State Response to submitted questions.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STATEWIDE TRAVEL ADMINISTRATOR SERVICES
- Solicitation number
- RFP 171 260000002486 3
- Issued by
- Michigan
About this file
This document is a State Response to Submitted Questions related to Michigan's Statewide Travel Administrator Services contract opportunity. The state received a vendor inquiry regarding the negotiability of commissions earned on state travel, with the vendor expressing concern that travel management companies depend heavily on such commissions for business viability. The state maintained its position that commissions should be returned to the state to ensure best practices and unbiased booking decisions, though the response indicates the state would be willing to consider negotiations on this matter.
The response reflects the state's commitment to obtaining travel administration services that prioritize cost savings and impartial vendor selection over allowing service providers to retain commission revenue. This approach suggests the state views commission returns as a mechanism to eliminate potential conflicts of interest in travel booking recommendations and to direct savings back to the state, while remaining open to dialogue with prospective vendors on terms that might be mutually acceptable.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Vendor Questions | State Response |
| Are "all commissions earned on State Travel" negotiable? I'd imagine that travel management companies rely heavily on those commissions in order to stay in business. | The state maintains the position that commissions be returned to ensure best practice and unbiased bookings. However, negotiations could be considered. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .