Statement of Work - 17 July 2023.pdf

PDF 117 KB Posted

Attached to
SOURCES SOUGHT Air Force/Space Force Branding Marketing Optimization Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA302223Q0334
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This statement of work outlines requirements for a third party to evaluate and optimize the Air Force and Space Force merchandise licensing program. Key objectives include benchmarking the existing program against three similar licensing programs, conducting market research to identify opportunities, providing guidance on licensing agreements and terms, and developing customized documents and a five-year licensing strategy. The contractor will review the program, policies, and staffing; benchmark against other programs; identify potential new markets and product categories; develop scorecards and processes for evaluating licensees; and provide recommendations to streamline operations and optimize revenue growth. Deliverables include reports on findings from the program review and market analysis, a five-year licensing strategy, and a final assessment report detailing recommendations. The contractor will hold biweekly remote meetings and may travel to San Antonio for on-site visits.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

POC: April D. Rowden, AFPAA/AOL, april.rowden@us.af.mil

Statement of Work for Program Optimization and Operations + Governance

1.0 General

1.1 Background

The Air & Space Forces Intellectual Property Management Office (ASFIPM) manages the merchandise licensing activity for the Department of the Air Force (DAF). The trademark licensing section (the “Client”) is responsible for vetting merchandise license applications from companies around the world interested in developing Air Force- or Space Force-branded merchandise for retail. The section manages the executed licenses to ensure compliance with provisions and deliverables. Additionally, the office manages the royalties generated from the sales of officially licensed merchandise.

1.2 Objective

The Client seeks to have an experienced independent third party evaluate the overall performance of the San Antonio, Texas-based merchandise licensing program, provide best practices from industry to optimize operations, and develop a formal licensing strategy that will further enhance the brands’ overall equity. The specific objectives of the project are as follows:

a. Evaluate the existing program and its strategies, to include processes, policies, and manpower, benchmarking it against three competitive, like-minded licensing programs (non-military).

b. Conduct qualitative (number-based) market research of the retail landscape to identify potential licensing opportunities, target markets, and current market saturation of DAF’s Tier 1 logos. Tier 1 logos are the Air Force Symbol and the Space Force Delta.

c. Provide guidance on licensing agreement negotiations, including terms and royalty structures.

d. Develop customized documents (license application questions, checklists, scorecards) to aid in the identification and evaluation of potential licensees, as well as renewal of expiring licenses.

e. Develop a comprehensive 5-year licensing strategy tailored to the DAF’s brands and business goals.

POC: April D. Rowden, AFPAA/AOL, april.rowden@us.af.mil

1.3 Scope of Work

The contractor shall provide all resources and materials necessary to accomplish the following tasks, subtasks and deliverables outlined in this Statement of Work (SOW).

1.4 Period of Performance

The anticipated period of performance: Date of award plus 9 months. The task milestones and the timelines for specific deliverables will be agreed upon during project kickoff.

1.5 Place of Performance

The contractor will perform primarily remotely with 1-2 on-site visits in San Antonio, Texas (JBSA – Randolph), if needed, to observe the program and present deliverables.

Travel costs will be included in the total contract price.

2.0 Specific Tasks

2.1 Task 1: Program Review

Subtask 2.1.1 Review the DAF brand identity, licensee portfolio and assigned rights, and target markets.

Subtask 2.1.2 Review a minimum of 15 valid (not expired or cancelled) DAF standard licensees’ use of their granted contractual rights. Licensees will be selected during project kickoff.

Subtask 2.1.3 Review the Client’s program for compliance with relevant state, federal, or international policies and guidance that are applicable to the federal program, such as Proposition 65 and Extender Producer Liability laws.

Subtask 2.1.4 Review the Client’s current licensing process from application intake through license termination, to include renewal applications and early termination processes.

Subtask 2.1.5 Review the Client’s three primary license templates (crafter, small business, and standard), exhibits, and schedules, for clear legal terms and reflections of the most current trademark licensing standards and provisions.

Subtask 2.1.6 Review the Client’s current staffing and internal organizational structure relevant to existing workload.

2.2 Task 2: Program Analysis

Subtask 2.2.1 Benchmark Client’s program against three competitive, like-minded licensing programs (non-military) for operations, governance, and revenue generation.

Subtask 2.2.2 Identify potential new categories, consumers, and channels for the Tier 1 logos using the program’s existing analytics, as well as market analysis, field work, and trends. Recommendations should protect the brands, promote the brands, and generate profits.

Subtask 2.2.3 Researching at least five top U.S. retailers of the Client’s brands, to include brick-and-mortar and ecommerce, identify areas of market over-saturation and under-saturation for Tier 1 logos, focusing on distribution channels and product categories.

Retailers will be selected during project kickoff.

Subtask 2.2.4 Analyze the industry for emerging state, federal, and international policies, guidance, and practices that could have future impact the federal program, for example, lawsuits and updates to the United Nation’s Guiding Principles.

2.3 Task 3: Licensing Strategy Development

Subtask 2.3.1 Through a variety of datapoints, including initial findings, staff interviews, field work, market analysis, and trends, develop a customized 5-year licensing strategy aligned with the Client's brands and business objectives.

Subtask 2.3.2 Define the product categories and distribution channels for licensing within the United States.

Subtask 2.3.3 Recommend staffing and internal organizational structure relevant to the workload based on anticipated growth from implementing the licensing strategy.

2.4 Task 4: Licensee Identification and Evaluation

Subtask 2.4.1 Establish licensee acquisition processes, including but not limited to criteria for evaluation of potential partners, due diligence forms, and sample proposal forms.

Subtask 2.4.2 Develop a score card for screening potential applicants using a variety of datapoints, including initial findings, staff interviews, field work, market analysis, trends, and industry connections.

Subtask 2.4.3 Develop a score card for screening renewal applications using a variety of datapoints, including initial findings, staff interviews, field work, market analysis, trends, and industry connections.

3.0 Deliverables

The contractor will provide the following deliverables as part of the project:

a) Report on the findings and recommendations from the program review assessment, to include industry best practices.

b) Program analysis report which includes, but is not limited to:

a. analysis of potential licensing opportunities,

b. analysis of target markets,

c. analysis of market over/undersaturation for the Tier 1 logos in the retail space, to include big box, e-commerce, and brick-and-mortar stores,

d. licensing agreement templates and guidelines for negotiations,

e. score cards for new applications and renewal applications commiserate with the appropriate licensing tier, and

f. overall comparison to the three competitive, like-minded licensing programs (non-military).

c) Licensing strategy document outlining the recommended approach to protect the brand and grow its equity, including, but not limited to, product categories, territories, and distribution channels, for the next 5 years. Licensing strategy should identify organic and incremental new revenue opportunities to support the Client’s growth ambitions.

d) Final assessment report detailing recommendations to streamline operations while optimizing licensing standards and provisions, to include staffing and internal organizational structure of the program. Report should reflect projected revenue growth.

4.0 Meetings

The contractor will hold remote meetings. The contractor will have meetings with the primary POC or the deputy every two weeks to report on progress.

5.0 Required Travel

The contractor may travel on-site to San Antonio, Texas (JBSA-Randolph) throughout the contract period to observe processes and present deliverables.

6.0 Government Furnished Property/Equipment

Not applicable. There will be no Government Furnished Property or Equipment provided to the Contractor.

1.0 General
2.3 Task 3: Licensing Strategy Development
2.4 Task 4: Licensee Identification and Evaluation
3.0 Deliverables
4.0 Meetings
The contractor will hold remote meetings. The contractor will have meetings with the primary POC or the deputy every two weeks to report on progress.
5.0 Required Travel
6.0 Government Furnished Property/Equipment

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .