US ITER UWAVS Ex-Vessel SOW (DRAFT).pdf

Statement of Work Manufacture, Inspection, Test and Delivery of the UWAVS

Ex-Vessel Subsystem

ITER Upper Wide Angle Viewing System (UWAVS)

Statement of Work for Manufacture, Inspection, Test, and

Delivery of the Ex-Vessel Subsystem

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory PO Box 451

Princeton, NJ 08543

Not shown in Figure 3 but included in scope is an infrared (IR) calibration source.[

PPPL APPROVAL

VERSION Date Author QA Engineer Approver

1.0 10//2025 Peter Dugan Patrick Temple Ravinder Bhatia

SEE EDRM

REVISION LOG

VERSION DATE MODIFICATIONS

1.0 Statement of work

Contents

PIPING 13

List of Figures

Figure 1. View of the UWAVS diagnostics on Divertor Figure 2. In-Vessel and Ex-Vessel Assemblies Figure 3. Interspace Optics Tube Subassemblies Figure 4. Bioshield Optics Labyrinth Subassembly Figure 5. Back-End Optics and Cameras Assembly Figure 6. Back End Optics and Camera Subassemblies Figure 7. Phase 1 and Phase 2 Graphical Timeline

List of Tables Table 1. Ex-Vessel Assemblies Table 2. MRR List of Documents Table 3. Supplier Verification Approach Table 4. Milestone Schedule Overview Table 5. Interspace Optics Tube/Bioshield Optical Labyrinth Assembly Deliverables Table 6. Back End Optics and Camera Assembly Deliverables

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW

International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) (http://www.iter.org) is an international project under construction in Saint Paul-lez-Durance, France (ITER St-Paul) that will demonstrate nuclear fusion at a power plant-relevant scale. ITER is a joint international research and development project with the programmatic goal to demonstrate the scientific and technical feasibility of fusion power. The ITER machine is being constructed in a collaboration with seven partners consisting of the United States, European Union, China, Russia, South Korea, Japan, and India. The US ITER Project Office (USIPO) is hosted by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), which is located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. ORNL works in partnership with Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) and Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) on USIPO scope. PPPL is responsible for several diagnostic systems supplied to ITER, pursuant to direction from the Department of Energy in its role as the ITER Domestic Agency for the United States. One of the ITER diagnostic systems being provided by PPPL is the Upper Port Visible/Infrared Wide-Angle Viewing System (UWAVS).

1.2 SUBJECT OF THIS SOW

The objective of this SOW is to specify:

(1) the manufacturing, procurement, and delivery of UWAVS EX-Vessel components, for four upper ports (2, 8, 11,14);

(2) the necessary assembly and testing activities to verify compliance with requirements of the supplied and manufactured parts;

(3) requirements and documentation related to the reviews: Manufacturing Readiness Review (MRR), Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT), Delivery Readiness Review (DRR) and Site Acceptance by the Port Integrators;

(4) other applicable project requirements.

UWAVS for Upper Port 17 is out of scope for this SOW.

2 DOCUMENTS

Any or all documents used in the execution of this SOW (applicable, reference, and information) are provided in a Current Reference List (CRL). See Attachment 2. If a deviation to following a standard is requested, the supplier shall seek approval from PPPL.

3 SCOPE OF SUPPLY

3.1 OVERVIEW OF UWAVS

UWAVS will provide real-time, simultaneous visible and infrared images of the ITER divertor region, via optical systems located in five upper port plugs (2, 8, 11, 14, and 17) as shown in Figure 1. UWAVS provides machine protection (monitoring for overheating of surfaces), plasma control (basic and advanced), and physics measurement roles.

Figure 1. View of the UWAVS diagnostics on Divertor

The UWAVS system is divided into three sections according to their location: In-Vessel, Ex-Vessel including the Interspace and Port Cell as shown as Figure 2, and Gallery and Diagnostic Building.

Figure 2. In-Vessel and Ex-Vessel Assemblies

The Ex-Vessel components of the UWAVS diagnostic reside in the Interspace, Bioshield, and Port Cell in the of upper ports 2, 8, 11, and 14.

The primary function of the Ex-vessel system is to pass light through an optical mirror train from the port plug to the cameras that are mounted in the port cell.

• The scope for this SOW to deliver the Ex-Vessel system that consists of three assemblies identified in Table 1.

Table 1. Ex-Vessel Assemblies Assemblies

Interspace Optics Tube (IOT) Bioshield Optics Labyrinth (BOL)

Back End Optics and Camera (BEOC)

3.1.1 INTERSPACE OPTICS TUBE (IOT) ASSEMBLY

The Interspace Optics Tube assembly resides in the Interspace which is mounted to the Interspace Support Structure (ISS), provides active beam steering to compensate Vacuum Vessel thermal displacements during operation and function as an optical relay. The Interspace Optics Tube consists of five subassemblies: the A40 mirror, A50 mirror group, interface plate assembly, optical bench and enclosure assembly, and Interspace Optics Tube services assembly as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Interspace Optics Tube Subassemblies

3.1.2 BIOSHIELD OPTICS LABYRINTH (BOL) ASSEMBLY

The Bioshield Optics Labyrinth resides in the Bioshield and maintains alignment between the Interspace

Optics Tube (IOT) and Back End Optics and Camera (BEOC). Two actuated mirror mount subassemblies are part of the BOL, as shown in

Figure 4. The two subassemblies also create an optical dogleg within the Bio shield to reduce neutron streaming through the diagnostic beam path.

Figure 4. Bioshield Optics Labyrinth Subassembly

3.1.3 BACK END OPTICS AND CAMERA (BEOC) ASSEMBLY

The Back End Optics and Camera reside in the port cell and contain conditioning optics, infrared (IR) and visible cameras inside a shielded cabinet, as shown in Figure 5. The Back End Optics and Camera assembly mounts to the Port Cell Support Structure (PCSS). The Back End Optics and Camera assembly includes structures and shielding of the optical relay system.

Figure 5. Back-End Optics and Cameras Assembly

The optical relay subassemblies shown in Figure 6 are composed of the A70, A80, A90, A100, A110 optics groups, a pair of filter wheel subassemblies, the IR and visible cameras, calibration system mounted on an optical bench and a shielded electronics enclosure.

Figure 6. Back End Optics and Camera Subassemblies

3.2 ITEMS TO BE PROVIDED BY PPPL

PPPL will deliver to the supplier a set of raw material blocks of, SS316L(N)-IG for the manufacture of the UWAVS ex-vessel components. PPPL will deliver the infrared and visible cameras.

3.3 OUT OF SCOPE

The integration of the UWAVS Ex-Vessel assemblies with the Interspace, Bioshield, and Port Cell of Upper Port Plugs (2,8,11 and 14) is out of the scope of this contract.

4 PHASED IMPLEMENATION

The Execution of this SOW is divided into two phases.

Phase 1 is Preparation for Manufacturing: that includes the documentation and build to print drawing development required to support Manufacturing Readiness Review(s) (MRR) and completion of prototyping manufacturing development activities.

Phase 2 is Manufacturing, and includes component fabrication, assembly, subassembly, factory acceptance testing, packaging, handling, storage, transport, delivery, and integration support of the assemblies.

5 PHASE 1: PREPARATION FOR MANUFACTURING

5.1 DOCUMENTATION DEVELOPMENT

a. The supplier shall prepare a manufacturing plan covering the full scope of manufacturing, inspection, conduct of factory acceptance tests, cleaning, packaging and shipment, and site acceptance.

b. The supplier shall develop an MRR package containing detailed information on how the supplier intends to execute documentation required for each MRR (see V02-07). The supplier shall provide documents shown in Table 2 for each MRR.

Table 2. MRR List of Documents

Document Expected Contents The supplier shall prepare a Quality Assurance Plan describing the specific quality assurance and quality control procedures and practices to meet the requirements of this SOW as shown in the Quality Plan Template [V02-26].

The supplier shall prepare an Inspection Plan (IP) that includes machining operation definition of cleaning/inspection points between machining, welding, testing and assembly operations, sample form provided as Sample Inspection Plan [V02-25] to include but not limited to the following:

The manufacturing sequence covers the manufacturing processes (machining, drilling, welding, bending, inspections, etc.) and operations (internal handling, transportation, etc.).

Description for each step of the manufacturing sequence including a short explanation, images, 3D views, possible issues or risks with proposed solutions and detailed design of jigs and fixtures to be used during fabrication and handling.

Description of each inspection activity for each manufacturing step, indicating the tools and procedures that will be used for the inspection.

Assembly sequence of the sub-parts or sub-assemblies up to complete the sub-assembly.

Define/propose for review at the MRR a suitable method to measure the surface roughness inside pipes, drills and holes.

Quality assurance requirements are identified in Paragraph 7.

The supplier shall prepare Welding and Inspection Plans (WIP) that includes but not limited to:

Applicable standards for welding and verification plan for compliance.

Specification of the location of each weld (welding map) with type of welds, and cross references.

Supporting Welding Procedure Specification (WPS).

Description of welding sequence (welding manufacturing plan) including tack welding, and supporting strategy (jigs, jacks and related means of assembly support).

Procedure of weld repairs.

Welder Performance Qualification Records (WPQRs).

The Non-Destructive Test (NDT) procedures to be used and corresponding NDT maps.

The supplier shall prepare a Coating/Plating and Inspection Plan(s) that include but is not limited to:

Drawings with cross references between areas to be coated, thickness, etc.

Coating/Plating Specification

Procedures describing how the supplier intend to execute the coating/plating (i.e. coating on bolts, pins, and shutter base).

Qualification plan, Qualification or pre-production tests to be performed by the supplier to demonstrate the suitability of the coating technique and process.

The supplier shall prepare a Dimensional Inspection Plan (DIP) consistent using V02- 04 with the manufacturing drawings.

The supplier shall prepare a Factory, Acceptance Test (FAT) plan

Assembly study justifying that there are no issues with V02-32 in relation to assembly sequences and fulfilment of required final tolerances.

Detailed assembly sequence using V02- 32 for all sub-assemblies including a short explanation, images, views, possible issues or risks with proposed solutions, detailed design of jigs, fixtures or tooling necessary during assembly and handling.

Tests and verifications that will be implemented considering constraints of Quality, Safety, Vacuum, Remote Handling (RH), Equipement Sous Pression Nucléaire (ESPN) as applicable.

Detailed description and procedures of each test to be made, including acceptance criteria.

Identification for each operation of the place where it will be carried out (i.e.

Workshop or Clean area).

The supplier shall prepare a Marking and Labelling Plan in accordance with the requirements for marking, labelling.

The supplier shall prepare a Cleaning, Packaging, and Transportation Plan that includes but is not limited to:

The plan shall be in accordance with the requirements for marking, labelling, cleaning, handling and packaging described in Paragraph 6.5.

Updated BoM, if required.

Updated Assembly Plan for System Acceptance.

Qualification report (if needed).

Risk plan.

Personnel qualifications.

The supplier shall prepare a Site Acceptance Plan (SAP).

Receipt Inspection Functional tests and acceptance criteria include required test measurement diagnostic equipment, test fixtures and interface components to be conducted at the port integrator facility.

c. The supplier shall use the following Codes and Standards for Manufacturing, Inspection and Testing:

● For conventional parts: American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME as defined in Codes and Standards for ITER Mechanical Components [V02-08].

● For non-conventional parts: Technical Specifications including requirements derived from design activities, see Section 6.2.3 of Codes and Standards for ITER Mechanical Components [V02-08].

● Electrical equipment and components use Code selected from Electrical Design Handbook (EDH):

Part 3 [V02-20].

d. Prior to MRR, the supplier shall provide specifications for purchasing necessary COTS items.

5.2 CAD DEVELOPMENT

a. The supplier shall review and suggest manufacturability modifications on provided drawings

CAD Models [V01-05] and Applicable Drawings [V01-07].

b. The supplier shall develop manufacturing build to print drawings and/or models from provided drawings, updated 3D models, 2D manufacturing drawings, and 2D assembly drawings including a list of implemented changes to provided drawings.

c. The supplier shall consider the use of CATIA as being the ITER standard. The use of CATIA is strongly preferred but is not mandatory.

d. The supplier shall implement a configuration management (CM) system for any design activities.

5.3 PROTOTYPING

a. The supplier shall develop plans for approved prototyping activities.

b. Following PPPL’s approval, the supplier shall conduct manufacturing prototyping on high-risk components and capture lessons learned and or best practices.

5.4 MANUFACTURING READINESS REVIEW

a. The supplier shall present its readiness for manufacture at formal MRRs.

b. The supplier may propose to split the MRR into several either full or simplified, for the different assemblies, subassemblies, or components.

c. The supplier shall submit all documents, drawings/models and prototype results in support of

MRR as defined in [V02-07].

d. The supplier shall address findings and recommendations in the MRR panel report.

6 PHASE 2: MANUFACTURING, ASSEMBLY, TEST, SHIPPING, AND ACCEPTANCE

Phase 2 Manufacture shall under no circumstances start before formal closeout of the MRR and is granted by PPPL.

6.1 MANUFACTURING

a. The supplier shall fabricate the three First Article assemblies in accordance with the manufacturing drawings, plans, and procedures approved at MRR, technical requirements stated in this SOW, and applicable/reference documents.

b. The supplier shall conduct first article inspection (FAI) of each of the first article assemblies.

c. The supplier shall conduct a Factory Acceptance Test of each first article.

d. Once the inspection, assembly, and factory acceptance testing of each first article assembly have been completed and approved by PPPL, the supplier shall fabricate, assemble and test the remaining articles.

6.2 MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

a. The supplier shall follow American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Section IX and

American Welding Society (AWS) for welding procedures, documentation, qualification, approval, and testing on assemblies, subassemblies, or components.

b. For all the ex-vessel components classified as Vacuum Class (VQC), i.e., vacuum extension line, the supplier shall follow Vacuum Handbook Attachment 1 - Welding [V02-03-21] for welding procedures, documentation, qualification, approval, and testing on components/subassemblies. For these components the supplier shall use only fluids selected from Vacuum Handbook – Appendix 4 Accepted Fluids [V02-03-04].

c. For fluids that contact UWAVS components, the supplier shall only use fluids that are water-soluble, non-halogenated, Phosphorus and Sulphur free.

d. The supplier shall clean fluids immediately after use on finished surfaces.

e. Halogenated materials are forbidden unless an exception is raised by the supplier and pre-approved by PPPL.

f. The supplier shall take the necessary measures to minimize the impact on the overall project schedule of non-PPPL provided commercial off the shelf (COTS) components and Raw Material. Accordingly, the supplier is expected to order/procure these materials as soon as reasonably practical.

g. The supplier shall conduct first article inspection (FAI) of each of the first article assemblies.

h. The supplier shall conduct Factory Acceptance Test of each first article.

6.2.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS

a. Electrical equipment shall be in accordance the Electrical Design Handbook (EDH) Part 1:

Introduction [V02-18], Part 2: Terminology & Acronyms [V02-19], Part 3: Codes & Standards [V02-20], and Part 4: Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) [V02-21].

b. The supplier shall check that the provided cable routing is compatible with the foreseen manufacturing constraints, and otherwise propose a new routing, subject to PPPL approval.

c. Thermocouples shall comply with ASTM E2846.

6.2.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COOLED COMPONENTS, GAS SYSTEM, AND

PIPING

a. The supplier shall check that the provided pipe routing is compatible with the foreseen manufacturing constraints, and otherwise propose a new routing, subject to PPPL approval.

b. For non-Vacuum Class components, the supplier shall follow American Society of Mechanical

Engineers (ASME) and American Welding Society (AWS) for welding procedures, documentation, qualification, approval, and testing on assemblies, subassemblies, or components.

c. For non-Vacuum Class components, the supplier shall conduct testing in accordance with the Interspace and Bioshield Technical Specification [V01.13] and Port Cell Technical Specification [V01-14].

d. For all the ex-vessel components classified as Vacuum Class (VQC), i.e., vacuum extension line, the supplier shall fabricate piping in accordance with Vacuum Handbook Appendix 11 Standard Pipe and Pipe Fitting Dimensions [V02-03-11].

e. For all the ex-vessel components classified as Vacuum Class, i.e., vacuum extension line, the supplier shall test according to Vacuum Handbook Appendix 12 Leak Testing [V02-03-12].

f. The supplier shall deliver pipes and internal cooling and gas circuits in a state that is drained and dried.

6.2.3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR OPTICAL COMPONENTS

a. The supplier shall follow the technical requirements related to coating captured in the

Interspace and Bioshield Technical Specification [V01.13] and Port Cell Technical Specification [V01-14].

b. The supplier’s coating procedure shall follow the coating and inspection plan approved at the

MRR.

6.2.4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MATERIALS

a. The supplier shall follow the ITER Material Properties Handbook (MPH) [V02-16].

b. The supplier shall take the necessary measures to minimize the impact on the overall project schedule of non-PPPL provided materials. Accordingly, the supplier is expected to order/procure these materials as soon as reasonably feasible.

c. The supplier shall ensure that material (including welds) for all UWAVS components have a relative magnetic permeability less than or equal to 1.03μ.

6.3 FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TESTING

6.3.1 FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN

a. The supplier shall use the verification approach provided in Table 3.

Table 3. Supplier Verification Approach

ITEM FIGURE(S) SUPPLIER VERIFICATION APPROACH

IOT Assembly 3 Factory Acceptance Test BOL Assembly 4 Factory Acceptance Test BEOC Assembly 5 Factory Acceptance Test

Ex-Vessel System 3, 4, & 5 System Level Test

b. The supplier shall detail the sequence and approach to perform all necessary tests for the acceptance of the UWAVS assemblies in the Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Plan, presented at MRR.

c. The FAT Plan shall include the following information covering all components, sub-assemblies and assemblies:

• Assembly study justifying that there are no issues in relation to assembly sequences and fulfilment of required final tolerances.

• Detailed assembly sequence for all sub-assemblies including a short explanation, images, views, possible issues or risks with proposed solutions, detailed design of jigs, fixtures or tooling necessary during assembly and handling.

d. The supplier may propose alternative assembly, test and acceptance criteria to those summarized in Interspace and Bioshield Technical Specification [V01-10] and Port Cell Technical Specification [V01-11].

e. The supplier shall prepare a functional system-level test plan for assemblies as shown in Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5. The test plan shall focus on, but not be limited to, IOT, BEOC and BOL optical alignment performance and component operation e.g., thermocouple, mirror active alignment.

6.3.2 FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TEST PROCEDURE

a. The supplier shall prepare a Factory Acceptance Test Procedure for each assembly to include as a minimum:

• determine that assembly sequences meet required final tolerances.

• detailed assembly sequence for all sub-assemblies including a short explanation, images, views, possible issues or risks with proposed solutions, detailed design of jigs, fixtures or tooling, test equipment necessary during assembly and handling.

• overview of the test to be performed in accordance with the FAT plan.

• definition of Compliance, Partial Compliance, Non-Compliance.

• define test techniques and test equipment.

• establish test criteria.

• develop verification matrix.

b. The supplier shall collaborate with the I&C supplier, through PPPL, as required, to define functional test interfaces, test techniques, and test equipment.

c. The supplier shall prepare a System Level Test Procedure for the Ex-Vessel system to include as a minimum:

• determine that assembly sequences meet required system level tolerances.

• detailed assembly sequence for all sub-assemblies including a short explanation, images, views, possible issues or risks with proposed solutions, detailed design of jigs, fixtures or tooling necessary during assembly and handling.

• overview of the test to be performed in accordance with the Ex-Vessel system-level test plan.

• definition of Compliance, Partial Compliance, Non-Compliance.

• define test techniques, test equipment, and dimensionally accurate mounting locations representing the interspace and port cell .

• establish test criteria.

• develop verification matrix.

d. The supplier shall conduct a test readiness review for the tests identified in Table 3, including upper ports 2, 8, 11, and 14.

e. The supplier shall conduct tests as identified in Table 3, including upper ports 2, 8, 11, and 14.

6.3.3 FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TEST VERIFICATION REPORT

a. The supplier shall deliver a FAT report, which shall include at a minimum:

• assembly sequences meet required final tolerances

• overview of the test performed in accordance with the FAT procedure

• summary of results

• list of Compliance, Partial Compliance, and Non-Compliance during Acceptance test and actions to be taken to resolve the Non-Compliance

• completed verification matrix.

b. The supplier shall deliver a system-level test and verification report which shall include at a minimum:

• assembly sequences meet required final tolerances

• overview of the test performed in accordance with the FAT procedure

• summary of results

• list of Compliance, Partial Compliance, and Non-Compliance during Acceptance test and actions to be taken to resolve the Non-Compliance

• completed verification matrix.

6.4 MARKING AND IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

a. The supplier shall mark and label deliverable items in accordance with ITER Numbering

System for Components and Parts [V02-05] and Procedure for Labelling on Physical Items [V02-06].

b. Marked items shall include but are not limited to:

● Title of Product

● Functional Reference Number (number provided by PPPL)

● Part Number of ITER (number provided by PPPL).

● Serial Number (SN) (generated by the supplier).

● Safety Classification, e.g. Non-PIC, ESPN, etc.

● Quality Class.

● CE marking, if applicable.

c. The supplier shall ensure that any marking is in a visible area after the production, packing, storage and installation.

d. The supplier shall mark each crate with the following:

● Subcontract number

● Delivery address

● Consignor (supplier’s name, address, and contact information)

● Package number (as identified on the packing list)

● ITER Equipment Identification Number(s) (if applicable)

● Gross Weight (kg)

● Net Weight (kg)

● Handling instructions

● Lifting/Lashing/Jacking points

● Center of Gravity (in 3 dimensions)

● Compliance marks (if applicable)

6.5 CLEANING, PACKAGING, HANDLING, STORAGE, AND TRANSPORT

a. For non-VQC components, cleaning across all aspects of manufacturing shall follow the technical specifications [V01-13] and [V01-14] and ASME code for pre and post welding, Non-Destructive Examination (NDE) and piping related cleaning activities.

b. For all the ex-vessel components classified as Vacuum Class, i.e., vacuum extension line, the supplier shall follow Cleaning Procedures identified in Vacuum Handbook Appendix 2 Environmental Cleanliness [V02-03-02] and ITER Vacuum Handbook Attachment 2 - Cleanliness Requirements Relating to the Assembly of Vacuum Equipment [V02-03-22].

c. The supplier shall control items during handling and shipping and while in storage, including PPPL-furnished items, and shall assure that materials and items are adequately protected from damage or deterioration, with special attention to packaging for shipment.

d. The supplier shall provide a package design document which includes the proposed packaging design as well as analysis showing the deliverable can withstand air, land, and sea transport.

e. The supplier shall include environmental packaging, as necessary.

f. The supplier shall control release from storage to prevent accidental or inadvertent use of non-compliant items.

g. After final cleaning, the handling of vacuum class components shall be strictly controlled to preserve cleanliness complying with the requirements.

h. The supplier shall provide packaging to protect the equipment from any conditions (e.g., shock, impact, weather, etc.) which could cause damage to the equipment resulting in nonconformity with applicable requirements.

i. The supplier shall package and prepare each piece of equipment for shipment to the port integration facility.

6.6 CREATION and SUBMITTAL OF PRE-SHIPMENT DOCUMENTATION

a. Transportation and Shipment of the Ex-Vessel Assemblies will be conducted by the ITER

Project's Global Logistical Services Provider (LSP), Daher International and/or its United States partner, St. Germain Heavy Industrial Projects (SHIP), and is therefore not part of this Agreement. However, Task Orders shall be generated with these logistics service providers.

b. The pre-shipment documentation consists of four pre-shipment packages each containing differing documents and timelines for delivery.

c. The supplier shall prepare material for a Delivery Readiness Review in accordance with the Procedure for the Transportation of Components to the ITER Site [V02-38].

d. The supplier shall provide a pre-shipment deliverable package #1 no later than 60 business days prior to the delivery readiness review, and contain the following items:

● Written notice of the planned date on which the goods will be packaged and available for shipment.

● Contact information for supplier’s shipping/logistics coordinator.

● Technical characteristics of the packaged components as follows:

○ Physical data and drawings showing dimensions, total and distributed weights, center of gravity (in 3 dimensions), shipping orientation,

○ Address of the location where items are to be picked up by the Logistics Service Provider.

● Documentation (e.g., material safety data sheet) regarding relevant compliance regimes, such as export control, transportation of dangerous goods, and environmental protection.

● Identification of any items that have been categorized as Safety Important Components (SIC) or

Protection Important Components (PIC).

● Conditions or precautions to be respected when moving, loading/offloading, handling/slinging, and storing/marshaling to include, when required, specific provisions and controls to be performed and recorded while under the control of the logistics service provider.

● Documentation confirming that packaging is designed to protect components from damage and contamination, considering anticipated environmental conditions and multimodal (e.g., highway, ocean) handling/transit accelerations.

● Packaging specification including confirmation of compliance with international packing standards (e.g., International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM)-15, Conformity European/CE certification for relevant package lifting appurtenances such as eyes/rings), agree barcoding requirements and regulations relating to packaging materials used.

● Definition of packaging/frame, when the components are packed or trapped, including any procedures for handling, moving, clean-up, maintenance, storage.

● Specification for securing and hanging packages/frames including jacking/lifting/lashing conditions, procedures, and acceptable securing points.

● Identification of specialized equipment/hardware (e.g., custom lifting fixture) interface requirements between each point of use within the supply chain.

● Description of interface between supplier and Logistics Service Provider (e.g., release conditions for loads, supplier’s loading means, etc.).

● Technical data concerning monitors (e.g., shock, vibration, tilt, acceleration, temperature) utilized to detect events during transit which may cause damage to components.

e. The supplier shall provide pre-shipment deliverable package #2 no later than 90 days prior to planned date of shipment, and contain the following items:

● Written confirmation of the date goods will be ready for shipment or submit revised shipment date for approval.

● Contact information for supplier’s shipping/logistics coordinator.

● Fabrication value of goods (for insurance purposes-should not include destination site support services).

● Transport drawings with sufficient detail to facilitate lifting / lashing / stowage and approval of the operators (e.g., steamship line, air carrier).

● Business documents shall be written in the English language.

● The transportation Incoterm rule is FCA (Free Carrier) Incoterms 2010. The supplier shall be responsible for packaging and loading of all hardware/equipment in accordance with this SOW.

● For shipments subject to United States export control law, the supplier shall comply with the

Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and Foreign Trade Statistics Regulations (FTSR).

● The supplier shall serve as both the Exporter (Shipper of Record) according to the EAR and the

U.S. Principal Party of Interest (USPPI) according to the FTSR.

● For shipments originating from foreign locations, the supplier shall serve as the Exporter according to the origin country's export control regulations.

● The supplier shall be responsible for assisting Company and LSP in coordination of the transportation and shipping arrangements. The Supplier may interface directly with the LSP, if written authorization is given in advance by the PPPL.

● Equipment will be shipped to the following address or alternate designated by PPPL:

ITER Organization Route de Vinon sur Verdon, CS 90 046 13067 St. Paul lez Durance, CEDEX France

● Declaration of Integrity The undersigned hereby certifies that the components and package(s) described on this Packing List meet the contractual requirements except for any approved deviations and non-conformance reports specified in the associated documentation.

f. The supplier shall provide pre-shipment deliverable package #3 no later than two weeks prior to planned date of shipment, and contain the following items:

● Evidence of appropriate proof testing and certification for any custom lifting apparatus that will travel with the item and be utilized during loading and unloading operations.

g. The supplier shall provide pre-shipment deliverable package #4 no later than one week prior to planned date of shipment, and contain the following:

● Any remaining information needed to facilitate appropriate completion of transport documents such as bills of lading or air waybills.

● Data elements and authorizations (e.g., shipper’s letter of Instruction, power of attorney) required for Logistics Service Provider submission of electronic filings in the automated export system, when necessary.

● Dangerous goods declaration if required for transport.

h. The supplier shall under no circumstances deliver items before formal written approval by PPPL.

6.7 SHIPMENT

a. If requested by PPPL, the supplier shall withhold shipment for up to 60 days to allow preparations at destination for Site Acceptance by the port integrators.

b. The supplier shall submit a Release for Shipment form [V02-13].

c. The supplier will issue Task Orders directly to the logistics service provider for transportation, shipment, logistics, and customs clearance associated with finished products under this Agreement. To facilitate the transportation activities being undertaken by the LSP and Company, the supplier is responsible for the timely provision of all transport documentation and information listed in this section. Transportation/freight costs associated with the finished products/deliverables required by the SOW are expressly unallowable under this Agreement.

d. The supplier shall load packaged components to be transported onto the Logistics Service Provider conveyance (e.g., truck, van, trailer, vessel, ocean container, air freight container, rail car) at the factory.

e. When a Release for Shipment form is specified, shipment must not be made until the shipping release form is signed and returned by PPPL.

6.8 SITE ACCEPTANCE and INTEGRATION SUPPORT

a. The supplier shall support PPPL and IO during the Site Acceptance using the Site Acceptance

Plan presented at the MRR after delivery to the port integration facility. The supplier shall use the On site Assembly Plans for the Ex-Vessel Components located in UP 2, 8, 11, 14 [V02-44] for the verification and final acceptance of UWAVS assemblies.

b. The supplier shall rectify any non-conformances during receipt inspections.

c. The supplier shall provide technical integration support to the port integrator.

d. If design issues are identified during this integration process, the supplier shall raise this to

PPPL for adjudication.

7 QUALITY ASSURANCE

7.1 INSPECTION / SURVEILLANCE / AUDIT BY PPPL

a. With prior written notification, PPPL may conduct source surveillance activities at the supplier’s facility to ensure quality objectives are met.

b. Authorized representatives of PPPL, the U. S. Government, and ITER Organization (IO) shall have the right at all reasonable times to visit the supplier's premises and those of supplier's sub-tier vendors for the purposes of inspection, surveillance, audit and/or obtaining any required information as may be necessary to assure that items or services are being furnished in accordance with specified requirements.

c. Such visits shall be coordinated with the supplier's personnel to minimize interference with the normal operations of premises.

d. The supplier shall make available records and documentation necessary for this function and shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of PPPL and/or U. S.

Government representatives in the performance of their duties. PPPL and the U. S. Government recognize the supplier's right to withhold information concerning proprietary processes. The supplier agrees to insert the paragraph above in each sub-tier procurement issued hereunder.

e. The supplier shall provide the above representatives access to all data, operating areas and processes pertinent to the subcontract, without exception.

f. Source surveillance by any of the above representatives shall not constitute product acceptance by PPPL and shall in no way relieve the supplier of the responsibility to furnish acceptable items.

g. This requirement to provide access on-site for quality assurance surveillance shall also flow down to all the supplier’s sub-tier contractors.

7.2 SUPPLIER’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONFORMANCE

a. Neither PPPL's review and/or approval of supplier's documents nor PPPL's inspection of supplier's items or services shall relieve the supplier of responsibility for full compliance with requirements of the purchase order/contract. The supplier is responsible for assuring that all requirements and restrictions are imposed on any sub-tier suppliers.

7.3 CHANGES TO PPPL APPROVED DOCUMENTS

a. Revisions or changes by the supplier to documents previously approved by PPPL shall be reviewed by PPPL and shall require approval by PPPL prior to use by the supplier.

7.4 SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

a. The supplier shall establish and maintain an effective Quality Assurance Program to assure that the supplier's work meets the required level of quality and is performed in accordance with contractual requirements.

b. The supplier's quality assurance function shall be organized to have sufficient authority and independence to identify quality problems, verify conformance of supplied items or services to specified requirements, and obtain satisfactory resolution of conflicts involving quality.

c. The supplier shall perform planned, periodic audits of the various aspects of its QA Program by persons not directly responsible for the area being audited. The supplier shall make available written reports of these audits to PPPL.

7.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

a. The supplier shall submit within 20 working days of subcontract/purchase order award and prior to start of manufacture a plan describing the specific quality assurance and quality control procedures and practices to meet the requirements of this subcontract/purchase order, for PPPL review and approval.

b. The supplier shall identify any planned subcontracted portions of the work scope in the Quality Assurance Plan.

c. The supplier shall describe the applicable contract/SOW requirements and the method of requirement flow-down to sub-tier suppliers.

7.6 INSPECTION PLAN

a. The supplier’s Inspection Plan shall: identify parts, show their integrated flow into end items, identify critical manufacturing operations; and show inspections and the characteristics/dimensions to be inspected. The Plan may include flow chart(s), Process Sheets, Shop Travelers, and inspection sheets, etc. PPPL may designate selected critical operations as mandatory "witness" points.

b. The supplier shall submit revisions or changes to the approved Inspection Plans for review by PPPL and shall require reviewed approval by PPPL prior to use by the supplier.

7.7 INSPECTION

a. The supplier shall perform inspections and tests in accordance with written procedures referencing criteria for acceptance or rejection.

b. The supplier inspection shall include assessment of:

• Dimensions: measuring and checking all notes and dimensions on drawings, both explicit

• Material: verifying the type and properties of the materials used.

• Appearance: checking the part's surface finish, color, and overall appearance.

7.8 DOCUMENT TRACEABILITY AND RECORDS

a. The supplier shall maintain a system of documentation whereby the results of required operations, inspections, examinations, and tests are systematically compiled, indexed and stored.

b. Such objective evidence may include "travelers"; and material test, certification, inspection, examination, test and discrepancy reports; which shall be complete, legible, signed, and dated and be traceable to subject items.

7.9 WITNESS / HOLD POINTS AND NOTIFICATION OF PPPL IN ADVANCE

a. PPPL reserves the right to designate selected manufacturing, inspection and/or test operations as mandatory Witness or Hold points.

b. The supplier shall provide PPPL with notice five working days in advance of such points.

These default hold points apply, in addition to any others that may be added for this work.

c. Adequate inspection records shall be maintained and available for PPPL's review.

7.10 PERFORMANCE AND DOCUMENTATION OF INSPECTIONS AND TESTS

a. The supplier’s inspection/test report(s) shall indicate the results of all tests and compliance with all drawing notes.

b. The supplier shall report actual values for all drawing dimensions, including Basic, and excluding Reference. The supplier shall use either a drawing copy or an inspection report as the report, but the supplier shall clearly indicate the drawing zone and actual measured values.

Regardless of format, the supplier report shall be dated and signed.

7.11 EQUIPMENT / MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION AND STATUS

a. The supplier shall maintain material and equipment identification and traceability throughout processing.

b. The supplier shall ensure the status of acceptability is readily discernible through the supplier's use of tags, stamps, serial numbers or other positive means.

7.12 DOCUMENT REVIEW, APPROVAL AND CONTROL

a. The supplier shall implement a system for review and approval of design documents (drawings, specifications, etc.), prior to issuance for use, and for approval and incorporation of changes in a formal and orderly manner.

b. The supplier shall control obsolete documents to prevent inadvertent use.

c. The supplier shall also control PPPL-furnished design documents.

d. The supplier shall ensure that any models are in sync with the applicable drawings, and that obsolete information is not used.

7.13 NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND NOTIFICATION

a. The supplier shall implement a system for review and approval of design documents (drawings, specifications, etc.), prior to issuance for use, and for approval and incorporation of changes in a formal and orderly manner.

b. The supplier shall control obsolete documents to prevent inadvertent use.

c. The supplier shall also control PPPL-furnished design documents.

d. The supplier shall ensure that any models are in sync with the applicable drawings, and that obsolete information is not used.

7.14 MEASURING EQUIPMENT / CALIBRATION

a. The supplier shall perform acceptance inspections and tests using calibrated measuring equipment.

b. The supplier shall ensure that the calibration standards are traceable to the National Institute for

Standards and Technology (NIST) or equivalent.

c. Where such standards do not exist, the basis used for calibration shall be documented.

d. The supplier shall ensure the Standards used for calibration are not to be used for shop inspections and shall be protected against damage or degradation.

7.15 SUBMITTAL OF COMPLETED PROCESS HISTORY (DOCUMENTATION

PACKAGE)

a. The supplier shall provide a Process History that includes a compilation of digital documents

(in pdf, Microsoft Word, or Microsoft Excel format), providing evidence of the acceptability of the work performed.

b. The Process History for each item shall be provided to PPPL with the Shipping Release Request. The Process History shall include the following at a minimum:

● Material Certifications:

o The supplier shall submit Manufacturer’s Certified Material Test Reports (CMTRs) showing relevant chemical, mechanical and electrical properties of materials used, where applicable, to PPPL.