StdBio Sole Source Justification.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NPSS1 FHKA 2027000010 1
- Issued by
- Arapahoe County, Denver City, Colorado
About this file
This is a Sole Source Justification Form submitted by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Laboratory Services Division for a service agreement with Standard BioTools, Inc. The procurement seeks ongoing preventive maintenance, unplanned repair services, and technical support for four Biomark X9 instruments (Serial Numbers: 190104, 190101, 190058, and 190059). The contract is structured as a pay-in-advance agreement with a start date of July 31, 2026, and an end date of April 22, 2031, representing a five-year term. The scope of work includes minimum annual preventive maintenance, unplanned service to maintain operational functionality, and remote or in-person technical support throughout the instrument lifecycle. No specific response dates, due dates, site visits, or bidder meetings are identified in this justification document.
The estimated dollar amount for the life of the project is $200,000. The justification for sole source procurement centers on Standard BioTools being the manufacturer of the proprietary Biomark X9 instruments and the only authorized party capable of providing certified parts, service, and trained engineers to maintain the equipment in accordance with quality management requirements for laboratory testing operations. The vendor possesses exclusive certifications, specialized training, and direct access to non-catalog parts required for these instruments. Historical pricing comparisons demonstrate that service costs have remained consistent over the instrument lifecycle, accounting only for inflation impacts on technical travel and parts, with no hidden or additional charges when scope of work requirements are followed. The Genomic Surveillance Program, with Program Manager Shannon Matzinger and contact Alexandria Rossheim (408-529-7406), requires this service agreement to maintain operational capability and meet quality control metrics necessary for funded testing deliverables.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FORM:
This completed form is to be submitted to PCU via the Request website as the first step in the Sole Source Process.
Important! Consult the document “Sole Source Justification Guidance” for additional instructions.
TYPE OR CLEARLY PRINT ALL INFORMATION
Project Name: Standard BioTools Instrument Service Vendor name: Standard BioTools, Inc.
Vendor Address: 2 Tower Place, Suite 2000, South San Francisco, CA 94080 Select one: X Original ☐ Modification CORE Vendor ID: VC00000000422053 PO or Contract Number (if this is a modification):
Describe the products and/or services to be procured and how they meet your needs. (This space is limited – provide a scope of work or specs as additional documentation)
This vendor provides authorized service to the following equipment (Model and Serial Number):
| Std. BioTools Instrument Service |
| SN |
| Biomark X9 |
| 190104 |
| Biomark X9 |
| 190101 |
| Biomark X9 |
| 190058 |
| Biomark X9 |
| 190059 |
This will be a pay in advance contract for ongoing preventive maintenance, unplanned repair services, and/or any other provisions as it pertains to a service contract. The vendor listed is the manufacturer of the equipment and therefore is the only authorized party to provide the parts, service, and certified engineers to perform maintenance and repairs.
List dates, agreement numbers and dollar amounts for any previously procured products or services from this vendor related to this project:
Term of agreement:
(If multi-year, indicate the full term up to 5 years)
| Start Date |
| 07/31/2026 |
| End Date |
| 4/22/2031 |
| If this is a modification, indicate the revised end date (if applicable). |
| Revised End Date |
| Estimated dollar amount - life of the project (up to 5 years): |
| Dollar |
amount $200K
| If a modification, complete the following: |
| Amount |
Increased
Revised Total
If a modification, state the reason(s):
A. Criteria: Answer both 1 and 2.
| 1. There is only one Good or Service that will meet the needs of the State. |
| Yes X |
| No ☐ |
| 2. There is only one Vendor that can supply that Good or Service. |
| Yes X |
| No ☐ |
If “NO” to either 1 or 2, answer 3 and 4, below.
3. The compatibility of equipment, software, accessories, or replacement parts is the paramount consideration and the items are only available from one vendor.
a. Is this a software package or other IT system and the existing system now requires only ongoing maintenance and support?
| Yes ☐ |
| No ☐ |
| Yes ☐ |
| No ☐ |
| 4. A sole supplier’s item is needed for trial use or testing. |
| Yes ☐ |
| No ☐ |
If “NO” to 1-4, above, this is not a sole source.
STOP
A formal solicitation is required. Complete a Purchasing Determination Form.
Submit all required documents via the PCU Request Site.
B. Explain in terms of 1 through 4, above, the basis for your identifying this as a sole source? A sole source is justified in the instance that this is the only vendor - not what the program may determine to be the best vendor. Is this the only vendor? Explain (See form instructions)…
The specialized equipment that has been procured, implemented and maintained by the state as fit to purpose in the existing testing infrastructure and workflows is proprietary to the vendor; under the purchase agreement the defined instrumentation is not eligible or able to be maintained by a third party and can only be serviced by the manufacturer’s certified and trained engineers, with their certified parts. Therefore there is only one entity, the manufacturer, which is capable of providing service on/for the defined equipment. If a distributor of the equipment does not have a two-party agreement allowing for the distributor to act on behalf of the manufacturer to support service, or a three-party agreement where the distributor has an agreement with the manufacturer and CDPHE, the customer to act on our behalf to facilitate direct, non-third or second party service, then only the manufacturer is eligible to provide the necessary service plan to maintain operational equipment.
The scope of work included in the service agreement, which includes preventative maintenance (PM) at a minimum cadence of annually, unplanned service to maintain functionality, and any technical support remote or in person that may arise during the life of the instrument, needs to be performed by the manufacturing vendor of the instrument to meet the quality control metrics required for performing testing. When service lapses, the PM is not performed, the instrument is broken and requires service to be operational or any such circumstance planned or unplanned that would call into question the functionality or integrity of the instrument, we are unable to continue the operation of the equipment until the instrument can be recertified and deemed operational by the manufacturer.
C. What makes this good or service unique to meeting your needs?
The instruments as defined in the above table under the project description section, requires specialized preventative maintenance services and in often cases unplanned maintenance that needs to be performed by the vendor who manufactured the proprietary instrument. The manufacturer has been identified as the entity, that has the specialized knowledge, training and certified engineers required to perform service work, as well as the allocated resources to first hand obtain the new, certified parts, and repair the instrument in a timely manner, as needed by the nature of the work performed in the laboratory environment. These services and parts meet the requirements for our Quality management requirements to perform the testing required by our funding deliverables.
| D. Is the Good or Service Proprietary (product or technology entirely owned by the individual/company and usually protected by trademark or copyright)? |
| Yes X |
| No ☐ |
E. What type of required, specific and exclusive experience, certifications, licenses etc. are possessed by this vendor that directly relate to the good or service to be procured?
The manufacturer staff the field engineers that are trained and certified with the specialized knowledge and have direct access to non-catalog parts for the instruments as defined in the above table under the project description section. The manufacturer is also required to provide liability insurance for the work performed under the service agreements.
F. What research has the program conducted to justify this sole source?
The vendor is the manufacturer of the instruments and parts. The vendor has established the required preventive maintenance schedules and repair criteria for the instruments. The vendor trains and certifies the technicians to perform this work to guarantee proper operation.
| G. Do you have an actual or potential conflict of interest in this purchase? (For example, is an individual from the Department or a family member affiliated with the vendor as an employee, board member, volunteer, etc.?) |
| Yes ☐ |
| No X |
If Yes: Please Explain. (This space is limited – please provide additional documentation if applicable.)
H. This Section is Required – You must answer “Yes” to at least one.
| 1. Did you compare prices/rates to established catalog prices or market prices? (If “Yes”, attach documentation) |
| Yes ☐ |
| No X |
2. Did you compare prices/rates to historical prices or rates for similar items or services procured in the past? (If “Yes”, attach documentation)
The price for service for the defined instruments has remained consistent over the life of the instrument accounting for inflation that impacts tech travel and parts. There have not been undefined changes to the price of service. Once the service contract is signed, there are no hidden or added charges as long as the scope of work is followed.
| Yes X |
| No ☐ |
| 3. Did you conduct a cost/price analysis? (If “Yes”, attach documentation) |
| Yes ☐ |
| No X |
If No to #3 above:
| 4. Do you know if the cost is "fair and reasonable"? |
| Yes X |
| No ☐ |
Demonstrate how you determined fair and reasonable prices/rates: Attach additional pages if required.
Division: CDPHE Laboratory Services Division Program: Genomic Surveillance Program Program Contact Name: Alexandria Rossheim Phone: 408-529-7406 Program Manager: Shannon Matzinger --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Procurement Use Only:------------------ Comments:
Approved: __________________________________________________________________________ Agency Procurement Director or Authorized Representative Signature Date Posted on VSS? Yes ☐ No ☐ If posted, original Intent to Sole Source VSS# __________________________________________
If not posted or modified, Approved CDPHE Request #: _______________________________________
Sole Source Justification 4 Version A2021
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .