Attachment 0001 IBAS Engineering Services Statement of Work (SOW).pdf

IBAS ES FY22-26

Attachment 0001 29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

FOR

ENGINEERING SERVICES (ES)

BRADLEY FIGHTING VEHICLE SYSTEMS (BFVS)

FAMILY OF VEHICLES (FOV)

IMPROVED BRADLEY ACQUISITION SUB-SYSTEM (IBAS)

29 October 2019

Prepared by

Tactical Aviation and Ground Munitions Project Office

Program Executive Office Missiles and Space

Redstone Arsenal, Alabama

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Scope

1.1 Objective

2.0 Applicable Documents

3.0 Engineering Services Technical Directive (TD) Requirements

3.1 Engineering Services in Support of Retrofits

3.2 Engineering Services in Support of Operation and Maintenance of Fielded Equipment

3.3 Technical Directives (TDs)

3.3.1 Generated TDs

3.3.2 TD Revision

3.3.3 Contractor Responsibility

3.3.4 TD Termination

4.0 Program Management

4.1 Funding/Financial Management

4.2 Engineering Services Program Reviews (PR)

4.3 Contractor Manpower Reporting

4.4 Earned Value Management (EVM)

5.0 Information Data Management

5.1 Cyber Security/Information Assurance (CS/IA) Requirement

5.2 Contractor’s Systems

5.2.1 Contractor's Unclassified Systems

5.2.2 Contractor's Classified Systems

5.3 Security Requirement

6.0 Engineering

6.1 Objective

6.2 General Requirements

6.3 Equipment Requirements

6.3.1 Standardization of Equipment, Production Techniques, Methods and Processes

6.3.2 Interchangeability/Commonality

6.4 System Safety

6.4.1 System Safety Program

6.4.2 Safety Hazard Analysis

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

6.4.3 Software

6.4.4 System Safety and Software System Safety (SwSS) Support

6.4.5 Engineering Change Proposal Safety Analysis

6.4.6 Health Hazards

6.4.7 Hazardous Materials Management

6.4.8 Radioactive Materials

6.5 Human Factors Engineering

6.6 Facilities and Operations Safety

7.0 Product Assurance

7.1 Objective

7.2 Quality Assurance Program

7.3 Requirements

7.4 Hardware

7.4.1 Soldering Specification

7.4.2 Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)

7.4.3 Equipment Analysis

7.4.4 Technical Support

7.4.5 Test Stations

7.4.6 Prohibited Parts and Related Materials and Processes

7.4.7 Counterfeit Prevention

8.0 Configuration Management (CM)

8.1 Configuration Management Planning

8.2 Configuration Identification

8.3 Configuration Change Management

8.4 Configuration Audits

8.5 Configuration Status Accounting

9.0 Integrated Product Support (IPS)

9.1 IPS Program Management

9.2 Support Validation/Verification/Testing

9.2.1 Support

9.2.2 Trial Retrofit kit(s)

9.2.3 Supportability Analysis

9.2.4 Human Systems Integration (HSI)

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

9.3 Provisioning Requirements

9.4 Logistics Support Documentation

9.5 Equipment Publications

9.5.1 Changes to Equipment Technical Publications

9.5.2 Validation

9.5.3 Verification

9.5.4 Modification Work Orders (MWO) Preparation

9.5.5 Publications Validation Completion Reports

9.6 Test Program Set (TPS) Development Support

9.7 Field Specification Analysis (FSA)

9.8 Packaging Documentation

9.8.1 Special Packaging Instructions

9.8.2 Special Reusable Shipping and Storage Containers

9.8.3 Item Unique Identification (IUID)

9.9 Field Service Representative (FSR) Support

9.10 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Support Documentation

9.11 Logistic Support for Foreign Military Sales

9.12 Contractor Level Repair

9.13 New Equipment Training (NET)

10.0 Travel and Training

10.1 Contractor Travel and Deployment

10.2 Proposed TDY Locations

10.3 Anti‐Terrorism (AT) Level 1 Training

10.4 AT Awareness Training for Contractor Personnel Traveling Overseas

10.5 iWATCH Training

10.6 Contractors Authorized to Accompany the Force

10.8 Access and General Protection/Security Policy and Procedures

10.9 Contractors Requiring a Common Access Card (CAC)

10.10 Contractors not Eligible for a CAC, but Requires Access to a DoD Facility or Installation

10.11 Contracts Handling or Having Access to Classified Information

10.12 Army Training Certification Tracking System (ATCTS) Registration for Contractors with a Government Information Systems Access Requirement

10.13 OPSEC Program

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

10.14 OPSEC Training

10.15 Information Assurance (IA)/Information Technology (IT) Training

10.17 Threat Awareness Reporting Program (TARP)

11.0 Government Furnished Property Management

11.1 Government Furnished Property (GFP)

11.1.1 Government Furnished Material (GFM)

11.1.2 Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

1.0 Scope. The contractor, as an independent contractor and not as an agent of the Government provides engineering services support for the BFVS IBAS and all associated equipment. All tasks specified in this SOW and the Contract Data Requirement Lists (CDRL) are to be performed only when specified in a Government Approved Technical Directive (TD).

1.1 Objective. The objective of this SOW is to establish the contractor requirements to perform engineering services to maintain and upgrade the required performance of the applicable systems and their operational readiness and availability, and to eliminate component obsolescence. Engineering service efforts are limited to those Government-directed, engineering, non-repetitive investigation, inspection, analysis, evaluation, design documentation, fabrication, testing, configuration management, Integrated Logistics Support, hardware supportability through Field Service Representatives, fielding, and contractor repair of all BFVS FOV IBAS, as applicable to the specific systems. All work performed under the Engineering Services contract will be performed as a result of a Technical Directive issued by the Tactical Aviation and Ground Munitions (TAGM) Project Office, Product Director, Bradley Sensors and Fire Control Systems, through the Contracting Officer.

2.0 Applicable Documents. Applicable Documents are cited in the Document Summary List (DSL) by number, title, and dates. The document versions specified in the DSL take precedence over the generic references (without revision letters) cited in the SOW.

3.0 Engineering Services Technical Directive (TD) Requirements. A TD enumerates the task(s) to be performed, the objectives to be attained, the estimated hours and dollars, and the time frame until completion or funding expiration with major milestones of the effort identified.

The contractor's services under this SOW shall include all necessary documentation support and the accomplishment of all other functions necessary to support the BFVS FOV IBAS and associated equipment so that producibility, reliability, maintainability, commonality between BFVS FOV IBAS, and quality are not degraded.

3.1 Engineering Services in Support of Retrofits. The contractor shall provide retrofit engineering services for upgrades including generation of documentation in support of production or spares procurements.

3.2 Engineering Services in Support of Operation and Maintenance of Fielded Equipment. The contractor shall provide engineering services In Accordance With (IAW) the requirements of this SOW in support of the operation and maintenance of the fielded equipment.

3.3 Technical Directives (TDs). The Product Director, Bradley IBAS or his/her delegate at the TAGM Project Office will be designated as the Government Technical Manager (GTM) and will have overall technical responsibility for this contract. TD’s shall only be accomplished by the issuance of a contract modification by the Contracting Officer. The contractor shall provide all of the labor, facilities, and materials necessary to perform the tasks in this SOW and within each individual TD.

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

3.3.1 Generated TDs. Upon direction of the technical manager, the contractor shall submit a TD IAW DI-MISC-80748 (A022), to provide the necessary effort to accomplish tasks within the provisions of this SOW including the manufacture and procurement of hardware as required for test or check-out of proposed design changes.

3.3.1.1 The contractor shall not submit a TD to cover the preparation of TDs.

3.3.2 TD Revision. If it becomes necessary to make addition, deletion, or revision to a TD, the contractor shall prepare a revised TD IAW DI-MISC-80748 (A022). The revised TD shall be complete and shall be assigned the original TD number with a suffix letter (A, B, and so-on) to denote the revision.

3.3.3 Contractor Responsibility. The contractor shall plan, coordinate, and control all tasks defined in TDs. The contractor shall direct execution of contracted effort. The contractor shall maintain distribution control of all reports, letters of transmittal, and technical directions. The contractor shall prepare an Engineering and Technical Services Accomplishment Report (Field Specification Analysis Report) and deliver IAW DI-MGMT-80061 (A001).

3.3.4 TD Termination. The contractor shall stop all work on a TD when so directed in writing or electronically by the Contracting Officer.

4.0 Program Management.

4.1 Funding/Financial Management. Funding for all TD’s will be supplied using Procurement, Research and Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Army Working Capital Fund and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funds, Foreign Military Sales (FMS) where applicable. The contractor shall maintain, budget, and implement a financial management program to control the resources allocated to meet the requirements for engineering services.

The contractor shall prepare and deliver a Performance and Cost Report for this contract IAW DI-FNCL-80912 (A025). The Contractor shall submit a detailed hours and cost breakdown as part of each TD. The contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer, in writing (email or letter), when a TD reaches 75% expenditure of allocated hours or dollars.

4.2 Engineering Services Program Reviews (PR). The contractor shall plan, budget, and schedule quarterly engineering services program reviews. The reviews shall include financial status, TD status, and future efforts. The contractor shall conduct PRs quarterly that shall serve as a comprehensive summary of key program status. PR agenda and content shall be coordinated with the TAGM GTM. PRs shall consist of detailed analyses of progress and performance and an assessment of problems or potential problems for each of the areas covered by TDs. An overview of financial status shall be presented at the reviews. The contractor shall prepare and deliver an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) IAW DI-MGMT-81861 (A045) for TDs as determined necessary by the GTM. The contractor shall prepare and deliver PR presentation material IAW DI-ADMN-81373 (A034).

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

4.3 Contractor Manpower Reporting. The contractor shall report all contractor labor hours required for performance of services provided under this contract for the TAGM Project Office via a secure data collection site. The contractor shall completely fill in all required data fields using the following web address: https://www.sam.gov/SAM/. Reporting inputs shall be for the labor executed during the period of performance during each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs October 1 through September 30. While inputs may be reported time during the FY, the contractor shall report all data no later than October 31 of each calendar year, beginning with 2022. Contractors may direct questions to the Help Desk at:

https://www.fsd.gov/fsd-gov/home.do.

4.4 Earned Value Management (EVM). EVM reporting shall be applied IAW Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) SUBPART 234.2 Earned Value Management System that includes 234.201 EVM Policy and 234.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause. However, BFVS FOV IBAS engineering services EVM reporting shall be established at the TD level and thresholds shall be determined based on the value of a standalone TD or the sum of related TDs, i.e., those TDs which can be connected by schedule dependencies and not the total contract value as contained in DFARS SUBPART 234.2. The Contractor shall prepare a Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) and CWBS dictionary IAW DI-MGMT- 81334 (A033) and MIL-STD-881, an Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) IAW DI- MGMT-81861 (A045), and a Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR) IAW DI-MGMT-81468 (A036).

5.0 Information Data Management. The contractor's deliverables and correspondence shall be electronically Web accessible to the Government via the Contractor Integrated Technical Information Service (CITIS). The CITIS shall provide access to all data generated under this contract and be compatible with the environment identified within the Program Executive Office (PEO), Missiles and Space, Information Management/Information Assurance Directorate (IM/IA). The contractor's CITIS manager shall coordinate the automated accessing of contractor data, and shall perform as the contractor focal point regarding the use of all automation tools provided by the contractor to the IM/IA in support of the TAGM Project Office. This shall include automation tools to allow the TAGM to perform analysis, view results of the analysis, and to provide reports from the analysis.

5.1 Cyber Security/Information Assurance (CS/IA) Requirement. The Contractor shall adhere to Cyber Security regulations and policies including the National Security Act; Clinger- Cohen Act; Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA); AR 25-1 Army Information Technology; AR 25-2 Army Cybersecurity; DoD 8500 series Directives and Instructions and their associated references (Cybersecurity); National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publications (SP) 800 series and their associated references; CNSSI No. 1253 Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems;

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual (CJCSM) 6000 Series; National Security Agency (NSA) Guides; Defense Information System Agency (DISA) Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs).

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

5.2 Contractor’s Systems. Paragraph 5.0 shall only apply to DoD components and shall not be applicable to the contractor's systems (both Classified and Unclassified) and associated systems. For the contractor's systems, the following applies:

5.2.1 Contractor's Unclassified Systems. The Contractor shall adhere to DoD guidance for contractor operated unclassified systems that contain covered defense information (CDI). The Contractor shall adhere to the relevant NIST SP 800-53 controls, as correlated to NIST SP 800- 171, as directed by DFARS Clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting (Latest Revision).

5.2.2 Contractor's Classified Systems. The Contractor shall adhere to IA regulations and security policies for classified systems including DoD 5220.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) and Defense Security Service Assessment and Authorization Process Manual (DAAPM).

5.3 Security Requirement. The contractor shall obtain a SECRET facility clearance from the Defense Security Service (DSS) and be able to maintain it. The contractor shall provide cleared personnel at the SECRET level to perform the classified tasks. The contractor shall have, at the minimum, a SECRET level facility clearance in order to obtain this contract.

Contractor personnel working with classified or sensitive information shall maintain, at a minimum, a clearance at the level of the information they will be working. NOTE: PEO Missiles and Space requires a final granted SECRET clearance to work on PEO Missiles and Space network systems.

6.0 Engineering.

6.1 Objective. The objective of this section is to provide guidelines and general requirements for engineering and product evaluation of the BFVS FOV IBAS and associated equipment.

6.2 General Requirements. The contractor shall perform engineering analyses, investigations, inspections, design/redesign, documentation, fabrication, and test and evaluation tasks to maintain or improve performance requirements.

6.3 Equipment Requirements. All equipment, manufacturing techniques, methods and processes resulting from effort under this SOW shall meet the Government specified contract requirements.

6.3.1 Standardization of Equipment, Production Techniques, Methods and Processes.

6.3.1.1 The contractor shall use state of practices and equipment, which has been proven through previous Government production efforts.

6.3.2 Interchangeability/Commonality. The contractor shall design changes for parts, 29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 subassemblies, or assemblies that produce physical and functional interchangeability, without modification, with the same parts, subassemblies or assemblies. Changes that unavoidably result in one-way-interchangeable parts, subassemblies, or assemblies shall be identified in an engineering change proposal (ECP) to the Technical Data Package (TDP), or applicable product performance specifications.

6.4 System Safety.

6.4.1 System Safety Program. The contractor shall maintain a system safety engineering program to support performance design changes, and engineering, analysis, and test activities.

The system safety program shall utilize the established general requirements IAW sections 3 and 4 of MIL-STD-882, Standard Practice for System Safety.

6.4.2 Safety Hazard Analysis. The contractor shall document the comprehensive safety program, safety assessment, and hazard analysis efforts for design changes by revising and updating the applicable Safety Assessment Report (SAR) IAW DI-SAFT-80102 (A002). The hazard analyses shall be conducted IAW Task 205 of MIL-STD-882. The SAR shall describe the System Safety Program/ Approach, tasks, and activities associated with the required safety management and engineering efforts, to include test data and analyses of safety critical components necessary to support a safety and materiel release.

6.4.3 Software.

6.4.3.1 The contractor shall perform the design, development, integration & test, and formal qualification testing of the BFVS FOV IBAS Mission Critical Computer Resources (MCCR) utilizing the existing Formal Qualification Test (FQT) Software Test Plan to verify all requirements.

6.4.3.2 The contractor shall support all development tools currently being used for BFVS FOV IBAS MCCR development and test. This support shall include providing support to transition to other development environments and/or test environments when required, and which may require modifications to the current BFVS FOV IBAS MCCR and then performing tests to verify that newly generated code meets the requirements.

6.4.3.3 The contractor shall support analysis of timing and resistance of all TOW missile related hardware. This analysis shall include TOW Missile Launchers and related hardware and software timing and voltage testing in order to resolve failures of hardware fielded.

6.4.3.4 The contractor shall perform a safety assessment of BFVS FOV IBAS software updates IAW MIL-STD-882 Appendix A and document a Software Hazard Analyses in an appendix to the Safety Assessment Report (SAR) IAW DI-SAFT-80102 (A002). The contractor shall perform and document a Software Development Process Assessment IAW AMCOM Regulation 385- 17 Appendix A and provide in an update to the SAR IAW DI-SAFT-80102 (A002).

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

6.4.4 System Safety and Software System Safety (SwSS) Support. The contractor shall support System Safety and SwSS Materiel Release activities required to attain Safety Certification as defined in AR 700-142. Materiel Release Activities may include implementation of Get-Well Plan findings from predecessor Materiel Release activities and support to applicable review boards (e.g., Software System Safety Technical Review Panel (SSSTRP), Weapons Review Board, Fuze Board, Ignition System Safety Review Board (ISSSRB).

6.4.5 Engineering Change Proposal Safety Analysis. The contractor shall perform an analysis on proposed changes to deliverable hardware and software to determine safety impact of the change. The safety analysis shall accompany each ECP package IAW DI-SESS-80639 (A015) and shall contain the impact of the change on the safety of the system and tests or assessments performed to determine the effect of the change on safety.

6.4.6 Health Hazards. The contractor shall identify and control potential health hazards that are indigenous to and generated by the system, including GFP to Occupational Safety and Health Administration compliance criteria IAW 29 CFR 1910 or to acceptable levels when regulations do not exist. The contractor shall delineate the identified health hazards according to those found during the operational, maintenance, and training phases, and the contractor shall include Material Safety Data Sheets on all hazardous materials to be used in/with the system. The contractor shall prepare and deliver this information IAW DI-SAFT-80106 (A003). The contractor shall document newly proposed hazardous materials identified in the registry of Toxic or Chemical Substances potential health hazards indigenous to and generated by the system and shall include planning for testing/assets to support Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) requirements. The contractor’s final submittal shall reflect tactical configuration and provide safe-to-handle procedures.

6.4.7 Hazardous Materials Management. All Contractor and subcontractor activities shall be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations.

The Contractor shall ensure that design, maintenance, operation, manufacturing, programmatic decisions and trade-off studies strive to eliminate or reduce hazardous materials and waste. The contractor shall not use Class I Ozone Depleting Chemical/Ozone Depleting Substance (ODC/ODS) (identified at https://www.epa.gov/ozone/ods.html) or unacceptable ODC/ODS solvents (identified at https://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/index.html) in the manufacture or support of items required by this SOW unless a waiver is obtained from the Army Acquisition Executive. ODC/ODS refrigerant alternatives used must appear in the EPA’s Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) list identified at https://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/index.html and have received a toxicity clearance from the U.S. Army Public Health Command (USAPHC).

The Contractor shall provide immediate notification via email to TAGM Product Director of proposed hazardous material mitigation/elimination efforts that may adversely impact schedules, cost and/or performance.

6.4.8 Radioactive Materials. The contractor shall not use radioactive materials.

6.5 Human Factors Engineering. The contractor shall analyze the user-system interfaces of proposed change to deliverable hardware and associated equipment to assure that human factors

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 engineering (HFE) features are enhanced or, if the proposed change is not directed toward the user-system interface, that the established HFE features are maintained or improved but are not adversely affected. The results of this analysis shall be included with an ECP IAW DI-SESS- 80639 (A015). Absence of an HFE statement shall indicate that the change does not involve the user-system interfaces.

If the change involves the user-system interface, the following shall be required: The contractor shall ensure the HFE is not degraded by change to enhance other aspects of the system and that user-system performance enhancing change does, indeed, accomplish the intent, based on user review.

6.6 Facilities and Operations Safety. The contractor shall provide access for Government personnel to all contractor and subcontractor facilities involving hazardous materials. The contractor shall maintain an accident prevention program. The contractor shall prepare accident/incident reports IAW DI-SAFT-81563 (A039).

7.0 Product Assurance.

7.1 Objective. The contractor shall provide ES in the areas of Quality Assurance (QA), Reliability and Maintainability (R&M), System Assessment (SA), and Software Quality Assurance (SQA) to include BFVS FOV IBAS training devices and ancillary equipment, as applicable.

7.2 Quality Assurance Program. The contractor shall maintain a Quality Assurance Program IAW ISO 9001, an equivalent, or TAGM approved.

7.3 Requirements. The contractor shall provide QA, R&M, SA, and SQA efforts to ensure that field deficiencies are resolved. The Government will evaluate the services provided, to ensure the requirements are maintained.

7.3.1 The contractor shall perform analysis of proposed changes to determine the impact on R&M and QA and deliver as supporting information to the engineering change proposal. The contractor shall correct identified deficiencies and provide corrections that do not degrade performance requirements of the system under test and evaluation during correction of deficiencies found during engineering evaluations and field support.

7.3.2 The contractor shall provide support for the Failure Review Board activities, and shall support Government conducted testing by providing data and analysis. The contractor shall coordinate the performance of failure analysis of test program failures or field failures and shall prepare corrective action plans IAW DI-SESS-80255 (006).

7.3.3 The contractor shall perform special reliability studies and tests analysis related to specific BFVS FOV IBAS items sustainment and identified by the TD.

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

7.3.4 The contractor shall analyze ECPs to identify the effect of the proposed change on reliability, maintainability and quality.

7.4 Hardware.

7.4.1 Soldering Specification. The contractor shall ensure that hardware designed under this contract shall utilize soldering processes IAW IPC-J-STD-001 class 3 and IPC-A-610 class 3.

7.4.2 Electrostatic Discharge (ESD). The contractor shall provide protection from electrostatic discharge IAW the contractor’s site Electrostatic Discharge Control Program Plan.

7.4.3 Equipment Analysis. The contractor shall perform failure analysis of the equipment, to identify the root cause of failures and the contractor shall conduct the analysis IAW specific instructions provided by TAGM GTM. The contractor shall prepare and deliver a report of each hardware failure analysis, to include recommendations for resolutions, IAW DI-SESS-80255 (A006).

7.4.4 Technical Support. The contractor shall analyze problems affecting the evaluation, usage and maintenance of equipment, including test equipment, to include efforts at the contractor's facility and on-site.

7.4.5 Test Stations. Automated test stations and procedures used for acceptance of subassemblies and major components will be validated by the TAGM GTM or his/her designee.

The contractor shall control the test station software (SW) and hardware (HW) configurations.

The contractor shall notify the TAGM GTM or his/her designee prior to making HW/SW changes to validated test stations. The TAGM GTM or his/her designee reserves the right to require revalidation of test stations changed/modified by the contractor. If revalidation is required, the contractor shall ensure the revalidation is successfully accomplished prior to further final acceptance testing use of the test stations.

7.4.6 Prohibited Parts and Related Materials and Processes. The contractor shall implement and maintain parts, materials and processes selection and control procedures to ensure compliance with the contract Attachment entitled Prohibited Parts, Materials and Processes. Exceptions to the Prohibited Parts, Materials and Processes guidance shall require authorization by the Government.

7.4.7 Counterfeit Prevention. For all hardware designed/redesigned under this contract, the contractor shall use the Government approved Parts Management Program Plan for all BFVS IBAS items. The contractor shall monitor all parts in the design/redesign effort to assure the parts are procured from an authorized manufacturer or authorized distributor. The contractor shall report part that is suspected or proven to be counterfeit to the Project Office by electronic means and a report submitted in the Government-industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP).

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

8.0 Configuration Management (CM).

8.1 Configuration Management Planning.

8.1.1 The contractor shall implement and maintain the CM program IAW the contractor’s CM plan and prepare plan IAW DI-SESS-80858 (A024). The contractor shall address resource management and schedule compliance with regard to CM activities under this contract at program reviews.

8.2 Configuration Identification.

8.2.1 The contractor shall prepare, maintain, and deliver functional and allocated baseline performance specifications and interface control documents IAW MIL-STD-961, DI-SDMP- 81465 (A035) and DI-SESS-81248 (A031), MIS-STD-52406-IS and TDP Option Selection Worksheet.

8.2.2 The contractor shall prepare, maintain, and deliver product baseline documentation IAW DI-SESS-81000 (A027), DI-SESS-81004 (A028), and DI-SESS-81008 (A029), MIL-STD-31000, MIS-STD-52406-IS, and TDP Option Selection Worksheet.

8.2.3 The contractor shall prepare, maintain, and deliver Software (SW)/Firmware (FW) source and executable code IAW DI-AVCS-80700 (A019). The contractor shall prepare and deliver SW/FW documentation IAW DI-MISC-80508 (A013).

8.3 Configuration Change Management.

8.3.1 The Government will have configuration control of existing IBAS Block I, II and 2.8 functional and allocated baselines. The Government will have configuration control of any existing IBAS functional, allocated, and product baselines. The Government will assume configuration control of newly developed IBAS functional, allocated, and product baselines as specified in the TD.

8.3.2 The contractor shall prepare and deliver ECPs IAW DI-SESS-80639 (A015) with accompanying NORs IAW DI-SESS-80642 (A016), to propose changes to Government-controlled documentation. The contractor shall utilize Government-assigned ECP numbers. The contractor shall include all supplemental documentation that supports the proposed changes within the ECP submittal.

8.3.3 The contractor shall prepare Engineering Release Records (ERR) IAW DI-SESS-80463 (A012) to officially release or modify the Government-controlled CD.

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

8.4 Configuration Audits.

8.4.1 The contractor shall prepare a Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) Plan IAW DI- SESS-81646 (A040). The contractor shall conduct, in conjunction with the Government, FCA’s based on the functional and allocated baselines for the specific IBAS Configuration Items (CI) being qualified in a TD. The contractor shall prepare a FCA Summary Report, to include all FCA documentation evidence, IAW DI-SESS-81022 (A030).

8.4.2 The contractor shall prepare a Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) Plan IAW DI-SESS- 81646 (A040). The contractor shall conduct, in conjunction with the Government, PCA’s to verify the specific IBAS hardware is built IAW the product baseline documentation. The contractor shall prepare a PCA Audit Summary report IAW DI-SESS-81022 (A030).

8.5 Configuration Status Accounting. The contractor shall prepare, maintain, and deliver as-built records IAW DI-CMAN-81516 (A038).

9.0 Integrated Product Support (IPS).

9.1 IPS Program Management. The contractor shall establish an IPS program for all BFVS FOV IBAS items to accomplish the support requirements of this contract. The contractor shall plan and provide the transition of all data, files, information and records established that are maintained under this contract to the Government upon contract completion. The contractor’s IPS program shall include provisions to perform the following:

a. Planning, coordination and technical resolution of fielding problems and implementation of changes into logistics elements resulting from Government approved system engineering changes.

b. Participation by the Government in joint planning and management meetings.

c. Maintenance and updating of the weapon systems’ spares configuration baseline.

d. Management of financial, technical, and scheduling oversight of logistics efforts.

9.2 Support Validation/Verification/Testing.

9.2.1 Support. The contractor shall provide logistic support and facilities for validation, verification, and test evaluation. The support shall include the following:

a. Department of the Army Modification Work Order (DAMWO) Kit Validation/Verification

b. DAMWO Technical Publication Validation/Verification

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

c. Technical Manual Validation/Verification

d. Maintenance and Test Problem Investigation

e. Test and Repair Procedure Development and Validation

f. Engineering Change Validation

g. Training Material and Programs of Instruction

h. Logistics Demonstration or BIT/BITE Validation/Verification

i. Test Equipment Validation/Verification

j. Test Program Set (TPS) Validation/Verification

k. Depot Maintenance Work Requirement (DMWR) Validation/Verification

l. Installation of modifications into the Depot Test and Automatic Equipment (DTAE).

m. Retrofit Instruction Document validation

9.2.2 Trial Retrofit kit(s). The contractor shall provide trial retrofit kit[s] to the Government to support MWO validation and verification, as required.

9.2.3 Supportability Analysis. The contractor shall perform supportability analysis IAW GEIA-STD-0007, A1-A9, of Government initiated hardware and software/firmware design changes on system hardware and provide a report IAW DI-SESS-81759 (A042) detailing how any change affects the IPS elements.

9.2.4 Human Systems Integration (HSI). The contractor shall evaluate Government-initiated hardware and software/firmware design changes for HSI impact IAW GEIA-STD-0007, A1-A9, and develop/update and provide a report prepared IAW DI-SESS-81759 (A042) detailing how any changes affect the HSI domains.

9.3 Provisioning Requirements.

9.3.1 The contractor shall establish and maintain a provisioning program for all support equipment and tactical hardware. The contractor shall develop provisioning data for new or modified equipment.

9.3.2 The contractor shall submit Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) IAW DI- SESS-81758 (A041) for integration into the existing provisioning files for each hardware covered by this contract and shall be updated as changes occur. The contractor shall develop

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 provisioning data capable of being integrated into the U.S. Army’s Logistics Modernization Program (LMP).

9.3.3 RESERVED

9.3.4 Procedural and data format changes will be furnished to the contractor in writing by the Government Technical Manager (GTM) or representative, and implemented into the provisioning database.

9.3.5 The contractor shall host a Provisioning Master Record (PMR) Reconciliation Conference, annually to reconcile data element discrepancies between the contractor-maintained provisioning data and the Army PMR. Government-generated data element changes will be furnished to the contractor as they occur. These changes will be documented on the PTD Transaction History format. The contractor shall update their provisioning data upon receipt.

9.3.6 The contractor shall deliver data that meets the U.S. Army automated data processing (ADP) edit routine with a 98 percent acceptance. The contractor shall rework data that does not meet this level of acceptance.

9.3.7 The contractor shall establish Unit of Measure (UM) prices for all new items loaded into the Provisioning Master Record. For common items where National Stock Numbers (NSN) are already assigned, the UM price shall be the published FED-LOG price. For vendor items, which the Government can buy directly from the source, the price shall be the vendor's current published price for an economic lot size determined by the vendor's price break points.

9.3.8 The contractor shall document spare repairables down to the lowest replaceable component. The contractor shall not be required to document repair parts for items coded non-repairable or consumable.

9.3.9 The contractor shall screen parts through the Defense Logistics Information Services (DLIS) or FED-LOG. The contractor shall load into the provisioning data existing NSN for an item, select valid reference number and update the provisioning data with applicable data elements. If no NSN exists, the contractor shall develop the necessary data elements and load into the provisioning file.

9.3.10 The contractor shall integrate into the provisioning data changes to the configuration baseline, which impacts maintenance or provisioned spare parts, to include hardware or software changes.

9.4 Logistics Support Documentation.

9.4.1 Product Support Analysis (PSA) Program. The contractor shall maintain, for the duration of this contract, an ADP system to store, process, retrieve and protect automated Logistics Product Data (LPD) data that is accessible to the Government via CITIS. The

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 contractor shall maintain and update all LPD records compatible with existing logistics data requirements for each system covered by this contract IAW DI-SESS-81758 (A041) and DI-

SESS-81759 (A042).

9.4.2 The contractor shall review each engineering change proposal for potential impact to the LPD, and shall include a statement of the impact with the ECP that is submitted to the Government. The contractor shall review each Government-initiated engineering change proposal for potential impact to the LPD.

9.4.3 All data for, operated by, or derived from the PSA requirement of this contract is subject to review by the Government at the contractor's facility. Formally scheduled Government reviews of the PSA program will occur as identified by the contracting activity. The contractor shall deliver all LPD data IAW DI-SESS-81758 (A041) and DI-SESS-81759 (A042).

9.4.4 The Government will assign the top level LSA Control Number (LCN) or alternate LCN (ALC) for all systems. The contractor shall ensure the compatibility of all LCNs, including subcontractor LCNs to those already established for each end item.

9.4.5 The contractor shall integrate in the LPD changes to the configuration baseline that impacts maintenance or provisioned spare parts compatible with existing LPD databases to include changes affecting hardware or software incorporated into systems, spare parts, or GFP.

9.5 Equipment Publications. The contractor shall prepare and deliver equipment publications, source data, and changes IAW para 9.5.1.

9.5.1 Changes to Equipment Technical Publications. The contractor shall prepare changes to the equipment technical publications in IAW DI-ADMN-80925 (A026). Publications shall be in the format/content already established and used during previous contracts, unless otherwise directed by the Technical Manager.

9.5.2 Validation. The contractor shall validate all changed procedures that affect operation and maintenance of the equipment unless specifically waived by the Technical Manager.

Validations shall be performed wherever the latest modified configuration of equipment can be made available. The documentation may be draft manuscripts or marked up pages from the affected manuals. Support for the validation effort, including operation, maintenance, repair parts and software will be supplied to the contractor by the Government.

9.5.3 Verification. The contractor shall support verification of the equipment publication or source data change. Support shall be defined as providing a technical representative to assist in the verification at a time and place as designated by the Government.

9.5.4 Modification Work Orders (MWO) Preparation. The contractor shall prepare MWOs and Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMs) IAW the requirements of MIL-STD-

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

40051-1 (A048) and MIL-PRF-63002 (A047). Additional instructions relative to the preparation of MWOs will be provided by the GTM or designee.

9.5.5 Publications Validation Completion Reports. The contractor shall prepare publications’ validation completion reports IAW DI-SESS-80792 (A023). The contractor shall report the cost of publications as part of the financial reporting tasks IAW DI-FNCL-80729 (A020).

9.6 Test Program Set (TPS) Development Support. The contractor shall provide technical documentation and assistance to sub-contractor to facilitate in the development of TPSs.

9.6.1 The documentation that the contractor shall provide includes the following IAW DI-

SESS-81000 (A027):

a. Developmental specifications

b. Critical item product specifications

c. Product performance specifications

d. Software requirements specifications

e. Circuit card assembly schematics

f. Interface requirement specifications

g. Interface control documents

h. BIT and other prime software algorithm description documents

i. Assembly drawings

9.6.2 The contractor shall provide configuration management efforts to prepare and track the data transfer to sub-contractor.

9.6.3 The contractor shall participate in technical interchange working groups (TIWGs) to support TPS development. These TIWGs shall include technical discussions on functionality and interfaces. The contractor shall provide the technical personnel to support these TIWGs including systems engineers, software engineers, electrical engineers, and mechanical engineers.

The TIWGs shall include the exchange of information regarding logistics maintenance actions, technical manuals, and training material.

9.6.4 The contractor shall support TAGM in review of data for preliminary and critical design reviews for TPSs.

9.7 Field Specification Analysis (FSA). The contractor shall perform test parameter studies to identify and achieve solutions to problems with testing parameters. The contractor shall conduct a FSA for deviations from the system testing parameters or techniques. The FSA shall contain a description of the problem, the effects of the problem on system effectiveness, recommendations, and justification for problem solutions. The FSA shall provide an official means for documenting the need and solution for testing when different from the system testing specification. The resulting FSA shall be prepared and delivered IAW DI-MGMT-80061 (A001).

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

9.8 Packaging Documentation.

9.8.1 Special Packaging Instructions. The contractor shall develop Packaging Data and Special Packaging Instructions (SPIs) for the system equipment/parts subjected to storage and transportation IAW DI-PACK-80120 (A004) and DI-PACK-80121 (A005), respectively. A packaging kit contents list shall be prepared by the contractor and included with applicable special packaging instructions for parts kits and modification kits IAW DI-MISC-81499 (A037).

The contractor shall package kits with materials and supplies in such a manner as to guarantee arrival in same condition as it was in prior to shipment.

9.8.2 Special Reusable Shipping and Storage Containers. The contractor shall identify and document special reusable shipping and storage containers and shall report the data analyses IAW DI-PACK-80683 (A017) and DI-PACK-80684 (A018).

9.8.3 Item Unique Identification (IUID). The contractor shall prepare an IUID Marking Plan IAW DI-MGMT-81803 (A043) for executing marking of IBAS configuration controlled components. The contractor shall prepare an IUID Marking Activity, Validation and Verification Report IAW DI-MGMT-81804 (A044) to confirm compliance with the MIL-STD-130 DFARS 252.211-7003, and the contractor’s IUID marking plan. All other parts not requiring IUID shall be marked IAW MIL-STD-129 and MIL-STD-130 and include Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) and Part Number data. Safety markings on newly introduced items of equipment shall be IAW ANSI Z535.4 or as otherwise identified in the systems supporting system safety hazard analysis.

9.9 Field Service Representative (FSR) Support.

9.9.1 The contractor shall provide FSRs to support fieldings, modifications, and other related activities.

9.9.2 The contractor shall provide technical support by; operating, maintaining, troubleshooting, repairing, retrofitting, applying hardware/software modifications, deprocessing rebuild LRUs/SRUs, repairing shipping and storage containers and provide training at unit hand-offs. FSR shall possess the following technical skills; able to recognize and eliminate safety hazards, have documented experience in the use of Test, Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE), the use of Army Technical Manuals, and fault isolation/troubleshooting procedures.

9.9.3 The contractor shall provide support to all sites, which includes technical support for operations, troubleshooting, maintenance, repair, and modifications of the components for which the FSR has responsibility.

9.9.4 The contractor shall provide travel and transportation for FSRs. The contractor shall provide technical data/documentation and required tools and TMDE. The contractor shall maintain current calibration standards for test equipment used by the FSRs.

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

9.9.5 The contractor shall prepare reports of significant activities/problems IAW DI-MISC- 80508 (A014). The contractor shall provide a summary of significant activities/problems and shall include the summary in the scheduled management reviews.

9.9.6 The contractor shall provide on-site support to investigate field problems experienced by the system, to include participation in meetings, analysis of problems, initiation of the engineering changes if dictated by problem solution, and travel to locations for on-site problem investigation.

The FSR shall isolate the cause of failures to the extent possible using available equipment.

9.9.7 The contractor shall provide on-site technical and engineering support. Current locations include; Ft Hood, Ft Bliss, Ft Riley, Ft Carson, MN ARNG, MS ARNG, Republic of Korea, Red River Army Depot and York, PA.

9.10 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Support Documentation.

9.10.1 The contractor shall furnish a logistics impact statement which shall identify the effects an ECP is anticipated to have on the IPS elements listed on DD Form 1692/2 and logistics impacts. The contractor shall submit logistics impact statements concurrently with ECP submittal.

9.10.2 The contractor’s DD Form 1692/2 shall address logistics impact on contractor developed Depot Maintenance Plant Equipment (DMPE), Special Inspection Equipment (SIE)/Special Test Equipment (STE), TPSs, and interchangeability between systems.

9.10.3 The contractor shall furnish documentation, e.g., marked-up technical manual (TM) and repair parts and special tools list (RPSTL) pages, and provisioning summaries to support the logistics impact assessment that the contractor shall furnish concurrently with the ECP, IAW DI-

SESS-80639 (A015).

9.10.4 When submitting the ECP, the contractor shall include a statement of “no impact” with the ECP indicating that the assessment determined that the change does not affect the ILS elements, reliability and maintainability, LPD or provisioning database, or logistics parameters.

9.11 Logistic Support for Foreign Military Sales.

9.11.1 The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistic Support Planning for deployment of the hardware and associated equipment through Foreign Military Sales, to include a definition of System Support requirements and specific recommendations for satisfying those requirements.

9.12 Contractor Level Repair.

9.12.1 The contractor shall furnish the services, materials, supplies, spare parts, repair parts, and equipment needed to receive, inspect, disassemble, repair, maintain, test, and deliver repaired assets back to the Government. Repaired hardware shall be returned to fully operational and

29 October 2019

Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 serviceable condition, defined as fully capable to perform the intended mission without degradation.

9.12.2 The contractor shall perform an initial inspection to determine the costs to repair each item submitted. Upon completion of the evaluation, the GTM will be notified of the cost to repair each item and the GTM will decide whether to repair, dis-assembly or dispose. No hardware shall be disposed of without authorization of the GTM or designee.

9.12.3 The contractor level repairs shall include performance of preventive maintenance such as removal of foreign matter, corrosion, repairing deep scars, scratches, and painting. This process shall include the restoration of exterior functional marking, including Unique Identification (UID) to a legible condition IAW MIL-STD-130. This preventative maintenance shall be performed even when an asset is determined by the contractor to have no evidence of failure.

9.12.4 During repairs, the contractor shall provide and incorporate hardware and software modifications to bring an asset to the most current configuration. If the cost to incorporate the modification exceeds $3,000, approval shall be obtained from the TD manager or designee.

9.12.5 Materials, supplies, spare parts, repair parts, and maintenance actions shall conform to the applicable TDP or product performance specifications.

9.12.6 The contractor shall prepare a written report IAW DI-PSSS-80386 (A008) upon the completion of each repair action, to indicate a description of repairs, parts replaced, and the cause of failure if known.

9.12.7 Tools and Test Equipment. The contractor shall provide assets required for calibration of test equipment. Facilities, tools, and test equipment above and beyond that already purchased under previous contracts shall not be purchased in support of contractor level repairs without prior TD…