Statement of Work_DRAFT.pdf

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

MK 66 Mod 0 Heavyweight Undersea Training Target (MK 66 HUTT)

1.0 Background

The Undersea Weapons Program Office (PMS404) has tasked the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport (NUWCDIVNPT), Code 85, to field the MK 66 Mod 0 Heavyweight Undersea Training Target (HUTT) to the Maintenance Activities (MA), conduct engineering services for future upgrades and enhancements, establish a logistics program, and procure production units. The SAAB AUV62-AT is a commercially available Anti- Submarine Warfare (ASW) training target that will provide the fleet with an improved and realistic ASW target for on range and open ocean use. The SAAB AUV62-AT will form the baseline MK 66 Mod 0 capability with minor modifications.

The MK 66 HUTT system is a modular, scalable, and easily configurable Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) system. The MK 66 HUTT is an artificial acoustic target that echo repeats and provides tonals that simulate a submarine target.

1.1 Places of Performance

The effort is expected to be completed primarily at the Contractor’s Facility or the MK66 HUTT Maintenance Activities, including:

• Atlantic Undersea Test & Evaluation Center (AUTEC), Andros Island, Bahamas

• Naval Air Station Mayport, Mayport, FL

• Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Division Keyport, Keyport, WA

• Naval Undersea Warfare Center, San Diego Detachment (NUWCDET San Diego), Naval Air Station, North Island, CA

• Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Hawaii Detachment (NUWCDET Hawaii), Pacific Missile Range Facility

(PMRF), Kauai, HI

• Naval Base Guam, Guam USA

1.2 Authorized Users

NUWCDIVNPT Code 85

1.3 Sponsors

PMS404 (Undersea Weapons)

1.4 Types of Funding

• Weapons Procurement, Navy (WPN)

• Operations and Maintenance, Navy (OMN)

• Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy (RDTEN)

2.0 Scope

The contractor shall perform engineering services for the MK 66 Heavyweight Undersea Training Target (MK 66 HUTT) program to include inspection, test, repair, operational testing, Depot maintenance, and software development. The contractor shall produce and deliver MK66 units.

2.1 Program or Systems Supported

This contract supports ASW training Targets funded by PMS404.

3.0 Applicable Documents

The contractor shall perform the tasking required in Section 4.0 in accordance with (IAW) the below Applicable Documents (ADs).

Number Title Revision Date Applicable SOW Task

3.1 Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management Plan

(RIOMP)

September 2023 4.1.3

3.2 ANSI/ISO/ASQ

9001-2015, Quality Management Systems

2015 4.2.1

3.3 DoDI 8500.01, "Cybersecurity", 14 March 2014 4.2.2

3.4 DoDI 8510.01, "Risk Management Framework

(RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT)" 19 July 2022 4.2.2

3.5 DoDM 8140.03, “Cyberspace Workforce

Qualification Program”

15 February 2023 4.2.2

3.6 NIST SP 800-53, “Security and Privacy Controls for

Information Systems and Organizations”

07 November 2023 4.2.2

3.7 System Level Continuous Monitoring (SLCM)

Strategy

04 November 2022 4.2.2

3.8 DoDD 8140.01, “Cyberspace Workforce

Management”

05 October 2020 4.2.2

3.9 DoDI 5200.39, "Critical Program Information (CPI)

Identification and Protection within the Department of Defense Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation

(RDT&E)

28 May 2015 4.2.2

3.10 DoDI 5200.44, "Protection of Mission Critical

Functions to Achieve Trusted Systems and Networks"

16 February 2024 4.2.3

3.11 NAVSEA-PMS404-204271N-401-A-P-C Rev C, “Configuration Management Plan for Anti-Submarine Warfare Targets Program”

16 May 2024 4.2.4

3.12 MIL-STD-31000, “Technical Data Package (TDP)” 21 August 2023 4.2.5

3.13 MK 66 Capability Requirement Document 01 June 2023 4.1

3.14 MK 66 Master Test Strategy 29 January 2027 4.1.1

3.15 MIL-STD-882E, System Safety 27 September 2023 4.2.8, 4.2.9,

3.16 S9310-AQ-SAF-010, “Navy Lithium Safety Program

Responsibilities and Procedures” 03 November 2020 4.2.7

3.17 SG270-BV-SAF-010, “High-Energy Storage

Systems”

27 April 2011 4.2.7

3.18 DoDI 4160.28-M, “DoD Demilitarization Program” 30 November 2022 4.2.7

3.19 MIL-STD-11991B, “General Standard for Parts, Materials, and Processes” 03 October 2023 4.2.12

3.20 SAE AS5553E, “Counterfeit Electronic Parts, Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation and Disposition”

12 November 2025 4.2.12

3.21 SAE AS6174B, “Counterfeit Materiel; Assuring

Acquisition of Authentic and Conforming Materiel”

16 February 2026 4.2.12

3.22 EIA-933C, “Requirements for a COTS Assembly

Management Plan”

03 August 2020 4.2.12

3.23 MIL-STD-130N, “Standard practice for Identification

Marking Of U.S. Military Property”

26 August 2019 4.1.5

3.24 MIL-STD-129R Standard practice for Military

marking for Shipment and Storage

25 February 2023 4.1.5

3.25 SAE AS1390A, “Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)” 04 April 2023 4.2.13

3.26 SAE TA-STD-0017, “Product Support Analysis

(PSA)”

01 May 2022 4.2.13

3.27 TDP Option Selection Worksheet 07 July 2023 4.2.5

3.28 MIL-STD-2073-1E Standard Practice for Military

Packaging 27 June2024 4.1.5

3.29 MIL-STD-1366E Interface Standard for

Transportability Criteria

31 October 2006 4.1.5

3.30 Government Approved HUTT TDP To be established All

4.0 Technical Requirements

The following tasks shall be performed in accordance with ADs listed in section 3.0 and using the Government Furnished Information (GFI) listed in section 6.0.

4.1 Production

The contractor shall manufacture MK 66 HUTT system(s), spares and support equipment. Support Equipment includes the Vehicle Battery Charger, Surface Communication Box (SCB), Mission Evaluation Computer (MEC), Mission Planning and Control Computer (MPCC), antennas, and the acoustic modem.

4.1.1 Production Acceptance Testing

The contractor shall manufacture, test and deliver MK 66 HUTTs. The contractor shall conduct factory acceptance and environmental testing. The contractor shall deliver testing reports. The contractor shall provide status of plans, procedures, and execution of the test during Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs) (SOW Task 4.1.2).

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A009: Test Report (Factory Acceptance Functional Test Report, and Environmental Test Report)

4.1.2 Program Review and Technical Interchange Meetings

The contractor shall conduct semi-annual Program Reviews and participate in monthly Technical Interchange Meetings (TIM) to provide working level status reporting including technical presentations and tasking. The contractor shall provide presentation materials prior to Program Reviews and TIMs.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A001: Presentation Material

4.1.3 Risk

The contractor shall identify, monitor, analyze, and mitigate program risk issues and opportunities, and present findings at the TIMs.

4.1.4 Integrated Product Support (IPS)

The contractor shall plan for, execute, and report status of Integrated Product Support efforts during the semi-annual MK 66 Program Reviews and monthly TIMs.

4.1.5 Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs)

The contractor shall submit Class I ECPs for awareness prior to incorporation into the baseline design. The contractor shall submit Class II ECPs quarterly. ECPs shall be submitted via a Government approved CM Database (currently CM Pro)

4.1.6 Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation

The contractor shall ensure the MK66 system, and related support and test equipment are packaged and shipped in accordance with the applicable documents in section 3.0.

4.1.7 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

The contractor is responsible for managing obsolescence over the entire period of the contract and remains responsible for meeting all performance and other requirements of this contract.

This obsolescence management responsibility includes an ongoing review and identification of actual and potential obsolescence issues, including obsolescence of components, assemblies, sub-assemblies, piece parts, and material.

The contractor shall avoid selecting technology and hardware, software, electronic, and material components that are nearing end-of-life. This effort (and associated deliverables) shall be performed during each year of production.

The contractor is responsible for all costs associated with obtaining a replacement if any parts and/or materials become obsolete.

The costs for which the contractor is responsible include the costs of investigating part availability, interchangeability and substitutability, locating part replacement, vendor interface, engineering efforts, testing requirements and internal drawing changes.

The contractor shall prevent any additional costs from being incurred by the Government due to obsolescence.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A027: Source Data for Forecasting Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

4.2 Contractual Documentation (Services)

The contractor shall deliver the following program documentation as specified in each Task Order (TO).

4.2.1 Quality Assurance Plan

The contractor shall establish, document, implement, and maintain a quality system that ensures conformance to requirements. The contractor shall generate a Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) for review and approval.

The QAPP shall describe the Quality Management System methodology and approaches to be used under the contract.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A002: Quality Assurance Program Plan

(QAPP)

4.2.2 Cybersecurity

The contractor shall develop and deliver a Security Controls Traceability Matrix (SCTM), and a Cybersecurity Plan.

The contractor shall implement required security controls to align with the Assess Only baseline set of security controls for Platform Information Technology (PIT). The SCTM is the baseline set of security controls that the contractor shall utilize to describe how the required security controls are being implemented, or planned to be implemented, implementation status, and track compliance. The contractor shall implement continuous monitoring activities for cybersecurity vulnerabilities. The contractor shall identify and allocate resources for implementing Risk Management Framework (RMF). This effort (and associated deliverables) shall be performed throughout the life of the contract.

The contractor shall establish and maintain security measures to protect all aspects of the system to include vulnerability management to meet DoD security and Cybersecurity requirements. The contractor shall perform cybersecurity (and associated deliverables) throughout the life of the contract.

The contractor shall host Government Cybersecurity test events required to obtain an Authorization to Operate.

The contractor shall provide input to the Government’s System Security Plan (SSP), to provide an overview of security requirements, description of security controls, and other artifacts required to support the submittal for Authorization to Operate. The contractor shall document non-compliant results from test events in a Plan of Actions and Milestones (POA&M) along with mitigating factors. The POA&M shall be included in the SSP. The contractor shall implement a cybersecurity vulnerability management program to ensure the system maintains its security posture throughout the life of the contract.

The contractor shall ensure that personnel working in the area of cybersecurity vulnerability management are trained and appropriately certified for providing Cybersecurity functional services.

The contractor shall prepare a Cybersecurity Plan tailored to the MK66 HUTT security features which the contractor has designed into the system. The plan shall address the security measures to protect all aspects of the system.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A003: Technical Report – Study/Services (Security Controls Traceability Matrix (SCTM))

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A004; Technical Report – Study/Services (Cybersecurity Plan)

4.2.2.1 Cyberspace Qualifications

All personnel performing cyber functions must be trained and qualified. In addition, personnel shall maintain the appropriate security clearance to perform the tasks associated with their assigned positions.

Note: DFARS uses Information Assurance (IA) which is the old title and acronym; it has been replaced by Cyberspace/Cyber Workforce (CWF).

The contractor is required to earn and maintain appropriate foundational qualification for the tasking being performed.

If privileged access is required, the contractor shall complete a privileged access agreement, SECNAV 5239/1, and submit it to the COR. The contractor shall provide a copy of the certificate(s) of completion to the COR.

4.2.2.2 Cyberspace Reporting

The contractor shall provide a list of all personnel assigned to the contract/task order performing cyber functions as a part of a monthly CWF Report. The report shall include employee name, contract/task order number, the applicable CWF category and level, required certifications and fulfillment status. Note that Contractor CWF personnel must receive designation approval in writing by the Commanding Officer, or the C-ISSM via “By Direction” authority, prior to performing CWF functions.

The contractor shall submit new hire information for tasking requiring cyber functions to the COR at least seven (7) days prior to the new hire employee beginning performance of any cyber functions. New hire information shall include name, contract/task order number, list of applicable cyber functions category, level, required certifications and fulfillment status, as well as a copy of the baseline certification documentation. Contractor personnel who do not have proper and current certifications shall be denied access to DoD information systems for the purpose of performing information assurance functions, and therefore may not be allowed to charge to the contract/task order.

Deliverable: The Contractor shall deliver a monthly CWF Report in accordance with CDRL A028.

4.2.3 Program Protection Implementation Plan

The contractor shall conduct Program Protection.

The contractor shall prepare and deliver a Program Protection Implementation Plan (PPIP).

The contractor shall adhere to Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM). The contractor shall perform a Criticality Analysis (CA) for SCRM to determine mission-critical components that may result in failures due to operational, system information, or component integrity aspects. The contractor shall procure integrated circuit-related products from a trusted supplier accredited by the Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) when they are custom-designed, custom-manufactured, or tailored for a specific DoD military-end use. The contractor shall document the SCRM in the PPIP.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A005: Program Protection Implementation Plan (PPIP)

4.2.4 Configuration Management

The contractor shall implement Configuration Management (CM) to establish and maintain a product baseline. The contractor shall prepare and deliver a Configuration Management Plan. The contractor’s plan shall, at a minimum, address the submission of Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) for any change(s) to the MK 66 and support equipment baseline. The contractor’s plan shall include provisions to identify whether a change impacts performance and include checkpoints for Government review and acknowledgement.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A006: Supplier’s Configuration Management Plan (Configuration Management Plan)

4.2.5 Technical Drawings

Upon submission of an ECP, the contractor shall develop and provide technical drawings that fully disclose the hardware and electrical design. The contractor shall prepare drawings that support the production and manufacture of hardware configuration items (HWCI). The contractor shall deliver all software and source code for software configuration items. The contractor shall identify and document Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) and Non- Developmental Items (NDI) in the drawings, to include, at a minimum: suggested source of supply, manufacturer name, and part number, and supporting information such as critical requirements and provisions to support product specification analysis and procurement. When the contractor updates associated drawings, the contractor shall maintain Interface Control Documents (ICD) to document external interface design requirements for external interfaces to ship systems such as handling, launch and recovery equipment. The contractor shall maintain all drawings in the Government’s CM Database.

The contractor shall produce technical drawings and documentation identified in the above paragraph at the Production Level. The contractor shall document any changes to: product drawings and associated lists, commercial drawings and associated lists, and test equipment drawings for the production and manufacture of the MK 66 System. The contractor shall develop and maintain Computer Aided Design (CAD) drawing files. The contractor shall identify any software that will be delivered with restrictive rights or special license rights as required by DFARS 252.227-7989. The contractor shall deliver a Technical Data Package (TDP) that includes the drawings and CAD files.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL B001: Technical Data Package (TDP)

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A007: Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A008: Software Version Description

4.2.6 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

The contractor shall provide environmental subject matter experts (SME) for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) certifications, audits, and review boards. The contractor shall develop presentation material for certifications, audits and review boards. Utilizing GFI, the contractor shall recommend changes to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A001: Presentation Material

4.2.7 Battery Certification

Lithium batteries shall comply with certification requirements. If total stored system energy equals or exceeds 1,000 watt-hours, the contractor shall also comply with the requirements of AD 3.17. The contractor shall not deliver lithium batteries which are not certified nor operated onboard USN ashore and afloat facilities. If the contractor elects to use any batteries which have not previously been tested by Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Carderock, the contractor shall fabricate and deliver eighteen (18) cells, and five (5) full battery assemblies as certification test assets. These cells and batteries shall pass Government-conducted destructive testing.

The contractor shall submit a Battery Design Package with any Request for Variances (RFVs) or ECPs related to the battery. The Battery Design Package shall include:

• energy system identification information, and include, at a minimum, dimensions, weight, voltages, current and energy system connector specifications;

• a schematic drawing of the energy system, showing the internal arrangement, recharging equipment sizing, voltage regulation, wiring size, and voltage drop calculations;

• all energy storage calculations, analysis and drawings used to determine energy system sizing, technology, and charging and refueling methodologies;

• related Facility and Pier Site energy System Certification information;

• branch circuit loads, protection, control, and accessibility with accompanying rationale;

• Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for the energy system;

• an overview of battery manufacturer, battery size, composition, and energy density as well as detailed descriptions of the software controls, interlocks and any other safety systems implemented on the battery in the TDP; and,

• presentation material associated with the battery qualification program and the Weapon System Explosives Safety Review Board (WSESRB).

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A010: Technical Report - Study/Services (Battery Design Package)

4.2.8 Functional Hazard Analysis

The contractor shall perform and document a Functional Hazard Analysis (FHA) on the MK 66 HUTT System in accordance with AD 3.15, Task 208 in MIL-STD-882E.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A011: System Safety Hazard Analysis (SSHA) Report (Functional Hazard Analysis)

4.2.9 Operating and Support Hazard Analysis

The contractor shall perform and document an Operating and Support Hazard Analysis (O&SHA) in accordance with Task 206 in MIL-STD-882E, AD 3.15 on the MK 66 HUTT System.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A012: Operating, Support, Health, and Safety (OSH&S) Hazard Analysis Report (Operating and Support Hazard Analysis (O&SHA))

4.2.10 Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)

The contractor shall conduct a failsafe and logic decision analysis of the MK 66 HUTT system. The contractor shall include logic decisions in the software that allows the vehicle to respond to failsafe and emergency situations, such as shallow water depth, malfunctioning or failed equipment, a snagged vehicle, high motions, or low energy. The contractor shall develop and provide a failsafe report and emergency operations procedure. The failsafe report shall include:

• Analysis of the major system failures and the required response of the system

• Loss of communications

• Failure of primary computer systems

• Loss of primary propulsion

• Loss of electrical power and loss of control

• Emergency recovery procedures to the host platform in the event of a major fault

• Identify and describe systems that allow for emergency abort during Launch and Recovery to include operator interface measures

• Identify and describe the operator interface measures.

The contractor shall conduct Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) on the MK 66 HUTT System to identify potential design weaknesses through systematic, and documented analysis of the following:

• Likelihood for a component or equipment to fail

• Causes for each mode of failure

• The effects and criticality of each failure on the mission objective.

The contractor shall investigate potential critical failure modes. The contractor shall prioritize critical failures to determine design improvements to eliminate or reduce the probability of occurrence of the failures to meet reliability requirements. This effort (and associated deliverables) shall be performed throughout the life of the contract.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A013: Technical Report – Study/Services (Failsafe Report)

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A014: Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis Report

4.2.11 Failure Reporting Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS)

The contractor shall develop and maintain a Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) to establish data collection and failure reporting of the MK 66 HUTT during Factory Acceptance Testing. The FRACAS shall provide procedures for analysis of failures to determine the root cause of failure and for recording corrective action taken and subsequent evaluation of any test results.

The contractor shall monitor and track reliability through the collection of equipment operating hours and equipment failure data during test events. MIL-HDBK-189C may be used as guidance. The contractor shall use test logs to document the start and stop times of the test, the type of test, the time of failure, and type of failure.

The contractor shall document failures in the Failure Summary & Analysis Report. The contractor shall focus corrective actions on the most frequent failure modes provided in the Failure Summary & Analysis Report.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A015: Failure Summary & Analysis Report

4.2.12 Parts Control and Standardization

The contractor shall conduct parts identification, selection, and parts management and control for the MK 66 HUTT System. The contractor shall deliver a Parts, Materials, and Processes Management Plan. The contractor shall develop a counterfeit risk mitigation plan which includes a COTS management section as part of the a Parts, Materials, and Processes Management Plan.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A016: Parts, Materials, and Processes Management Plan

4.2.13 Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)

The contractor shall complete a LORA of the MK 66 HUTT. The contractor shall use the results to identify requirements for related IPS elements to include: Technical Manuals; Supply and Spares; Support & Test Equipment (S&TE); Facilities; Manpower & Personnel.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A017 - Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) Report

4.2.14 RESERVED

4.2.15 Software User Manual

The contractor shall develop and deliver a Software User Manual. The contractor shall describe all operator-machine interface controls to support system, subsystem, and equipment level operations. The contractor shall develop equipment-oriented instructions necessary to support the operational aspects of the hardware and software baselines that, at a minimum, describe:

• system software install and load procedures;

• system initialization and administration procedures; and

• all operator-machine interface controls to support system, subsystem, and equipment level operations

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A018 - Software User Manual (SUM)

4.2.16 Computer Based Training Development

The contractor shall develop computer-based training that includes operational, intermediate and depot level maintenance training. DODI 1322.26 and MIL-PRF-29612 may be used as guidance. The contractor shall provide a Training System Support Document (TSSD) which includes the following:

• A complete procedure for utilization of all software utility programs, support software file generation and system performance characteristics verification for life-cycle maintenance, and

• Instructions for trainees utilizing the computer-based training on how to complete all courses and material.

The contractor shall generate training presentations and videos for MK 66 HUTT operations and maintenance. The contractor shall develop Operator, intermediate and depot maintenance training and procedures for future operations.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A019: Training System Support Document

4.3 Engineering Services

TOs will be issued to initiate specific tasking as particular needs are identified. TOs will identify the specific requirement(s) within the scope of the SOW, provide amplifying or clarifying information, specify the applicable facility, describe work to be performed, outline estimated travel, other costs, and material requirements, list required Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Government Furnished Information (GFI), and list deliverables.

4.3.1 Modification

As specified via TO, the contractor shall modify MK 66 HUTT and support equipment or subsystems, to meet specific testing or operational requirements. The contractor shall conduct testing to include witness testing at the Range Operation Center (ROC), recording data, preparing and operating the MK 66 HUTT and support equipment.

The contractor shall modify software code to meet specific testing or operational requirements, and extract and analyze data. When Government vessels are not available, the contractor shall provide vessel services necessary to complete testing. The contractor shall document the modifications and deliver to the Government.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A023: Test/Inspection Report

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A022: Technical Report - Study/Services

4.3.2 Test Planning, Execution and Analysis

The contractor shall develop, update, and maintain test plans and procedures to test and evaluate performance enhancements of Government Furnished payloads after integration within the MK 66 HUTT. The contractor shall develop plans that address test objectives, performance metrics, launch platform requirements, personnel requirements, training, geometries, location options, equipment staging, timeline recommendations, actions to prevent mutual interference (PMI), safety requirements, environmental impact constraints, data recording and logging requirements, security restrictions, and information assurance restrictions. The contractor shall assess safety hazards and develop mitigation plans, prepare documentation to support approval from applicable environmental compliance boards, and verify feasibility of data recording methods. The contractor shall deliver test plans for Government approval.

The contractor shall conduct all preparations to execute test evolutions with the system in a water, land, or air environment. The contractor shall perform upgrades, overhauls, or tune-ups of test vehicles and equipment deployment apparatus to support in-water testing for the required test duration. The contractor shall prepare, brief, and deliver materials to support training of personnel assigned to testing regarding proper operation of test equipment, safety procedures, and operation of the prototype equipment at the test readiness review. The contractor shall package equipment for shipping and arrange for transport of equipment to the test sites and staging areas.

Upon Government approval of the test plan, the contractor shall perform the test to demonstrate, evaluate, verify, and validate performance of the system. The contractor shall travel to the test site, board the assigned test platforms, communicate test objectives with platform commanders or controllers, support execution of test geometries, operate equipment associated with the test, collect and organize data, summarize results in written form, and package data for transport. The contractor shall document the test event and provide a test event report including a summary of accomplishments, notable issues, and any problems encountered.

The contractor shall perform analysis and technical investigations of data collected during operation testing of the system to assess system performance relative to test objectives and system technical requirements. The contractor shall use mathematical models and computer simulation tools to assess expected performance characteristics of the system in concert with the reconstructed environmental and positional conditions present during test execution.

Platform data will be provided as GFI. The contractor shall determine the root cause, generate alternative solutions, and recommend courses of action for results that fail to meet performance requirements. The contractor shall prepare and deliver a test report describing work performed, tests conducted, investigations completed, and conclusions drawn from post-test analysis tasking.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A021: Test Plans/Test Procedures

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A001: Presentation Material (Safety mitigation plan)

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A022: Technical Report

4.3.3 Repair

As specified in a TO, the contractor shall inspect the MK 66 HUTT and support equipment for visual, electrical, and mechanical damage, or other failure modes. The contractor shall repair the MK 66 HUTT and support equipment back to ready for issue state. The contractor shall test the MK 66 HUTT and support equipment to ensure it is ready for issue state. The contractor shall prepare and deliver a Certificate of Compliance (COC) for all repaired material.

The contractor shall provide Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) depot services to include logistics and maintenance for the MK 66 HUTT. The contractor shall maintain and repair all subsystems. The contractor shall perform OEM level repairs on the signal generation module, software, and other non-commercial components. The contractor shall conduct component repair and maintain inventory for sparing. Logistic support includes shipping subsystems and associated material to operate MK 66 HUTT, preparation of maintenance support plans, installation procedures and support, spare parts lists, instructional training materials, repair analyses and procedures, provisioning data, and Failure Summary & Analysis Reports.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A024: Certificate of Compliance

4.3.4 Government Directed PECP/ECPs

In order to meet emergent requirements, new technologies, or parts obsolescence as identified in specific TOs, the contractor shall prepare and submit a Preliminary Engineering Change Proposals (PECPs) or Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) for changes to the MK 66 HUTT and support equipment baselines. The contractor shall submit PECPs and ECPs to the Government approved Configuration Management (CM) database. (Currently CMPro)

The contractor shall include all affected Technical drawings and documentation at the level specified in the TO. The contractor shall document any changes to product drawings and associated lists, commercial drawings and associated lists, and test equipment drawings for the production and manufacture of the MK 66 HUTT. The contractor shall develop CAD drawing files in the TDP worksheet. The contractor shall identify any item(s) that will be delivered with limited, restrictive rights or special license rights as required by DFARS 252.227-7989.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A007: Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)

4.3.5 Software Development

The contractor shall develop or modify software and conduct software validation testing for the MK 66 HUTT and support equipment software to meet emergent requirements as specified by TO. The contractor shall develop, modify, and deliver source code for the MK66 HUTT and support equipment.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A022: Technical Report - Study/Services

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A025: Software Product Specification/ Source Code

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A008: Software Version Description

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A028: Software Development Plan

4.3.6 Training

The contractor shall provide programming and operational training on the MK 66 and support equipment to Military and Civilian personnel at each of the Maintenance Activities (MA). The location of the training will be identified in individual TOs. The MAs are:

• Atlantic Undersea Test & Evaluation Center (AUTEC), Andros Island, Bahamas

• Naval Air Station Mayport, Mayport, FL

• Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Division Keyport, Keyport, WA

• Naval Undersea Warfare Center, San Diego Detachment (NUWCDET San Diego), Naval Air Station, North Island, CA

• Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Hawaii Detachment (NUWCDET Hawaii), Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kauai, HI

• Naval Base Guam, Guam USA

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A019: Training System Support Document (Task Performance Analysis)

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A020: Training Presentations and Videos

5.0 RESERVED

6.0 Government Furnished Information

The following Government Furnished Information (GFI) will be made available under this contract.

Number Title Applicable SOW Task Number

6.1 MIL-HDBK-2155 4.2.11

6.3 DODI 1322.26 4.2.16

6.4 MIL-PRF-29612 4.2.16

6.5 Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 4.2.6

7.0 Government Furnished Property

The Government may provide Government Furnished Property (GFP) as listed in Attachment 3. The contractor shall adhere to DFARS Clause 252.245–7005 for the management and reporting of Government Property and shall use the GFP Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) as specified in the clause. In addition, the contractor shall prepare and submit a Government Property (GP) Inventory Report to capture GFP status IAW CDRL A033.

The contractor shall deliver documentation in accordance with CDRL A026: Government Property Inventory Report

8.0 Quality Surveillance and Performance Standards

The Government will conduct quality surveillance via various methods including formal and informal meetings, review of technical reports, review of monthly progress reports, and review of deliverables. Contractor performance will be evaluated in the areas of technical quality, schedule/timeliness, management, utilization of small business, and regulatory compliance as follows:

• Technical Quality: The Government will evaluate technical quality using the criteria defined in the Performance Requirements Summary Table (PRST), Attachment 4;

• Schedule/Timeliness: The Government will evaluate the contractor’s ability to meet negotiated milestones and delivery schedules;

• Management: The Government will evaluate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract/task order;

• Utilization of Small Business: The Government will evaluate the contractor’s compliance with the Small Business Subcontracting Plan and any small business subcontracting goals contained in the contract/task order;

• Regulatory Compliance: The Government will evaluate the contractor’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract/task order relating to applicable regulations and codes.

9.0 Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Accessibility Requirements

The Government has determined that this procurement is an exception to the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Accessibility Standards (36 C.F.R. Part 1194, Appendix A). Notwithstanding that an exception exists, the Contractor may furnish items or services provided under this contract that comply with the ICT Accessibility Standards (36 C.F.R. Part 1194, Appendix A).

Exception #1 National Security for MK 66 Program

10.0 Security Compliance

10.1 Program Protection

SECURITY: All contractor personnel shall adhere to the Security provisions of 32 CFR Part 117 – National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) and the security requirements of the attached DD254.

While performing work at a Government Facility, contractor personnel shall comply with the security regulations of the host facility. Applicable FAR, DFARS, NMCARS clauses, and NAVSEA text shall be adhered to in the performance of this contract. Security incidents shall be promptly reported through the companies Facility Security Officer (FSO), to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), Technical Point of Contact (TPOC), and the Cognizant Security Office to NUWCDIVNPT Security.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) including Legacy FOUO and Covered Defense Information (meeting the definition of 48 CFR 252.204–7012(a)) generated and/or provided under this contract shall be marked and safeguarded as specified in DoD Instruction 5200.48, CUI available at:

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF. Any product containing Covered Defense Information shall be assigned a distribution statement (distribution statements B through F) in accordance with DoDI 5230.24 (Distribution Statements on Technical Documents); and DoDI 5230.24, Enclosure 3 Procedures, available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/523024p.pdf

INFORMATION SECURITY: If the work is performed at the contractor's facility, the contractor shall implement and maintain security procedures and controls to prevent unauthorized disclosure of classified information and controlled unclassified information (CUI) and to control distribution of CUI in accordance with National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) codifying 32 CFR Part 117, NISPOM Rule, and SECNAV M- 5510.36B. If the work is performed at the Government's facility, the contractor shall comply with facility policy.

CUI INCIDENT REPORTING AND RESPONSE: The contractor shall promptly report any unauthorized, inadvertent, or illegal release or disclosure of CUI to the Contracting Officer’s Representative / Technical Point of Contact (TPOC), Procuring Contracting Officer, and the Security Office. Contractor personnel shall coordinate this effort through the relevant industry site FSO.

PUBLIC RELEASE: Any controlled unclassified information pertaining to this contract shall not be released for public dissemination, including posting to any social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter, unless it has been approved for public release by appropriate U.S. Government authority. Proposed public releases shall be submitted for approval prior to release through the appropriate U.S. Government Office.

10.2 Operations Security (OPSEC)

OPSEC is a process that identifies critical information to determine if friendly actions can be observed by adversary intelligence systems, determines if information obtained by adversaries could be interpreted to be useful to them, and then executes selected measures that eliminate or reduce adversary exploitation of friendly critical information.

The contractor shall develop and implement, and update and maintain an OPSEC program to protect controlled unclassified and classified activities, information, equipment, and material used or developed by the contractor and any subcontractor during performance of the contract. The contractor shall be responsible for the subcontractor implementation of the OPSEC requirements. The contractor developed OPSEC program may include Information

Assurance and Communications Security (COMSEC). The OPSEC program shall be in accordance with National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) 28, and at a minimum shall include:

1) Assignment of responsibility for OPSEC direction and implementation.

2) Issuance of procedures and planning guidance for the use of OPSEC techniques to identify vulnerabilities and apply applicable countermeasures.

3) Establishment of OPSEC education and awareness training.

4) Provisions for management, annual review, and evaluation of OPSEC programs.

5) Flow down of OPSEC requirements to subcontractors when applicable.

While performing aboard Government sites, the contractor shall: comply with all OPSEC instructions and policies;

include OPSEC as part of its ongoing security awareness program and take all required Agency training; be responsive to the Supporting OPSEC Manager on a non-interference basis; and Protect sensitive unclassified information and activities, which could compromise classified information or operations, or degrade the planning and execution of operations performed by the Requiring Organization and contractor in support of the mission.

10.3 Electronic Spillage

Electronic Spillage (ES) is defined as a situation where information of higher classification than a system is authorized to process is introduced into that system, intentionally or otherwise. If a contractor is determined to be responsible for an ES, all direct and indirect costs incurred by the Government for ES remediation will be charged to the contractor.