Attch_0018_ACWS_Past_Performance_Questions_2016_04_04.docx
DOCX document 107 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ACWS
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-16-R-0058
About this file
Attachment 0018
View the file
Other files
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Unclassified
ARMY CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM
(ACWS)
Attachment 0018 Past_Performance_Questions Version 1.0 04 April 2016 Solicitation Number: W52P1J-16-R-0058
Prepared By:
Product Manager Army Contract Writing System (ACWS)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
RFP W52P1J-16-R-0058 Army Contract Writing System (ACWS)
OFFEROR NAME and CAGE:
SECTION I – GENERAL GUIDANCE
Introduction: Under solicitation W52P1J-16-R-0058 ACWS, the Army Contracting Command at Rock Island, IL (ACC-RI) is obtaining past performance information. The completed PPQ serves as a source of information to evaluate the Offerors recent and relevant performance of the submitted project/contract reference (listed in Section IIB below) as it relates to the solicitation.
Instructions:
1. Offerors shall –
· Complete Section IIA and IIB, then email entire PPQ to the intended PPQ Respondent.
· Instruct the PPQ Respondent to complete Section III.
· Respondents to the PPQ shall –
· Complete Section III entirely, to include comments (if any)
· Send the completed PPQ to the ACC-RI Contracting Officer Jonathan Anderson, jonathan.j.anderson16.civ@mail and Contract Specialist John Hemmen, john.p.hemmen.civ@mail.
· Recommended format for email Subject: “Completed PPQ for W52P1J-16-R-0058, [Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-[referenced contract number]”.
· Recommended PPQ electronic document filename: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]_PPQ_ACWS_[contract reference number].doc” or “.docx” or “.pdf”.
· Send the completed PPQ to the Contract Specialist identified above. DO NOT send a copy of the completed PPQ to the Offeror.
In addition to the submitted PPQ email response, Respondents may receive follow-up phone calls for clarification purposes from an ACC-RI Official. This is a critical acquisition and as such comments are appreciated for all ratings as applicable.
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Excellent |
| The Offeror's past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits. |
| Good |
| The Offeror’s past performance exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements. |
| Marginal |
| The Offeror's past performance could have been improved. The Offeror required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The Offeror's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements. |
SECTION II (To be completed by the Offeror A. 1 - 6 and B. 1 - 9)
A. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
| 1. |
| Name & Job Title: |
| 2. |
| Organization: |
| 3. |
| Address: |
| 4. |
| Phone No: |
| 5. |
| Email: |
| 6. |
| Date: |
B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
| 1. |
| CAGE and Company (if other than a prime contract holder and first tier subcontractor) |
| 2. |
| Contract Name: |
| 3. |
| Contract Identification Number: |
| 4. |
| Order Number(s) (if applicable): |
| 5. |
| Date of Contract Award and total contract value: |
| 6. |
| Average Annual value of the Contract (provide the number of years used to calculate the average): |
(if any) Estimated Products Value:
(if any) Estimated Services Value:
| 7. |
| Period of Actual Contract Performance |
| 8. |
| CONUS and/or OCONUS locations: |
| 9. |
| Describe the products and/work the work effort performed on this referenced contract or as a subcontractor. Word count is limited to no more than 500 words maximum: |
THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONDENT POC.
SECTION III. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
| 1. |
| Name and Respondent’s Job Title (e.g. COR, Contracting Officer, etc.) |
| 2. |
| Indicate your satisfaction with Offeror’s performance in providing software products and related deliverables that were compliant with stated requirements, met expectations established in their original proposal, and were configured / maintained up to standards of good workmanship. |
| Exceptional ____ |
Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory )___
| 3. |
| Indicate your satisfaction with Offeror’s performance in providing systems integration services and related deliverables that were compliant with service level agreements, appropriate to the work effort required to meet specifications, and effective at designing, developing, testing, operating, and maintaining systems in accordance with predetermined performance standards and objectives. |
Exceptional ____ Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____
Unsatisfactory ___
| 4. |
| Indicate your satisfaction with the Offeror’s performance managing critical project variables such as schedule, reporting, human resources, risk identification and mitigation, and change management. |
| Exceptional ____ |
Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____
5.
| Indicate your satisfaction with the Offeror’s performance obtaining, installing, configuring, and delivering software solutions in a timely manner. |
| Exceptional ____ |
Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____
| 6. |
| Taking into consideration the original performance timelines and scheduling influences outside of the Offeror’s control; indicate your satisfaction with the Offeror’s performance in establishing, maintaining, and executing tasks based on a resource allocated schedule. |
| Exceptional ____ |
Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory __
| 7. |
| Indicate your satisfaction with the Offeror’s effectiveness at consistently accounting, reporting, and billing for allowable costs on mixed type contracts (contracts with Firm Fixed Price and Cost Reimbursable line items). |
Exceptional ____ Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____
| 8. |
| Indicate your satisfaction with the Offeror’s effectiveness of developing, implementing, and improving financial forecasting and cost control measures for Cost-Reimbursable cost elements. |
| Exceptional ____ |
Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____
9.
| Indicate your satisfaction with the Offeror’s methodology for creating and maintain a professional relationship with business partners, customers, and stakeholders that aligns to the customer’s interests and while fostering a mutually beneficial relationship. |
| Exceptional ____ |
Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____
10. Please provide any other relevant performance information that you think would be important for the Government to consider as part of this assessment:
11. Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company? If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
| Name |
| Email Address |
| Telephone Number |
THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSES
image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .