Technical Evaluation Criteria.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR RECREATION SITES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140L0321R0001
About this file
This document outlines the technical evaluation criteria for a solicitation seeking janitorial services for recreation sites. The Bureau of Land Management Carlsbad Field Office is seeking proposals on a lowest price technically acceptable basis to provide regularly scheduled maintenance, cleaning services, site maintenance, and restroom maintenance at nine designated recreation sites for a base year plus four option years. Offerors must submit pricing in one volume and non-pricing information addressing the evaluation factors in a separate volume by December 21, 2020. Evaluation factors include the offeror's approach to performing the required tasks and meeting COVID-19 guidelines, capacity and expertise to perform the work, and examples of past performance on similar federal, state, or local government contracts. The solicitation is available on SAM.gov and questions are due by December 15, 2020.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 52.222.26 Deviation Clause_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Amendment_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140L0321R0001_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination 2015 5455 Rev 13 6.6.2020.pdf | ||
| SunsetReef_DirectionMap_v2.pdf | ||
| Chosa Campground Map.pdf | ||
| Hackberry Map.PDF | ||
| Bid Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Conoco Lake.pdf | ||
| Parks Ranch Driving Directions - Detail.pdf | ||
| BackCountry ByWay Map.PDF | ||
| La Cueva Map.pdf | ||
| Black_River Map.pdf | ||
| Alkali Lake Map.pdf | ||
| Hackberry_Lake_ Dunes map.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L0321R0001.pdf | ||
| Carlsbad Rec Custodial Services Performance Statement 2021.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Technical Evaluation Criteria
Carlsbad Recreation Sites Custodial Services
The Government intends to award the contract to a responsible party whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation process for the regularly scheduled custodial services to the recreation areas and provides “Best Value to the Government” on a Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis.
A Technical Evaluation Panel consisting of no less than three members will conduct the initial evaluation. The panel will include the government project manager who is technically qualified to evaluate all proposals. Upon completion of the evaluation period, the panel will review each proposal and make their final award recommendation to the Contracting Officer. Provide your bid in two separate volumes: Volume 1-Pricing. Volume 2 – Non-pricing, which includes information that addresses the evaluation factors.
All evaluation factors other than price, when combined will be weighted equally. The evaluation factors listed below will be used to select the contractor that offers the BLM the LTPA offer.
Evaluation Factors:
· Approach to performing the required tasks as described in the schedule of work within the period of performance. The proposal shall include a narrative explaining how the work will be carried out in terms of the techniques, procedures, and cleaning schedule. Please, include a description for any contingency plans related to Covid-19 to follow any CDC guidelines.
· Capacity and expertise to perform the required tasks within the period of performance and to meet all goals and objectives on schedule.
· Past performance. The proposal shall include examples of successful, timely completion of similar work. The examples may come from federal, state, or local government. Include the following information:
· Name of the job (to include address)
· Project Prime’s name
· Issuing agency or company
· Contract/Identification number
· Start and completion dates
· Brief description of the scope of work
· How the work is substantially similar to the proposed project
· No less than two (2) valid references that includes:
· Agency name, Point of Contact, Phone Number, Email Address
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .