USDA Past Performance Rating Form.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12-1NTS-21-Q-0008
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| KC337 Rate Schedule print.pdf | ||
| RFQ - 1NTS-21-Q-0008 (signed SF1449).pdf | ||
| KC337 Rate Schedule.pdf | ||
| RFQ - 1NTS-21-Q-0008.pdf | ||
| KC334 Survey Summary.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION 12-1NTS-21-Q-0008
PLEASE RETURN TO kyle.hugo@usda.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Solicitation Number 12-1NTS-21-Q-0008. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer via kyle.hugo@usda.gov.
Questionnaire is due to Kyle Hugo no later than September 6, 2021. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate email account.
For the purpose of gathering USDA past performance information please complete the following questions to the best of your knowledge, only considering contracts for the past three years.
Thank you.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Question 2. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide deliverables in a timely manner?
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Comments, if any.
Question 3. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements and schedule) on contract being assessed?
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
Name of Evaluator: __________________________________________ Date: ____________
Title: ______________________________________________________
Company Name: _____________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .