Tab 16 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Configuration, Logistics, and Management Resource Solutions (CLMRS) Supply Chain Transformation Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-22-R-00030DRAFT
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information on a related federal contract opportunity for supply chain transformation support services. The past performance questionnaire requests references and ratings on a previous contractor's quality, timeliness, cost control, business relations, customer satisfaction, integrity, and performance on a similar contract. It will be used to evaluate proposals submitted in response to Screening Information Request 6973GH-22-R-00030 issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Franchise Acquisition Services. This pre-solicitation notice provides details on the opportunity, which seeks proposals to provide support services to the FAA's Configuration, Logistics, and Management Resource Solutions program office utilizing an IFS system. Interested parties must submit proposed pricing using an attached Excel spreadsheet by January 31st, unless extended, and distribute past performance questionnaires for return to the FAA by January 10th.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Tab 16 Schedule B Price Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Tab 16 6973GH-22-R-00030.pdf | ||
| Tab 03g SOW SCTS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Supply Chain Transformation Support, SIR 6973GH-22-R-00030 Please return the completed questionnaire to the Contract Specialist at: Joshua.M.Frisch@faa.gov
Please complete and/or verify the following reference check information:
1. Name of Contractor: __________________________________________________________________
2. What type of Service was provided (i.e. cost accounting, budgeting, financial management, etc.)?
3. Type of Contract/Agreement for Pricing (i.e. firm fixed-price, fixed rate per hour (labor-hour, T&M), cost-reimbursable, etc.):
4. Contract Number: _________________________________
5. Total Contract Amount: $____________________________
6. Date of Contract Award: ____________________________
7. Contract Period of Performance: Start ________________ Complete __________________
8. Contractor Role / Responsibility (circle one): Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor
Please complete and/or verify the following responder information:
Name of Responding Point of Contact: _____________________________________________________
Agency / Organization: _________________________________________________________________
Mailing Address: __________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: __________________________________
Fax Number: __________________________________
E-mail Address: __________________________________
1. Quality/Timeliness of Service.
a. How would you rate the contractor's general overall compliance with contract requirements?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the timeliness of the Contractor's service - delivered reports on time and adhering to the required schedule?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) |
c. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to meet contract requirements?
| Provided abundant resources | ( ) |
| Provided sufficient resources | ( ) |
| Provided minimal resources | ( ) |
| Provided insufficient resources | ( ) |
d. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to solve problems?
| Provided abundant resources | ( ) |
| Provided sufficient resources | ( ) |
| Provided minimal resources | ( ) |
| Provided insufficient resources | ( ) |
e. How would you rate the contractor on the timeliness of its responses to inquiries or other administrative matters?
| Extremely timely | ( ) | |
| Generally timely | ( ) | |
| Generally not timely | ( ) | |
| Seldom timely | ( ) |
2. Cost Control.
a. If applicable, to what extent did the contractor meet the proposed cost estimates?
| Less than estimated cost | ( ) | ||
| Comparatively equal to estimate | ( ) | ||
| Exceeded the costs | ( ) | ||
| Considerably surpassed estimate | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the contractor's initiative, if any, in reducing overall costs to the Government?
| Extremely efficient | ( ) |
| Generally efficient | ( ) |
| Generally inefficient | ( ) |
| Extremely inefficient | ( ) |
3. Business Relations - Effective Management.
a. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government (or entity with requirement) counterparts?
| Considerably successful | ( ) | |
| Generally successful | ( ) | |
| Little Success | ( ) | |
| No success | ( ) |
b. To what extent did the contractor display initiative in meeting contract requirements?
| Displayed considerable initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed some initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed little initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed no initiative | ( ) |
c. Was the contractor's selection and use of personnel appropriate for the performance of this contract?
| Provided highly qualified personnel | ( ) | |
| Provided qualified personnel | ( ) | |
| Provided minimal personnel | ( ) | |
| Provided insufficient personnel | ( ) |
d. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Government's (or other) staff?
| Extremely effective | ( ) |
| Generally effective | ( ) |
| Generally ineffective | ( ) |
| Extremely ineffective | ( ) |
e. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default, or is a termination pending?
( ) Yes If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance or delivery schedules.)
( ) No
f. Has it ever been necessary to send this Contractor a Notice to Cure letter?
( ) Yes If yes, please explain and indicate the status.
( ) No
g. How would you rate the performance of the contractor's key personnel?
| Extremely effective | ( ) |
| Generally effective | ( ) |
| Generally ineffective | ( ) |
| Extremely ineffective | ( ) |
4. Customer Satisfaction.
a. To what extent did the contractor provide timely assistance, when responding to problems?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | ||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the contractor's response to inquiries related to administrative issues?
| Displayed considerable initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed some initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed little initiative | ( ) | |
| Displayed no initiative | ( ) |
c. Would you select this contractor again?
( ) Yes ( ) No
5. Integrity.
a. Did you experience any integrity problems with this Contractor?
( ) Yes If yes, please explain.
( ) No
b. Did the contractor maintain integrity during contract performance? If not, please provide reason.
( ) Yes ( ) No If no, please explain.
6. Please provide any other comments you may have.
08/07/2020
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .