Supplemental Instructions - SAM 940 instruments.pdf
PDF 95 KB Posted
- Attached to
- J066--SAM 940 Instruments
- Solicitation number
- 36C24526Q0790
About this file
This document contains Supplemental Instructions to Offerors for a Request for Quote (RFQ) issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The solicitation is for a Firm Fixed Price Contract with a one-year period of performance. Offerors must submit quotes via email to Jameel Gordon (jameel.gordon@va.gov) by the deadline specified in Box 8 of the SF1449 form; late submissions and phone calls will not be accepted.
Offerors must complete specific sections of the SF1449, including boxes for entity identification (name, address, telephone, SAM UEI, and CAGE code), contractor point of contact information, and the price/cost schedule with unit prices for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN). Quotes must demonstrate three key areas: (1) Technical Capability—a clear description of methods for performing the Statement of Work; (2) Pricing—legible pricing entries in the cost schedule; and (3) Past Performance—minimum three years of relevant experience documented through CPARS records or a completed past performance questionnaire. Award decisions will be made using Comparative Evaluation per FAR 12.203(c)(2), which involves direct side-by-side comparison of acceptable quotes to identify the "best" overall response, rather than individual evaluation against specified factors or rating methodologies.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Past Performance Questionnaire rev.pdf | ||
| 36C24526Q0790.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
Offeror quote must be submitted by the due date and time identified in box 8 on the solicitation (SF1449) (Page 1). Late quotes and phone calls will not be accepted. Quotes and questions shall be submitted via email only to: Jameel Gordon, Email: jameel.gordon@va.gov
Quotes must comply with all aspects of the SF1449 (RFQ) to be considered.
Type of award:
Firm Fixed Price Contract, One Year Period of Performance
Offeror must:
(a) Complete the SF1449 (Page 1) Boxes 12, 17a., and 30a., b. and c of the solicitation.
Provide the entity’s name, address, telephone number, SAM UEI and cage code identifier in Box 17a.
(b) Complete Section B.1., Contractor POC information.
(c) Complete Section B.3 Price/Cost Schedule: You must enter your unit -price for each CLIN.
Offeror must: Provide information that demonstrates your company’s:
(a) TECHNICAL CAPABILITY—
1. Offeror shall submit documentation demonstrating a clear description of the method(s) that will be used for performing the efforts listed in the statement of work
(b) PRICING
1. Pricing shall be entered legible in the price/cost schedule information. There will not be any verification of prices that is not legible.
(c) PAST PERFORMANCE
1. Minimum three (3) years of relevant past performance i.a.w. the scope of work.
2. Offeror Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) record(s) is acceptable and/or a filled out past performance questionnaire. (See Section D.
Attachment - Past Performance Questionnaire)
(d) Comparative Evaluation will be conducted in accordance with Revolutionary FAR Overhaul FAR 12.203 (c)(2).
Additional information pertaining to Comparative Evaluation below:
What Comparative Evaluation is:
• It is the direct comparison of one quotation/offer with another in a uniform and fair manner to determine which quote/offer provides the
Government with what it needs, where and when as identified in the
RFQ
• It is an assessment of which response is the “best” as a whole mailto:jameel.gordon@va.gov
• Once one quotation/offer is found acceptable, it is compared side by side to the remaining ones, and the “best” one is chosen
What Comparative Evaluation is not:
• It does not individually evaluate quote/offers against specified evaluation factors
• It does not assign a rating using a color, numerical, or other rating methodology
• It does not require additional evaluation to determine if minimal advantage is worth a minimal or normal price difference, but not prohibited
• It is not a low price technically acceptable (LPTA) or trade-off process
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .