TAB12a - PAST PERFORMANCE.pdf
PDF 390 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ASBESTOS ABATEMENT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2121301C62282
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| TAB12a - FAR MATRIX SERVICE.pdf | ||
| TAB 7m - WAGE DETERMINATION.pdf | ||
| TAB 3c - STATEMENT OF WORK.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
U.S. COAST GUARD
BASE CLEVELAND, PROCUREMENT & CONTRACTING BRANCH CONTRACTOR
EVALUATION FORM
The U. S. Coast Guard, Base Cleveland, Procurement & Contracting has a requirement for asbestos abatement for Air Station Traverse City. As a result, we are performing a survey and reference investigation on possible contractors for the upcoming contract.
The information contained herein is considered “Source Selection Information” in accordance with FAR 3.104. Therefore, it is asked that you treat it accordingly. While the results of the overall past performance survey may be discussed with the contractor, FAR Part 15.610 and 15.1004 prohibits the release of the name of the individual responding to the survey.
Responses to this questionnaire should be E-MAILED TO SONYA CALIHAN AT Sonya.J.Calihan@uscg.mil
Should you have any questions concerning this survey, please contact the above named person at
(216) 902-6339.
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION: (Fill-in)
NAME OF CONTRACTOR BEING RATED:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
CONTRACT TYPE:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
TYPE OF SERVICE PROVIDED:
RESPONDENT’S NAME: PHONE:
E-Mail FAX:
RESPONDENT’S COMPANY NAME:
II. GENERAL GUIDANCE:
The following questions are divided into two types:
YES/NO and RATING. When responding to the RATING type questions, choose the number on the scale of 1 to 3, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Responses to the RATING type questions may be supplemented with an explanatory narrative as well. The numbers 1 to 3 correspond with the following descriptive values: Please assign an overall rating for each section where indicated.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
SEE FAR 3.104
Please rate the contractor on a graduated scale from 1 to 3 in accordance with the following descriptive values:
Excellent (1) - Meets contractual requirements and significantly exceeds contract requirements to the Government’s benefit.
Satisfactory (2) – Meets contractual requirements.
UnSatisfactory (3) – Does not meet contractual requirement and is not in the best interest of the
Government.
IF AN ELEMENT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO YOUR SERVICES, PLEASE RATE AS N/A.
III. QUALITY OF SERVICE: RATING
1. The contractor’s level of effort regarding Biological Evaluation met your requirements
2. The contractor’s initiative at correcting problems or deficiencies prior to Government intervention
3. The contractor’s response to emergencies
4. Contractor’s overall quality of service
5. Has a contract discrepancy report (or equivalent) ever been issued?
6. Has an election ever been made to not exercise an option due to contractor’s poor performance?
OVERALL RATING FOR QUALITY OF SERVICES
COMMENTS:__________________________________________________________________
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
1. Rating for customer satisfaction
2. Ability of the contractor to meet the terms of the contract
OVERALL RATING FOR CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
______________________________________________________________________________ FOR
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Yes___No___
C. MANAGEMENT/LABOR:
1. Performance of on-site management staff.
2. Performance of labor force. 3. Corporate management’s support of contract performance.
4. Have there been any labor disputes or violations of the Service Contract Act?
OVERALL RATING FOR MANAGEMENT/LABOR
V. GENERAL/BUSINESS RELATIONS:
1. Contractor’s preparation and training of personnel.
2. Contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.
3. Contractor’s ability to meet the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price.
4. Contractor’s overall cooperation relative to this contract
5. Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems?
6. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to this contract?
7. Willingness to award another contract to this contractor.
OVERALL RATING FOR GENERAL/BUSINESS RELATIONS
COMMENTS:_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON ANY RATING ELEMENT CAN BE MADE BELOW:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .