal Content

L.2.1.1 All proposals shall be in English (American Standard) and shall be in US dollars. Proposals not in English or in US Dollars may be rejected. The proposal shall include all information specified and shall address all requirements outlined in Section L. The offeror's proposal shall be submitted in four separate volumes and in the quantities as set forth below. The offerors proposal shall consist of the following volumes:

Volume

Number Title Quantity______ _____ ________

Volume I Past Performance 1

Volume II Price 1

Volume III Administrative 1

L.2.1.2 A Proposal Executive Summary or transmittal letter is optional. It will neither be considered as part of the volumes required, nor will it be evaluated. If a Proposal Executive Summary is submitted, it must be submitted as part of the Administrative volume above and it should be no more than four pages in length.

L.2.2 Proposal Method of Submission, Format, and Instructions

L.2.2.1 Method of Submission:

Electronic proposals submitted via E-mail or Fax, and hardcopy proposals will NOT be accepted. Hand-carried offers, whether hardcopy or electronic, will NOT be accepted.

Offerors are required to submit proposals electronically, via DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) in accordance with the following

Proposal Submission Instructions and Process. Use of DoD SAFE requires the offerors understanding and consent of DoD SAFEs user behavior guidelines and all terms of use. This RFP requires use of a one-time submission code provided by the Government for tracking purposes outlined in Proposal Submission Instructions and Process below. Offerors with CAC cards may not submit a proposal via DoD SAFE without a Government provided submission code.

NOTE: In accordance with FAR 15.208, it is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure the proposal is received by the date and time specified on the cover page of this solicitation in accordance with the Instructions below. The DoD SAFE submission code is a one-time code. Therefore, Offerors should allow adequate time to request, receive, and input the code multiple times in case there is a problem

5 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

with submittal of the proposal. Please note that when submitting through DoD SAFE, it will take time to upload the proposal submission;

size and content may be factors, therefore offerors are strongly cautioned when submitting proposals to allow adequate time for submission.

Proposal Submission Instructions and Process:

Step 1 (Offeror): Offerors shall email Michael D. Brusate (email: michael.d.brusate.civ@mail.mil) of their intent to submit a proposal and request a DoD SAFE Drop Off code. Unless otherwise specified in the request, the Government will use the email account from the request to process a Drop-Off Request.

NOTE 1: It is recommended that this request is submitted no sooner than 14 days (Drop Off Requests are only valid for 14 days), and no later than 72 hours, prior to proposal due date and time.

NOTE 2: The current file limit for Drop Off is 25 files. If the offeror intends to submit more than 25 files, it is the offerors responsibility to request a 2nd Drop Off code with its request.

Step 2 (Government): The Government will send a one-time submission code through the Request A Drop-Off feature of DoD SAFE. For tracking purposes, the Government will only provide this to a single email account on behalf of the offeror.

Step 3 (Offeror): The Offeror will receive an email from the DoD SAFE with a link and a one-time submission code must be used to submit a proposal for this solicitation. The offeror opens the link and Adds Files.

Step 4: The Offeror shall ensure that all Recipients listed in Step 1 are included in the File Drop Off Submission. DoD SAFE will default to adding only the Recipient that initiated the File Drop-Off Request.

Step 5 (Offeror): The offeror submits files by clicking Drop-off File. Proposal submission does not occur until the Drop-off File occurs.

NOTE 3: It is highly recommended that the offeror take a screen shot of the Drop Off Completed screen and email it to Michael D. Brusate

(email: michael.d.brusate.civ@mail.mil)

Step 6 (Offeror): If the offeror needs to update its submission prior to the RFP closing date, it shall follow the same steps outlined above.

L.2.2.2 Proposal Format and Instructions

L.2.2.2.1 Each submitted File shall be labeled and named so it is identifiable for which volume it pertains (example: Volume 2, Price

Factor)

L.2.2.2.2 Electronic Files. The proposal electronic file name should not exceed 50 characters in length (not including the file extension). Ensure the file name does not contain any periods.

L.2.2.2.3 Acceptable File Formats. All electronic information provided in response to the solicitation must be provided in Microsoft

(MS) Office 2013 compatible or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) format or except as noted in instructions for individual volumes.

For files in PDF format, scanners should be set to 200 dots per inch. The proposal shall not contain citations for, or active links to live Internet sites or pages. All linked information shall be contained within the electronic proposal. Any linked information that is not contained in the proposal will not be accepted.

L.2.2.2.4 Unless otherwise specified, it is recommended that the proposal be formatted for 8.5 inch x 11 inch paper with a minimum font size of 10 pt. and with a minimum of 0.5 margins. Schedules, drawings and other documents more appropriate to larger size should be formatted for no larger than 8.5 inch x 14 inch dimensions.

L.2.2.2.5 Provide spreadsheets that include all formulas, function, macros, computations, or equations used to compute the proposed amounts. For each workbook, all Rows, Columns, Cells, and Worksheets are to be visible. Do not include Zero height and zero width rows and columns in Worksheets. Do not format Worksheet cells with font color equal to the fill color. If Workbooks or Worksheets are password protected, then the passwords must be provided. Do not submit print image files or pictures or files containing only values are not acceptable. Failure to provide fully functional excel spreadsheets in the proposal may result in the proposal being rejected

(See Section M.2.1(a)).

L.2.2.2.6 The offeror shall make every effort to ensure that the proposal is virus-free. Proposals (or portions thereof) submitted which indicate the presence of a virus, or which are otherwise rendered unreadable by damage in electronic transit, shall be treated as

"unreadable" as described in FAR 15.207(c).

L.2.2.3 Submission Due Date

6 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The offeror must ensure its proposal, in its entirety, reaches the required destination before the date and time set for closing of the solicitation set forth in Block 9 on the SF 33 front page of the solicitation.

L.2.2.3.1 Lateness

The lateness rules for submitted proposals are outlined in FAR 52.215-1 "Instructions to Offerors - Competitive," and are incorporated into this solicitation.

L.2.2.4 Proposal Modifications vs Proposal Revisions.

Proposal modification is a change made to a proposal before the solicitations closing date and time, or made in response to an amendment, or made to correct a mistake at any time before award. Proposal revision is a change to a proposal made after the solicitation closing date, at the request of or as allowed by a Contracting Officer as the result of negotiations.

L.2.2.4.1 Offerors may submit proposal modifications at any time before the solicitation closing date and time as permitted by the

Federal Acquisition Regulations.

L.2.2.4.2 Offerors may submit proposal revisions only if requested or allowed by the Contracting Officer.

L.2.3 Single Proposal Submission

Offerors are limited to submitting one proposal with one approach to meeting all the requirements of this solicitation. Proposals that contain alternative terms and conditions will be considered as taking exception to the requirements of the solicitation. See Section

M.2.

L.2.4 Organizational Conflict of Interest

L.2.4.1 The provisions of FAR 9.5, Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI), apply to any award under this Request for Proposal (RFP).

Potential offerors should review their current and planned participation in any other Government contracts, subcontracts, consulting, or teaming arrangements where they may be in a position of actual or perceived bias or unfair competitive advantage.

L.2.4.2 Offerors shall disclose any potential OCI situations to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) as soon as identified including prior to proposal submission. The disclosure should include the facts and an analysis of the actual or perceived conflict and a recommended approach(s) to neutralize or mitigate the potential conflict. The preferred approach to potential conflicts is to negate/obviate the conflict. Mitigation is considered only if it is not practical to negate/obviate the conflict. The PCO will promptly respond to resolve any potential conflicts.

L.2.5 Restriction On Disclosure and Use of Data.

Offerors that include in their proposals data that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, shall:

L.2.5.1 Mark the title page with the following legend:

This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed -- in whole or in part -- for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to this offeror as a result of -- or in connection with -- the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Governments right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets [insert numbers or other identification of sheets]; and

L.2.5.2 Mark each sheet of data it wishes to restrict with the following legend:

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.

L.3 All or None

Offers in response to this solicitation must be submitted for all the requirements identified in the solicitation. Offers submitted for less than all the requirements called for by this solicitation may be rejected or ineligible for award.

L.4 Evaluation Factors

Offeror proposals shall address the following 2 Factors:

(a) Past Performance Factor

(b) Price Factor

L.4.1 Volume I Past Performance

For the Past Performance Factor, provide information for a total of up to three Recent Federal USG Contracts performed by the offeror as the prime contractor. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror. It is the offeror's responsibility to submit detailed and complete information so the Government may evaluate its Past Performance volume. The

7 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from internal and external sources other than the proposal, the burden to provide thorough and complete past performance information rests with the offeror. The below instructions are provided to advise offerors as to the information required by the Government to assess the contractors Recent and Relevant past performance. Since this information constitutes a basis of the

Government's review, it is imperative that the offeror present its past performance in a clear and complete manner. Failure to provide the information requested under paragraph L.4.1.3 and L.4.1.4 (if applicable) below may result in an assessment that the offeror does not possess a record of Recent and Relevant past performance.

For the purpose of this Factor, a Contract is defined as a written instrument that requires the performance of a distinct effort and demonstrates the distinct effort was actually performed. Written instruments containing supplies or services that can be ordered but typically do not demonstrate actual performance, such as Indefinite Delivery Contracts (FAR 16.5), Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA), Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA), and Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) do not meet the definition of a Contract. Written instruments considered to demonstrate actual performance may include a single task or delivery order, a single work directive, or a single definite quantity contract provided it demonstrates a distinct effort was actually performed. An offeror may submit, or the Government may require, written instruments that enhance the Governments understanding of the distinct effort actually performed if it is not identified on the Contract itself. It is incumbent upon the offeror to demonstrate that a distinct effort was actually performed.

L.4.1.1 Recent Contracts are those performed within 3 years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

L.4.1.2 Relevant Contracts are those comparable in scope and magnitude of effort and complexity to the following statement of work requirement:

Building a rifled weapon barrel to a Government TDP requiring manganese phosphate and anodized finishes at a rate of 300 units a month.

L.4.1.3 Contract Information: Refer to the definition of a Contract above (L.4.1). The offerors proposal shall substantiate what distinct effort was required and actually performed under each of the proposed Contract(s). For each Contract(s) submitted, provide the following information:

(a) Prime Contractor name and address;

(b) Contract Number (and delivery/task order number if applicable);

(c) Contract Type;

(d) Total Value of the Contract (beginning & ending value);

(e) Delivery or Performance Schedule;

(f) Government or private industry contracting activity address, telephone number and e-mail;

(g) Procuring Contracting Officers (PCO) and/or Contract Specialists name, or point of contact for private industry entity responsible for signing or administering the Contract, telephone number and e-mail;

(h) Government (DCMA) or private industry administrative contracting officer (ACO), contracting officers representative (COR), performance certifier, and/or quality assurance representative (QAR), name, telephone number and email;

(i) Specify the Government or Contractor Point(s) of Contact for which the Questionnaire was sent, and provide the date(s) it was sent.

(j) A description of the work performed by the offeror, which shall include a narrative describing the similarities between (1) the relevant work performed under the statement of work requirements of the offerors cited Contract(s) and (2) the statement of work requirements identified in L.4.1.2. In its narrative, the offeror shall specify the location in the cited Contracts statement of work

(to include paragraph and page number) that substantiates the relevant work performed;

(k) Contract period of performance;

(l) Provide a brief self-assessment of Contract performance. The self-assessment must address performance to meet Technical and Schedule requirements; and

(m) Copy of the complete Performance Work Statement or Scope of Work for each of the submitted Contracts. If the proposed Contract was issued under or in connection with a related written instrument (e.g. Indefinite Delivery Contracts, BOA, BPA, FSS) and the details of the distinct effort actually performed needed to establish relevancy on the proposed Contract are further defined within the terms and conditions (e.g. statement of work) of that related written instrument, provide that information and any other information necessary to establish this instruments relationship to the proposed Contract. (These documents can be submitted as stand-alone attachments within the proposal volume).

8 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.4.1.4 Associated Entity, Predecessor Company, and Joint Venture. As stated above (L.4.1), only Contracts performed by the named offeror will be considered, however the Government may consider the past performance of an associated entity, a predecessor company, or joint venture as explained below.

L.4.1.4.1 Associated Entity. The Government may consider the past performance of an associated entity if the offeror successfully demonstrates meaningful involvement by the associated entity in the proposed effort.

(a) An associated entity may include a parent company, separate corporate division within the same parent company, subsidiary company, a legally affiliated company, etc. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains the offerors relationship to the associated entity. The offeror shall support the narrative with legal documentation, including corporate papers, establishing the legal nexus between the offeror and the associated entity.

(b) The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains the meaningful involvement the associated entity will provide to the proposed effort i.e. the work to be performed by the associated entity. Meaningful involvement may include a description of the associated entitys resources, such as its workforce, facilities, and/or other resources that will be provided or relied upon in the proposed effort. A Contract will not be considered unless the offeror successfully establishes meaningful involvement by the associated entity in the proposed effort.

L.4.1.4.2 Predecessor Company. The Government may consider the past performance of a predecessor company if the offeror demonstrates the experience of the predecessor company is reasonably predictive of the offerors performance under the proposed effort.

a) A predecessor company may include a company which was acquired by the offeror or merged with the offeror. It may also include other instances where the predecessor company was reorganized, restructured, or otherwise altered. A predecessor company does not include an entity which remains separate and distinct from the offeror. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains the offerors relationship to the predecessor company. The offeror shall support the narrative with documentation evidencing the offerors status as the successor company.

b) The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains why the predecessors past performance is predictive of the offerors performance under the proposed effort. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, continuity of operations such as the continued employment of the predecessors employees and the transfer of assets including buildings, furnishings, and fixtures.

L.4.1.4.3 Individual Partners of a Joint Venture. If the offeror is a Joint Venture, the Government may consider past performance of each partner of the Joint Venture and any work performed by the Joint Venture itself previously. The offeror must successfully demonstrate meaningful involvement by the partner to the proposed effort.

i. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that discloses the individual partners of the Joint Venture and shall provide documentation evidencing the Joint Venture.

ii. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains the meaningful involvement the Joint Venture partner will provide to the proposed effort. Meaningful involvement may include a description of the partners resources, such as its workforce, facilities, and/or other resources that will be provided or relied upon in the proposed effort. A Contract will not be considered unless the offeror successfully establishes meaningful involvement by the partner in the proposed effort.

L.4.1.5 Past Performance Questionnaire. A past performance questionnaire is provided in Attachment 0007. For each contract submitted by the offeror, the offeror shall send a copy of the past performance questionnaire directly to the appropriate PCO and/or COR listed in

L.4.1.3 (g) and (h). The offeror shall request that these individuals complete the questionnaire and forward it electronically directly to the Government at michael.d.brusate.civ@mail.mil as soon as possible and prior to the RFP closing date (See Block #9 of the SF33 cover page to this solicitation) with the subject heading PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FOR [Offeror name].

L.4.2 Volume II Price Factor

L.4.2 Price Volume

In accordance with FAR 15.403-5(a)(1), certified cost or pricing data is not required for initial proposal submission. However, after initial proposal submission, if only one offer is received, the Government reserves the right to request certified cost or pricing data in accordance with DFARS 252.215-7008. In the event certified cost or pricing data is required, the offeror may submit a written request for exception based on the applicable clauses contained herein.

For initial proposal submission, provide the information outlined below. Offerors may submit any other additional cost or price information it considers to be helpful in the Government's evaluation of its price proposal.

L.4.2.1 Provide all prices and costs in U.S. dollars only.

9 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.4.2.2 Attachment 0003 Price Evaluation Sheet Rev 1:

Submit your completed Attachment 0003 - Price Evaluation Sheet Rev 1with your proposal. Complete the attachment in accordance with the instructions included within the attachment. Propose Firm-Fixed-Prices for all CLINs included in the Attachment. Submit the attachment in Microsoft Excel format. Do not enter any proposed prices into Section B of the RFP.

L.4.2.3 Range Pricing:

For each CLIN with range pricing, propose a unit price for each range shown in Attachment 0003 Price Evaluation Sheet Rev 1. The offeror may enter the same unit price for all ranges if desired.

L.4.2.4 The Government reserves the right to request additional or more detailed cost or price information to support its evaluation.

L.4.2.5 Use of Existing Government-Furnished Property (if applicable):

L.4.2.5.1 If the offeror is proposing to utilize Government-Furnished Property (GFP) on a rent-free basis in performance of this contract, then the offeror must provide a list of GFP that includes the following for each item:

- Acquisition cost;

- Age;

- Type of GFP;

- The accountable contract under which the property is held;

- The dates during which the property will be available for use (including the first, last, and all intervening months) and, for any property that will be used concurrently in performing two or more contracts, the amounts of the respective uses in sufficient detail to support prorating the rent;

- The amount of rent that would otherwise be charged in accordance with FAR 52.245-9, Use and Charges;

- Evidence that it obtained authorization for its rent-free use from the contracting officer having cognizance of the property; and

- Any additional information required in accordance with Attachment 0005 Use of Existing Government-Furnished Property.

L.4.2.5.2 The offeror is to obtain any rental equivalent amounts (or any other data required) from the cognizant contracting officer necessary to determine the GFP Price Adjustment calculated in accordance with Attachment 0005 Use of Existing Government-Furnished

Property.

L.4.2.5.3 The offeror shall identify the total GFP Price Adjustment (for all classifications of property) that it calculated in accordance with Attachment 0005 Use of Existing Government-Furnished Property, and provide all calculations showing how the total GFP

Price Adjustment was developed. If applicable, the offeror is to also identify the rationale for any allocations to each CLIN.

L.5 Volume V Administrative. The offer shall submit the following information:

L.5.1 Signature Actions/offeror Fill-Ins. The offeror shall submit a scanned image of a signed copy of the SF33 cover page, a copy of all completed fill-ins for Sections A through K, and (if applicable) a signed copy of all Amendments to the solicitation. System for

Award Management (SAM) certifications need not be separately submitted; however, all offerors must be successfully registered and valid in SAM prior to award.

L.5.1.1 Where certifications and approved systems are required for an offeror, if the proposal is being submitted by a Joint Venture

(JV), certifications and approved systems for the principals (partners) of the joint venture will be considered as valid for that offeror providing the necessary documentation from all principals (partners) is provided with the proposal.

L.5.1.2 JV: To be recognized as a JV and eligible for award, the membership arrangements of the JV must be identified and the company relationships fully disclosed in the offeror's proposal in accordance with FAR 9.603. A copy of the agreement establishing the JV must contain the signatures of all of the members comprising the JV.

L.5.2 The offerors proposal acceptance period in terms of calendar days from the date for receipt of offers specified in the RFP (See

Section L.1.2).

L.5.3 Statement of Acknowledgement. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions of the

RFP, and a statement of agreement to furnish and deliver the items or perform services set forth in the RFP in consideration for offerors proposed price(s) set opposite each item or service. Any disagreement with the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents may be determined to be a Deficiency and grounds for the PCO to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process (Reference Section M.2.1).

L.5.4 Assumptions. The offeror shall consolidate and identify all offeror's generated "assumptions" contained anywhere in the proposal.

The offeror shall include a statement that none of the "assumptions" contradict or take exception to any terms, conditions, or requirements of the solicitation. Any exceptions taken to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents may be determined to be a Deficiency and grounds for the PCO to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process (Reference Section M.2.1).

10 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.5.5 The offeror shall provide an affirmative statement that the offeror does not have an OCI as it applies to this solicitation.

(Reference Section L.2.4)

L.5.6 If applicable, include the written consent of its proposed Subcontractor to allow the Government to discuss the subcontractor's past performance with the offeror.

L.5.7 If Government Property (as defined in 52.245-1) will be utilized in the performance of this contract, provide a description of your property management system, plan, and any customary commercial practices, voluntary consensus standards, or industry-leading practices and standards to be used by you in managing Government property in accordance with 52.245-1.

property in accordance with 52.245-1.

L.6 HQ-AMC LEVEL PROTEST PROCEDURES

Complete AMC Protest Procedures can be found at: http://www.amc.army.mil/Connect/Legal-Resources/

An agency protest may be filed with either the contracting officer or to HQAMC but not both following the procedures listed on the website above.

*** END OF NARRATIVE L0001 ***

11 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 Basis of Award

M.1.1 GENERAL The Government plans to award an idefinite delivery indefinite quantity, firm fixed price type contract for this requirement as a result of this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to choose not to award a contract if such action is in the Governments best interest.

M.1.1.1 There are 2 evaluation factors:

a. Past Performance Factor

b. Price Factor

The relative order of importance of these Factors are described in Section M.4 below.

M.1.1.2 It is the Governments intent to award one contract. Award will be made using the Trade Off source selection process IAW FAR

15.101-1, which states award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror that is eligible for award. The Government will follow the source selection process set forth in Section M.3 below.

M.1.1.3 Importance of Price. Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal is otherwise eligible for award under M.1.2, and (2) represents the best value to the Government. This may not be the Offeror with the lowest evaluated Price Factor. However, the closer the

Offeror's evaluations are to each other in those Factors other than the Price Factor, the more important the Price Factor becomes in the decision. Notwithstanding the relative order of importance of the two evaluation Factors stated herein, price may be controlling when:

(a) Proposals are otherwise considered approximately equal in non-price factors; or

(b) The advantages of a higher rated, higher priced proposal are not considered to be worth the price premium.

M.1.2 Eligibility for Award. Award will only be made to an offeror who is eligible for award. To be eligible for award:

a. The offeror must be registered in System for Award Management (SAM) (see provision 52.204-7); and

b. The offeror must be determined responsible (See Section M.3.6); and

c. The proposal must not contain a Deficiency(s) (per FAR Part 15.001)

M.2 REJECTION OF OFFERS

M.2.1 The Government may reject any proposal if doing so is in the Government's best interest at any time after receipt of proposals.

Examples include, but are not limited to, the following proposal conditions:

a. The proposal fails to meaningfully respond to the instructions in Section L of this solicitation (i.e. a proposal provides some data, but omits significant material data and information required by Section L, fails to follow proposal key proposal instructions or format requirements in Section L); or

b. When a proposal merely offers to perform work according to the RFP terms or fails to present more than a statement indicating its capability to comply with the RFP terms and does not provide support and elaboration as specified in Section L of this solicitation.

c. The proposal proposes exceptions to the solicitation requirements, attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or solicitation terms and conditions; or

d. The proposal contains one or more OCIs that cannot be avoided or mitigated. Refer to Section L.3 of this solicitation, "Organizational Conflict of Interest."; or

e. The proposal is unbalanced as to price. See Section M.4.2; or

f. The proposals acceptance period does not meet the Governments required minimum acceptance period (Refer to Section L.1.2); or

g. The proposal is not in English (American Standard) or in US Dollars; or

h. A proposal submitted for less than all the requirements called for by this solicitation.

i. A proposal is received, but the contractor did not access both Technical Data Packages.

12 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

M.3 Source Selection Process.

M.3.1 Compliance Review. After receipt of proposals, but prior to the evaluation process, the Government will perform a compliance review of the offeror's proposal to determine the extent of compliance to the solicitation instructions, and whether the proposal meets any of the conditions listed in M.2, Rejection of Offerors.

M.3.2 Evaluation Process Evaluated proposals which are eligible for award will be subject to the Source Selection Trade-off process, considering both the evaluation factors and their relative order of importance as cited in Section M.4, to identify the proposal which represents the best value to the Government. The Government will weigh the evaluated proposals (other than the Price Factor) against the total evaluated price to the Government. As part of the best value determination, the relative strengths and weaknesses of each offeror's proposal shall be considered, as specified below, in addition to the other evaluation methods described below. Selection of the successful Offeror shall be made following an assessment of each proposal, based on the response to the information requested in

Section L of this solicitation and against the solicitation requirements and the evaluation criteria described in Section M.

M.3.3 Source Selection Authority (SSA). The SSA is the official designated to direct the source selection process and select the Offeror for contract award.

M.3.4 Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). An SSEB has been established by the Government to evaluate proposals in response to this solicitation. The SSEB is comprised of technically qualified individuals who have been selected to conduct this evaluation in accordance with the evaluation criteria for this solicitation. Careful, full and impartial consideration will be given to the evaluation of all proposals received pursuant to this solicitation.

M.3.5 Award without Discussions: This RFP includes FAR Provision 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors Competitive Acquisition in Section L which advises offerors that the Government intends to make award without conducting discussions. Where awards will be made without discussions, exchanges with offerors are limited to Clarifications as defined in FAR 15.306(a). Therefore, the offerors initial proposal should contain the offerors best terms from a Price and non-Price Factor standpoint. However, under FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government reserves the right to hold discussions, if necessary. If the PCO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the PCO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

M.3.6 Determination of Responsibility. Per FAR 9.103, the Government will place a contract only with an Offeror that the Contracting

Officer determines to be responsible or refer the matter to the SBA per FAR 19.602. A prospective Offeror, in order to be eligible for award for this acquisition, must be able to demonstrate it meets the standards of responsibility set forth in FAR 9.104. As a part of this determination, the Contracting Officer may utilize the Offeror's proposed prices, as well as other information, to determine if the prospective contractor has adequate financial resources to perform the contract. The Government reserves the right to conduct a Pre-

Award Survey on any or all Offeror(s) or its subcontractors to aid the Contracting Officer in the evaluation of each Offeror's proposal and ensure a selected Offeror is responsible. To verify an Offeror meets the responsibility criteria at FAR 9.104, the Government reserves the right to request additional information, to include the following:

(a) Arrange a visit to the Offeror(s) plant and perform a necessary Pre-Award Survey; or

(b) Request an Offeror provide financial, technical, production, or managerial background information. If an Offeror does not submit the requested information within seven working days from the date of the receipt of the request, or if an Offeror refuses to provide the

Government access to its facility, the Government may determine the Offeror to be non-responsible. If the Government visits the

Offeror's facility, the Offeror shall ensure current data relevant to the proposal is available for Government personnel to review.

M.3.7 Consistency. Each volume of the offerors proposal shall be consistent with the other proposal volumes and shall demonstrate the understanding and ability to perform according to the statement of work of the contract. The offeror should provide supporting documentation in sufficient detail to permit a complete evaluation of the proposal. The Government may conduct a crosswalk between the information provided in offerors proposal volumes to assess whether the offeror submits consistent proposal information. Any inconsistency between proposal volumes, which indicates the offeror has an inherent misunderstanding of the requirements or an inability to perform the resultant contract, may result in an offeror being assessed with increased risk in one or more Factors and/or ineligible for award.

M.4 Evaluation Factors. The Government will assess each Offeror in 2 factors:

a. Factor 1: Past Performance (M.4.1)

b. Factor 2: Price (M.4.2)

The relative order of importance is Past Performance is significantly more important than Price. As required to be defined by FAR

15.304(e), the non- cost/price factor is significantly more important than cost/price.

M.4.1 Past Performance

M.4.1.1 The Government will conduct a Performance Confidence Assessment to establish a Confidence Assessment Rating for each offeror.

13 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The Confidence Assessment Rating assigned will be based on the offerors Recent and Relevant performance record and the expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort described in L. 4.1.2.

M.4.1.2 Contracts submitted in the Past Performance Factor volume of the offeror's proposal will not be considered if the Government determines them to be not Recent, not Relevant, or lacking any credible past performance information. Offerors without a record of

Recent and Relevant past performance information upon which to base a meaningful confidence assessment will be rated as "Neutral

Confidence", which is neither favorable nor unfavorable.

M.4.1.3 The offeror may also be evaluated on past contract performance information based on internal Government or private source information and reserves the right to use any information received as part of its evaluation. The Government may contact any of the references the offeror provides, and reserves the right to use any information received as part of its evaluation.

M.4.1.4 Past performance which is identified in the offerors Past Performance Factor volume but is not supported with the information requested in Section L may be determined not Relevant. In addition, if any other proposal volume indicates the Government will not realize the benefit of the cited past performance during contract performance, then the cited past performance may be determined not

Relevant.

M.4.2 Price Factor

M.4.2.1 The Price Factor evaluation will consider the Total Evaluated Price to the Government. The Government will also evaluate the offerors price proposal for price reasonableness and unbalanced pricing.

M.4.2.1.1 Total Evaluated Price:

The Price Factor evaluation will result in a determination of the Total Evaluated Price. The Total Evaluated Price equals the sum of the following:

(a) The proposed prices for all CLINs, as calculated in Attachment 0003 - Price Evaluation Sheet Rev 1; and

(b) If applicable, any other price adjustments, for evaluation purposes only, that are required in accordance with the (i) FAR; (ii)

DFARS; or (iii) clauses, provisions, or RFP Attachments contained within this solicitation; and

(c) The USG evaluation of transportation costs for FOB Origin shipment of M203A2 calculated IAW M.5, as follows:

LOCATION QUANTITY ________ ________

Amman, Jordan 1,500

Santa Marta, Columbia 250

Alabama, USA 600

Kabul, Afghanistan 237 ________

TOTAL 2,587

M.4.2.1.2 Weighted Average CLIN Price:

For each CLIN with range pricing, the weighted average unit prices will be the summation of the proposed unit prices for each range multiplied by the weighting percentages as stated in Attachment 0003. The proposed price of each such CLIN will then be based on multiplying the weighted average unit price by the estimated CLIN quantities as stated in Attachment 0003 to calculate the Weighted

Average CLIN Price.

M.4.2.2 Price Reasonableness:

The Government will evaluate whether or not the offerors proposed price is reasonable. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. The Government may make a determination of reasonableness by any means allowable under FAR 15.404-1.

M.4.2.3 Unbalanced Pricing:

The Government will evaluate the Offerors proposal for unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items or ranges is significantly over- or understated as indicated by the application of cost and price analysis techniques. Offerors are cautioned that a proposal the Government assesses to be unbalanced as to price, may either be rejected or determined unacceptable for award. See FAR 15.404-1(g) for more information on unbalanced pricing.

M.5 METHOD OF EVALUATION FOR F.O.B. ORIGIN TRANSPORTATION OFFERS

For the evaluation of this offer, we will use the lowest freight rates from the Transportation Officer that are:

(a) In effect (or the lowest rates that will become effective before the expected date of initial shipment),

(b) On file or published with the Transportation Officer by the date of bid opening (or by the closing date specified for requests for proposals), 14 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(c) For the Government selected method of shipment, and

(d) Based upon the following freight classification:

STCC ITEM NO.: 19 111 60 STCC: 6001-AV

NMFC ITEM NO: 146250 NMFTA: STB NMF 100-AT

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

15 15