Technical Proposal Scoring Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 37 KB Posted Apr 17, 2025

Attached to: Language & Interpretation Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: 70SBUR25R00000006
Issued by: Department of Homeland Security US Citizen and Immigration Services

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Apr 18, 2025

The Technical Proposal Scoring Sheet is a comprehensive evaluation document for a Language & Interpretation Support Services contract solicited by the Department of Homeland Security (USCIS). The solicitation (Number 70SBUR25R00000006) is a full and open competition with a small business reserve, anticipating 3-5 multiple-award Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contracts with a $100,000 minimum guarantee. Offerors will be evaluated across three technical subfactors: Technical Approach & Language Capabilities, Management Approach & Staffing Plan, and Past Performance.

The scoring sheet details extensive evaluation criteria, including the ability to provide interpretation services for over 100 languages, with a focus on more common languages like Spanish, Mandarin, Punjabi, and Farsi. Key requirements include 24/7 interpreter availability, telecommunication capabilities, language proficiency, staffing flexibility, compliance with confidentiality and privacy considerations, and demonstrated past performance. The preproposal conference is scheduled for April 28, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time, with questions accepted until April 24, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Contractors must submit proposals using the provided Technical Proposal Scoring Sheet and Price Proposal spreadsheet.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Language & Interpretation Support Services, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
70SBUR25R00000006 Q_A.pdf	PDF	May 2, 2025
70SBUR25R00000006 Amend 0001 SF 30.pdf	PDF	May 2, 2025
70SBUR25R00000006 Amend 0001 Conformed Copy.pdf	PDF	May 2, 2025
Price Proposal.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 17, 2025
70SBUR25R00000006.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2025

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Technical Evaluation Scoring

WHEN COMPLETED WITH PROPOSAL INFORMATION - Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104	Score
Technical Subfactor 1: Technical Approach & Required Language Capabilities	0
Technical Subfactor 2: Management Approach & Staffing Plan	0
Technical Subfactor 3: Past Performance	0
Technical Score (Overall)	0
Yellow Highlighted Cells are those requiring entries by the Offeror (On Technical Subfactor Tabs)

Technical Subfactor 1

WHEN COMPLETED WITH PROPOSAL INFORMATION - Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Technical Subfactor 1: Technical Approach & Required Language Capabilities

Technical Subfactor 1: Score:

Technical Approach (PWS Sections 6, 9 and 23)	How well does the Offeror's Technical Proposal address the ability to satisfy the requirements of the PWS Section 6 (SPECIFIC TASKS/REQUIREMENTS)?	Will the Offeror have the capability of telecommunication technology (i.e., landline and cell phone, Microsoft Teams, email, fax (machine or electronic), video conferencing, and basic internet function)) to provide interpreter services when conducting interviews?	Does the Offeror currently have the capability to provide, or will the Offeror be able to recruit and provide, both a ASL and CDI upon request from an Asylum Office Government representative and accommodate sign language requests such that a confirmation of scheduling is provided within seventy-two (72) hours (three (3) calendar days)?	Will the Offeror provide at minimum one (1) dedicated toll-free telephone number (domestic and international) with a security Personal Identification Number (PIN) that the Government would use to access the interpreter services on an as-needed basis, twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) calendar days per week, 365 calendar days per year?	How well does the Offeror's Technical Proposal address the ability to satisfy the requirements of the PWS Section 9 (QUALITY CONTROL)?	How well does the Offeror's Technical Proposal address the ability to satisfy the requirements of the PWS Section 23 (PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & QUALITY ASSURANCE)?
Technical Approach: Score						Unsatisfactory
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

	Required Language Capabilities (PWS Attachment 25.1)
	Required Language Capabilities: Score
	0
	PWS Attachment 25.1 Required Languages
(Updated 12/5/2024)	Table A, More Common / More Frequently Required Languages/Dialects, or

Table B, Less Common / Less Frequently Required Languages/Dialects (Based on the Estimated minutes/year) Estimated minutes/year

(This is the total for all awarded contracts;

Note that the Government anticipates 3-5 multiple-award contracts; Therefore, it is not anticipated that this entire workload would be carried by any one awardee) Is this a language for which the Offeror either currently has or will be able to recruit and provide Interpretation Services? Score How many Interpreters meeting the PWS requirements does the Offeror currently have available to begin the Entry on Duty (EOD) Application process immediately after award?

Proof of these numbers detailed in the Technical Proposal (Section 25 consistent with the PWS Section 25) Score How many Interpreters meeting the PWS requirements does the Offeror estimate it will be able to recruit to begin the Entry on Duty (EOD) Application process within forty-five (45) days after award?

Strategy to achieve these numbers detailed in the Staffing Plan (Section 14 consistent with the PWS Section 14) Score Is this a language for which the Offeror either currently has or will be able to recruit and provide

Document Translation Services?	Score
	Spanish	Table A	17,637,215		0		0		0		0
	Mandarin	Table A	1,703,481		0		0		0		0
	Punjabi	Table A	1,126,282		0		0		0		0
	Farsi-Afghani (Also known as Dari)	Table A	734,532		0		0		0		0
	Russian	Table A	715,668		0		0		0		0
	Korean	Table A	519,069		0		0		0		0
	Pashto (Also spelled Pushtu)	Table A	519,069		0		0		0		0
	Arabic	Table A	504,069		0		0		0		0
	Hindi	Table A	293,400		0		0		0		0
	French	Table A	273,813		0		0		0		0
	Portuguese	Table A	273,813		0		0		0		0
	Bengali	Table A	224,844		0		0		0		0
	Haitian Creole	Table A	175,875		0		0		0		0
	Nepali	Table A	151,494		0		0		0		0
	Quiche (Also spelled K'iche)	Table A	131,906		0		0		0		0
	Tigrinya	Table A	131,906		0		0		0		0
	Pulaar	Table A	131,906		0		0		0		0
	Turkish	Table A	106,443		0		0		0		0
	Mam	Table A	102,525		0		0		0		0
	Hausa	Table A	102,525		0		0		0		0
	Armenian	Table A	93,608		0		0		0		0
	Gujarati	Table A	82,938		0		0		0		0
	Tagalog	Table A	66,108		0		0		0		0
	Hmong	Table A	66,108		0		0		0		0
	Uzbek	Table A	66,108		0		0		0		0
	Swahili	Table A	66,108		0		0		0		0
	Amharic	Table A	44,072		0		0		0		0
	Serbian	Table A	44,072		0		0		0		0
	Azerbaijani	Table A	44,072		0		0		0		0
	Ibo	Table A	44,072		0		0		0		0
	Urdu	Table A	36,727		0		0		0		0
	Fukienese	Table A	36,727		0		0		0		0
	Igbo	Table A	36,727		0		0		0		0
	Kinyarwanda	Table A	36,727		0		0		0		0
	Assyrian	Table A	36,727		0		0		0		0
	Bosnian	Table A	36,727		0		0		0		0
	Greek	Table A	35,527		0		0		0		0
	Lao	Table A	35,527		0		0		0		0
	Sinhalese	Table A	35,527		0		0		0		0
	Bulgarian	Table A	35,527		0		0		0		0
	Hebrew	Table A	35,527		0		0		0		0
	Macedonian	Table A	35,527		0		0		0		0
	Farsi-Iranian	Table A	35,257		0		0		0		0
	Tamil	Table A	31,340		0		0		0		0
	Malayalam	Table A	31,340		0		0		0		0
	Romanian	Table A	29,382		0		0		0		0
	Montenegrin	Table A	29,382		0		0		0		0
	Vietnamese	Table A	24,484		0		0		0		0
	Polish	Table A	24,484		0		0		0		0
	Albanian	Table A	21,547		0		0		0		0
	Fulani	Table A	21,547		0		0		0		0
	Serbo-Croatian	Table A	21,547		0		0		0		0
	Telugu	Table A	21,547		0		0		0		0
	Konjobal (Also known as Q`anjob`al)	Table A	21,546		0		0		0		0
	Malay	Table A	21,546		0		0		0		0
	Shanghai	Table A	21,546		0		0		0		0
	Thai	Table A	21,546		0		0		0		0
	Bahasa Indonesia	Table A	18,608		0		0		0		0
	Italian	Table A	18,608		0		0		0		0
	Lingala	Table A	15,670		0		0		0		0
	Japanese	Table A	15,670		0		0		0		0
	Wolof	Table B	1,659		0		0		0		0
	Quichua (Canar Highland dialect)	Table B	1,521		0		0		0		0
	Georgian	Table B	1,521		0		0		0		0
	Cantonese	Table B	1,521		0		0		0		0
	Somali	Table B	1,521		0		0		0		0
	Kazakh	Table B	983		0		0		0		0
	Quechua	Table B	983		0		0		0		0
	Quichua (Chimborazo Highland dialect)	Table B	797		0		0		0		0
	Hassaniya	Table B	491		0		0		0		0
	Burmese	Table B	491		0		0		0		0
	Ixel	Table B	441		0		0		0		0
	Ukrainian	Table B	430		0		0		0		0
	Bambara	Table B	246		0		0		0		0
	Acateco	Table B	234		0		0		0		0
	Berber (Also known as Tamazight)	Table B	222		0		0		0		0
	Twi	Table B	199		0		0		0		0
	Kyrgyzstani	Table B	199		0		0		0		0
	Akan	Table B	199		0		0		0		0
	Sylheti	Table B	199		0		0		0		0
	Garifuna	Table B	199		0		0		0		0
	Krio	Table B	199		0		0		0		0
	Tajiki	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Marathi	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Haryanvi	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Mixtec	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Chuj	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Kaqchikel	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Kirghiz	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Pidgin English	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Soninke	Table B	184		0		0		0		0
	Quichua (Salasaca Highland Dialect)	Table B	149		0		0		0		0
	Oromo	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Mongolian	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Yoruba	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Foo Chow	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Hungarian	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Kurdish	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Gheg Albanian	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Kirundi	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Maymay	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Mandinka	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Sorani Kurdish	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
	Karen	Table B	124		0		0		0		0
				10% of the Subtotal	0	20% of the Subtotal	0	20% of the Subtotal	0	10% of the Subtotal	0

Technical Subfactor 2

WHEN COMPLETED WITH PROPOSAL INFORMATION - Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Technical Subfactor 2: Management Approach & Staffing Plan

Technical Subfactor 2: Score

Management Approach (PWS Sections 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 24) How well does the Offeror's Technical Proposal address the ability to satisfy the requirements of the PWS Section 7 (INTERPRETER REQUIREMENTS, QUALIFICATIONS, & FLUENCY)? How well does the Offeror's Technical Proposal address the ability to satisfy the requirements of the PWS Section 8 (CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL)? Will the Offeror have qualified staff for managing accounts and security issues, i.e. clearing interpreters through the USCIS Office of Security and Integrity (OSI) and onboarding? Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 10 (CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVACY CONSIDERATIONS)? How well does the Offeror's Technical Proposal address the ability to satisfy the requirements of the PWS Section 11 (OTHER APPLICABLE CONDITIONS)? Will the Offeror have the capability to stagger interpreter schedules to ensure coverage across all timezones?

The Technical Proposal must detail how the Offeror will execute.	Will the Offeror be able to staff support on the weekends on short notice.	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 12 (REPORTING REQUIREMENTS)?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 13 (POST AWARD CONFERENCE/MEETING)?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 15 (TRANSITION SUPPORT IN/OUT PLAN)?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 16 (PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP))?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 17 (DOCUMENTATION)?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 18 (CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN/BUSINESS DISRUPTION PLAN)?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 19 (CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE MEETING)?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 20 (E-VERIFY)?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 21 (INVOICES)?	Will the Offeror be able to comply with the requirements of the PWS Section 24 (DELIVERABLES)?
	Management Approach: Score
	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Staffing Plan (PWS Section 14)	How well does the Offeror's Staffing Plan address the ability to satisfy the requirements of the PWS Section 14 (STAFFING PLAN)?	Will the Offeror have the capability to maintain an adequate workforce of 90% on-board for the uninterrupted performance of all tasks defined in the PWS?
	Staffing Plan: Score
	0	0	0

Technical Subfactor 3

WHEN COMPLETED WITH PROPOSAL INFORMATION - Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Technical Subfactor 3: Past Performance

Technical Subfactor 3: Score

Past Performance Example Contract/Order (Up to 1 of 3) Contract/Order Number Contracting Officer/Ordering Individual Point Of Contact (POC) Name & E-mail Address For Performace Ratings verification (If determined to be necessary by the Government) Recent Past Performance: A past or current contract/order with supporting information included at the end of the Technical Proposal with services performed by the Offeror within two (2) years of the date specified for receipt of offers. Relevant Past Performance: A past or current contract/order with supporting information included at the end of the Technical Proposal with services performed by the Offeror that are similar to the services required by this solicitation.

	Performance Rating - Quality
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Schedule
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Cost Control
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Management
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Small Business
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Regulatory

of the services performed by the Offeror

Past Performance Example Contract/Order (Up to 1 of 3): Score
0			0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Past Performance Example Contract/Order (Up to 2 of 3)	Contract/Order Number	Contracting Officer/Ordering Individual

Point Of Contact (POC) Name & E-mail Address For Performace Ratings verification (If determined to be necessary by the Government) Recent Past Performance: A past or current contract/order with supporting information included at the end of the Technical Proposal with services performed by the Offeror within two (2) years of the date specified for receipt of offers. Relevant Past Performance: A past or current contract/order with supporting information included at the end of the Technical Proposal with services performed by the Offeror that are similar to the services required by this solicitation.

	Performance Rating - Quality
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Schedule
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Cost Control
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Management
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Small Business
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Regulatory

of the services performed by the Offeror

Past Performance Example Contract/Order (Up to 2 of 3): Score
0			0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Past Performance Example Contract/Order (Up to 3 of 3)	Contract/Order Number	Contracting Officer/Ordering Individual

	Performance Rating - Quality
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Schedule
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Cost Control
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Management
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Small Business
of the services performed by the Offeror	Performance Rating - Regulatory

of the services performed by the Offeror

Past Performance Example Contract/Order (Up to 3 of 3): Score
0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Aug 13, 2026.