SPRTA126Q0094_01.pdf

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

PAGE OF PAGES

5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE

(X)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER3. EFFECTIVE DATE

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

SPRTA1-26-Q-0094-0001

DLA WEAPONS SUPPORT AT OKLAHOMA CIT

DLR PROCUREMENT OPERATIONS (AO)

3001 STAFF DRIVE

TINKER AFB OK 73145-3070

BUYER: Lori Bautista/AOAA lori.bautista@us.af.mil Phone: (385) 591- 3148

SPRTA1

29 APR 2026 FD20302400825

J

X

SPRTA126Q0094

31-OCT-2025

XX

X

FMS REQUIREMENT

See Block 14 for amendment details.

SPRTA1-26-Q-0094-0001

Continuation of block 14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

The purpose of this amendment is to add First Article, add sections L&M, update the required quantity and, in turn, extend the proposal due date to allow ample time to revise proposals.

FIRST: In Section B add First Article Line Items

FROM: 0001, 0002, 0003

TO: 0001, 0001AA, 0001AB, 0001AC, 0001AD, 0001AE, 0001AF

SECOND: Update the required quantity

FROM: 44 EACH

TO: 30 EACH

THIRD: The proposal due date will be extended to account for time to revise any proposal that may change due to the quantity increase. The proposal due date is hereby changed as follows:

FROM: 01 December 2025, 3:00PM CST TO: 29 May 2026, 3:00PM CST

FOURTH: All other terms and conditions remain the same for this solicitation.

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

SECTION B

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

NOTE 1: To be eligible for contract award, offerors must be approved sources, in accordance with the Qualification Requirements clause. Note that the Government is not required to delay the contract award to review pending Source Approval Requests (SARs). Therefore, offerors are encouraged to submit the SAR as soon as possible. Due to export control restrictions, the Engineering Data List (EDL) and drawings can only be obtained through www.sam.gov via a secure link to the solicitation notice for view only by vendors authorized to view exportcontrolled data.

NOTE 2: In order to maintain unit price integrity, contractors must price Line Items individually or clearly state that there is a “ZERO DOLLAR CHARGE” for these items.

NOTE 3: The Government may accept BID A (FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED) or BID B (FIRST ARTICLE NOT REQUIRED) depending upon which alternative is most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. DO NOT QUOTE BOTH BIDS.

NOTE 4: It is anticipated that pricing of this action will be based on adequate price competition;

therefore, offerors will not be required to provide information necessary to determine price reasonableness. However, if after receipt of proposals it is determined that adequate price competition does not exist; cost or pricing data (see FAR 15.403) shall be required within 10 calendar days after receipt of the Government's request if applicable.

Information CLIN

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price

NSN: 2840-01-443-5590 NZ

DUCT,COMPRESSOR,AIR

6th Stage duct segment provides 6th stage compressor margin/air seal between 6th stage compressor blades on rear comprssor case & stator assy.

Nickel Alloy Manufacturer Part Number 51992 4082849 52661 4082849 Associated Document(s) Line Item(s)

FD20302400825 03 0001

Priority: E Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:

Buy American Act/Balance of Payments Program IUID Required: Yes Class I ODS Substance Application/Use Quantity None None None

FIRST ARTICLE TEST PLAN

Bid A - First Article Required Item No.

0001AA

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount 1 LT Not Separately Priced

CLIN ACRN ACRN Total

0001AA AA

First Article Test Plan First Article Test Plan IAW DD Form 1423

9999DTH260143

Associated Document(s) Line Item(s)

FD20302400825 03 0008

Priority: E

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Standard Inspection Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:GR-D-TBD

Transportation From Continental United States CONUS (CONUS) Sources

TYPE / SHIP TO CODE F.O.B.

* FA8111 ORIGIN

Type / Ship To PACRN Mark For

* FA8111 First Article Monitor Type / Ship To Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract Req No / Pri

Required Delivery

* FA8111 1 LT *30 Calendar Days Non-MilStrip

Proposed Delivery

* FA8111 1 LT

Inspection and Acceptance Reports will be submitted using Wide Area Workflow (WAWF).

NOTE 1: DO NOT proceed with line items 0001AB and 0001AC until the First Article Test Plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Activity. Estimated approval/disapproval time is 45 days.

NOTE 2: Contractor First Article Test Plan IAW DD 14231, attached hereto.

FIRST ARTICLE TEST REPORT

Bid A - First Article Required Item No.

0001AB

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount 1 LT Not Separately Priced

CLIN ACRN ACRN Total

0001AB AA

First Article Test Report

FIRST ARTICLE TEST REPORT

Bid A - First Article Required Test Report In Accordance With DD Form 1423, Attached Hereto.

9999DTH260144

Associated Document(s) Line Item(s)

FD20302400825 03 0009

Priority: E

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Standard Inspection Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:GR-D-TBD

Transportation From Continental United States CONUS (CONUS) Sources

TYPE / SHIP TO CODE F.O.B.

* FA8111 ORIGIN

Type / Ship To PACRN Mark For

* FA8111 First Article Monitor Type / Ship To Quantity (U/I) *ARO from the date of government approvalof test plan.

Req No / Pri

Required Delivery

* FA8111 1 LT *120 Calendar Days Non-MilStrip

Proposed Delivery

* FA8111 1 LT

Inspection and Acceptance Reports will be submitted using Wide Area Workflow (WAWF).

NOTE: The first article test reports shall be received at OCALC/ENRS, 120 calendar days from the date of government approval of test plan.

NOTE 1: This item will ship in place at the contractor's facility and will be held until the First Article Test Report is approved and the QAR has signed the WAWF receiving report confirming the first article has been accepted and can be invoiced for payment.

NOTE 2: This First Article is one of the requirements set forth in FAR Clause 52.2093.

NOTE 3: The contractor may present this first article exhibit to the Government Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) for inspection and acceptance when the contractor has received the First Article Test Report Approval Modification from the Government Contracting Officer.

BID A-FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED (DESTRUCTIVE EXHIBIT)

Bid A - First Article Required Item No.

0001AC

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

BID A-FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED (DESTRUCTIVE EXHIBIT)

Bid A - First Article Required

1 EA

CLIN ACRN ACRN Total

0001AC AA

NSN: 2840-01-443-5590 NZ

First Article - Same As Basic Item Above First Article - First Article To Be Destroyed Associated Document(s) Line Item(s)

FD20302400825 03 0001AB

Priority: E

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Origin Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2015 2008

Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:GR-D-TBD Buy American Act/Balance of Payments Program

Transportation From Continental United States CONUS (CONUS) Sources

TYPE / SHIP TO CODE F.O.B.

* TBDTBD ORIGIN

Type / Ship To PACRN Mark For

* TBDTBD PAB FA Monitor Type / Ship To Quantity (U/I) IAW Form 260 Req No / Pri

Required Delivery

* TBDTBD 1 EA IAW Form 260 DGRQ5431330084 / PRI:

Proposed Delivery

* TBDTBD 1 EA

Inspection and Acceptance Reports will be submitted using Wide Area Workflow (WAWF).

NOTE: The first article exhibit shall be destructively tested/evaluated IAW LPFQAR003 (attached hereto) and will be condemned and disposed of at the vendor's facility.

NOTE: These First Article exhibits are the remaining two first articles required by FAR Clause 52.2093.

Do not ship these exhibits with the First Article Test Report. These two exhibits may be presented to the Government QAR for Inspection and Acceptance when the Contractor has received the First Article Test Report Approval Modification from the Government Contracting Officer.

BID-A FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED (NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXHIBITS)

Bid A - First Article Required Item No.

0001AD

Firm Fixed Price

BID-A FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED (NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXHIBITS)

Bid A - First Article Required Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

2 EA

CLIN ACRN ACRN Total

0001AD AA

NSN: 2840-01-443-5590 NZ

First Article - Same As Basic Item Above First Article - Exhibits for Non-Destructive Testing Associated Document(s) Line Item(s)

FD20302400825 03 0001AA

Priority: E

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Origin Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2015 2008

Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:GR-D-QAK Buy American Act/Balance of Payments Program

Transportation From Continental United States CONUS (CONUS) Sources

TYPE / SHIP TO CODE F.O.B.

* DGR002 ORIGIN

Type / Ship To PACRN Mark For

* DGR002 PAB DGRQ00

Type / Ship To Quantity (U/I) On or Before Req No / Pri

Required Delivery

* DGR002 2 EA 23 SEP 2026 DGRQ5431330084 / PRI:

Proposed Delivery

* DGR002 2 EA

Inspection and Acceptance Reports will be submitted using Wide Area Workflow (WAWF).

NOTE 1: The quantity of First Article exhibits for Line Item 0001AD may be considered part of the contract quantity if the First Articles on Line Item 0001AC are approved by the Government as required by FAR Clause 52.2093.

NOTE 2: These items will ship in place at the contractor's facility and will be held until the First Article Test Report has been reviewed and approved, and the Government Quality Assurance (QAR) has signed the WAWF receiving report confirming the First Articles have been accepted and can be invoiced for payment. This note refers to the "TYPE/SHIP TO" block of this item number and the data associated with the block.

NOTE 3: The contractor may present these First Article exhibits to the QAR for inspection and acceptance when the contractor has received the First Article Test Report Approval Modification data associated with that block.

NOTE 4: The First Articles offered must be manufactured at the facilities in which those items are to be produced under the contract, or if the First Articles are a component not manufactured by the contractor, such component must be manufactured at the facilities in which the component is to be produced for the contract. A certification to this effect must accompany each First Article which is offered.

NOTE 5: The contractor SHALL NOT take any action on Line Item 0001AE until approval/disapproval is received for the First Article Units required in above line items.

BID-A FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED (PRODUCTION ITEMS)

Bid A - First Article Required Item No.

0001AE

Firm Fixed Price Best Estimated Qty

U/I Unit Price Amount

28 EA

CLIN ACRN ACRN Total

0001AE AA

NSN: 2840-01-443-5590 NZ

First Article - Same As Basic Item Above First Article - Production Items Associated Document(s) Line Item(s)

FD20302400825 03 0001

Priority: E

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Origin Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2015 2008

Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:GR-D-QAK Buy American Act/Balance of Payments Program

Transportation From Continental United States CONUS (CONUS) Sources

TYPE / SHIP TO CODE F.O.B.

* DGR002 ORIGIN

Type / Ship To PACRN Mark For

* DGR002 PAB DGRQ00

Type / Ship To Quantity (U/I) On or Before Req No / Pri

Required Delivery

* DGR002 28 EA 23 SEP 2026 DGRQ5431330084 / PRI:

BID-A FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED (PRODUCTION ITEMS)

Bid A - First Article Required Proposed Delivery

* DGR002 28 EA

Inspection and Acceptance Reports will be submitted using Wide Area Workflow (WAWF).

NOTE: If the First Article units for Line Item 0001AD are approved by the Government, then 2 each will become a part of production for Line Item 0001AE and combine to make the current required quantity of 30 each.

BID-B PRODUCTION ARTICLES (NO FIRST ARTICLE REQUIRED)

Bid B - First Article NOT Required Item No.

0001AF

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

30 EA

CLIN ACRN ACRN Total

0001AF AA

NSN: 2840-01-443-5590 NZ

Production Article - Same As Basic Item Above Production Article Associated Document(s) Line Item(s)

FD20302400825 03 0001

Priority: E

Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Origin Quality Assurance: This is a Critical Safety Item (CSI) on the F100 engine. Contract Quality Requirement/Special Inspection Requirements: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements: ISO 9001:2015 Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:GR-D-QAK Buy American Act/Balance of Payments Program

Transportation From Continental United States CONUS (CONUS) Sources

TYPE / SHIP TO CODE F.O.B.

* DGR002 ORIGIN

Type / Ship To PACRN Mark For

* DGR002 PAB DGRQ00

Type / Ship To Quantity (U/I) On or Before Req No / Pri

Required Delivery

* DGR002 30 EA 23 SEP 2026 DGRQ5431330084 / PRI:

Proposed Delivery

* DGR002 30 EA

Inspection and Acceptance Reports will be submitted using Wide Area Workflow (WAWF).

TAC:D283

SHIP TO (FOREIGN MILITARY SALES)

TYPE/CODE: * DGR002

SUPPLEMENTAL ADDRESS CODE: DA2QAK

FMS CASE CODE/LOA: GR-D-QAK/001

MAPAC SHIP TO CODE: DGR002

MAPAC MARK FOR: DGRQ00

REQUISITION NUMBER: (See Individual Line Item) REQUISITION PRIORITY: (See Individual Line Item)

AWARD NUMBER:

TYPE/CODE: * FA8111

SUPPLEMENTAL ADDRESS CODE: TBDTBD

FMS CASE CODE/LOA: GR-D-TBD/001

MAPAC SHIP TO CODE: FA8111

MAPAC MARK FOR: First A

REQUISITION NUMBER: (See Individual Line Item) REQUISITION PRIORITY: (See Individual Line Item)

AWARD NUMBER:

TYPE/CODE: * TBDTBD

SUPPLEMENTAL ADDRESS CODE: TBDTBD

FMS CASE CODE/LOA: GR-D-TBD/001

MAPAC SHIP TO CODE: TBDTBD

MAPAC MARK FOR: FA Moni

REQUISITION NUMBER: (See Individual Line Item) REQUISITION PRIORITY: (See Individual Line Item)

AWARD NUMBER:

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

SECTION E

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

FIRST ARTICLE TEST, CERTIFICATION AND DISPOSITION REQUIREMENTS (FEB 1998)

(IAW FAR 9.3082)

Test criteria are as follows:

Lot/Item Government Test/Inspection Requirements 0001 N/A

Lot/Item Contractor Test/Inspection Requirements 0001 See Below

Part Number: 4082849

First Article Quantity is 3 parts:

-2 parts will be part of production quantity -1 part will be in addition to production quantity

First article test requirements shall be per LPF-QAR-003 and the following:

-a. All three first articles shall be inspected in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5 of LPF-

QAR-003.

-b. The assembly detail part numbers (if an assembly), shall be inspected per paragraphs 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5 of LPF-QAR- 003 prior to assembly.

-c. After completion of inspections per 9.B.a above, one article shall be destructively tested/evaluated in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 3.6 of LPF-QAR-003.

-NOTE: Deliveries (FAT test plan and Reports) are preferably submitted on ISO-10149 compliant CD-ROM in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format.

Disposition of First Articles:

First Article part will be destructively tested. This item will be condemned and disposed of at vendor's facility.

The cognizant Government engineering authority shall be the final authority for determining if a contractor meets the conditions of waiver.

First article testing is waived if the offeror is the prime contractor, Pratt & Whitney.

This is a critical part used in the F100 series turbine engine. Poor quality parts will have an adverse effect on mission capability and system safety. For this reason, First Article

Testing is required to insure first time manufacturers or manufacturers that have not produced the item within three years manufacture parts in accordance with the drawing and specification requirements.

Disposition of the First Article shall be as follows:

Lot/Item Approved

0001AC

0001AD

Expended in Testing Returned to Contractor for Shipment with Production Item(s).

Lot/Item Disapproved 0001AC Returned to Contractor 0001AD Returned to Contractor

(The above Clause/Provision has been modified.)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

SECTION F

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

52.247-48 F.O.B. DESTINATION--EVIDENCE OF SHIPMENT (FEB 1999)

(IAW FAR 47.305-4(c))

Applicable Item No(s)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

SECTION G

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (AUG 1998)

Accounting and Appropriation Chargeable ACRN Funds Citation Amount Chargeable

AA 9711X8242 .0002 4F X LC 5W CQAKGR 000000 00000 001000 503000 F03000 $0.00

PSR: 285641 FSR: 034206 DSR: 152331 CIN: F3YTBK5085A0020000AA

REFERENCE:

AA FD20302400825-03

ACRN TOTAL $ 0.00

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

SECTION I

CONTRACT CLAUSES

52.209-1 QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS (FEB 1995)

(IAW FAR 9.206-2)

(a) Definition: "Qualification Requirement," as used in this clause, means a Government requirement for testing or other quality assurance demonstration that must be completed before award.

(b) One or more qualification requirements apply to the supplies or services covered by this contract. For those supplies or services requiring qualification, whether the covered product or service is an end item, the product, manufacturer, or source must have demonstrated that it meets the standards prescribed for qualification before award of this contract. The product, manufacturer, or source must be qualified at the time of award whether or not the name of the product, manufacturer, or source is actually included on a qualified products list, qualified manufacturers list, or qualified bidders list. Offerors should contact the agency activity designated below to obtain all requirements that they or their products or services, or their subcontractors or their products or services, must satisfy to become qualified and to arrange for an opportunity to demonstrate their abilities to meet the standards specified for qualification.

Item No Agency Name/Address AFSC Small Business Office (AFSC/SB)

3001 Staff Drive Suite 1AG85A Tinker AFB OK 73145-3009 Cory.wilson.1@us.af.mil 312-339-7243

(c) If an offeror, manufacturer, source, product or service covered by a qualification requirement has already met the standards specified, the relevant information noted below should be provided.

Offeror's Name ______________________________

Manufacturer's Name _________________________

Source's Name ______________________________

Item Name _________________________________

Service Identification _________________________

Test Number _______________________________ (to the extent known)

(d) Even though a product or service subject to a qualification requirement is not itself an end item under this contract, the product, manufacturer, or source must nevertheless be qualified at the time of award of this contract.

This is necessary whether the Contractor or a subcontractor will ultimately provide the product or service in question.

If, after award, the Contracting Officer discovers that an applicable qualification requirement was not in fact met at the time of award, the Contracting Officer may either terminate this contract for default or allow performance to continue if adequate consideration is offered and the action is determined to be otherwise in the Government's best interests.

(e) If an offeror, manufacturer, source, product, or service has met the qualification requirement but is not yet on a qualified products list, qualified manufacturers list, or qualified bidders list, the offeror must submit evidence of qualification prior to award of this contract. Unless determined to be in the Government's interest, award of this contract shall not be delayed to permit an offeror to submit evidence of qualification.

(f) Any change in location or ownership of the plant where a previously qualified product or service was manufactured or performed requires reevaluation of the qualification. Similarly, any change in location or ownership of a previously qualified manufacturer or source requires reevaluation of the qualification. The reevaluation must be accomplished before the date of award.

(The above Clause/Provision has been modified.)

52.209-3 FIRST ARTICLE APPROVAL--CONTRACTOR TESTING (SEP 1989)

(IAW FAR 9.308-1(a)(1), FAR 9.308-1(b)(1))

(a) The Contractor shall test ** unit(s) of Lot/Item * as specified in this contract. At least *** calendar days before the beginning of first article tests, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, of the time and location of the testing so that the Government may witness the tests.

*Lot/Item ***Calendar Days Before Test **Quantity 0001 30 3

(b) The Contractor shall submit the first article test report within ___**___ calendar days from the date of this contract to ___***___ marked "FIRST ARTICLE TEST REPORT: Contract No. _____ Lot/Item No. ___*___” Within ___****___ calendar days after the Government receives the test report, the Contracting Officer shall notify the Contractor, in writing, of the conditional approval, approval, or disapproval of the first article. The notice of conditional approval or approval shall not relieve the Contractor from complying with all requirements of the specifications and all other terms and conditions of this contract. A notice of conditional approval shall state any further action required of the Contractor. A notice of disapproval shall cite reasons for the disapproval.

*Lot/Item ****Approval Days ELIN No.

0001 60

FA Test Report Item ***Type/Location **Calendar Days

FA8111 AFLCMC/LZPED

3001 Staff Dr, Ste 1AB 85A Tinker AFB, OK 73145- Attn: FA Monitor

(c) If the first article is disapproved, the Contractor, upon Government request, shall repeat any or all first article tests.

After each request for additional tests, the Contractor shall make any necessary changes, modifications, or repairs to the first article or select another first article for testing. All costs related to these tests are to be borne by the Contractor, including any and all costs for additional tests following a disapproval. The Contractor shall then conduct the tests and deliver another report to the Government under the terms and conditions and within the time specified by the Government. The Government shall take action on this report within the time specified in paragraph (b) above.

The Government reserves the right to require an equitable adjustment of the contract price for any extension of the delivery schedule, or for any additional costs to the Government related to these tests.

(d) If the Contractor fails to deliver any first article report on time, or the Contracting Officer disapproves any first article, the Contractor shall be deemed to have failed to make delivery within the meaning of the Default clause of this contract.

(e) Unless otherwise provided in the contract, and if the approved first article is not consumed or destroyed in testing, the Contractor may deliver the approved first article as part of the contract quantity if it meets all contract requirements for acceptance.

(f) If the Government does not act within the time specified in paragraph (b) or (c) above, the Contracting Officer shall, upon timely written request from the Contractor, equitably adjust under the changes clause of this contract the delivery or performance dates and/or the contract price, and any other contractual term affected by the delay.

(g) Before first article approval, the acquisition of materials or components for, or the commencement of production of, the balance of the contract quantity is at the sole risk of the Contractor. Before first article approval, the costs thereof shall not be allocable to this contract for

(1) progress payments, or

(2) termination settlements if the contract is terminated for the convenience of the Government.

(h) The Government may waive the requirement for first article approval test where supplies identical or similar to those called for in the schedule have been previously furnished by the offeror/contractor and have been accepted by the Government. The offeror/contractor may request a waiver.

(The above Clause/Provision has been modified.)

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Form Number Description/File Name Date Number of Pages MQR-PSD-1 Manufacture Qualification Reqs for CSI 26MAR2025 31

DD FORM 1423-1 Contract Data Requirements List 26MAR2025 2

LPF-QAR-003 LPF-QAR-003 26MAR2025 4

IUID 24-00825_IUID.pdf 26MAR2026 1

AFMC 158 24-00825_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf 26MAR2026 1

DD 1653 24-00825_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf 26MAR2026 3

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS

FIRST ARTICLE APPLICABILITY AND/OR CONDITIONS FOR WAIVER (FEB 2013)

(IAW FAR 9.306(c))

(a) First Article Testing is a requirement of this contract. This requirement may be waived by the Contracting Officer, if the bidder/offeror meets any one of the conditions for waiver listed below *** and in the instance of a prior contract, not more than __*__ months have elapsed since the completion of that contract:

*Item No *Months Since Completion of Contract 0001 36 months

(b) Bidders who meet the conditions for waiver set forth below shall submit a bid or proposal on Bid/Offer "B" which does not require compliance with the First Article Approval provision set forth herein and furnish the following information in the individual solicitation: Contract No. __________________________, Contract Item No. _________, Date of Contract. __________, Name & Address of Government Agency issuing the Contract.

Failure to include this information will render the IFB(s) non-responsive and may cause rejection of RFP(s).

(c) Bidders/offerors who do not meet the conditions for waiver set forth below shall submit a bid on Bid/Offer, “A” which includes compliance with First Article Approval.

(d) Performance or other characteristics, which the First Article must meet, and detailed technical data requirements for testing of the First Article (including necessary data to be submitted in First Article Test Report, if applicable) are as set forth in this solicitation.

(e) The approved First Article ___**___ serve as a manufacturing standard.

**Item No **Serve as a Manufacturing Standard

0001 WILL NOT

(f) Waivers

***Item No ***Conditions for Waiver 0001 Previously furnished to prime contractor for delivery to DoD 0001 Previously furnished to DoD 0001 Currently in production for DoD

(The above Clause/Provision has been modified.)

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO) AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR QUOTE PREPARATION

USING BEST VALUE PROCESS, PERFORMANCE PRICE TRADEOFF (PPT) SOURCE SELECTION

PROCEDURES

General Instructions

Instructions to the Offerors (ITO):

This section of the ITO provides general guidance for preparing quotes as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the quote. The offeror’s quote must include all data and information requested by the ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Solicitation and the attachments of the solicitation. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in the ITO may result in an unfavorable quote evaluation.

Include Sufficient Detail:

The quote shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The quote should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements. Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s quote.

Embellishment Not Desired:

Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

Quote Acceptance and Validity Dates:

The quote acceptance period is specified in Section A of the solicitation. The offer shall make a clear statement in Section A of the quote documentation that the quote is valid for at least the number of days identified in Section A, starting from the closing date of the solicitation.

Disposition of Quotes:

In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.803(a)(10) (Contents of Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful quotes. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful quotes.

Electronic Reference Documents All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Beta Sam Website under Contract Opportunities (formerly FedBizOpps) at https://sam.gov/, unless indicated otherwise. Potential Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

Amendments to Solicitation If this RFQ is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment and provide confirmation upon submission of the offeror’s quote.

General Information

Point of Contact:

The Buyer identified in Block 5b is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the buyer. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the buyer at the address located in Section A of the solicitation.

Discrepancies:

If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the buyer in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the

Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial quote, as received, without discussions.

Electronic Offers:

Quotes may be emailed to lori.bautista@us.af.mil by the closing date.

Technical Quote Offerors shall bid IAW requirements in Section B. Your responses to the factors will be evaluated in accordance with Section M of the solicitation. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory.

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION COST FACTOR FOR FIRST ARTICLE (OCT 1988)

(IAW FAR 9.306(i))

The cost to the Government for first article testing or engineering review and approval of first article test reports (where preliminary Contractor testing is required), as applicable, shall be a factor in the evaluation of this solicitation.

The factor to be used in evaluation shall be

Lot/Item Evaluation cost 0001 $2,500.00

(The above Clause/Provision has been modified.)

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD USING

BEST VALUE PROCESS, PERFORMANCE PRICE TRADEOFF (PPT) SOURCE SELECTION PROCEDURES

A. Basis for Contract Award This acquisition will utilize the Best Value Process, Performance price Tradeoff source selection procedures in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15.101-1, as supplemented, to make an assessment for a best value award decision. Tradeoffs will be made only between price and past performance among those offerors who have been determined technically acceptable. Award will be made to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR Part 15.101, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements and is judged, based on the evaluation factors, to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offeror who gives the Defense Logistics Agency the greatest confidence that it will best meet the requirements affordably. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) reasonably determined that the technical acceptable, superior past performance of the higher price offeror outweighs the cost difference. While the Government source selection evaluation team and the SSA will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and, therefore, professional judgement is implicit throughout the entire process.

The Government intends to award without discussions/reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer.

B. Number of Contracts to be Awarded The Government intends to select one contractor for the program. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all, depending on the quality of the proposals and prices submitted and the availability of funds.

C. Rejection of Unrealistic Offers The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low in cost/price when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

D. Correction Potential of Proposals The Government will consider, throughout the evaluation, the “correction potential” of any deficiency or proposal inadequacy. The judgment of such “correction potential” is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of an offeror’s proposal not meeting the Government’s requirements is not considered correctable, the offeror may be eliminated from the competitive range.

PRE-AWARD SURVEY

The Government may conduct a pre-award survey (PAS) as part of this source selection. Results of the PAS (if conducted) will be evaluated to determine each offeror’s capability to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

PLANT VISITS

In the event discussions are necessary, plant visits may be conducted during the evaluation phase to develop knowledge for judging the potential for correction of the deficiencies.

SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors, subfactors to be eligible for award.

Any aspect of the proposal judged to be unacceptable would render the entire proposal unacceptable. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being removed from consideration for award. Any exceptions to the solicitation’s terms and conditions must be fully explained and justified.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AWARD

(IAW FAR 13.106-2(b), 14.201-5(c), and 15.204-5(c))

For the purposes of award, offers will be evaluated for acceptability of evaluation factors described below:

FACTOR 1: Technical FACTOR 2: Cost/Price FACTOR 3: Past Performance

a. Order of Importance For this solicitation, technical acceptability is a prerequisite to the best value analysis and potential trade-off between Price and Past Performance. The Order of importance is used to explain how the other factors will be traded off on technically acceptable proposals.

For all technically acceptable proposals, Factor 2 (Cost/Price) will be evaluated on a basis approximately equal to Factor 3 (Past Performance). Tradeoffs may only be made between price and past performance among those offerors who have been determined technically acceptable.

b. Evaluation Methodology All proposals will first be evaluated for technical acceptability. Second, price will be evaluated. Concurrent with the price evaluation, past performance will be evaluated. A decision will then be made as to which proposal provides the best value to the Government.

c. Technical Factor

(1) Technical proposals are not required. Technical acceptability will be determined based on the offerors compliance with the requirement as stated in Section B Schedule and/or any referenced specifications, engineering notes and all other attachments herein.

(2) The delivery schedule will be evaluated based on the dates established in Section B of the solicitation. It should be noted that the Government’s required delivery is based on the Requirements’ need date and may not be attainable. Therefore, if a proposed delivery does not meet the Government’s required delivery, the proposed delivery may be considered responsive.

Technical acceptability will be ascertained based on one of the ratings described below. Proposals will be evaluated for compliance with solicitation; receipt of a responsive proposal to deliver the supplies in accordance with the solicitation and all other attachments herein.

Acceptable – The proposal meets specified minimum requirements necessary for acceptable contract performance.

Unacceptable – The proposal fails to meet specified minimum requirements necessary for contract performance. Proposals with an unacceptable rating are not awardable.

d. Cost/Price Factor (IAW 5315.305(a)(1))

(1) The offeror’s cost/price proposal will be evaluated for award purposes by multiplying the proposed unit price by the total quantity. The quantity utilized for evaluation will be based on the firm quantity incorporated in Schedule B.

(2) Unrealistically low proposed costs or prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement, or the offeror has made an unrealistic proposal.

(3) Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment or unreasonably high prices. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to separately priced line items or subline items. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the government.

Proposals for Bid “A” (Contractor Test FAT-Required) will be evaluated as follows:

The offeror’s total evaluated cost/price for Line Item 0001AC (Contractor FAT-Destructive Exhibit) and Line Item 0001AD (Contractor FAT – Non-Destructive Exhibits), and BEQ under Line Item 0001AE (Contractor FAT – First article required Production Units) are the price factors that will be used for this evaluation. The BEQ that will be used for evaluation will be determined by the Government Requirements group prior to award as currently stated on the solicitation. At that point, the quantity type will be changed from BEQ to Fixed Quantity (FQ). The offeror’s proposed cost/price for Line Item 0001AC and Line Item 0001AD will be added together for purposes of evaluation and the offeror’s proposed cost/price for the BEQ under Line Item 0001AE will be multiplied by the quantity. The estimated cost factor of $2,500.00 for Contractor First Article Test/Inspection evaluation will then be added to this total. The cumulative price of these factors will be used in evaluation of proposals submitted under Bid “A” for a Firm Fixed Price/Fixed Quantity (FFP/FQ) award.

Proposals for Bid “B” (Contractor FAT- NOT Required) will be evaluated as follows:

The offeror’s total evaluated cost/price for the BEQ under CLIN 0001AF (Contractor FAT – NOT Required) is the price factor that will be used in evaluation. The BEQ that will be used for evaluation will be determined by the Government Requirements group prior to award as stated within the solicitation. At that point, the quantity type will be changed from BEQ to Fixed Quantity. Evaluation of award will be based on the proposed unit price multiplied by the required quantity.

* The Government may accept BID “A” or BID “B” depending upon which alternative is most advantageous to the government, price and other factors considered.

(4) If incidental or miscellaneous expenses not related to specific CLIN structure accompany vendor proposals, these charges shall be added to the total CLIN cost/price to reach the final total cost/price proposed to the Government. In addition, ‘Price Analysis’ shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine ‘Reasonableness’ on all offers submitted by vendors.

*Unrealistically low costs/prices proposed either initially or subsequently may be grounds for elimination of an offer from the competition and shall be based upon the vendor not understanding requirements or because an unrealistic proposal was submitted.

e. Past Performance Factor The Past Performance Evaluation is accomplished by reviewing aspects of an offeror's (1) relevant past performance and (2) recent past performance, focusing on and targeting performance, which is relevant to the technical requirement. In determining relevance, consideration will be given to the likeliness and similarity of the effort to include contract scope, contract type, and contract schedule. This information may include data on parts manufactured by other divisions, critical subcontractors, or teaming contractors, if such resources significantly influence the proposed requirement. The Government may consider relevant work as those performed for agencies of the federal, state, or local governments and commercial customers. Where relevant performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and to evaluate their effectiveness.

The Government will evaluate the offeror's past performance by reviewing the offeror’s record of supplying products that comply with contract requirements, including cost and schedule. Under the Past Performance factor, a Performance Confidence Assessment Rating represents the evaluation of an offeror's present and past work record to assess the Government’s confidence in the offeror's probability of successfully performing as proposed.

The offeror is not required to provide Past Performance information. Past performance information will be determined primarily based on the offeror’s “Supplier Risk Score” in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) at the time of the close of the solicitation period. Past performance may also be obtained through the contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), similarly systems of other Government departments and agencies (MOCAS, etc), questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of this acquisition, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with program managers and contracting officers, and other sources known to the Government, including commercial sources.

Each offeror will receive an integrated Performance Confidence Assessment rating, which is the rating for the Past Performance factor. Although the past performance evaluation focuses on performance that is recent and relevant to the technical requirement, the resulting Performance Confidence Assessment is made at the factor level and represents an overall evaluation of contractor performance. The Past Performance factor will receive one of the following performance confidence assessment ratings IAW the Department of Defense (DoD) Source Selection Procedures.

Note: With regards to the best value award decision, all offerors receiving the same past performance rating will be considered equal for the Past Performance Factor.

Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive a "Neutral confidence" rating for the Past Performance factor. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

Offerors with adverse past performance information to which they have not previously had an opportunity to respond will be given the opportunity to provide clarifications concerning the adverse information.

E. Discussions It is the Government’s intent to award without discussions, therefore, it is imperative that offerors submit their best terms initially. However, if during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs), and the Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs) will be considered in making the source selection decision.

Rating Description

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NEUTRAL

CONFIDENCE

No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.