B08 Atch 5 PRAQ.pdf
PDF 138 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W25G1V20R0006
About this file
This document is a performance risk assessment questionnaire for a federal contract solicitation for cargo door, fire door, and dock equipment maintenance services. The solicitation is issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground. Offerors are required to provide candid responses to questions about compliance, project management, timeliness, customer satisfaction, and other performance factors on relevant past efforts. References and points of contact are also requested. Completed questionnaires must be returned within 3 days to the identified contracting specialist via email. The nature of the contractual effort involves maintenance services for cargo doors, fire doors, and dock equipment.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B08 Atch 1 PWS - REVISED 3 2 20.pdf | ||
| W25G1V20R0006 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers (2).pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers #1.pdf | ||
| B08 Atch 3 Door & Dock Locations.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B08 W25G1V20R0006 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| B08 Atch 1 PWS.pdf | ||
| B08 Atch 6 Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| B08 Atch 4 QASP.pdf | ||
| B08 Atch 2 Offeror's Proposed Pricing Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Atch 5
Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire For W25G1V-20-R-0006
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contract Specialist identified in Part III within 3 days.
Adjectival Rating Definitions:
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Acceptable
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Acceptable
D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Acceptable
E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contract Specialist identified below:
Cheryl A. Saylock Contract Specialist Cheryl.a.saylock.civ@mail.mil Army Contracting Command-APG Tobyhanna Division 11 Hap Arnold Blvd Tobyhanna, PA 18466-5100
Thank you for your assistance.
mailto:Cheryl.a.saylock.civ@mail.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .