T-ESD and ESB Class Alteration Design Support PWS.docx

DOCX document 88 KB Posted

Attached to
T-ESD and ESB Class Alteration Design Support
Solicitation number
N32205-26-RFPREQ-DSM-N7-0636
Issued by

About this file

This is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for T-ESD and ESB Class Alteration Design Support services required by the Military Sealift Command (MSC). The contractor must develop three (3) TRANSALT (Transportation Alteration) work packages for modifications onboard T-ESD and ESB Class vessels over a 32-week period of performance. The work encompasses design and engineering services across naval architecture, electrical, mechanical, and structural disciplines, requiring the contractor to conduct detailed ship checks on one T-ESD Class vessel and one ESB Class vessel, then produce comprehensive work packages including engineering calculations, contract guidance drawings, bills of materials, cost estimates, weight reports, test procedures, technical manuals, and spare parts lists. All deliverables must comply with American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) rules, USCG regulations, SOLAS/IMO requirements, and applicable federal standards, with drawings prepared in AutoCAD LT 2021 and technical documents in MS Word 2016 format.

The three specific TRANSALT projects include: (1) upgrading ESB Class sludge transfer pumps to double capacity from 22 gpm with air-operated positive displacement pumps; (2) modernizing engine room bridge crane components by replacing obsolete rotary limit switches and determining other obsolete components requiring OEM approval; and (3) replacing unreliable two-stage reciprocating piston starting air compressors with rotary screw compressors on T-ESD and ESB Class vessels with remote operation capability from the IACMS system. The contractor must assign qualified key personnel including a Project Manager (minimum 5 years multi-disciplinary shipboard experience, B.S. degree), Lead Electrical Engineer (B.S. in Electrical Engineering, 5 years marine electrical design experience), Lead Mechanical Engineer (B.S. in Engineering, 5 years marine mechanical experience), Lead Naval Architect/Structural Engineer (B.S. in Naval Architecture/Structural Engineering, 5 years related experience), and a separate QA Engineer (5 years related engineering experience, cannot be dual-hatted). Deliverables follow a three-phase review process (P1, P2, and Rev-) with MSC retaining unlimited rights to all work products, and payment is structured as 100% upon Rev- acceptance and contract completion.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SOURCES SOUGHT NOTICE - T-ESD and ESB Class Alteration.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Title: T-ESD and ESB Class Alteration Design Support

Technical POC (TPOC): Christopher Lloyd christopher.j.lloyd2.civ@us.navy.mil

(757) 341-7647

Enclosures:(1) TRANSALT T-ESB-24-013R Requirements
(2) TRANSALT T-ESB-25-051R Requirements
(3) TRANSALT ESB 3-0015R Requirements

1. Background: The Military Sealift Command (MSC) requires Contractor professional engineering services for the development of TRANSALT work packages outlined in the Enclosures listed above. This performance work statement (PWS) details the standard deliverables that are generated when developing a TRANSALT. This PWS is used in conjunction with the Enclosures listed above and detailed in the Enclosures themselves. The Enclosures call out the required deliverables as defined in this PWS and identifies any non-standard deliverables that are necessary for development of a TRANSALT

2. Scope: Design and develop three (3) MSC approved TRANSALT work packages for the execution of modifications outlined in the Enclosures onboard the T-ESD and ESB Class. Each TRANSALT work package consists, at a minimum, of a work item, contract guidance drawings, consolidated list of materials, production estimate, and weight report. Enclosures will detail additional deliverables over and above this minimum requirement.

3. Specific Tasks: The contractor must perform the following tasks to develop work packages as required in Section 2 above:

3.1. Kickoff Meeting – The Contractor must conduct a kick-off meeting with MSC in accordance with Section 6.1 to discuss all work packages required by Section 2 above. All Key Technical Personnel must participate in the kick-off meeting. The Contractor must arrange the date and time with the Contracting Officer (KO) and Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) to attend a kickoff meeting via teleconference.

3.2. Progress Meetings – The Contractor must host regular progress meetings to discuss all work packages required by Section 2 above. The purpose of these meetings will be to discuss physical progress of the project and to identify any issues that may impact the design or schedule. A standard agenda must be developed and customized by the Contractor for each meeting. The frequency of these meetings must be held in accordance with Section 6.1. Deviation from this periodicity or the cancellation of any meetings must be approved by the TPOC. Meetings must be held at the Contractor’s facility or via teleconference. The format for each meeting must be approved by the TPOC.

3.3. Meeting Minutes – The Contractor must provide minutes from all meetings to be delivered in accordance with Section 6.1. These minutes must document the discussion (including any formal concerns raised by the Government), any decisions made during the meeting, and all action items (including the individual responsible, the deliverable, and the due date).

3.4. Project Plan – The Contractor must develop a Gantt chart for each ship to account for the development and submission of all deliverables in relation to work packages required by Section 2 above in accordance the milestones identified in Section 6.1. The Project Plan will serve as a metric to gauge the Contractor’s schedule performance and must be updated and submitted to the TPOC monthly to reflect actual progress. The start date of the Project Plan must be aligned with the issue date of this task.

3.5. Ship Check Plan – The Contractor must forward the ship check plan for all work packages required by Section 2 above for MSC review in accordance with Section 6.1. The plan must provide a chronological scheme of how the ship survey is to be conducted and the types of information to be acquired and recorded. Specific information required for each modification must be identified to ensure all data that is necessary to develop complete work packages is obtained. Any special access to secure spaces or tanks must be identified.

3.6. Ship Check – The Contractor must conduct detailed ship checks for all work packages required by Section 2 above, to survey and gather the necessary information in order to provide complete work package deliverables required herein. A shipcheck must be completed on one T-ESD Class vessel and one ESB Class vessel for a total of two (2) shipchecks. During each ship check, the Contractor must gather information required to support the development of the TRANSALT work package. Key Technical Personnel must attend the ship checks along with any additional support personnel necessary to gather all required information in the time provided.

3.6.1. During the ship checks, the Contractor must physically verify the existing ship conditions including structure, piping, ducting, cableways, power panels, load centers and affected equipment necessary to complete all tasks. The Contractor must also perform a dimensional verification of ship structure in way of modifications and record for incorporation into the work packages. All permanent and temporary interferences in way of structure, penetrations, piping, HVAC and electrical installations must be recorded in detail.

3.6.2. The Contractor must provide daily Ship Check Notes throughout the duration of the ship checks. The Ship Check Notes must be consolidated at the end of each day and forwarded electronically to the TPOC per Section 6.1. The Contractor must meet each morning with the TPOC to discuss the Ship Check Notes from the previous day and to discuss the work plan for each day. This daily meeting will address any questions or concerns from the day before as well as align support needs for that day. The Contractor must discuss their notes with the TPOC and conduct a brief walk-through of the areas to be worked that day to ensure all of the necessary information is being collected. This ship check plan must guide the execution of the ship check.

3.6.3. The Contractor must conduct a meeting on the final day of the ship check to summarize the ship check events and to discuss any outstanding concerns. The Contractor must review all the Ship Check Notes with the MSC Representatives and conduct a complete walk-through of all the locations addressed in this PWS. The purpose of the walk-through is to ensure all the necessary information has been collected to develop the required work packages. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure that all information needed to develop complete work packages has been gathered during the ship checks. The review and monitoring by the Government does not relieve the Contractor from this responsibility.

3.7. Ship Check Report (SCR) (CDRL 001) – The Contractor must generate a ship check report and submit it to the TPOC for review in accordance with Section 6.1 for all work packages identified in Section 2 above.

3.7.1. The ship check report must be broken down into discipline-specific sections. The report must detail the findings of the ship check, actions taken during the ship check, and all pertinent photographs. The report must include sketches and discussions of existing ship conditions and any reservations, deficiencies, or anticipated problems in developing the conceptual design and work package. The report must document all decisions and assumptions made during the ship check. All photographs must be organized in an MS PowerPoint presentation (converted to pdf) with one photograph per slide and a short description accompanying each photo. Alternative methods for presenting photos may be considered but must be approved by the TPOC.

3.8. Not Used

3.9. TRANSALT Work Packages (CDRL 002) – The Contractor must develop TRANSALT work packages for the PWS in accordance with Section 6.1. TRANSALT work packages must be based off the Ship Check Reports as required by this PWS. Any work items or drawings not expressly identified in this PWS must not absolve the Contractor from providing complete work packages necessary to meet all design requirements listed in Section 2. Work package requirements are provided below.

3.9.1. System Engineering Calculations – The Contractor must develop all engineering calculations required to ensure the final designs will be fully functional as required by Section 2 above. The source for all calculation methods must be documented. All assumptions must be clearly identified and explained. The calculations must clearly link the design results and equipment selected to ensure that the system will function as desired. MSC may require more information if what is provided by the Contractor is unclear, incomplete, or untraceable. The Contractor must also provide all working files used to develop the calculations. Calculations must be submitted in a report format for each system that requires calculations as described in this Section. Additionally, all designs must comply with all ABS rules, USCG regulations, international laws and regulations (SOLAS/IMO), and other applicable requirements outlined in Sections 7 and 8. The Contractor is responsible for any calculations associated with ABS rules and USCG regulations and resolving any resulting regulatory agency comments. The following must be developed and submitted as required to validate acceptable system performance for all new and modified systems:

3.9.1.1. Naval Architecture Calculations and Schematics

· Structural Analyses

· Finite Element Analyses compatible with NX Nastran and FEMAP

· Weight and Moment Reports and Calculations

· Arrangements (Hull and Deck) and Outfitting

· Weld and Connection Analyses

· Vibration Analyses

*Foundations for equipment and structural modifications must be adequate to resist forces from supported equipment generated by ships motions up to Sea State Eight (8). These calculations must be provided during each submittal of the drawings. Contractor is responsible to check deck loading and determine if underdeck stiffening and modifications as necessary. Contractor is required to maintain manufacturer's recommended clearances between equipment.

3.9.1.2. Electrical Calculations and Schematics

· Voltage Drop Calculations

· Load Calculations

· Power & Lighting One Line Diagram

· Electrical Plant Load Analysis (EPLA)

· Coordination Studies

3.9.1.3. Mechanical System Calculations and Schematics

· System Load Estimates

· Pipe Sizing/Fluid Flow Calculations/Models in accordance with CRANE Technical Paper No. 410 or equivalent; models must be compatible with PIPE-FLO

· Equipment Selection Methodology

3.9.1.4. Calculations required by ABS & USCG & the Enclosures.

3.9.1.5. Other calculations required to prove proper system functionality to include modified systems and systems impacted by design changes must meet the design performance requirements of this PWS.

3.9.2. Work Item – The Contractor must develop a work item to cover all modifications required by Section 2 and for each Enclosure. Work items are the contractual vehicle for tasking a shipyard to perform work. Work items must be produced to the standards outlined in the MSC Work Item Preparation Guide (GFI 7.4) and the General Technical Requirements (GFI 7.1). The work items must contain all the necessary working level detail needed for installing activity implementation.

3.9.3. Contract Guidance Drawings – The Contractor must develop guidance drawings that address all removals (temporary and permanent), renewals, modifications, and installations necessary to ensure all systems are fully functional as required by Section 2 and the Enclosures. These drawings must be separated by engineering discipline and provide all necessary electrical power, controls, mechanical, structural, foundations, and outfitting/arrangements modifications required to install a fully functional system. Guidance drawings are developed along with the work item and are provided as guidance for installation and must comply with the standards outlined in GFI 7.2 and templates provided as GFI 7.15-7.17. The drawings must contain all the necessary working level detail needed for installing activity implementation. The drawings must have a Bill of Materials which details ordering requirements and options for each component for procurement. All details and special system requirements must be listed. Any equipment or material identified as Long Lead Time Material per Section 3.9.8 must be labeled GFM in the Bill of Material (BOM). New MSC drawing numbers will be provided by the TPOC. Types of guidance drawings that may be included for each TRANSALT work package may include, but should not be limited to:

· Arrangements & Outfitting

· Structural

· Electrical Power Systems

· Lighting Systems

· IT Systems

· Alarm, Monitoring, & Controls Systems

· Piping Systems (Multiple) – Piping Drawings must provide sufficient information to perform fluid flow calculations. Piping details such as size, lengths, elevations, fittings, valves, and locations in relation to new/existing/modified structure and/or components must be provided. Install piping to allow access to new and existing equipment for operation and maintenance.

· HVAC Systems

3.9.4. Sortable Bill of Material – The Contractor must provide a sortable Bill of Materials (BOM) spreadsheet (GFI 7.5) for each work packages identified in Section 2 and the Enclosures that includes all material and equipment broken out by drawing. Each spreadsheet must be broken out by drawing as well as one sheet showing all material required for the entire work package. This list should mirror the contents of all drawings. The materials list must contain the following for each piece of equipment:

· Equipment name, make, and model

· Description

· Distributor (Identify website, POC, and contact info)

· Distributor Part Number (if different than above)

· Salient characteristics (size/dimensions, power, capacity, etc.)

· Quantity

· Applicable Design and Material Standards for mechanical components

· Purchase lead time for all items. Clearly identify lead time for any items over 6 weeks and designate as long lead time material (LLTM).

· Designate which items must be Government Furnished Material (GFM) or Installing Activity Furnished (IAF) as coordinated with the TPOC

· Price Quote or Catalog Pricing

· Reference to work item or drawing where the material is used

· Additional Comments (as warranted)

3.9.5. Equipment Cut Sheets/Vendor Quotes - Any long lead time items per Section 3.9.4 or equipment/material with special requirements including custom built equipment or furniture must be provided. Provide cut-sheets along with up-to-date vendor contact information necessary for ordering all of the equipment/material for each item identified as LLTM in the BOM.

3.9.6. Installing Activity Cost Estimate – Provide a detailed installing activity cost estimate spreadsheet (MS Excel) for each work item showing man hours, labor cost, and material cost (both GFM and CFM), and a sheet showing the total cost for the work package for all packages identified in Section 2. Cost estimates consist of a detailed breakdown of all the labor categories and materials associated with a work package. A detailed breakout of all labor categories that corresponds to the required production steps must be provided. The spreadsheet must be created such that changing the labor rate in one cell adjusts the labor cost throughout the MS Excel workbook.

3.9.7. Weight Report – The Contractor must prepare a detailed weight report for the work packages identified in Section 2 in accordance with GFI 7.7. The report must list all weight additions, removals and relocations on the ship, including the associated centers of gravity, as a result of the work performed in this task. The weight report is to specify the aggregate weight change and impact to lightship. Changes in buoyancy must also be reported. Each drawing must have a weight and moment impact table that matches the weight reports provided. Units in the weight report and weight and moment impact tables are to match the units in the ship’s as-built drawings.

3.9.7.1. Account for all weight changes

· Small weights (less than 200 lbs) may be combined and estimated

· Document weights by actual weighing, using a manufacturer’s catalog weight, calculating or estimating

· Account for items at the component level. For systems normally containing liquids (piping, machinery with sumps, etc.) report the weight of liquid in the system separate from the dry weight of the system

· Reference planes, units, and sign conventions must be in accordance with the current approved Trim and Stability Booklet GFI 7.23.

3.9.7.2. Prepare the report in tabular format, per GFI 7.8, with the following information grouped according to work items in the work package

· Item number and description

· Weight

· Vertical Center Of Gravity (VCG), distance from reference plane

· Vertical Moment

· Longitudinal Center of Gravity (LCG), distance from reference plane

· Longitudinal moment

· Transverse Center of Gravity (TCG), distance off centerline port/starboard

· Transverse moment

· Resultant weights

· Resultant VCG

· Resultant LCG

· Resultant TCG

3.9.7.3. Round-off values as follows:

· Weight and distance to two (2) places to the right of the decimal point

· Moments to the whole ft-lbs or m-tonne

3.9.8. Shipboard Test Procedures – The Contractor must develop separate detailed test procedures for each modified system identified in Section 2 in order to ensure the proper operation of all modified and installed equipment.

3.9.9. Technical Manuals – Technical Manuals must be provided for all new and modified equipment and systems identified in Section 2. Technical Manuals must be developed in accordance with GFI 7.20. Any modified Technical Manuals must be updated and not just redlined or inserted. Technical manuals not currently in MS Word must be converted into MS Word 2016. Drawing inserts that are not currently in AutoCAD must be converted into AutoCAD LT 2021.

3.9.10. Spare Parts - The Contractor must provide a list of recommended spare parts and maintenance equipment. The spare parts list must include both recommended shipboard spares and shore based spares for thirty (30) day, one (1) year, and five (5) year time periods. The list must give a full description of each part with component manufacturer's part number, ordering data, including source for the part, and National Stock Number (NSN) if available. Parts must be priced individually.

3.9.11. SRD’s – Affected SRD’s must be redlined for all modifications.

4. Deliverable Format: It is the responsibility of the Contractor to plan for submission of all deliverables in order to ensure that the final deliverables are accepted by MSC prior to the end of the period of performance.

4.1. The Contractor must deliver all drawings using AutoCAD LT 2021 compatible versions. The drawing details must be located in model space. The drawing sheet zones and title must be located in layout/paper space. The drawing details must be placed on the pages using viewports with hidden (invisible) lines. The native sheet size must be 11 x 17 inches. The Contractor must follow the guidelines identified in the following documents: “Preparation of Computer Aided Designed (CAD) Drawings for USNS Ships” (GFI 7.2) and “Work Item Preparation Guide when Preparing Shipyard Packages” (GFI 7.4). Electronic copies must be in both AutoCAD LT 2021 and Adobe PDF (Version 6 or newer).

4.2. The Contractor must deliver Work Items, Technical Manuals, Test Procedures, and Reports in MS Word 2016 compatible format using MSC Standard Work Item format found in Section 7. The Contractor must provide electronic copy in MS WORD and PDF (Version 6 or newer).

4.3. The Contractor must provide Cost Estimates and Engineering Calculations using MS Excel 2016 compatible spreadsheets or using required software as identified within this PWS.

4.4. The Contractor must provide the Project Plan in MS Project 2010.

4.5. The Contractor must submit all electronic files (AutoCAD 2021 [.dwg], MS Word 2016 [.doc], MS Excel 2016 [.xls], Adobe Portable Data Files [.pdf]) on hard disk via expedited delivery, or by other means deemed acceptable by the TPOC (e.g., electronic submission via DOD SAFE).

5. Review Process: All deliverables described in Section 3 must be submitted in accordance with the following process:

5.1. The Contractor must submit P1 deliverables for MSC review and comment in accordance with Section 6.1. The P1 deliverables must be complete, technically correct, and properly formatted with no reservations, errors or omissions. The P1 deliverables must be reviewed by the Contractor’s Quality Assurance personnel as identified in Section 11.6 prior to submission to the TPOC. MSC review is not to be used as the Contractor’s Quality Assurance (QA) review. If P1 deliverables are submitted with reservations, omissions or are unacceptable per the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) the P1 deliverables will be rejected and returned to the contractor as unacceptable and updated P1 deliverables must be resubmitted to MSC. This process must continue until MSC accepts the P1 deliverables. Each new revision of P1 deliverables must be marked with a subsequent letter starting with P1A, P1B, P1C, etc until P1 deliverables are accepted by MSC. An updated POAM must be submitted within 2 business days of receiving the rejection from TPOC.

5.2. The Contractor must adjudicate and/or incorporate all comments from the P1 deliverables review to create the P2 deliverables. The P2 deliverables must be complete, technically correct, and properly formatted with no reservations, errors or omissions. The P2 deliverables must be reviewed by the Contractor’s Quality Assurance personnel as identified in Section 11.6 prior to submission to the TPOC. MSC review is not to be used as the Contractor’s Quality Assurance (QA) review. The P2 deliverables must be submitted with a listing of all P1 comments (or later revision, if required) and their resolution status. The listing should also include explanation for any comments not thoroughly incorporated, and responses to any design questions. The Contractor’s Quality Assurance personnel must ensure all P1 (or later revision, if required) comments have satisfactorily addressed prior to submission to the TPOC. If P2 deliverables are submitted with reservations, omissions or are unacceptable per the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) the deliverable will be rejected and returned to the contractor as unacceptable and updated Preliminary Copy (P2) must be submitted to MSC. This process must continue until MSC accepts the P2 deliverables. Each new revision of P2 must be marked with a subsequent letter starting with P2A, P2B, P2C, etc until P2 deliverables are accepted by MSC. An updated POAM must be submitted within 2 business days of receiving the rejection from TPOC. MSC reserves the right to new comments during P2 review.

5.3. After P2 deliverables have been accepted by the TPOC, all preliminary revision marks and revision notes must be removed from the drawings and they must be labeled as “Rev –” or the most up to date revision. The “Rev –” deliverables must be reviewed by the Contractor’s Quality Assurance personnel prior to submission to the TPOC. If Rev- is submitted with reservations, omissions or is unacceptable per the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) the deliverable will be rejected and returned to the contractor as unacceptable and an updated Rev - must be submitted to MSC. This process must continue until MSC accepts the Rev - deliverable. Each new revision of Rev - must be marked with the submittal date on both the file name and in the revision notes section for document control. For any deliverables that do not require regulatory approval, this deliverable will become the Final Copy after MSC’s comments are incorporated and Rev – is accepted.

6. Delivery Schedule:

6.1. The delivery schedule for all deliverables must be in accordance with the approved Project Plan described in Section 3.4 and the milestones listed below:

No.
Deliverable/Activity
Due Date
3.1
Kickoff Meeting
Within 5 BD after Award
3.2
Progress Meetings
Held Weekly
3.3
Meeting Minutes
COB the BD after the Meeting
3.4
Project Plan
Within 3 BD after Award with Kick Off Meeting Minutes, and on the last business day of each month
3.5
Ship Check Plan
5 BD prior to the Ship Check
3.6.2
Daily Ship Check Notes
End of Each Day During the Ship Check
3.7
Ship Check Report
5 BD after Ship Check Completion
3.8
Not Used
3.9
P1 TRANSALT Work Package
30 BD after Approved SCR
MSC Review
20 BD
3.9
P2 TRANSALT Work Package
15 BD after submission of P1 Review
MSC Review
10 BD
3.9
Rev – TRANSALT Work Package
10 BD after submission of P2 Review
MSC Review
10 BD

*BD = Business Day(s)

7. Government Furnished Information (GFI): The following is general GFI to be used for all tasks. Electronic copies of these documents are available from the TPOC upon request.

7.1. MSC Standard Drawing # 7081122 – MSC General Technical Requirements

7.2. MSC Standard Drawing # 7080803 – Preparation of CAD Drawings for USNS Ships

7.3. MSC Standard Drawing # 7079667 – Preparation of Selected Record Drawings

7.4. MSC Standard Drawing # 7081124 – Work Item Preparation Guide

7.5. Not Used

7.6. MSC COMSCINST 4750.2 Preservation Instructions for MSC Ships

7.7. MSC EPI N721-9096-001 Weight and Stability Control

7.8. Weight and Moment Calculation Sheet and User Guide

7.9. USNS Montford Point Ship Drawing Index

7.10. USNS Montford Point Tech Manual Index

7.11. USS Lewis B. Puller Ship Drawing Index

7.12. USS Lewis B. Puller Tech Manual Index

7.13. MSC Electrical Drawing Template

7.14. MSC Naval Architect Drawing Template

7.15. MSC Mechanical Drawing Template

7.16. SECNAV 5512 DON ID Card Base Access Pass

7.17. ODP Form Blank

7.18. MSC Tech Library Guidance - Tech Manual Creation/Modification

7.19. MSC N721 Structural Analysis Minimum Design Requirements Rev-

7.20. USNS Montford Point Trim and Stability Booklet

7.21. USS Lewis B. Puller Trim and Stability Booklet

7.22. Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

7.23. Performance Requirement Summary (PRS)

8. Applicable Documents: Design and review must be in accordance with the following specifications, standards and all requirements incorporated within these documents. Where requirements of these documents conflict the most stringent requirement must take precedent. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to furnish these documents. Any deviation from the requirements of these documents must be approved in writing by the Contracting Officer.

8.1. USCG Code of Federal Regulations

8.2. American Bureau of Shipping, Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels

8.3. IEEE –STD-45, Recommended Practice for Electrical Installations on Shipboard

8.4. MARPOL

8.5. SOLAS

8.6. CRANE Technical Paper No. 410; Flow of Fluids

9. Place and Period of Performance. The overall Period of Performance will begin upon Order issuance and end after 32 weeks. Each individual task outlined in Section 6.1 define the Period of Performance for this PWS. All work must be performed at the Contractor’s facility, MSC Norfolk and onboard the T-ESD and ESB Class vessel.

10. Invoice Schedule: The Contractor must abide by the following invoice schedule unless an alternate invoice schedule is proposed by the Contractor and accepted with the initial proposal.

· Rev- Acceptance by MSC and contract completion– 100% Travel and Labor

11. Key Personnel: Key personnel must be responsible for the development of all deliverables. Resumes for all key personnel must be provided. No personnel may be “dual hatted”.

11.1. Project Manager – The Contractor must supply an individual having a minimum of 05 years of relative shipboard multi-disciplinary experience managing projects similar in scope to the current requirement. The Project Manager must have at a minimum a B.S. degree and be able to understand and describe technical details. The Project Manager will be the Contractor’s point of contact who will communicate with the TPOC.

11.2. Lead Electrical Engineer – The Contractor supply an individual having at a minimum a Bachelor of Science Degree in Electrical Engineering and 05 years of related, marine electrical design work package experience.

11.3. Lead Mechanical Engineer – The Contractor supply an individual having at a minimum a Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering and 05 years of related, marine mechanical design work package experience.

11.4. Lead Naval Architect/Structural Engineer – The Contractor supply an individual having at a minimum a Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering in Naval Architecture/Structural Engineering and 05 years of related experience.

11.5. QA Engineer – The Contractor must supply a separate QA Engineer who will be responsible for the review of all deliverables prior to submission to MSC. The QA Engineer cannot be dual-hatted. The QA Engineer must have 05 years of experience in a related engineering field and have experience reviewing drawings and monitoring quality before all deliverables are submitted to MSC in accordance with the enclosed Performance Assessment.

12. Ship and Base Access: Vendors are responsible for correctly submitting forms/applications. Vendors are encouraged to monitor email using “Request a Read Receipt” function and to confirm receipt of facsimile transmissions. Permit is required to access Navy facilities. Base/Repair Facility. Access Request is required seven days prior to ship check or performance start date. Submit forms per the document instruction provided as GFI 7.18 and 7.19 and to the TPOC.

12.1. Due to enhanced security measures, ship and base access is required for pre-award ship visits (e.g. ship-check) and for contract performance. Specifically, the following permissions are required:

· Base/Repair Facility Access Request

· Vehicle Access Request

· Ship Access List

12.2. Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS) is being implemented for access to DoD facilities in CONUS, HI, Guam and Puerto Rico (replaces RapidGate). Vendor is responsible to acquire DBIDS credentials prior to performance start date. Delays that may result from inadequate planning are contractor responsibility. Vendor instructions and program information is available at https://www.cnic.navy.mil/om/dbids.html. DBIDS credentials require (in succession) (1) Present a letter or official document from the Government sponsoring organization that provides the purpose for your access, (2) Present valid identification, such as a passport or Real ID Act-compliant state driver's license, (3) Present a completed copy of the SECNAV 5512/1 form to obtain your background check, (4) Upon completion of the background check, the Visitor Control Center representative will complete the DBIDS enrollment process, which includes your photo, finger prints, base restrictions, and several other assessments, and (5) After all of this is done, the contractor will be provided with the DBDIS credential. For vendors with existing Navy Commercial Access Control System (NCACS) cards, see https://www.cnic.navy.mil/om/dbids.html for instructions to obtain DBIDS credentials. Vendor is responsible to confirm that each employee held DBIDS credentials are active for the specific facility and performance period in accordance with DBIDS.

12.3. Vehicle Access: Required for vehicle access to Navy facilities. Follow supplemental instructions on Base Access forms or base-specific vehicle access forms.

12.4. Ship Access List: On company letterhead attachment via email, the vendor is required to provide the MSC TPOC with an accurate, current list of performing personnel prior to being admitted aboard the vessel.

12.5. Additional access permissions may be required.

13. Data Rights

13.1. All work performed by the Contractor under the Contract must become the exclusive property of MSC in which the Government will have unlimited rights. The Contractor will not deliver or otherwise provide to the Government technical data or computer software, to include the deliverables under the Contract, with restrictions, including those as to use, modification, reproduction, and transfer, or with restrictive markings.

Enclosure (1): TRANSALT T-ESB-24-013R Requirements

T-ALT NUMBER: T-ESB-24-013R

SHIP NAME/CLASS: ESB CLASS

TASK TRACKER ID: 24N70324P

ESB CLASS TALT 24-013 UPGRADE SLUDGE TRANSFER PUMPS

Abstract: ESB Class sludge transfer pumps have a low rated capacity resulting in extended transfer times. It is required to upgrade the sludge transfer pumps to increase pumping capacity to ultimately save on man hours during shore discharge operations.

Applicable References: The References listed below must be used by the Contractor in addition to those identified in Sections 7 and 8 of the PWS.

Drawing No. 593-8886052(Rev-) – Sludge Transfer System Diagram Drawing No. 551-8468136(RevD) – General Service & Control Air System Diagram Drawing No. Drawing No. 320-8468257(Rev K) – Electrical System One Line Diagram (ESB 3-5) Drawing No. 320-8496383(Rev F) – Electrical System One Line Diagram (ESB 6-8)

Scope of Work: Contractor must develop a TRANSALT package that replaces the existing air operated sludge transfer pumps with new air operated positive displacement pumps with double the capacity. TRANSALT package must include all modifications necessary for a complete operational system that meets all regulatory requirements.

Discipline Specific Considerations:

Arrangements and Outfitting: None

Structural: Contractor must evaluate existing foundations for the sludge transfer pumps and make any modifications required to accommodate the new pumps.

Mechanical: Existing sludge transfer pumps have a rated capacity of 22 gpm and a TDH of 65 psi per Reference E1-2.1. New transfer pumps will at a minimum, double the pumping capacity of the existing pumps and remain air operated. Contractor must evaluate the existing ships service air piping and sludge transfer piping for the increased pumping capacity and make any modifications necessary.

Electrical: Existing pumps have a local control and two remote controls from the Fire Control Station and near shore discharge connections. Controllers shouldn’t need to be evaluated unless modifications are required for air supply solenoid valve.

E1-3.1.5 Automation Modifications: None additional

Deliverables Requirements: In addition to the deliverables described in Section 3 of the PWS, the Contractor must provide the following deliverables in the development of this Enclosure.

None Additional

Enclosure (2): TRANSALT T-ESB-25-051R Requirements

T-ALT NUMBER: T-ESB-25-051R

SHIP NAME/CLASS: T-ESD AND ESB CLASS

TASK TRACKER ID: 25N70606P

ESB CLASS TALT T-ESB-25-051 MODERNIZATION OF ENGINE ROOM BRIDGE CRANES

Abstract: The two (2) engine room bridge cranes onboard the T-ESD and ESB Class are installed with rotary limit switches known to be obsolete. It is currently unknown how many other components of the bridge cranes are obsolete. MSC requires contractor support to determine a suitable replacement for the bridge crane rotary limit switches. Additionally, MSC requires contractor support to determine what other components may be obsolete and to find suitable replacements for those components.

Applicable References: The References listed below must be used by the Contractor in addition to those identified in Sections 7 and 8 of the PWS.

Technical Manual TG812-AL-MMC-010 Engine Room Crane (Model #3912) Drawing No. 3912-A000 (RevD) - Engine Room Bridge Crane 3.5 Ton

Scope of Work: Contractor must work with the bridge crane OEM to determine a suitable replacement for the existing rotary limit switch (3912-D052 Switch, Rotary Limit) and develop a complete TRANSALT package to replace the switch. In addition to the rotary limit switch, Contractor must work with OEM to determine if any other components listed in Reference E2-2.1 are obsolete. If components are determined to be obsolete, Contractor must provide MSC with a report detailing which components are obsolete, recommended replacement components with manufacturer part numbers and cost of each component.

Discipline Specific Considerations:

Arrangements and Outfitting: None

Structural: None

Mechanical: All recommended replacement components must meet the criteria in Reference E2-2.1 and be approved by the OEM and applicable regulatory bodies.

Electrical: All recommended replacement components must meet the criteria in Reference E2-2.1 and be approved by the OEM and applicable regulatory bodies.

Automation: None

Deliverables Requirements: In addition to the deliverables described in Section 3 of the PWS, the Contractor must provide the following deliverables in the development of this Enclosure.

Obsolete bridge crane components and recommended replacements report

Enclosure (3): TRANSALT ESB 3-0015R Requirements

T-ALT NUMBER: ESB 3-0015R

SHIP NAME/CLASS: T-ESD AND ESB CLASS

TASK TRACKER ID: 25N70672P

ESB CLASS TALT ESB 3-0015 UPGRADE START AIR COMPRESSOR

Abstract: The existing Main Diesel Generator Starting Air Compressors onboard T-ESD and ESB Class vessels are two stage reciprocating piston compressors and have become unreliable for crew to operate and maintain. It is required to replace the existing compressors and receiver modules with more reliable rotary screw compressors.

Applicable References: The References listed below must be used by the Contractor in addition to those identified in Sections 7 and 8 of the PWS.

Technical Manual T9551-BJ-MMC-010 Air Compressor, Start Air, Main Diesel Generator, Model HL2/105A With L1500 Receivers Drawing No. 551-8467994(Rev C) – Main Diesel Generators Starting Air System Diagram (T-ESD Class) Drawing No. 551-8390162(Rev A) – Main Diesel Generators Starting Air System Diagram (ESB 3-5) Drawing No. 551-8613546(Rev B) – Main Diesel Generators Starting Air System Diagram (ESB 6-8) Drawing No. Drawing No. 320-8468257(Rev K) – Electrical System One Line Diagram (ESB 3-5) Drawing No. 320-8496383(Rev F) – Electrical System One Line Diagram (ESB 6-8)

Scope of Work: Contractor must develop a TRANSALT to replace the main diesel generators starting air compressors onboard the T-ESD and ESB Class that meets all regulatory and OEM requirements.

Discipline Specific Considerations:

Arrangements and Outfitting: New compressor and receiver modules must be located to ensure all maintenance clearances are met. Below lists the configuration of each ship:

T-ESD Class Two (2) Starting Air Compressor Modules (4 Compressors and 4 Receivers Total) located in the PORT and STBD Machinery Rooms.

ESB 3-4

Two (2) Starting Air Compressor Modules (4 Compressors and 4 Receivers Total) located in the PORT and STBD Machinery Rooms.

ESB 5-8

Three (3) Starting Air Compressor Modules (6 Compressors and 6 Receivers Total) located in the PORT/STBD Machinery Rooms and Steering Gear Room.

Structural: FEA must be completed for all new foundations.

Mechanical: Compressors and air receivers must be sized in accordance with regulatory rules and the OEM requirements of the MAN 6L48/60CR series engines.

Electrical: New compressors must be rated for 460V, 60HZ, 3PH.

Automation: New compressors must be capable of remote operation from the IACMS system in addition to the local controls.

Deliverables Requirements: In addition to the deliverables described in Section 3 of the PWS, the Contractor must provide the following deliverables in the development of this Enclosure.

Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .