STA 7114T Form - JA - Redaction - All-Lifts - Aluminum Stairs_ (1) (1) (1).pdf

TACOM OPSEC REVIEW CERTIFICATION

(OPSEC Program is Governed by AR 530-1, Operations Security)

DTA ALCD v1.00 Page 1 of 2STA FORM 7114, SEP 2006

I am aware that there is foreign intelligence interests in publicly available information; I have sufficient technical expertise in the subject matter to certify that it is appropriate to release this information to the public, because there are no operational, legal, or security reasons for withholding its release. Information that was given a previous OPSEC Review does not require a second review, unless the original information has been changed.

DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION TO RECEIVE OPSEC REVIEW

Title/Description of item to be released:

(STEP 1) Author/Originator Organization Phone #:

Are you a contractor? NOYES If YES, Contract #:

Forum where this information is to appear:

Purpose of release:

Product Format (check one): Article Briefing Web Site Equipment Display Video Tape Brochure CD

(STEP 2) TECH REVIEWER/TEAM LEADER:

Signature

Grade: Position:

Phone:

(STEP 3) Gov't Supervisor/Assoc Dir:

Phone:

Position:Grade:

Signature

(STEP 4) Gov't Contracting Officer (if applicable):

Phone:Signature

(STEP 5) Legal Office Review (if applicable):

Phone:Signature

(STEP 6) G2/G3 (OPSEC Officer):

Phone:

Position:

Signature

(STEP 7) Public Affairs Reviewer:

Phone:

Position:

Signature

Initial and Date in the appropriate box Author Tech

Reviewer Gov't Supervisor Gov't Cont.

Officer Legal G2/G3

(OPSEC Off) Public Affairs

a. Concur for Public Release

b. Concur for Public Release w/Comment

c. Nonconcur

PREVIOUS VERSIONS ARE OBSOLETE.

DTA ALCD v1.00 Page 2 of 2STA Form 7114, SEP 2006

TACOM OPSEC REVIEW PROCESS

1. An OPSEC Review is intended to evaluate government information (document, video tape, voice tape, briefings, articles, or equipment) to determine if it can be designated for unclassified and unlimited (public domain) distribution. The purpose of an OPSEC Review is to ensure the continued protection of government information, which for operation, legal or security reasons, is considered sensitive or critical information that should not be released to the public.

2. Before a government employee or contractor can release US Government information to the public, it must have an OPSEC Review.

3. TACOM, TARDEC and all TACOM installations, will use the STA Form 7114, OPSEC Review Certification to guide and document the OPSEC Review process. While individuals involved in the OPSEC Review Process can send the STA Form 7114 electronically, two hard copies of the proposed release must be provided to the G2/G3 Office.

4. OPSEC Review Steps:

STEP 1 - Author prepares information for the public release in response to government tasking (conference, symposium, periodical, briefing, etc.)

STEP 2 - A technical expert reviews the prepared product (must be someone other than the author).

STEP 3 - Government supervisor reviews and approves product (must be someone other than the author).

STEP 4 - Government contracting officer reviews if contractor or proprietary information in involved.

STEP 5 - Legal office reviews if contractor information, proprietary information, or copyrighted materials (e.g. text, illustrations, photos, movie clips or sound tracks) are involved. Attach owner's written consent to use copyright material, if available.

STEP 6 - G2/G3 reviews for operational security, security classification, and foreign disclosure.

STEP 7 - Public Affairs Office reviews for context and if product is consistent with Army/TACOM mission.

STEP 8 - Product is returned to originator for release. Author will add the following statement to the front page of the document, and on the video, CD, etc. "Distribution Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited, per AR 380-5. OPSEC Review conducted per AR 530-1 and

HQ TACOM OPSEC SOP."

STEP 9 - If OPSEC Review is returned with comments or is disapproved, a face-to-face meeting will be held to resolve comment concerns, if necessary.

STEP 10 - A copy of the STA Form 7114 and a copy of the product to be retained by the originator and G2/G3 as the official record copy.

Examples of potentially inappropriate information for public release

a. Equipment capabilities, limitations, and vulnerabilities. b. Detailed mission statement.

c. Operation schedules. d. Readiness and vulnerability assessments.

e. Test locations and dates. f. Inventory charts and reports.

g. Detailed budget data. h. Internal installation maps and photographs.

i. Standard Operating Procedures and tactics. j. Detailed personal biographies.

k. Detailed organization charts (with phone and email listings). l. Sensitive unclassified reports for internal Army use.

m. Technical and scientific proprietary data developed by a contractor. n. Unclassified technical data with military applications.

o. Critical Maintenance information. p. Information extracted from any internet website.

q. Personal information pertaining to individuals (PII). r. Lessons learned that could reveal sensitive military operations, exercises, or vulnerabilities.

s. Movement of assets where uncertainty of location is a program or operational element t. Logistics support (munitions, weapons movement).

u. Specific, real-time support to current/ongoing military operations.

PREVIOUS VERSIONS ARE OBSOLETE.

TACOM OPSEC REVIEW CERTIFICATION

(OPSEC Program is Governed by AR 530-1, Operations Security)

TACOM OPSEC REVIEW CERTIFICATION

DTA ALCD v1.00 Page 1 of 2

STA FORM 7114, SEP 2006

I am aware that there is foreign intelligence interests in publicly available information; I have sufficient technical expertise in the subject matter to certify that it is appropriate to release this information to the public, because there are no operational, legal, or security reasons for withholding its release. Information that was given a previous OPSEC Review does not require a second review, unless the original information has been changed.

I am aware that there is foreign intelligence interests in publicly available information; I have sufficient technical expertise in the subject matter to certify that it is appropriate to release this information to the public, because there are no operational, legal, or security reasons for withholding its release. Information that was given a previous OPSEC Review does not require a second review, unless the original information has been changed.

DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION TO RECEIVE OPSEC REVIEW

DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION TO RECEIVE OPSEC REVIEW

Are you a contractor?

Product Format (check one):

Initial and Date in the appropriate box Initial and Date in the appropriate box Author Tech Reviewer Gov't Supervisor Gov't Cont.

Officer Legal G2/G3 (OPSEC Off) Public Affairs

a. Concur for Public Release

b. Concur for Public Release w/Comment

c. Nonconcur

PREVIOUS VERSIONS ARE OBSOLETE.

DTA ALCD v1.00 Page 2 of 2 STA Form 7114, SEP 2006

TACOM OPSEC REVIEW PROCESS

1. An OPSEC Review is intended to evaluate government information (document, video tape, voice tape, briefings, articles, or equipment) to determine if it can be designated for unclassified and unlimited (public domain) distribution. The purpose of an OPSEC Review is to ensure the continued protection of government information, which for operation, legal or security reasons, is considered sensitive or critical information that should not be released to the public.

2. Before a government employee or contractor can release US Government information to the public, it must have an OPSEC Review.

3. TACOM, TARDEC and all TACOM installations, will use the STA Form 7114, OPSEC Review Certification to guide and document the OPSEC Review process. While individuals involved in the OPSEC Review Process can send the STA Form 7114 electronically, two hard copies of the proposed release must be provided to the G2/G3 Office.

4. OPSEC Review Steps:

STEP 1 - Author prepares information for the public release in response to government tasking (conference, symposium, periodical, briefing, etc.)

STEP 2 - A technical expert reviews the prepared product (must be someone other than the author).

STEP 3 - Government supervisor reviews and approves product (must be someone other than the author).

STEP 4 - Government contracting officer reviews if contractor or proprietary information in involved.

STEP 5 - Legal office reviews if contractor information, proprietary information, or copyrighted materials (e.g. text, illustrations, photos, movie clips or sound tracks) are involved. Attach owner's written consent to use copyright material, if available.

STEP 6 - G2/G3 reviews for operational security, security classification, and foreign disclosure.

STEP 7 - Public Affairs Office reviews for context and if product is consistent with Army/TACOM mission.

STEP 8 - Product is returned to originator for release. Author will add the following statement to the front page of the document, and on the video, CD, etc. "Distribution Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited, per AR 380-5. OPSEC Review conducted per AR 530-1 and

HQ TACOM OPSEC SOP."

STEP 9 - If OPSEC Review is returned with comments or is disapproved, a face-to-face meeting will be held to resolve comment concerns, if necessary.

STEP 10 - A copy of the STA Form 7114 and a copy of the product to be retained by the originator and G2/G3 as the official record copy.

1. An OPSEC Review is intended to evaluate government information (document, video tape, voice tape, briefings, articles, or equipment) to determine if it can be designated for unclassified and unlimited (public domain) distribution. The purpose of an OPSEC Review is to ensure the continued protection of government information, which for operation, legal or security reasons, is considered sensitive or critical information that should not be released to the public.

2. Before a government employee or contractor can release US Government information to the public, it must have an OPSEC Review.

3. TACOM, TARDEC and all TACOM installations, will use the STA Form 7114, OPSEC Review Certification to guide and document the OPSEC Review process. While individuals involved in the OPSEC Review Process can send the STA Form 7114 electronically, two hard copies of the proposed release must be provided to the G2/G3 Office.

4. OPSEC Review Steps:

STEP 1 - Author prepares information for the public release in response to government tasking (conference, symposium, periodical, briefing, etc.)

STEP 2 - A technical expert reviews the prepared product (must be someone other than the author).

STEP 3 - Government supervisor reviews and approves product (must be someone other than the author).

STEP 4 - Government contracting officer reviews if contractor or proprietary information in involved.

STEP 5 - Legal office reviews if contractor information, proprietary information, or copyrighted materials (e.g. text, illustrations, photos, movie clips or sound tracks) are involved. Attach owner's written consent to use copyright material, if available.

STEP 6 - G2/G3 reviews for operational security, security classification, and foreign disclosure.

STEP 7 - Public Affairs Office reviews for context and if product is consistent with Army/TACOM mission.

STEP 8 - Product is returned to originator for release. Author will add the following statement to the front page of the document, and on the video, CD, etc. "Distribution Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited, per AR 380-5. OPSEC Review conducted per AR 530-1 and

HQ TACOM OPSEC SOP."

STEP 9 - If OPSEC Review is returned with comments or is disapproved, a face-to-face meeting will be held to resolve comment concerns, if necessary.

STEP 10 - A copy of the STA Form 7114 and a copy of the product to be retained by the originator and G2/G3 as the official record copy.

Examples of potentially inappropriate information for public release Examples of potentially inappropriate information for public release

a. Equipment capabilities, limitations, and vulnerabilities.

a. Equipment capabilities, limitations, and vulnerabilities.

b. Detailed mission statement.

b. Detailed mission statement.

c. Operation schedules.

c. Operation schedules.

d. Readiness and vulnerability assessments.

d. Readiness and vulnerability assessments.

e. Test locations and dates.

e. Test locations and dates.

f. Inventory charts and reports.

f. Inventory charts and reports.

g. Detailed budget data.

g. Detailed budget data.

h. Internal installation maps and photographs.

h. Internal installation maps and photographs.

i. Standard Operating Procedures and tactics.

i. Standard Operating Procedures and tactics.

j. Detailed personal biographies.

j. Detailed personal biographies.

k. Detailed organization charts (with phone and email listings).

k. Detailed organization charts (with phone and email listings).

l. Sensitive unclassified reports for internal Army use.

l. Sensitive unclassified reports for internal Army use.

m. Technical and scientific proprietary data developed by a contractor.

m. Technical and scientific proprietary data developed by a contractor.

n. Unclassified technical data with military applications.

n. Unclassified technical data with military applications.

o. Critical Maintenance information.

o. Critical Maintenance information.

p. Information extracted from any internet website.

p. Information extracted from any internet website.

q. Personal information pertaining to individuals (PII).

q. Personal information pertaining to individuals (PII).

r. Lessons learned that could reveal sensitive military operations, exercises, or vulnerabilities.

r. Lessons learned that could reveal sensitive military operations, exercises, or vulnerabilities.

s. Movement of assets where uncertainty of location is a program or operational element

s. Movement of assets where uncertainty of location is a program or operational element

t. Logistics support (munitions, weapons movement).

t. Logistics support (munitions, weapons movement).

u. Specific, real-time support to current/ongoing military operations.

u. Specific, real-time support to current/ongoing military operations.

PREVIOUS VERSIONS ARE OBSOLETE.

Robert Anick 18 Mar 2015

PEO CS&CSS

PEO CS&CSS OPSEC Refiew Certification Stacey R. Bell STA Form 7114-2 18 Mar 2015