Vendor Name_Past Perf Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NRS Durham Lab Janitorial Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12444824Q0028
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Past and Present Performance Questionnaire related to Solicitation No. 12444824Q0028 for a janitorial services contract at the Durham Lab facility. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's performance, including the provision of experienced personnel, quality control, problem-solving, and overall performance. It also asks whether the contractor has received any cure or show cause notices, if they are rated in CPARS, and if the respondent would award another contract to the contractor.
The related federal contract opportunity is for a janitorial services contract at the Durham Lab facility, with a NAICS code of 561720 and a small business size standard of $22M. The contract is for a one-year base period with four one-year option periods. A virtual site visit and pre-bid conference are scheduled for September 11, 2024, and responses are due by September 16, 2024. The contract is set aside for small businesses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_12444824Q0028_CO Signed.pdf | ||
| SAM.gov Service Contract Act WD 2015-4017.pdf | ||
| Vendor Name_Experience Questionaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| SCHEDULE OF ITEMS - WITH OPTIONS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No: 12444824Q0028 Durham Lab
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _____________________ Telephone Number: ______________________
Address: ________________________________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: __________________Dollar Amount: $ _____________________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ___________________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: ___________________Title: _________________________________________
Telephone Number: _______________________________
Email Address: _______________________________
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Alternatively, select N/A where appropriate.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| NEUTRAL or N/A |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. |
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. |
Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance, the record is inconclusive, or rated area is not applicable.
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 7. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 9. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 10. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 11. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
| 12. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER
Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________________
RETURN BY EMAIL TO no later than COB 13 SEP 2024: gayle.geiger@usda.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .