SR87_220578_Signalization_Project_Manual_&_Bid_Documents.pdf

PROJECT MANUAL, SPECIFICATIONS,

PLANS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

Signal at State Road No. 87 and Ray Helms Road

SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA

PREPARED FOR:

Santa Rosa County, Engineering Division

6051 Old Bagdad Highway, Suite 300

Milton, FL 32583

PREPARED BY:

226 South Palafox Place, Floor 6

Pensacola, Florida 32502

Signal at State Road No. 87 and Ray Helms Road April 2026

Santa Rosa County, Florida

Signal at State Road No. 87 and Ray Helms Road

PROJECT MANUAL - TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PROJECT NARRATIVE……………………………………………………………………

2.0 SUMMARY OF PAY ITEMS………………………...……………………………………..

3.0 GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS……………………………………………………...…

4.0 PROJECT PERMITS………………………………………………………………………..

4.1 FDOT DRIVEWAY CONNECTION PERMIT

5.0 UTILITY COORDINATION……………………………………………………………….

6.0 GEOTECHNICAL AND SUE REPORTS……….……………………………………

7.0 BID PLANS…………………………………………………………………………………..

1.0 PROJECT NARRATIVE

1.0 PROJECT NARRATIVE

Introduction

This project consists of the design and construction of a new traffic signal and associated roadway improvements at the intersection of State Road 87 (SR 87) and Ray Helms Road (also known as Business

Street) in Santa Rosa County, Florida. The project is located within the vicinity of the Milton Interchange

Park and is intended to improve traffic operations, enhance safety, and accommodate increased vehicular and pedestrian activity associated with ongoing development in the area.

SR 87 serves as a major north-south arterial roadway with a posted speed limit of approximately 45 mph, while Ray Helms Road functions as a minor roadway providing local access. The existing intersection is currently unsignalized and requires control improvements to address turning movements, traffic conflicts, and future traffic demand. This project has been developed in accordance with applicable Florida

Department of Transportation (FDOT) standards and Santa Rosa County requirements.

Background

JTS Capital, LLC purchased the subject property in 2020 to initiate the design and permitting efforts for the Milton Interchange Park (MIP). Progress on the project was subsequently placed on hold due to insufficient sanitary sewer capacity available to serve the site.

In 2021, Santa Rosa County acquired the property and advanced the project by initiating the design of a new wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), to be located at the southeast corner of the proposed industrial park. This improvement was intended to provide the necessary infrastructure to support future development within the MIP.

In 2023, Santa Rosa County further facilitated the project by acquiring the required roadway right-of-way from JTS Capital to establish a connection to State Road 87 (SR 87), thereby allowing development efforts to move forward. Through coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), it was determined that a traffic signal would be required at the proposed access point to ensure safe and efficient traffic operations.

The project is located at the intersection of Ray Helms Road (also known as Business Street) and SR 87 in Santa Rosa County, Florida.

Scope

The proposed improvements include the installation of a fully actuated traffic signal system along with associated roadway, signing, pavement marking, and ITS enhancements. Major elements of the work include:

• Traffic Signalization:

Installation of a new mast arm traffic signal system, including steel mast arms, signal poles, signal heads, pedestrian signals with countdown timers, and a traffic controller cabinet. The system includes vehicle video detection and pedestrian detection equipment to optimize signal operations.

• Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS):

Integration of advanced technologies including video detection cameras, a high-definition CCTV camera, managed Ethernet switch, wireless communication device, and signal preemption system for emergency response vehicles.

• Electrical and Communication Infrastructure:

Installation of underground conduit, pull boxes, service wiring, and electrical power service to support signal operations and communication systems.

• Roadway Improvements:

Milling and resurfacing of the existing asphalt pavement within the project limits, including friction course placement to improve ride quality and skid resistance.

• Signing and Pavement Markings:

Installation of new regulatory, warning, and guide signs, along with thermoplastic pavement markings, raised pavement markers, and crosswalk markings to clearly define traffic movements and improve visibility.

• Pedestrian Facilities:

Installation of pedestrian signal equipment and associated detection devices to enhance pedestrian safety and accessibility across SR 87.

• Miscellaneous Improvements:

Minor curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements as required to support signalization and pedestrian features.

All work shall be completed in accordance with FDOT Standard Plans, Standard Specifications, and project-specific details. Maintenance of traffic shall be provided throughout construction to ensure the safe and continuous flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic.

2.0 SUMMARY OF PAY ITEMS

101-1 MOBILIZATION LS 1

120-1 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1

150 FDOT ACCESS PERMIT REQUIREMENTS LS 1

327-70-6 MILLING EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT, 1 1/2" AVG DEPTH SY 5635

337-7-88 ASPHALT CONCRETE FRICTION COURSE,TRAFFIC E, FC-12.5, PG 76-22 TN 465

520-1-11 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE F LF 18

520-2-4 CONCRETE CURB, TYPE D LF 18

0522-1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAYS, 4" THICK SY 13

630-2-11 CONDUIT, FURNISH & INSTALL, OPEN TRENCH LF 180

630-2-12 CONDUIT, FURNISH & INSTALL, DIRECTIONAL BORE LF 262

632-7-1 SIGNAL CABLE- NEW OR RECONSTRUCTED INTERSECTION, FURNISH & INSTALL PI 1

635-2-11 PULL & SPLICE BOX, F&I, 13" x 24" COVER SIZE EA 9

639-1-122 ELECTRICAL POWER SERVICE, F&I, UNDERGROUND, METER PURCHASED BY CONTRACTOR AS 1

639-2-1 ELECTRICAL SERVICE WIRE, FURNISH & INSTALL LF 75

641-2-12 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POLE, F&I, TYPE P-II SERVICE POLE EA 1

646-1-11 ALUMINUM SIGNALS POLE, PEDESTAL EA 3

649-21-10 STEEL MAST ARM ASSEMBLY, FURNISH AND INSTALL, SINGLE ARM 60' EA 2

649-21-15 STEEL MAST ARM ASSEMBLY, FURNISH AND INSTALL, SINGLE ARM 70' EA 1

650-1-14 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SIGNAL, FURNISH & INSTALL ALUMINUM, 3 SECTION, 1 WAY AS 7

650-1-16 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SIGNAL, FURNISH & INSTALL ALUMINUM, 4 SECTION, 1 WAY AS 1

653-1-11 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, FURNISH & INSTALL LED COUNTDOWN, 1 WAY AS 2

653-1-12 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, FURNISH & INSTALL LED COUNTDOWN, 2 WAYS AS 1

660-4-11 VEHICLE DETECTION SYSTEM- VIDEO, FURNISH & INSTALL CABINET EQUIPMENT EA 1

660-4-12 VEHICLE DETECTION SYSTEM- VIDEO, FURNISH & INSTALL ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT EA 3

663-1-122 SIGNAL PRIORITY AND PREEMPTION SYSTEM, FURNISH AND INSTALL, GPS, DETECTOR EA 1

663-1-123 SIGNAL PRIORITY AND PREEMPTION SYSTEM, FURNISH AND INSTALL, GPS, CABINET ELECTRONICS EA 1

665-1-11 PEDESTRIAN DETECTOR, FURNISH & INSTALL, STANDARD EA 4

670-5-161 TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY, F&I, NEMA W/STANDARD LOCK, 1 PREEMPTION AS 1

682-1-163 ITS CCTV CAMERA, PRESSURIZED, IP, HIGH DEFINITION EA 1

684-1-1 MANAGED FIELD ETHERNET SWITCH, FURNISH & INSTALL EA 1

684-6-12 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE, FURNISH & INSTALL ETHERNET SUBSCRIBER UNIT EA 1

685-1-13 UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY, FURNISH AND INSTALL, LINE INTERACTIVE WITH CABINET EA 1

685-2-1 REMOTE POWER MANAGEMENT UNIT- RPMU, FURNISH AND INSTALL EA 1

700-1-111 SINGLE COLUMN GROUND SIGN ASSEMBLY, F&I GROUND MOUNT, LESS THAN 12 SF EA 2

700-1-600 SINGLE COLUMN GROUND SIGN ASSEMBLY, REMOVE EA 2

700-5-22 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN, FURNISH & INSTALL, OVERHEAD MOUNT, 12-18 SF EA 3

704-1-4 TUBULAR MARKER, 36" YELLOW POST EA 8

706-1-3 RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER, TYPE B EA 104

710-90 PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, FINAL SURFACE LS 1

711-11123 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID, 12" FOR CROSSWALK AND ROUNDABOUT LF 391

711-11125 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID, 24" FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK LF 156

711-11141 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, 2-4 DOTTED GUIDELINE/ 6-10 GAP EXTENSION, 6" GM 0.02

711-11170 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW EA 7

711-11241 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, YELLOW, 2-4 DOTTED GUIDE LINE /6-10 DOTTED EXTENSION LINE, 6" GM 0.02

710 12290 PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, DURABLE PAINT, YELLOW, ISLAND NOSE SF 140

711-14125 THERMOPLASTIC, PREFORMED, WHITE, SOLID, 24" FOR CROSSWALK LF 212

711-14160 THERMOPLASTIC, PREFORMED, WHITE, MESSAGE EA 4

711-14170 THERMOPLASTIC, PREFORMED, WHITE, ARROW EA 4

711-16101 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD-OTHER SURFACES, WHITE, SOLID, 6" GM 0.45

711-16131 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD-OTHER SURFACES, WHITE, SKIP, 6",10-30 SKIP OR 3-9 LANE DROP GM 0.22

711-16201 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD-OTHER SURFACES, YELLOW, SOLID, 6" GM 0.24

711-12224 THERMOPLASTIC, YELLOW, SOLID, 18" FOR DIAGONAL OR CHEVRON LF 12

QUANTITY

SUMMARY OF PAY ITEMS

PAY

ITEM

NO.

DESCRIPTION UNIT

3.0 GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS

Governing Documents and Specifications

This Santa Rosa County project shall be designed and constructed in full compliance with all applicable Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Specifications and Standard Plans. All work performed under this project will adhere to the most current edition of the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and the applicable FDOT Standard Plans governing the work. The intent of this requirement is to ensure uniformity with established state transportation criteria, promote public safety, and maintain a high level of quality and durability throughout all phases of the project.

The contractor shall be responsible for executing all work in accordance with FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans, including but not limited to roadway construction, drainage systems, signing and pavement markings, maintenance of traffic, and all associated appurtenances. This requirement specifically includes the installation, modification, or integration of traffic signals and pedestrian signals, which shall be designed and constructed in strict accordance with FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans. All signal equipment, materials, and installation procedures shall meet FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans to ensure proper functionality, safety, and long-term reliability.

Any deviations from FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans must be reviewed and approved in advance by Santa Rosa County and any applicable regulatory agencies.

Materials incorporated into the project shall conform to FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans and shall be tested, handled, and installed in accordance with those requirements to ensure compliance and performance.

Construction methods, inspection procedures, and quality control measures shall also align with FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans. This includes adherence to required testing frequencies, tolerances, and documentation as defined within FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans. The contractor shall coordinate with Santa Rosa County representatives and the Engineer of Record to verify that all work meets or exceeds the requirements established by FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans.

All temporary traffic control during construction shall comply with FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans to ensure the safety of the traveling public, pedestrians, and construction personnel. By requiring adherence to FDOT Specifications and Standard Plans, Santa Rosa County ensures that the completed infrastructure integrates seamlessly with the existing transportation network and meets established standards for safety, efficiency, and long-term maintenance.

4.0 PROJECT PERMITS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

DRIVEWAY CONNECTION PERMIT

FOR ALL CATEGORIES

Access Classification:

See following pages for General and Special Provisions

PART 1: PERMIT INFORMATION

APPLICATION NUMBER:

Permit Category:

Project:

Permittee:

Section/Mile Post: State Road:

Section/Mile Post: State Road:

PART 2: PERMITTEE INFORMATION

Permittee Name:

Permittee Mailing Address:

City, State, Zip:

Telephone:

Engineer/Consultant/or Project Manager:

Engineer responsible for construction inspection:

NAME P.E. #

Mailing Address:

City, State, Zip:

Telephone:

PART 3: PERMIT APPROVAL

The above application has been reviewed and is hereby approved subject to all Provisions as attached.

Permit Number:

Department of Transportation

Title:

Special provisions attached

Date of Issuance:

Signature:

Department Representative's Printed Name

Temporary Permit (If temporary, this permit is only valid for 6 months)

If this is a normal (non-temporary) permit it authorizes construction for one year from the date of issuance. This can only be extended by the Department as specified in 14-96.007(6).

SYSTEMS PLANNING - 06/06

850-040-18

NOYES

NOYES

Rule 14-96, F.A.C.

FAX, Mobile Phone, etc.

2020-A-395-00072

Jack Morris

Jack Morris

Milton Interchange Park

83867

OPERATIONS ENGINEER

2914 Cleveland Ave

2020-A-395-00072

Jack Morris

Heather Baril

Ft. Myers, Florida 33901

Jack Morris

87040 / 18.000

Fort Myers, Florida 33901

(239) 337-3993 ext. ______

2914 Cleveland Ave

12/18/2025

F - 10,001 to 30,000 VTPD

(239) 337-3993 ext. ______

Fax: / Mobile:

Heather Baril

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Heather Baril 12/18/2025

PART 4: GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. Notify the Department of Transportation Maintenance Office at least 48 hours in advance of starting proposed work.

Phone: , Attention:

2. A copy of the approved permit must be displayed in a prominent location in the immediate vicinity of the connection construction.

3.

Comply with Rule 14-96.008(7), F.A.C., on Utility Notification Requirements.4.

Comply with Rule 14-96.008(1), F.A.C., Disruption of Traffic.

5. All work performed in the Department's right of way shall be done in accordance with the most current Department standards, specifications and the permit provisions.

6. The permittee shall not commence use of the connection prior to a final inspection and acceptance by the Department.

7. Comply with Rule 14-96.003(3)(a), F.A.C., Cost of Construction.

8. If a Significant Change of the permittee's land use, as defined in Section 335.182, Florida Statutes, occurs, the Permittee must contact the Department.

9. Medians may be added and median openings may be changed by the Department as part of a Construction Project or Safety Project. The provision for a median might change the operation of the connection to be for right turns only.

10. All conditions in NOTICE OF INTENT WILL APPLY unless specifically changed by the Department.

11. All approved connection(s) and turning movements are subject to the Department's continuing authority to modify such connection(s) or turning movements in order to protect safety and traffic operations on the state highway or State Highway System.

12. Transportation Control Features and Devices in the State Right of Way. Transportation control features and devices in the Department's right of way, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, medians, median openings, or any other transportation control features or devices in the state right of way, are operational and safety characteristics of the State Highway and are not means of access. The Department may install, remove or modify any present or future transportation control feature or device in the state right of way to make changes to promote safety in the right of way or efficient traffic operations on the highway.

13. The Permittee for him/herself, his/her heirs, his/her assigns and successors in interest, binds and is bound and obligated to save and hold the State of Florida, and the Department, its agents and employees harmless from any and all damages, claims, expense, or injuries arising out of any act, neglect, or omission by the applicant, his/her heirs, assigns and successors in interest that may occur by reason of this facility design, construction, maintenance, or continuing existence of the connection facility,except that the applicant shall not be liable under this provision for damages arising from the sole negligence of the Department.

14. The Permittee shall be responsible for determining and notify all other users of the right of way.

15. Starting work on the State Right of Way means that I am accepting all conditions on the Permit.

SYSTEMS PLANNING - 06/06

850-040-18

Rule 14-96, F.A.C.

8509812824 Stacey Mcleod

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

NOYES

OTHER SPECIAL PROVISIONS:

PART 5: SPECIAL PROVISIONS

NON-CONFORMING CONNECTIONS:

If this is a non-conforming connection permit, as defined in Rule Chapters 14-96 and 14-97, then the following shall be a part of this permit.

1. The non-conforming connection(s) described in this permit is (are) not permitted for traffic volumes exceeding the Permit Category on page 1 of this permit, or as specified in "Other Special Provisions" below.

2. All non-conforming connections will be subject to closure or relocation when reasonable access becomes available in the future.

PART 6: APPEAL PROCEDURES

You may petition for an administrative hearing pursuant to sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes. If you dispute the facts stated in the foregoing Notice of Intended Department Action (hereinafter Notice), you may petition for a formal administrative hearing pursuant to section 120.57 (1), Florida Statutes. If you agree with the facts stated in the Notice, you may petition for an informal administrative hearing pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes. You must file the petition with:

Clerk of Agency Proceedings Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458

1.

The petition for an administrative hearing must conform to the requirements of Rule 28-106.201(2) or Rule 28-106.301(2), Florida Administrative Code, and be filed with the Clerk of Agency Proceedings by 5:00 p.m. no later than 21 days after you received the Notice. The petition must include a copy of the Notice, be legible, on 8 1/2 by 11 inch white paper, and contain:

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

If there are disputed issues of material fact a formal hearing will be held, where you may present evidence and argument on all issues involved and conduct cross-examination. If there are no disputed issues of material fact an informal hearing will be held, where you may present evidence or a written statement for consideration by the Department.

Mediation, pursuant to section 120.573, Florida Statutes, may be available if agreed to by all parties, and on such terms as may be agreed upon by all parties. The right to an adminstrative hearing is not affected when mediation does not result in a settlement.

Your petition for an administrative hearing shall be dismissed if it is not in substantial compliance with the above requirements of Rule 28-106.201(2) or Rule 28-106.301(2), Florida Administrative Code. If you fail to timely file your petition in accordance with the above requirements, you will have waived your right to have the intended action reviewed pursuant to chapter 120, Florida Statutes, and the action set forth in the Notice shall be conclusive and final.

Your name, address, telephone number, any Department of Transportation identifying number on the Notice, if known, the name and identification number of each agency affected, if known, and the name, address, and telephone number of your representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding.

An explanation of how your substantial interests will be affected by the action described in the Notice;

A statement of when and how you received the Notice;

A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, you must so indicate;

A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts you contend warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action, as well as an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules and statutes you contend require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action;

A statement of the relief sought, stating precisely the desired action you wish the agency to take in respect to the agency's proposed action.

SYSTEMS PLANNING - 06/06

850-040-18

Rule 14-96, F.A.C.

See attached special conditions.

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

SPECIAL CONDITIONS TO PERMIT

***The Following Special Conditions Apply***

1) The Department will review ALL lane/sidewalk closures, detour, and lane shift requests separately from the permit process. FDOT approval is required before commencement of work involving the closure, detour, or lane shift for work along the State highway system. If a lane closure is needed, submit a written request with proposed dates/times/MOT indices or plan.

2) Permittee is responsible for restoring FDOT right-of-way to original or better condition after construction is complete. Permittee shall be responsible to clean and grade ditch to the flow line of culverts and/or match adjacent existing conditions.

3) Permittee agrees to utilize State Right-of-Way for ingress/egress only. Permittee understands that State Right-of-Way is not to be used for parking and is to be kept clear of vehicles and obstacles.

4) All lanes must be open within 24 hours after notice, during an evacuation notice of a hurricane or other catastrophic event and shall remain open for the duration of the evacuation or event as directed by the local FDOT Maintenance Engineer or his designee.

5) All vehicles and equipment shall have legible company identification and operating strobe lights while present on State right-of-way.

6) Schedule and have an on-site Pre-construction meeting (representative from FDOT, Testing laboratory, paving contractor, and any other interested party present).

7) At final acceptance/completion of this permitted project, the applicant will provide documentation by a Professional Engineer register in the State of Florida that construction was accomplished in accordance with the requirements set out in the permit. This documentation shall include a statement that necessary inspections, test, and physical measurements have been made, that construction was accomplished in accordance with the design information included with the connection permit in accordance with Rule Chapter 14-96, F.A.C., and that all materials entering into the work conform to the specifications in the connection permit, conform to the applicable specifications contained in the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, or otherwise conform to or meet generally accepted professional practices. The Record Drawings Report by Permittee’s Professional Engineer, Form 850-040-19, shall be used for this purpose.

8) PRIOR to commencement of work within State right-of-way, provide electronically signed & sealed Security Instrument Receipt/Cost Estimate and Performance Bond (send original bond to local permits office). Also provide electronically signed and sealed Quality Control Plan and add FDOT as additional insured on the Liability Insurance (minimum $500,000 general liability each occurance).

9) Schedule and have an on-site pre-construction meeting prior to work on proposed traffic signal/drilled shaft.

10) Drilled Shaft Installation Plan must be provided for review and approval prior to drilled shaft pre-construction meeting.

11) Permittee is required to provide a third party CTQP Drilled Shaft certified inspector for drilled shaft installation. Information for CTQP Drilled Shaft certified inspector must be provided to FDOT.

12) Engineer of Record is required to provide acceptance or denial of drilled shafts.

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

State Road 87 at Ray Helms Road

(Milton Interchange Park)

Santa Rosa County

Intersection Control Evaluation

Prepared For:

Florida Department of Transportation

District Three

October 25, 2023 i

Table of Contents

Introduction

Purpose and Need

Existing Conditions

Existing Speeds

Crash History

Traffic Volumes

Signal Warrant Analysis

ICE

Traffic signal

Two-lane Roundabout

Recommendation

Appendix

List of Figures Figure 1: Study Location Map

List of Tables Table 1: Collision Type

Table 2: Projected Traffic Volumes for 2028

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Introduction Milton Interchange Park is a proposed mixed use commercial and industrial park in Santa Rosa County, containing twenty (20) lots along with supporting infrastructure and common area tracts. The development proposes two (2) vehicular use access points to State Road 87 (SR 87). This will include a right-in/ right-out access directly to SR 87 across from the existing Welcome Church Road and a full maneuver intersection via Ray Helms Road. At the request of FDOT District 3 traffic operations, a study was commissioned to evaluate if any operational improvements are needed at this location. One of the findings of this study was that a traffic signal is warranted at the intersection to accommodate the expected traffic, especially truck traffic expected at the intersection. These recommendations meet the applicability standards as given in the Manual on Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) for initiating an ICE which will be used to determine the most appropriate intersection control at this location.

Purpose and Need The purpose and need for intersection control at SR 87 and Ray Helms Road is to provide a safe and efficient transportation facility for all roadway users that pass through the intersection. Substantial traffic volumes are expected at this intersection as the industrial park is built out, and based on this an intersection control strategy that better facilitates the intersecting volumes will be needed to maintain safe operations.

Existing Conditions Milton Interchange Park (MIP) is comprised of two owners, Santa Rosa County owns 186.32 acres (lots

10-24 zoned M-1, Industrial) plus the proposed entrance road right of way connecting to SR 87. The second owner, JTS Capital Realty owns 24.12 acres ( Lots 1-9, zoned HCD). Santa Rosa County is planning to start construction of MIP in January 2024. A new WWTP is also being constructed starting in

January 2024. Both projects need to be complete by the end of February 2025 to accommodate construction of major distribution facilities already committed to the MIP. Surrounding uses include the

I-10 right-of-way to the North, residential to the East, airport and residential to the South, and gas station to the West across State Highway 87.

SR 87 at Ray Helms Road is currently an unsignalized intersection consisting of unrestricted movements north and south on SR 87. At this location, SR 87 is a four-lane divided urban minor arterial. There is a dedicated left-turn lane on both the north and south approaches of the intersection.

Ray Helms Road at SR 87 is regulated by a STOP sign and a STOP bar. It is a two-lane undivided roadway.

There are no dedicated turn lanes on either approach of Ray Helms Road.

Figure 1 shows the intersection location for which the ICE is being performed. The red line included on the map shows a potential realignment of Welcome Church Road to tie in to the intersection of SR 87 with

Ray Helms Road. This re-alignment is conceptual at this point, and would require three willing sellers for the right-of-way, coordination with Florida Power and Light, and funding for the new road included in the budget for Santa Rosa County.

Figure 1: Study Location Map

Existing Speeds

The posted speed limit for SR 87 is 45 mph, and the speed limit for Ray Helms Road is 25 mph.

Crash History

Historical crash information for the years 2018 through August 7, 2023, was obtained from Signal Four

Analytics for the un-signalized intersections of SR 87 at Ray Helms Road and SR 87 with Welcome Church

Road. Table 2 is a summary of the documented crash data:

STUDY INTERSECTION

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Table 1: Collision Type

Year Left Turn Rear End Right Angle Side Swipe

Loss of

Control Head-on

Pedestrian/

Bike Other

2018 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2020 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2021 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2022 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2023 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 11 4 2 4 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COLLISIONS 21 Property Damage Control 15 Injury 6

A review of the crash report narratives revealed that four of the crashes occurred at the Ray Helms intersection, while the remaining 17 occurred at the Welcome Church intersection. More than half of the crashes that occurred were left-turning crashes out of which 36% resulted in injuries to the passengers.

Of the total crashes, one resulted in injuries where one or more people required transportation to a medical facility. This involved a vehicle turning left at the Ray Helms intersection in front of a northbound motorcycle on SR 87.

Traffic Volumes The forecast AADT for SR 87 for the year 2028 was prepared by combining data from the Traffic Impact

Study Report of Milton Interchange Park dated June 12, 2023 (which assumes full-buildout of the industrial park) with projected background volumes on SR 87 using a growth trend based on historical

AADT data from the Florida Traffic Online Website. The total forecast AADT was used along with hourly factors obtained from the FDOT Source Book for the roadway context (C-2) to determine hourly volumes for SR 87.

Table 2: Projected Traffic Volumes for 2028

TIME SR 87

Existing Ray Helms Rd

Left Turn Right Turns

12.00 AM 147 17 41

1.00 AM 101 11 25

2.00 AM 83 9 22

3.00 AM 96 9 20

4.000 AM 155 13 29

5.00 AM 355 25 59

6.00 AM 757 58 135

7.00 AM 1105 114 266

8.00 AM 997 136 318

9.00 AM 921 148 346

10.00 AM 951 144 335

11.00 AM 1019 202 471

12.00 PM 1068 260 606

1.00 PM 1079 196 457

2.00 PM 1130 185 431

3.00 PM 1211 195 456

4.00 PM 1277 219 511

5.00 PM 1269 265 618

6.00 PM 951 160 373

7.00 PM 699 124 290

8.00 PM 546 105 246

9.00 PM 424 91 212

10.00 PM 316 63 146

11.00 PM 236 35 83

TOTAL 16892 2784 6496

Signal Warrant Analysis A review of signal warrants was made for the intersection. MUTCD Warrant 1a, Warrant 1b, Warrant 2, and Warrant 3 were met for 100% volume threshold.

ICE

Stage 1 of the ICE process is the screening of intersection control strategies using the Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions (CAP-X) and Safety Performance of Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) tools. Approved 2020-A-395-00072

If this initial screening does not reveal which strategy is best, more refined analysis is used in Stages 2 and

3 to reach a decision.

Based on Figure A1 of the FDOT Manual on ICE, traffic signal and two lane roundabout alternatives were viable alternatives considering projected traffic volumes. Due to existing right of way constraints, high truck volume and operational characteristics of the intersection, a signalized intersection is recommended per the ICE evaluation. The Stage 1 ICE Worksheet is included in the study appendix.

Traffic signal

Due to the projected turning volumes at the intersection at full buildout, dual left turn lanes will eventually be needed for southbound SR 87 as well as a northbound right turn auxiliary lane. This will necessitate dual receiving lanes for eastbound Ray Helms Road. With these improvements, this strategy should facilitate the traffic demand through the intersection efficiently. For the three-legged intersection the overall volume to capacity ratio with traffic signal control ranks first with the best pedestrian accommodation. The intersection meets MUTCD Warrants 1A, 1B and 2 and 3 for the signal operation requirement. The traffic signal strategy will be advanced as a possible control strategy.

Acknowledging that Welcome Church Road may be re-aligned in the future to come in as the east leg of this intersection, a separate ICE analysis was prepared for a 4-way intersection. In both the three-legged and four-legged ICE analyses the traffic signal alternative outperforms the two-lane roundabout alternative in capacity and pedestrian accommodation.

Two-lane Roundabout

A two- lane roundabout at this location could operate with a volume to capacity ratio below 1, but it will be nearly at capacity in the AM. The roundabout ranks first in the Crash Prediction methodology in SPICE, but it does not accommodate traffic volumes or pedestrians as efficiently as a signal. Existing right of way widths could make it difficult to fit the roundabout in at this location without an acquisition as the inscribed circle for a two-lane roundabout can be up to 200 feet across. For these reasons, the roundabout option will not be advanced as a possible control strategy.

Recommendation It is recommended that the Department proceed with a traffic signal intersection control strategy at the intersection of SR 87 at Ray Helms Road.

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Appendix

Florida Department of Transportation

Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening

CAP-X Results

SPICE Results

Historical AADT

Date 10/16/2023

18.229

16,892

2 Left

Through 666

0 Right 95

2 Left 356

Through 698

0 Right

Agency/CompanyKevin Abel, PE

FDOT Project # NASTATE ROAD 87 AT RAY HELMS ROAD (MILTON INTERCHANGE PARK) kabel@moffattnichol.com

Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic

Volumes

Crosswalk on Approach? No Left-Through

MilepostSR 87

Design Vehicle

Design Year AADT

Control Vehicle

Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)

Primary Functional Classification

Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turn

Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left-Turn

Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30Florida Department of Transportation

Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form

Moffatt & Nichol

Multimodal Context

(Describe the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit activity in the area and the potential for activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns )

Daily Truck % 9.1%

A pp ro ac h #2

Direction Southbound

FDOT District

Project Funding Source

Email

Non-federal

County

C2 - RuralIntersection Type FDOT Context ClassificationAt-Grade Intersection

Project Type Other

Milton, FL

15,606Existing AADTNone/New Intersection

Multi-Use Path? No Left-Through-Right Through 498

Scheduled Bus Service?

A pp ro ac h #1

Direction Northbound

Through-Right

Yes

Weekday PM Peak

Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turn

No Through-Right Right

Through Left

Scheduled Bus Service? No

Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach

Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic

Volumes

Left-Through Weekday AM Peak

On-Street Bike Facilities? Yes Through Left

Multi-Use Path? No Left-Through-Right Through

On-Street Bike Facilities?

Stage 1: Screening

Project Name

Submitted By

Left-Turn

Crosswalk on Approach?

Major Street Information

Route #: Route Name(s)

Existing Control Type

To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms are to be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Selections must be made in the "Intersection Type" and "Project Funding Source" cells below for the appropriate Stage 1 and Stage 2 forms to fully populate.

Project Locality (City/Town/Village )

Project Purpose (What is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken? )

No

Study Period #2 Traffic

Volumes

Weekday PM Peak

District 3

Milton Interchange Park is a proposed mixed use commercial and industrial park in Santa Rosa County at I-10 and SR

87. The development proposes two (2) vehicular use access points to State Road 87 (SR 87). A right-in/ right-out access (“access point 1”) directly to SR 87 across from the existing Welcome Church Road and a full maneuver intersection (“access point 2”) via Ray Helms Road.

There are bike lanes on both sides of the major road with no pedestrian signal or crosswalk. The minor road does not have a ped signal or crosswalk. There are no fixed transit routes in the area.

The purpose of this project was to study the operational and safety characteristics of the intersection of SR 87 at Ray

Helms Road, and then make recommendations on how to alleviate any deficiencies or issues.

Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62)Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62)

Project Setting Description

(Describe the area surrounding the intersection )

Santa Rosa

Design Speed (mph)

Target Speed (mph) [if app.]

Rural Minor Arterial

Right 190

Weekday AM Peak

Daily Truck % 9.1%

Study Period #2 Traffic

Volumes

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

FDOT ICE: Stage 1

18,560

Left 308

Through

Right 257

Left

Through

Right

Left

Through

Right

Weekday PM Peak

On-Street Bike Facilities? No Through Left

Crosswalk on Approach? No Left-Through

Daily Truck %

Existing Control Type None/New Intersection

Route #: N/A

Multi-Use Path?

Milepost (if app.)

•There were twenty-one (21) documented crashes reported by the Signal Four Analytics within the last five (6) years.

•One (1) of the reported collisions (5%) resulted in injury where one or more people required transportation to a medical facility.

Daily Truck %

A pp ro ac h #3

Study Period #2 Traffic

VolumesLeft-Turn

Crash History (Existing Intersections Only)

Append the most recent five-years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety performance, discuss briefly here:

Direction Number of Lanes

Right

Weekday AM Peak

On-Street Bike Facilities? Through Left

Scheduled Bus Service? Through-Right

Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turn

Through

Study Period #1 Traffic

VolumesSidewalks along:

Crosswalk on Approach?

Daily Truck %

A pp ro ac h #2

Bus Stop on Approach? Right-Turn

Multi-Use Path?

Bus Stop on Approach?

Left-Through-Right

Study Period #2 Traffic

Volumes

Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic

Volumes

Multi-Use Path? No Left-Through-Right Through

Scheduled Bus Service? No Through-Right Right

Left-Through Weekday PM Peak

Sidewalks along: Neither side of the approach Left-Turn

Through Left

Study Period #2 Traffic

VolumesSidewalks along: Neither side of the approach Left-Turn

Minor Street Information

No Left-Through Weekday AM Peak

Route Name(s) Ray Helms Road

Weekday PM Peak

On-Street Bike Facilities? No

Through

Design Year AADT

Design Vehicle Passenger car (P) Control Vehicle Passenger car (P)

A pp ro ac h #1

Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic

Volumes

9.1%

Scheduled Bus Service? No Through-Right Right

No Right-Turn

Crosswalk on Approach?

Rural Local Design Speed (mph)

Target Speed (mph) [if app.]

Weekday AM Peak

No Left-Through-Right

Primary Functional Classification

Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)

Existing AADT 2,000

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

4.17 4.45 2 1

4.64 4.37 1 1

SSI

Rank

0.64 0.56

This strategy would accommodate the vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic well.

Control Strategy Evaluation

Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts.

Roundabout

(2-lane)

0.92 0.62

With capacity limitations and potential R/W constrains, this option will not be advanced as a control strategy.

CAP-X Outputs

Control Strategy

Two-Way Stop-

Controlled

All-Way Stop-

Controlled

Signalized

Control

Roundabout

(1-lane)

Justification Weekday PM

Peak

V/C Ratio

Strategy to be

Advanced?

Weekday AM

Peak

SPICE Outputs

Crash

Prediction

Rank

Ped

Accom.

Bike

Accom.

Continuous

Green Tee

Quadrant

Roadway

Thru-Cut

(Unsignalized)

Jughandle

Thru-Cut

(Signalized)

Median

U-Turn

Displaced Left-

Turn

RCUT

(Unsignalized)

RCUT

Bowtie

Other (Type)

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Date

DateSignature

Resolution

To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer

Comments

DTOE Name Signature

Project Determination

DDE Name

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Date 10/16/2023

18.229

16,892

2 Left 18

Through 666

0 Right 95

2 Left 445

Through 698

0 Right 34

Design Speed (mph)

Target Speed (mph) [if app.]

Rural Minor Arterial

Right 190

Weekday AM Peak

Daily Truck % 9.1%

Study Period #2 Traffic

Volumes

Stage 1: Screening

Project Name

Submitted By

Left-Turn

Crosswalk on Approach?

Major Street Information

Route #: Route Name(s)

Existing Control Type

To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms are to be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Selections must be made in the "Intersection Type" and "Project Funding Source" cells below for the appropriate Stage 1 and Stage 2 forms to fully populate.

Project Locality (City/Town/Village )

Project Purpose (What is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken? )

No

Study Period #2 Traffic

Volumes

Weekday PM Peak

District 3

Milton Interchange Park is a proposed mixed use commercial and industrial park in Santa Rosa County at I-10 and SR

87. This analysis considers a re-alignment of Welcome Church Road to align with Ray Helms Road making a 4-way intersection.

There are bike lanes on both sides of the major road with no pedestrian signal or crosswalk. The minor road does not have a ped signal or crosswalk. There are no fixed transit routes in the area.

The purpose of this project was to study the operational and safety characteristics of the intersection of SR 87 at Ray

Helms Road, and then make recommendations on how to alleviate any deficiencies or issues.

Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62)Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62)

Project Setting Description

(Describe the area surrounding the intersection )

Santa Rosa

Through Left

Scheduled Bus Service? No

Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach

Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic

Volumes

Left-Through Weekday AM Peak

On-Street Bike Facilities? Yes Through Left 17

Multi-Use Path? No Left-Through-Right Through

On-Street Bike Facilities?

A pp ro ac h #1

Direction Northbound

Through-Right

Yes

Weekday PM Peak

Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turn

No Through-Right Right

FDOT District

Project Funding Source

Email

Non-federal

County

C2 - RuralIntersection Type FDOT Context ClassificationAt-Grade Intersection

Project Type Other

Milton, FL

15,606Existing AADTNone/New Intersection

Multi-Use Path? Yes Left-Through-Right Through 498

Scheduled Bus Service? 33

Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30Florida Department of Transportation

Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form

Moffatt & Nichol

Multimodal Context

(Describe the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit activity in the area and the potential for activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns )

Daily Truck % 9.1%

A pp ro ac h #2

Direction Southbound

Agency/CompanyKevin Abel, PE

FDOT Project # NASTATE ROAD 87 AT RAY HELMS ROAD (MILTON INTERCHANGE PARK) kabel@moffattnichol.com

Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic

Volumes

Crosswalk on Approach? No Left-Through

MilepostSR 87

Design Vehicle

Design Year AADT

Control Vehicle

Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)

Primary Functional Classification

Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turn

Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left-Turn

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

18,560

Left 308

Through

Right 257

Left 33

Through

1 Right 17

Left

Through

Right

Rural Local Design Speed (mph)

Target Speed (mph) [if app.]

Weekday AM Peak

No Left-Through-Right

Primary Functional Classification

Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)

Existing AADT 2,000

Weekday PM Peak

On-Street Bike Facilities? No

Through

Design Year AADT

Design Vehicle Passenger car (P) Control Vehicle Passenger car (P)

A pp ro ac h #1

Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic

Volumes

9.1%

Scheduled Bus Service? No Through-Right Right

No Right-Turn

Crosswalk on Approach?

114Through Left

Study Period #2 Traffic

VolumesSidewalks along: Neither side of the approach Left-Turn

Minor Street Information

No Left-Through Weekday AM Peak

Route Name(s) Ray Helms Road

Bus Stop on Approach?

Left-Through-Right

Study Period #2 Traffic

Volumes

Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic

Volumes

Multi-Use Path? No Left-Through-Right Through

Scheduled Bus Service? No Through-Right Right 21

Left-Through Weekday PM Peak

Sidewalks along: Neither side of the approach Left-Turn

Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turn

Through

Study Period #1 Traffic

VolumesSidewalks along:

Crosswalk on Approach?

Daily Truck % 9.1%

A pp ro ac h #2

Bus Stop on Approach? Right-Turn

Multi-Use Path?

Daily Truck %

A pp ro ac h #3

Study Period #2 Traffic

VolumesLeft-Turn

Crash History (Existing Intersections Only)

Append the most recent five-years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety performance, discuss briefly here:

Direction Number of Lanes

Right

Weekday AM Peak

On-Street Bike Facilities? Through Left

Scheduled Bus Service? Through-Right

•There were twenty-one (21) documented crashes reported by the Signal Four Analytics within the last five (6) years.

•One (1) of the reported collisions (5%) resulted in injury where one or more people required transportation to a medical facility.

Multi-Use Path?

Milepost (if app.)

Daily Truck %

Existing Control Type None/New Intersection

Route #: N/A

Weekday PM Peak

On-Street Bike Facilities? No Through Left 37

Crosswalk on Approach? No Left-Through

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

5.02 4.37 2 1

4.64 4.33 1 2

(Unsignalized)

Bowtie

Other (Type)

Median

U-Turn

Displaced Left-

Turn

Jughandle

Thru-Cut

Ped

Accom.

Bike

Accom.

Continuous

Green Tee

Quadrant

Roadway

Thru-Cut

(Unsignalized)

Control Strategy Evaluation

Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts.

Roundabout

(2-lane)

0.95 0.62

With capacity limitations and potential R/W constraints, this option will not be advanced as a control strategy.

CAP-X Outputs

Control Strategy

Two-Way Stop-

Controlled

All-Way Stop-

Controlled

Signalized

Control

Roundabout

(1-lane)

Justification Weekday PM

Peak

V/C Ratio

Strategy to be

Advanced?

Weekday AM

Peak

SPICE Outputs

Crash

Prediction

Rank

0.68 0.60

This strategy would accommodate the vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic well.

SSI

Rank

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Date

DateDDE Name

Project Determination

Signature

Resolution

To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer

Comments

DTOE Name Signature

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Dynamic Results Summary

No

TYPE OF INTERSECTION

Overall

V/C Ratio

V/C Ranking

Pedestrian Accommodations

Bicycle Accommodations

Traffic Signal 0.64 1 4.17 4.45

2NS X 1EW 0.92 2 4.86 4.46

2 X 2 0.92 2 4.64 4.37

Use the "yes/no" drop-down menus in Step 2 (Base and Alt Selection) to exclude intersection types from summary rankings, if they are not applicable.

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Heather Baril 12/18/2025 kabel Text Box Three-Legged Intersection AM

TYPE OF INTERSECTION

Overall

V/C Ratio

V/C Ranking

Pedestrian Accommodations

Bicycle Accommodations

Traffic Signal 0.56 1 4.17 4.45

2 X 2 0.62 2 4.64 4.37

2NS X 1EW 0.87 3 4.86 4.46

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Heather Baril 12/18/2025 kabel

Three-Legged Intersection PM

TYPE OF INTERSECTION

Overall

V/C Ratio

V/C Ranking

Pedestrian Accommodations

Bicycle Accommodations

Traffic Signal 0.68 1 5.02 4.37

2NS X 1EW 0.95 2 4.86 4.41

2 X 2 0.95 2 4.64 4.33

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Heather Baril 12/18/2025 kabel

Four-Legged Intersection AM

Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Dynamic Results Summary

No

TYPE OF INTERSECTION

Overall

V/C Ratio

V/C Ranking

Pedestrian Accommodations

Bicycle Accommodations

Traffic Signal 0.60 1 4.18 4.37

2 X 2 0.62 2 4.64 4.33

2NS X 1EW 0.90 3 4.86 4.41

Use the "yes/no" drop-down menus in Step 2 (Base and Alt Selection) to exclude intersection types from summary rankings, if they are not applicable.

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Heather Baril 12/18/2025 kabel

Four-Legged Intersection PM

Project Name:

Intersection:

Agency:

Project Reference:

City:

State:

Date:

Analyst:

Opening

Year

Design

Year Rank

Total 5.07 6.65 29.39

Fatal & Injury 1.79 2.23 10.10

Total 6.43 8.82 38.13

Fatal & Injury 1.12 1.64 6.89

1-Way/2-Way

# of Major Street Lanes (both directions)

Major Street Approach Speed

5 or fewer

Less than 55 mph

SSI Score

AADT Within SPF Prediction

Range?

Source of Prediction

100 100Calibrated SPF

Total Project Life Cycle

Project Information

FLORIDA

10/13/2023

KEVIN L ABEL

SR 87 AT RAY HELMS ROAD

MOFFATT & NICHOL

SANTA ROSA COUNTY

At-Grade Intersection

Intersection Type

Opening Year

Design Year

Facility Type

Number of Legs

On Rural Multilane Highway

3-leg

2-way Intersecting 2-way

Control Strategy

Traffic Signal

Crash Prediction Rank

No

Crash Type Opening Year Design Year

Yes

1100Uncalibrated SPF2-lane Roundabout 1001

Crash Prediction Summary

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Project Name:

Intersection:

Agency:

Project Reference:

City:

State:

Date:

Analyst:

Opening

Year

Design

Year Rank

Total 6.78 10.59 44.08

Fatal & Injury 2.67 3.67 16.04

Total 5.34 9.57 37.16

Fatal & Injury 1.14 2.16 8.18

1-Way/2-Way

# of Major Street Lanes (both directions)

Major Street Approach Speed

5 or fewer

Less than 55 mph

SSI Score

AADT Within SPF Prediction

Range?

Source of Prediction

100 97Calibrated SPF

Total Project Life Cycle

Project Information

FLORIDA

10/13/2023

KEVIN L ABEL

SR 87 AT RAY HELMS ROAD

MOFFATT & NICHOL

SANTA ROSA COUNTY

At-Grade Intersection

Intersection Type

Opening Year

Design Year

Facility Type

Number of Legs

On Rural Multilane Highway

4-leg

2-way Intersecting 2-way

Control Strategy

Traffic Signal

Crash Prediction Rank

Yes

Crash Type Opening Year Design Year

No

294Uncalibrated SPF2-lane Roundabout 1001

Crash Prediction Summary

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE

2022 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT

COUNTY: 58 - SANTA ROSA

SITE: 0271 - SR 87 - 300' S OF I-10 RAMPS (SOUTH SIDE)

YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR

2022 15000 C N 7700 S 7300 9.00 54.80 9.10 2021 13800 F N 7000 S 6800 9.00 56.20 12.20 2020 13400 C N 6800 S 6600 9.00 56.40 12.20 2019 15400 C N 7500 S 7900 9.00 54.90 10.20 2018 13000 C N 6300 S 6700 9.00 55.40 9.90 2017 13200 C N 6400 S 6800 9.00 56.00 12.40 2016 11700 C N 5500 S 6200 9.00 56.00 10.10 2015 10900 C N 5200 S 5700 9.00 55.60 10.10 2014 9100 C N 4600 S 4500 9.00 55.00 9.60 2013 8500 C N 4300 S 4200 9.00 56.80 10.70 2012 10600 C N 5300 S 5300 9.00 57.20 6.40 2011 9800 C N 5000 S 4800 9.00 55.80 6.80 2010 8900 C N 4500 S 4400 10.61 55.16 7.50 2009 9700 C N 5100 S 4600 10.79 55.78 6.70 2008 9400 C N 4900 S 4500 11.25 54.42 7.70 2007 9300 C N 0 S 0 10.84 54.80 9.90

AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE

S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE

V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN

*K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES

Approved 2020-A-395-00072

Rule 14-96, F.A.C. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RECEIPT OF CONNECTION APPLICATION

AND FEE (OR WAIVER OF FEE)

850…