Vendor Questions & Government Responses - FODRM32SB.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 10 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BPM057760
- Issued by
- Maryland
About this file
This is a Vendor Questions & Government Responses document for IFB #FODRM32SB, an on-call roofing inspection, maintenance, and repair contract issued by the State of Maryland for the SHA Hanover Complex. The document addresses two vendor inquiries submitted during the bidding process. Pre-bid attendance was not mandatory for vendors to submit bids on this project. The solicitation includes specific contracting requirements and modifications addressed through formal amendments and addendums.
The document clarifies that the Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) goal specified in the contract is limited to certified MBE firms and does not include Virginia Small Business Enterprise (VSBE) companies, despite apparent confusion created by initial language in the Office of Equal Opportunity script. A corrected version of the OEO script was posted with the amendment to provide clarity to bidders. The responses indicate that the government addressed vendor concerns through formal documentation to ensure uniform understanding of contract requirements and eligibility criteria among all potential bidders.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| IFB #FODRM32SB - On-Call Roofing Inspection, Maintenance, & Repairs at SHA Hanover Complex | |||
| Vendor Question Template | |||
| Question # | Section Reference | Vendor Question | Government Response |
| 1 | 22 Addendum No. [#] – MBE/VSBE language | Would it be possible to include Maryland VSBE companies as part of the MBE goal for this project? If not, why? | No, because the goal is specific to MBE, not VSBE. There was an apparent typo in the Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) script that may have created confusion, but that script has been corrected and posted with this amendment. |
| 2 | General | Was Pre-Bid attendance mandatory in order for us to submit a bid on this project? | Pre-bid attendance was NOT mandatory to submit a bid on this project. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .