Attachment 0006 Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation.pdf

Attachment 0006 Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial items

(OCT 2014)

1. The USG will evaluate responses to this solicitation in accordance with FAR 52.212-2 and the information contained within this addendum.

2. The USG intends to intend one award to the lowest priced, technically acceptable, responsible Offeror. The Evaluation Factors for this solicitation are as follows:

a. Factor 1: Technical

i. Technical Sub-Factor 1: Staffing Plan

ii. Technical Sub-Factor 2: Quality Control Plan

iii. Technical Sub-Factor 3: Transition in/out Plan

b. Factor 2: Price

In order to be rated Acceptable for the Technical Factor, all Technical Sub- Factors shall be rated Acceptable. An Unacceptable rating in one or more Technical Sub-Factors will render the entire Technical Factor Unacceptable.

Only Offers that are found to be Technically Acceptable, will be evaluated for Price.

3. Technical Factors will be evaluated as follows:

a. Technical Sub-Factor 1: Staffing Plan

ACCEPTABLE: The Offeror has presented a staffing plan that details the project organizational structure. The Offeror has identified the number of employees, as well as all position titles it proposes to use for the duration of this project. The Offeror has provided a realistic schedule to accomplish all tasks in accordance with the PWS and all Attachments and Annexes. The plan shall account for employee illness, employee turnover, as well as retention and hiring practices to ensure continued services throughout the life of the contract. The Offeror has provided sufficient detail to demonstrate the proposed organizational structure, number of employees, along with the proposed schedule will allow for successful completion of the PWS, all attachments and annexes.

UNACCEPTABLE: The Offeror fails to provide a staffing plan that details the project organizational structure. The Offeror fails to identify the number of employees, as well as all position titles it proposes to use for the duration of this project. The Offeror has failed to provide a realistic schedule to accomplish all tasks in accordance with the PWS and all Attachments and Annexes. The plan does not adequately account for employee illness, employee turnover, as well as retention and hiring practices to ensure continued services throughout the life of the contract. The Offeror fails to provide sufficient detail to demonstrate the proposed organizational structure, number of employees, along with the proposed schedule will allow for successful completion of the PWS, all attachments and annexes.

b. Technical Sub-Factor 2: Quality Control Plan

ACCEPTABLE: The Offeror presents a QCP that identifies procedures to identify and prevent the recurrence f defective services, intended methods to manage the quality of work, description of the inspection system, and a comprehensive list of equipment to be used in the performance of the contract.

The QCP includes comprehensive task lists for employee use to ensure work is completed in accordance with the PWS, all attachments and annexes. The Plan includes draft Contractor logs in sufficient detail to allow for USG Quality Control Inspections.

UNACCEPTABLE: The Offeror does not present a QCP that identifies procedures to identify and/or prevent the recurrence of defective services, or does not include intended methods to manage the quality of work, or fails to provide a description of the inspection system, or fails to provide a comprehensive list of equipment to be used in the performance of the contract.

The QCP fails to provide comprehensive task lists for employee use to ensure work is completed in accordance with the PWS, all attachments and annexes.

The Plan fails to include draft Contractor logs in sufficient detail to allow for USG Quality Control Inspections.

c. Technical Sub-Factor 3: Transition in/out plan

ACCEPTABLE: The Offeror provides a comprehensive transition plan that details how the vendor intends to transition services with the current incumbent contractor as well as transitioning out of providing services at the end of the contractor. This plan ensures continuity of services throughout transition and without defective services.

UNACCEPTABLE: The Offeror fails to provide a comprehensive transition plan that details how the vendor intends to transition services with the current incumbent contractor as well as transitioning out of providing services at the end of the contractor. This plan fails to ensure continuity of services throughout transition and without defective services.

In order to be rated Acceptable for the Technical Factor, all Technical Sub- Factors shall be rated Acceptable. An Unacceptable rating in one or more Technical Sub-Factors will render the entire Technical Factor Unacceptable.

4. Only quotes rated TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE will be evaluated on Price.

Price will be evaluated as follows:

a. A price will be derived for each period of performance: Transition, Base Year, Option Year 1, Option Year 2, Option Year 3, and Option Year 4. This will be done by summing the following CLINs for EACH period of performance:

Custodial Services PBA, Custodial Services ECBC, Custodial Services MEDCOM, Custodial Services QMUN, Custodial Services RCMD and Special Event Cleaning.

b. The USG will calculate the 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, 6 month price by dividing the total price for option year 4 by two.

c. The USG will sum the totals for each period, Transition, Base Year, Option

Year 1, Option Year 2, Option Year 3, Option Year 4, and 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services to derive the TEP.

5. Award will be made to the lowest price, technically acceptable, responsive and responsible Offeror in accordance with FAR 9.104.