W52P1J-19-R-0136.pdf

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD 1. This Contract Is A Rated Order Under

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

Rating Page of Pages

2. Contract Number 3. Solicitation Number 4. Type of Solicitation 5. Date Issued 6. Requisition/Purchase Number Sealed Bid (IFB)

Negotiated (RFP)

7. Issued By Code 8. Address Offer To (If Other Than Item 7)

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations ‘offer’ and ‘offeror’ mean ‘bid’ and ‘bidder’.

SOLICITATION

9. Sealed offers in original and copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in until (hour) local time (Date).

Caution - Late Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. For Information A. Name B. Telephone (No Collect Calls) C. E-mail Address

Call: Area Code Number Ext.

11. Table Of Contents

(X) Sec. Description Page(s) (X) Sec. Description Page(s)

Part I - The Schedule Part II - Contract Clauses A Solicitation/Contract Form I Contract Clauses

B Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs Part III - List Of Documents, Exhibits, And Other Attach.

C Description/Specs./Work Statement J List of Attachments D Packaging and Marking Part IV - Representations And Instructions E Inspection and Acceptance K Representations, Certifications, and F Deliveries or Performance Other Statements of Offerors G Contract Administration Data L Instrs., Conds., and Notices to Offerors H Special Contract Requirements M Evaluation Factors for Award

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within _____ calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. Discount For Prompt Payment 10 Calendar Days (%) 20 Calendar Days (%) 30 Calendar Days (%) Calendar Days (%) (See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. Acknowledgment of Amendments (The offeror acknowledges Amendment No. Date Amendment No. Date receipt of amendments to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

15A. Name and Code Facility 16. Name and Title of Person Authorized to Sign Offer Address of (Type or Print) Offeror

15B. Telephone Number 15C. Check if Remittance Address is 17. Signature 18. Offer Date Area Code Number Ext. Different From Above – Enter such

Address In Schedule

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. Accepted As To Items Numbered 20. Amount 21. Accounting And Appropriation

22. Authority For Using Other Than Full And Open Competition: 23. Submit Invoices To Address Shown In Item

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

24. Administered By (If other than Item 7) Code 25. Payment Will Be Made By Code

26. Name of Contracting Officer (Type or Print) 27. United States Of America 28. Award Date

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION Standard Form 33 (Rev. 9-97) Previous edition is unusable Prescribed By GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

W52P1J-19-R-0136 X

DOA6

SEE SCHEDULE

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

THOR A OLSON

(309)782-8678

CCRI-TC

THOR.A.OLSON2.CIV@MAIL.MIL

1 29

X 1

X 9

X 10 X 11

X 12

X 14

X 19

X 20

X 27

X 29

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: THOR A OLSON

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRI-TC/(309)782-8678

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

1. This is a DRAFT Request for Proposal. It does NOT constitute a final Request for Proposal (RFP), nor serve to bind the United States

Government (USG) in any way. This DRAFT RFP does not constitute a guarantee of a future RFP or requirement. It should not be assumed that the information contained herein will be representative of the final RFP. Offerors will not be reimbursed for costs associated with reviewing and preparing comments in response to this RFP. The USG is not using this document to negotiate or solicit offers. NO

OFFERS ARE REQUESTED OR WILL BE ACCEPTED AT THIS TIME.

2. Army Contracting Command Rock Island (ACC-RI) is seeking industry comment and feedback on this DRAFT RFPs content prior to release of the final RFP. It is the USGs intent that, to the maximum extent practicable and if in the best interests of the USG, all comments received will be taken into consideration for possible incorporation into the Final RFP. It is preferable that only one set of questions be submitted by each offeror, instead of multiple sets of questions. Feedback shall be submitted to the Government no later than 1400 Central Time, 28 August 2019.

3. The DRAFT RFP is being issued for the sole purpose of receiving questions/comments from potential offerors regarding the procurement of the MET Sustainment requirement and all related incidental hardware, software, and construction, as part of the overall MET

Sustainment requirement. Responses are voluntary, not mandatory.

4. Any clarifications regarding this DRFP should be provided to the below individual, via electronic mail:

Mr. Thor Olson

Contract Specialist

309-782-8678

"mailto:thor.a.olson2.civ@mail.mil "_____________________________________

5. It is noted that the comments and all questions and answers relating to this DRAFT RFP will be posted to the draft solicitation website (FedBizOpps). Accordingly, information will NOT be treated as proprietary, unless specifically stated otherwise. Please be aware that keeping innovative ideas as proprietary may preclude them from being incorporated into the solicitation.

6. Information regarding this solicitation, including questions and answers, will be posted in FedBizOpps under Solicitation W52P1J-19-

R-0136.

General Summary_______________

1. This is a non-personal services contract utilizing Full and Open competition procedures under FAR Part 15, and will be supported under a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), and Cost Reimbursable (CR) basis. The five year period of performance consists of a base period and four (4) one (1) year option periods.

2. The Government intends to award one (1) contract with FFP, CPFF and CR CLINs. Each Offeror shall submit a maximum of one proposal.

An Offeror may only be awarded the one contract and cannot participate as a subcontractor, team member, or otherwise be affiliated with another Offeror under this solicitation.

3. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541330 Engineering Services.

4. The Government does not intend to hold discussions regarding this solicitation; however, the Government reserves the right to hold discussions, if it is in the best interest of the Government.

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS_____________________________________________________________________

1. The following is a draft summary of the evaluation factors that MAY be part of the final RFP. The Government reserves the right to amend/change/remove parts of these evaluation factors based on the results of this RFP. Specific details on the formatting of the proposal have been left off of this DRFP but will be part of the final RFP. Evaluation factors are as follows:

A. Technical Factor___________________

2 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Subfactor 1 - Management________________________

Corporate Capability - The Offeror shall describe its management planning approach in accordance with PWS paragraph 3.15.5 to support____________________

MET Sustainment requirements specified in section 3 of PWS. The Offeror shall describe its approach or method for ensuring successful completion of all tasks (particularly emphasizing communications, project metrics, early detection of issues, flexibility in allocating resources based on Government priorities, and management of subcontractors). The Offeror shall describe its corporate experience and capability to support key MET requirements to include eight each continental US (CONUS) on-site depot sustainment visits yearly, eight each outside CONUS (OCONUS) on-site depot sustainment visits yearly, five each CONUS on-site Technical Assistance visits yearly, five each OCONUS on-site Technical Assistance visits yearly, provide 170 each telephone/email assistance request responses yearly, and develop or update of logistics documentation to include interactive electronic technical manuals and training documents. The Offeror shall describe its proposed key personnel to include managers and/or team leaders for associated functional areas to include program management, engineering support, installation and test, logistics and depot supply and maintenance support. The Offeror shall briefly outline the technical and/or managerial experience, knowledge/certification of the key personnel in relation to PWS functional areas/requirements. The Offeror shall describe its approach to de-install Legacy terminals (one AN/GSC-52A and one AN/FSC-78C) at up to two OCONUS and two CONUS locations per year, and install MET Large Fixed terminals at up to two OCONUS and two CONUS locations per year.

The approach shall include a notional schedule and address the Management, Engineering, implementation and testing required to de-install the legacy terminals, prepare the site and antenna pad and install the MET. The Offeror shall describe its approach for monitoring, identifying and evaluating components for obsolescence and end of life. The Offeror shall also include a notional schedule to accomplish obsolescence issue resolution. The Offeror shall provide its approach to accomplishing up to 1400 shipments of material and documents, including up to eight MET systems to worldwide sites each year. The Offeror shall describe its approach to managing

Environmental Control Units (ECU) at up to 49 sites worldwide and coordinating or performing depot repair activities for up to 700

Satellite Communications (SATCOM) terminal subassemblies per year.

Staffing Plan - The Offeror shall describe its proposed MET organization structure for the various functional areas. The Offeror shall_____________ provide and identify proposed labor hours, labor type/mix and category for each of the CLINs listed in the MET Sustainment solicitation.

For the Installation & De-installation CLINs, the Offeror shall further break down the proposed labor hours, labor type/mix and category for the associated SLINs.

Quality/Configuration Management - The Offeror shall describe the industry standard or program quality requirements per PWS paragraph________________________________

3.7 to be used during sustainment of the MET program. The Offeror shall also describe its approach for configuration management and accounting of MET hardware, warranty, associated MET documentation and shipment information.

Subfactor 2 Facility_____________________

Environmentally Controlled Area - The Offeror shall describe its facility and capability for supporting the engineering, program_______________________________ reviews, testing, depot services, stocking and storage of Depot assets requirements of the PWS. The Offeror shall describe proposed test equipment, tools (hardware and software) for supporting the PWS maintenance and test requirements.

Outdoor Area - The Offeror shall address and describe its capability to support the anticipated Government Furnished SATCOM systems to____________ include a quantity of one MET V2 terminal and two MET V10 systems IAW PWS paragraph 3.1 to be installed and maintained at contractor facility for duration of contract.

Security - The Offeror shall also address and describe its capability to support security requirements IAW the PWS and DD Form 254 to________ include capability to store classified material.

B. Past Performance Factor__________________________

The Offeror shall submit a list of Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime Offeror and each major subcontractor relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. The Offeror shall submit no more than three references of relevant contracts within the past three years for its own performance. The Offeror shall submit no more than one reference for each subcontractor proposed. The contracts may be past or current as long as the performance did not end more than three years prior to the due date for proposal submission. Relevant contracts are those involving any effort related to the core competencies as identified in the PWS. Each Task

Order under a contract shall be considered a separate instance of Past Performance. Offerors shall sanitize information relative to classified contracts or orders.

For any contracts identified above, the Offeror shall provide a specific narrative explanation of the effort performed. The narrative explanation shall include a description of the work performed and detail how the effort is relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.

Offerors shall submit copies of any and all of the following received on any contracts or orders within the past five years, including those not proposed in response to this solicitation. There is no page limit for the required copies.

a. Termination for default (including the settlement agreement)

b. Notice of default (including the settlement agreement)

c. No-cost settlement (including the settlement agreement)

3 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

d. Show cause notice

e. Cure notice

f. Suspension or Debarment

g. Any security inspection or assessment ratings or reports indicating security programs or facilities are less than satisfactory, and/or any suspensions or revocations of a facility security clearance

h. Notifications received for violations of FAR 32.006

Offerors shall include a narrative explaining each event above, including any corrective actions taken, not to exceed one (1) page per event. If none of the above were received within the past five (5) years, the Offeror shall state so in the proposal.

Offerors shall state if they have no recent or relevant past performance.

Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaires must be completed for all contracts identified above. The Offeror shall complete Part I of the questionnaire that will be provided by the Government and e-mail the questionnaire to the government contracting activity. In cases where the performance had been conducted as a subcontractor, the questionnaires shall be provided to the prime contractor POC, in addition to the government POC. All POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire that will be provided by the Government and e-mail the entire, completed questionnaire by proposal due date to the Contracting Officer, Michael

Lansing, "mailto:michael.l.lansing2.civ@mail.mil " and the Contract Specialist, Thor Olson, "mailto:thor.a.olson2.civ@mail.mil " . The __________________________________________ _____________________________________

Offeror shall also email the Contracting Officer a list of all POCs who were sent a questionnaire. The government must receive this list within 14 calendar days after release of the RFP. The POC List shall be submitted in MS Word Table format with the following fields:

Solicitation number; Company name; Contract number; Government agency; POC last name, first name; POC title; POC telephone number; POC e-mail address; date e-mailed to POC (month/day).

C. Cost/Price Factor____________________

For the purpose of this draft RFP, the Government has provided a proposed CLIN Structure for this requirement. In the event of a release of a final RFP for this requirement, a pricing matrix with detailed instructions will be released as an attachment to the final

RFP. Proposed CLIN Structure can be found as Attachment 0002 to this DRAFT RFP.

Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations__________________________________________________________________________

Each Offeror shall complete (fill-in and signatures) the solicitation sections indicated below using the file (without modification to the file) provided with the solicitation. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the SF 33 and all certifications requiring original signature. An Acrobat PDF file shall be created to capture the signatures for submission.

Section A Standard Form 33 (SF 33), Solicitation, Offer and Award

Section G Contract Administration Data

Section K Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors

Solicitations, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations shall not be addressed separately from that submitted in

VOLUME V- SOLICITATIONS,

The Offeror shall provide evidence of any commitments by major subcontractors or other team members proposed for consideration in the evaluation of the past performance factor. Note that this is different and in addition to the requirements provided elsewhere for the small business factor.

If the Offeror is a subsidiary of another company, the Offeror shall provide an organizational outline showing the legal status and relationship of the Offeror, its parent organizations, and affiliates.

In lieu of submitting hard copy certifications and representations, Offerors shall include a statement affirming their certifications and representations are current and accurate in the System for Award Management database.

Evaluation Criteria___________________

1. The proposal will be evaluated on the Offerors ability to provide a precise, detailed, and complete proposal that clearly and fully demonstrates the Offerors knowledge and understanding of the requirements. At a minimum, the proposal must contain sufficient detail so that it may be evaluated IAW the Evaluation Factors of this Request for Proposal (RFP).

2. Basis for award - The Government anticipates awarding a single contract using a best value tradeoff approach to the Offeror whose proposal is determined to be the most advantageous to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three evaluation factors: Technical, Past Performance, and Cost/Price. Offerors are cautioned that award may not necessarily be made to the lowest priced Offeror. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than "Acceptable" must be achieved for the Technical Factor and all Technical subfactors, and a rating of no less than Satisfactory Confidence must be achieved for the Past Performance Factor.

FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

4 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal:

a. FACTOR I TECHNICAL

i. Subfactor 1 Management

ii. Subfactor 2 Facility

b. FACTOR II PAST PERFORMANCE

c. FACTOR III PRICE/COST

Each Technical Management and Facilitywill be evaluated and adjectivally rated individually. The overall technical factor rating will then be a roll-up of the subfactor ratings. The Management subfactor is more important than the Facility subfactor. Offerors are cautioned that, to receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than Acceptable must be achieved for the Technical factor, and each Technical subfactor.

The relative order of importance assigned to the evaluation factors and subfactors is as follows:

The Technical Factor is significantly more important than the Past Performance, and Price/Cost Factor. Past Performance is more important than the Price/Cost Factor. When combined, the non-cost factors are significantly more important than the Price/Cost Factor.

Within the Technical Factor, the Management subfactor is more important than the Facility subfactor.

EVALUATION APPROACH

No assumptions will be made by Government evaluators regarding areas not defined in the Offerors written proposal; therefore complete and specific information should be provided. At a minimum, Offerors must address all areas defined in Section L of the solicitation.

TECHNICAL FACTOR:

The Technical factor consists of the following subfactors:

Subfactor 1- Management

Subfactor 2- Facility

The following criteria will be used to evaluate the Technical factor and each of the two subfactors (Management and Facility).

Subfactor 1 - Management:

Corporate Capability - The Offerors Management planning approach and method will be evaluated to determine risk associated with its____________________ overall management effort. The Offerors proposal will be evaluated based on its management capability and approach to provide the knowledge, experience and technical expertise in DoD SATCOM with a focus on engineering support, installation and test, depot maintenance services, and logistics documentation. The Offerors proposed key personnel will be evaluated on technical experience and leadership capability to successfully manage the various functional areas to include MET program management, engineering support, installation and test, logistics and depot support. The Offerors approach to de-install legacy terminals and install the replacement MET systems will be evaluated to determine the risk of a successful installation, the plan is complete and the proposed labor categories and hours are appropriate for completing the efforts within realistic timeframes. The Offerors proposed method for accomplishing shipments of repair parts, documents and MET systems within the specified timeframes using the appropriate labor categories and hours. Document and training material will be evaluated based on ability to perform the tasks within a reasonable period of time using the proposed labor categories and hours. The Offerors approach to managing on site periodic and demand ECU maintenance and performing depot repair activities will be evaluated based on subcontracts approach and appropriate labor categories and hours associated with the efforts.

Staffing Plan - The Offerors staffing plan will be evaluated to determine if the proposed staffing level for the various functional_____________ areas along with the proposed labor categories and labor hours ensures adequate staffing and support for the sustainment effort and demonstrates adequate understanding of Government requirements.

Quality/Configuration Management - The Offerors proposed quality program will be evaluated to determine compliance with certification________________________________ requirements. The Offerors proposed configuration management approach will be evaluated to ensure proper accounting and tracking of terminal systems configuration, components, documents, warranty and shipments.

Subfactor 2 - Facility:

Environmentally Controlled Area - The Offerors proposal will be evaluated on adequacy of proposed facility to provide storage of MET_______________________________ hardware components and the availability of test equipment and tools within the facility. The Offerors conference room will be

5 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

evaluated to determine whether the facility can provide support for up to 50 attendees and teleconference capability.

Outdoor Area - The Offerors proposal will be evaluated to determine whether proposed facility can adequately support the installation____________ and testing of one MET V2 system and two MET V10 systems.

Security - The proposed facility will be evaluated to determine compliance with DD Form 254 security requirements to include storage of________ classified material.

Definitions and Ratings

Using the evaluation procedures and evaluation criteria described above, the Technical Factor, to include all Sub-factors, will be evaluated and assigned an adjectival rating as defined below. The ratings and associated definitions will be used for any findings identified in an Offerors proposal. The substance of the findings along with the contents of the proposal will be used to provide a rating for each sub-factor under the Technical Factor, and an overall rating will be assigned to the Technical Factor based on the ratings of the respective sub-factors.

The Technical Factor Ratings, excerpted below, focus on the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies of the Offeror's proposal.

Strengths may be given in areas where the contractor exceeds the minimum requirements defined or referenced in the PROPOSAL PREPARATION

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS section of this Draft RFP. The rating depicts how well the Offerors proposal meets the

Technical Factor requirements.

Strength An aspect of an Offerors proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that________ will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness - A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.________

Deficiency - A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal__________ that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Table 1- Definitions of Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Color

RatingAdjectival

Rating

DescriptionBlueOutstandingProposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. PurpleGoodProposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

GreenAcceptableProposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.YellowMarginalProposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

RedUnacceptableProposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION APPROACH

The Government will evaluate the Offerors record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS. The Government may consider a wide array of information from a variety of sources.

a. Evaluation of past performance will be performed in accordance with criteria outlined below utilizing the forms and questionnaires set forth in the solicitation, and other information as deemed necessary.

b. The Government will focus its inquiries on the Offerors (and major subcontractors) record of performance as it relates to all solicitation requirements, including cost, schedule, performance and management of subcontractors. Major subcontractors are defined as members of an Offerors overall team who are expected to perform ten (10) percent or more of the proposed effort. A significant achievement, problem, or lack of relevant data in any element of the work can become an important consideration in the evaluation process. Therefore, Offerors will be reminded to include the most recent and relevant efforts in their proposal.

Absent any recent and relevant past performance history or when the performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror will be assigned an unknown confidence rating and its proposal will not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance. The Government may use data provided by the Offeror in its proposal and

6 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

data obtained from other sources, including data in Government files or data obtained through interviews with personnel familiar with the contractor and their current and past performance under Federal, State or Local government or commercial contracts for same or similar services. The contracts may be past or current as long as the performance did not end more than 3 years prior to proposal submission due date.

c. The past performance factor considers each Offerors demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract requirements. There are three (3) aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy

(including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor information and source of information). The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance shall be considered. These are combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each Offeror.

(i) RECENCY: The first aspect is to evaluate the recency of the Offerors past performance. Recency is defined as prime

Offerors and each major

Subcontractors performance in past three years. The contracts may be past or current as long as the performance did not end more than 3 years from the due date of proposal submission.

(ii) RELEVANCY: The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the Offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. Common aspects of relevancy include, but are not limited to the following:

similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and extent of subcontract/teaming.

Past Performance Relevancy RatingsRatingDefinitionVery RelevantPresent/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.RelevantPresent/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat RelevantPresent/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not RelevantPresent/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(iii) QUALITY OF PRODUCTS OR SERVICES. The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the Offerors past performance. The Past Performance Evaluation Team will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the Offerors performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate these into the performance confidence assessment.

Performance Confidence AssessmentsRatingDefinitionSubstantial ConfidenceBased on the Offerors recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

.Satisfactory ConfidenceBased on the Offerors recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the

Offeror will successfully perform the required effort

Limited ConfidenceBased on the Offerors recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No ConfidenceBased on the Offerors recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence

(Neutral)No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offerors performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

PRICE/COST/ EVALUATION APPROACH_______________________________

The total evaluated price to be used in the award determination will be the total cost identified in the Offerors cost proposal, which includes all cost elements of Direct Labor, Indirect Rates, Subcontracting, Material, General and Administrative (G&A) Expense, Cost of

Money (COM), and FEE, subject to most probable cost adjustment(s) resulting from the Governments cost realism analysis. The Government shall evaluate each cost proposal to ensure that all the proposed costs are fair, reasonable, and realistic. Each Offerors proposal will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria in FAR 15.404-1. Accordingly, the analytical techniques and procedures prescribed in

FAR 15.404-1 for evaluating Offerors proposal may be used singly or in combination with others to ensure the costs are fair, reasonable, and/or realistic.

7 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The probable cost may be determined by adjusting (for purposes of evaluation only) each Offerors proposed cost and/or Fee, when appropriate, to reflect any additions or reductions in cost elements to realistic levels based on the results of the Governments cost realism analysis.

If an Offerors proposed cost does not equal the Governments probable cost due to adjustments made as a result of cost realism analysis, the Offeror will be ranked based on the Government probable cost (the adjusted cost). The Government probable cost will be considered the total evaluated cost and will be used in conducting the tradeoff analysis for the basis of award.

NOTE: The Government may use external sources of information in performing its cost evaluation to include, but not limited to, Bureau of

Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, Department of State, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) or the Defense Contract Audit

Agency (DCAA). This DOES NOT preclude the Offeror from submitting supporting documentation for its rates proposed.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0001 ***

8 29

PIIN/SIIN

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

0001 INFORMATIONAL CLIN $ __________________ __________________

SERVICE REQUESTED: INFORMATIONAL

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

This CLIN was added for informational purposes only.

Please reference the Solicitation Narrative for CLIN structure and information.

(End of narrative B001)

Deliveries or Performance _________________________

9 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

This document incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at these addresses:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ or https://www.acquisition.gov/

If the clause requires additional or unique information, then that information is provided immediately after the clause title.

Regulatory Cite Title Date Regulatory Cite Title Date _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________

E-1 52.246-4 INSPECTION OF SERVICES--FIXED-PRICE AUG/1996

10 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

This document incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at these addresses:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ or https://www.acquisition.gov/

If the clause requires additional or unique information, then that information is provided immediately after the clause title.

11 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

Regulatory Cite Title Date Regulatory Cite Title Date _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________

G-1 252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS DEC/2018

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

"Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC)" is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.

"Document type" means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF).

"Local processing office (LPO)" is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.

"Payment request" and "receiving report" are defined in the clause at 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and

Receiving Reports.

(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system provides the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and

Receiving Reports.

(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall--

(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the System for Award Management at https://www.sam.gov ; and

(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this

Web site.

(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training Course and use the Practice

Training Site before submitting payment requests through WAWF. Both can be accessed by selecting the "Web Based Training" link on the

WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/ .

(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via Web entry, Electronic Data Interchange, or File Transfer

Protocol.

(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor shall use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract or task or delivery order:

(1) Document type. The Contractor shall submit payment requests using the following document type(s):

(i) For cost-type line items, including labor-hour or time-and-materials, submit a cost voucher.

(ii) For fixed price line items--

(A) That require shipment of a deliverable, submit the invoice and receiving report specified by the Contracting Officer.

-1-

(B) For services that do not require shipment of a deliverable, submit either the Invoice 2in1, which meets the requirements for the invoice and receiving report, or the applicable invoice and receiving report, as specified by the Contracting Officer.

-2-

(iii) For customary progress payments based on costs incurred, submit a progress payment request.

(iv) For performance based payments, submit a performance based payment request.

(v) For commercial item financing, submit a commercial item financing request.

(2) Fast Pay requests are only permitted when Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.213-1 is included in the contract.

[Note: The Contractor may use a WAWF "combo" document type to create some Combinations of invoice and receiving report in one step.]

(3) Document routing. The Contractor shall use the information in the Routing Data Table below only to fill in applicable fields in

12 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

WAWF when creating payment requests and receiving reports in the system.

Routing Data Table*

Field Name in WAWF Data to be entered in WAWF

Pay Official DoDAAC -3-

Issue By DoDAAC -4-

Admin DoDAAC -5-

Inspect By DoDAAC -6-

Ship To Code -7-

Ship From Code -8-

Mark For Code -9-

Service Approver (DoDAAC) -10-

Service Acceptor (DoDAAC) -11-

Accept at Other DoDAAC -12-

LPO DoDAAC -13-

DCAA Auditor DoDAAC -14-

Other DoDAAC(s) -15-

(4) Payment request. The Contractor shall ensure a payment request includes documentation appropriate to the type of payment request in accordance with the payment clause, contract financing clause, or Federal Acquisition Regulation 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and

Payment, as applicable.

(5) Receiving report. The Contractor shall ensure a receiving report meets the requirements of DFARS Appendix F.

(g) WAWF point of contact.

(1) The Contractor may obtain clarification regarding invoicing in WAWF from the following contracting activity's WAWF point of contact.

-16-

(2) Contact the WAWF helpdesk at 866-618-5988, if assistance is needed.

(End of clause)

13 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

This document incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at these addresses:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ or https://www.acquisition.gov/

If the clause requires additional or unique information, then that information is provided immediately after the clause title.

Regulatory Cite Title Date Regulatory Cite Title Date _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________

I-1 52.202-1 DEFINITIONS NOV/2013

I-2 52.203-3 GRATUITIES APR/1984

I-3 52.203-5 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES MAY/2014

I-4 52.203-6 RESTRICTIONS ON SUBCONTRACTOR SALES TO THE GOVERNMENT SEP/2006

I-5 52.203-7 ANTI-KICKBACK PROCEDURES MAY/2014

I-6 52.203-8 CANCELLATION, RESCISSION, AND RECOVERY OF FUNDS FOR ILLEGAL OR MAY/2014

IMPROPER ACTIVITY

I-7 52.203-10 PRICE OR FEE ADJUSTMENT FOR ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER ACTIVITY MAY/2014

I-8 52.203-12 LIMITATION ON PAYMENTS TO INFLUENCE CERTAIN FEDERAL TRANSACTIONS OCT/2010

I-9 52.203-19 PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING CERTAIN INTERNAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS JAN/2017

OR STATEMENTS

I-10 52.204-4 PRINTED OR COPIED DOUBLE-SIDED ON POSTCONSUMER FIBER CONTENT PAPER MAY/2011

I-11 52.204-10 REPORTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND FIRST-TIER SUBCONTRACT AWARDS OCT/2018

I-12 52.204-13 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT MAINTENANCE OCT/2018

I-13 52.204-18 COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENT ENTITY CODE MAINTENANCE JUL/2016

I-14 52.204-23 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND SERVICES JUL/2018

DEVELOPED OR PROVIDED BY KASPERSKY LAB AND OTHER COVERED ENTITIES

I-15 52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO AUG/2019

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT

I-16 52.209-6 PROTECTING THE GOVERNMENT'S INTEREST WHEN SUBCONTRACTING WITH OCT/2015

CONTRACTORS DEBARRED, SUSPENDED, OR PROPOSED FOR DEBARMENT

I-17 52.209-9 UPDATES OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY OCT/2018

MATTERS

I-18 52.211-15 DEFENSE PRIORITY AND ALLOCATION REQUIREMENTS APR/2008

I-19 52.215-15 PENSION ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSET REVERSIONS OCT/2010

I-20 52.215-18 REVERSION OR ADJUSTMENT OF PLANS FOR POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (PRB) JUL/2005

OTHER THAN PENSIONS

I-21 52.219-8 UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS OCT/2018

I-22 52.222-21 PROHIBITION OF SEGREGATED FACILITIES APR/2015

I-23 52.222-26 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY SEP/2016

I-24 52.222-37 EMPLOYMENT REPORTS ON VETERANS FEB/2016

I-25 52.222-40 NOTIFICATION OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS DEC/2010

ACT

I-26 52.222-50 COMBATING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS JAN/2019

I-27 52.222-54 EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION OCT/2015

I-28 52.223-18 ENCOURAGING CONTRACTOR POLICIES TO BAN TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING AUG/2011

I-29 52.225-13 RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN FOREIGN PURCHASES JUN/2008

I-30 52.227-1 AUTHORIZATION AND CONSENT DEC/2007

I-31 52.227-2 NOTICE AND ASSISTANCE REGARDING PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT DEC/2007

I-32 52.229-3 FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL TAXES FEB/2013

I-33 52.232-1 PAYMENTS APR/1984

I-34 52.232-8 DISCOUNTS FOR PROMPT PAYMENT FEB/2002

I-35 52.232-11 EXTRAS APR/1984

I-36 52.232-23 ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIMS (MAY 2014) -- ALTERNATE I (APR 1984) APR/1984

I-37 52.232-25 PROMPT PAYMENT JAN/2017

I-38 52.232-39 UNENFORCEABILITY OF UNAUTHORIZED OBLIGATIONS JUN/2013

I-39 52.232-40 PROVIDING ACCELERATED PAYMENTS TO SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTORS DEC/2013

I-40 52.233-1 DISPUTES MAY/2014

I-41 52.233-3 PROTEST AFTER AWARD AUG/1996

I-42 52.233-4 APPLICABLE LAW FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM OCT/2004

I-43 52.242-13 BANKRUPTCY JUL/1995

I-44 52.243-1 CHANGES--FIXED PRICE (AUG 1987) -- ALTERNATE I (APR 1984) APR/1984

14 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Regulatory Cite Title Date Regulatory Cite Title Date _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________

I-45 52.244-6 SUBCONTRACTS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS AUG/2019

I-46 52.247-63 PREFERENCE FOR U.S.-FLAG AIR CARRIERS JUN/2003

I-47 52.249-8 DEFAULT (FIXED-PRICE SUPPLY AND SERVICE) APR/1984

I-48 52.253-1 COMPUTER GENERATED FORMS JAN/1991

I-49 252.203-7000 REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO COMPENSATION OF FORMER DOD OFFICIALS SEP/2011

I-50 252.203-7001 PROHIBITION ON PERSONS CONVICTED OF FRAUD OR OTHER DEFENSE-CONTRACT- DEC/2008

RELATED FELONIES

I-51 252.203-7002 REQUIREMENT TO INFORM EMPLOYEES OF WHISTLEBLOWER RIGHTS SEP/2013

I-52 252.204-7000 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION OCT/2016

I-53 252.204-7003 CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL WORK PRODUCT APR/1992

I-54 252.204-7012 SAFEGUARDING COVERED DEFENSE INFORMATION AND CYBER INCIDENT REPORTING OCT/2016

I-55 252.204-7015 NOTICE OF AUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FOR LITIGATION SUPPORT MAY/2016

I-56 252.205-7000 PROVISION OF INFORMATION TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT HOLDERS DEC/1991

I-57 252.209-7004 SUBCONTRACTING WITH FIRMS THAT ARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE MAY/2019

GOVERNMENT OF A TERRORIST COUNTRY

I-58 252.222-7006 RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS DEC/2010

I-59 252.225-7048 EXPORT-CONTROLLED ITEMS JUN/2013

I-60 252.226-7001 UTILIZATION OF INDIAN ORGANIZATIONS, INDIAN-OWNED ECONOMIC APR/2019

ENTERPRISES, AND NATIVE HAWAIIAN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

I-61 252.227-7013 RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA--NONCOMMERCIAL ITEMS FEB/2014

I-62 252.227-7014 RIGHTS IN NONCOMMERCIAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND NONCOMMERCIAL COMPUTER FEB/2014

SOFTWARE DOCUMENTATION

I-63 252.227-7015 TECHNICAL DATA--COMMERCIAL ITEMS FEB/2014

I-64 252.227-7016 RIGHTS IN BID OR PROPOSAL INFORMATION JAN/2011

I-65 252.227-7019 VALIDATION OF ASSERTED RESTRICTIONS--COMPUTER SOFTWARE SEP/2016

I-66 252.227-7025 LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OR DISCLOSURE OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED MAY/2013

INFORMATION MARKED WITH RESTRICTIVE LEGENDS

I-67 252.227-7027 DEFERRED ORDERING OF TECHNICAL DATA OR COMPUTER SOFTWARE APR/1988

I-68 252.227-7030 TECHNICAL DATA--WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENT MAR/2000

I-69 252.227-7037 VALIDATION OF RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS ON TECHNICAL DATA SEP/2016

I-70 252.231-7000 SUPPLEMENTAL COST PRINCIPLES DEC/1991

I-71 252.232-7003 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PAYMENT REQUESTS AND RECEIVING REPORTS DEC/2018

I-72 252.232-7010 LEVIES ON CONTRACT PAYMENTS DEC/2006

I-73 252.237-7010 PROHIBITION ON INTERROGATION OF DETAINEES BY CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL JUN/2013

I-74 252.243-7001 PRICING OF CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS DEC/1991

I-75 252.243-7002 REQUESTS FOR EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT DEC/2012

I-76 252.244-7000 SUBCONTRACTS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS JUN/2013

I-77 252.247-7023 TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES BY SEA--BASIC FEB/2019

I-78 52.217-8 OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES NOV/1999

The Government may require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. These rates may be adjusted only as a result of revisions to prevailing labor rates provided by the Secretary of Labor. The option provision may be exercised more than once, but the total extension of performance hereunder shall not exceed 6 months. The Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within -1-.

(End of Clause)

I-79 52.204-19 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS DEC/2014

The Contractor's representations and certifications, including those completed electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM), are incorporated by reference into the contract.

(End of clause)

I-80 52.215-19 NOTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP CHANGES OCT/1997

(a) The Contractor shall make the following notifications in writing:

15 29

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(1) When the Contractor becomes aware that a change in its ownership has occurred, or is certain to occur, that could result in changes in the valuation of its capitalized assets in the accounting records, the Contractor shall notify the Administrative Contracting

Officer (ACO) within 30 days.

(2) The Contractor shall also notify the ACO within 30 days whenever changes to asset valuations or any other cost changes have occurred or are certain to occur as a result of a change in ownership.

(b) The Contractor shall --

(1) Maintain current, accurate, and complete inventory records of assets and their costs;

(2) Provide the ACO or designated representative ready access to the records upon request;

(3) Ensure that all individual and grouped assets, their capitalized values, accumulated depreciation or amortization, and remaining useful lives are identified accurately before and after each of the Contractors ownership changes; and

(4) Retain and continue to maintain depreciation and amortization schedules based on the asset records maintained before each

Contractor ownership change.

(c) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause in all subcontracts under this contract that meet the applicability requirement of FAR 15.408(k).

(End of Clause)

I-81 52.219-28 POST-AWARD SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REREPRESENTATION JUL/2013

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

"Long-term contract" means a contract of more than five years in duration, including options. However, the term does not include contracts that exceed five years in duration because the period of performance has been extended for a cumulative period not to exceed six months under the clause at 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, or other appropriate authority.

"Small business concern" means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR part

121 and…